Labour backbenchers call for ‘meaningful tweaks' to farm inheritance tax plan
Sam Rushworth said that farmers who work a £5 million estate are 'not millionaires', while Julia Buckley said sector businesses currently face a choice to 'go big or go bust'.
Conservative former Scottish secretary David Mundell warned that under plans to impose inheritance tax on agricultural property worth more than £1 million, farmers' children will sell their land to private equity firms to cover the bill, and estates would instead be used for solar panels or industrial tree planting.
They made their comments during a debate about a House of Commons petition which called on Treasury ministers to carry on with a 100% relief from inheritance tax covering agricultural property.
The discussion began just minutes after the petition gathered its 150,000th signature, and while farmers lined Whitehall and Parliament Square outside the Palace of Westminster, blasting their horns to the tune of Old MacDonald Had A Farm and Europe's number-one hit The Final Countdown.
Mr Rushworth told MPs: 'If you inherit a £5 million farm, you're not a millionaire, you're the custodian of agricultural land with the responsibility to farm it to produce food for the nation.'
The MP for Bishop Auckland said that 'there was more that could have been done by the previous government on things like trade deals, supply chains, flood defences and on crime', adding: 'They have no problem with the principle, with the principle that we should be closing tax loopholes.
'They want to stop billionaires, to quote The Telegraph, from hoovering up agricultural land which they know is pushing up land prices.
'And they even support the principle of paying tax and raising revenue for the Treasury, because they know that Treasury revenue is necessary to improve the NHS and to improve schools in their communities, as well as a strong agricultural budget.
'But they are asking, and they're not asking, by the way, for a full U-turn, but they are asking for some meaningful tweaks that will help the policy to better target the goals that it intends to achieve.'
He said that the £1 million threshold, with inheritance tax applied at a rate of 20% above on land worth more than this from April 2026, 'is quite low'.
Ms Buckley said: 'My farmers in my Shrewsbury constituency have told me that for many years now, they've struggled to make a profit.
'Indeed, they say the only game in town is to go big or go bust, in other words, 12,000 small farmers have gone under because over the last decade, it's not been a profitable business.
'And they say to me that they're ready to make some of these behavioural changes to pass the asset down to the next generation, so it can be profitable and sustainable and environmentally friendly, because that next generation have just come out of agricultural college and learned all these new techniques.'
David Smith, the Labour MP for North Northumberland, said that few farms in his constituency would fall below the £1 million threshold and be exempted from the tax.
'The value of the land is often not bearing a relation to the limited cashflow or profit that is being made,' he said, adding that 'raising the threshold would provide instant peace of mind to family farmers'.
Mr Smith also suggested an 'active farmer test' using Government data to 'judge if the land is being put to public use', and proposed a 'clawback' system so the Treasury could charge for the relief if a farmer's beneficiary sells the land within a short period of time after a death.
Mr Mundell said: 'If we go down the route of requiring farms to be sold to meet inheritance tax demands, farms will not be sold to new family farmers.
'They will not be sold to new entrants. They will be sold to these very private equity firms who want not to produce food on our land, but want to actually maximise other tax benefits that they can do under carbon offset and other environmental tax benefits that they get.
'And in addition to that, they don't employ anyone.'
Conservative former minister Damian Hinds said it is 'not too late for this minister, for this Government to change their minds, to make significant changes'.
He said: 'There's no shame in it and I urge them to do so.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Two Labour-run councils 'considering all options' to challenge migrant hotel use
Two Labour-run councils have said they are considering taking legal action to stop the use of hotels to house migrants in their areas after Epping council won a temporary injunction on Tuesday. The leaders of Wirral and Tamworth councils both say they are considering their legal options in the wake of the Epping case, citing similar concerns about the impact of the hotels on their local communities. Epping Forest District Council won an interim High Court injunction to stop migrants from being accommodated at The Bell Hotel, after arguing its owners did not have planning permission to use it to house migrants. Politics latest: In a statement, Paula Basnett, the Labour leader of Wirral council, said: "Like many other local authorities, we have concerns about the Home Office's practice of placing asylum seekers in hotels without consultation or regard to local planning requirements. "We are actively considering all options available to us to ensure that any use of hotels or other premises in Wirral is lawful and does not ride roughshod over planning regulations or the wishes of our communities. "Wirral has always been proud of its record in supporting families and those fleeing conflict, but it is unacceptable for the government to impose unsuitable, short-term arrangements that disrupt communities and bypass local decision-making. "If necessary, we will not hesitate to challenge such decisions in order to protect both residents and those seeking refuge." Carol Dean, the Labour leader of Tamworth Borough Council, said she understands the "strong feelings" of residents about the use of a local hotel to house asylum seekers, and that the council is "listening to their concerns and taking them seriously". She pointed out that under the national Labour government, the use of hotels has halved from 402 to 210, with the aim of stopping the use of any hotels by the end of this parliament. But she continued: "Following the temporary High Court injunction granted to Epping Forest District Council, we are closely monitoring developments and reviewing our legal position in light of this significant ruling." Cllr Dean added that they had previously explored their legal options to challenge the use of the hotel but decided against them, as temporary injunctions were not being upheld. However, the Epping ruling "represents a potentially important legal precedent", which is why they are "carefully assessing" its significance for Tamworth. "We fully recognise the UK government has a statutory duty to accommodate people seeking asylum. However, we have consistently maintained that the prolonged use of hotel accommodation may not represent the best approach - either for our local community or for the asylum seekers themselves," she said. "We will continue to work constructively with government departments and all relevant agencies while making sure the voice of our community is heard at the highest levels of government." Last night, Conservative-run Broxbourne Council also announced it was exploring its legal options, and the Reform UK leader of Kent County said she was writing to fellow leaders in Kent to explore whether they could potentially take legal action as well. Use of Epping hotel 'sidestepped public scrutiny' The prime minister and the home secretary are under huge pressure to clear the asylum backlog and stop using hotels across the country to house those waiting for their applications to be processed. Protests have sprung up at migrant hotels across the country. But The Bell Hotel in Epping became a focal point in recent weeks after an asylum seeker housed there was charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl. Epping Forest District Council sought an interim High Court injunction to stop migrants from being accommodated at the hotel, owned by Somani Hotels Limited, on the basis that using it for that purpose contravened local planning regulations. The interim injunction demanded that the hotel be cleared of its occupants within 14 days, but in his ruling on Tuesday, Mr Justice Eyre granted the temporary block, while extending the time limit by which it must stop housing asylum seekers to 12 September. Somani Hotels said it intended to appeal the decision, its barrister, Piers Riley-Smith, arguing it would set a precedent that could affect "the wider strategy" of housing asylum seekers in hotels. A government attempt to delay the application was rejected by the High Court judge earlier on Tuesday, Home Office barristers arguing the case had a "substantial impact" on the Home Secretary, Yvette Cooper, in performing her legal duties to asylum seekers. But Mr Justice Eyre dismissed the Home Office's bid, stating that the department's involvement was "not necessary". Read more: The judge said the hotel's owners "sidestepped the public scrutiny and explanation which would otherwise have taken place if an application for planning permission or for a certificate of lawful use had been made". He added: "It was also deliberately taking the chance that its understanding of the legal position was incorrect. This is a factor of particular weight in the circumstances of this case." Reacting to Tuesday's judgment, border security minister Dame Angela Eagle said the government will "continue working with local authorities and communities to address legitimate concerns". She added: "Our work continues to close all asylum hotels by the end of this parliament."
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Strike CEO's New Venture Takes Aim at Bitcoin's Biggest Corporate Holders With Revolutionary 'Bitcoin Per Share' Strategy
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. Jack Mallers' Twenty One Capital plans to dethrone MicroStrategy and Marathon with $5 billion Bitcoin treasury—but the real innovation might be how they measure success Jack Mallers, the Bitcoin maximalist behind Strike—a digital payments app that uses the Lightning Network to enable instant, low-cost Bitcoin and dollar transactions—and the driving force that helped El Salvador adopt Bitcoin as legal tender, is making his boldest move yet. His new venture, Twenty One Capital, has accumulated over 43,500 Bitcoin worth more than $5 billion and is positioning itself to become the world's largest corporate Bitcoin holder—surpassing current leaders MicroStrategy (NASDAQ:MSTR) and MARA Holdings (NASDAQ:MARA). Don't Miss: The same firms that backed Uber, Venmo and eBay are investing in this pre-IPO company disrupting a $1.8T market — — no wallets, just price speculation and free paper trading to practice different strategies. But what sets Twenty One apart isn't just the size of its Bitcoin war chest. In a recent Bloomberg Television interview, Mallers revealed a fundamentally different approach to measuring corporate performance that could reshape how Bitcoin-native companies think about shareholder value. The 'Bitcoin Per Share' Revolution While traditional companies obsess over earnings per share, Twenty One has introduced what Mallers calls 'Bitcoin per share' as their primary performance metric. The reasoning is both simple and profound: measuring success in dollars is meaningless when fiat currencies are constantly debased. 'Everything goes up in dollar terms,' Mallers told Bloomberg. 'The objective is for shareholders to get wealthier in Bitcoin terms by growing the Bitcoin per share.' This isn't just accounting innovation—it's a philosophical shift that treats Bitcoin as the ultimate unit of account. Twenty One expects to complete its public listing in the third quarter following Securities and Exchange Commission review, with over $5 billion in Bitcoin at launch, giving investors direct exposure to this new performance framework. Trending: If there was a new fund backed by Jeff Bezos offering a ? The Scarcity Advantage Mallers' confidence in Bitcoin's trajectory stems from what he calls 'definitive scarcity.' Unlike traditional commodities where increased demand can stimulate additional supply, Bitcoin's fixed 21 million coin limit means new buyers must compete for existing holdings. 'If you want more bitcoin, you don't go to the bitcoin factory. You have to go up in price,' Mallers told Bloomberg, predicting Bitcoin could reach $150,000 as institutional and sovereign buyers compete for limited supply. This supply constraint is already creating upward pressure. MicroStrategy holds the largest corporate Bitcoin treasury, while MARA ranks second with over 46,000 BTC. Twenty One's goal to surpass both reflects Mallers' belief that corporate adoption is still in its infancy. Beyond Treasury: The Dual Strategy Twenty One isn't just another Bitcoin treasury play. With backing from heavyweights including Tether and SoftBank on its board, the company plans to build Bitcoin products, technology, and tools—essentially competing with both treasury companies like MicroStrategy and product-focused firms like Coinbase Global (NASDAQ:COIN). 'Why not both?' appears to be Mallers' philosophy. His track record supports this ambition: Strike, his previous company, became a major Bitcoin financial services platform, and his involvement with El Salvador's Bitcoin adoption demonstrated his ability to execute complex, high-stakes 'Maxi' Advantage Perhaps most telling is Twenty One's unwavering focus on Bitcoin exclusively. Mallers embraces the 'Bitcoin maximalist' label, viewing other cryptocurrencies as inferior alternatives to what he calls 'pristine money.' His rationale centers on Bitcoin's role as a store of value in a world where traditional assets are constantly diluted. 'I've created value and I want to keep it,' he summarizes as Bitcoin's core use case. 'Bitcoin allows you to abstract your effort, time, and energy, and take it with you tomorrow,' he told Bloomberg. This single-asset focus contrasts sharply with diversified crypto strategies, but it also provides clarity of purpose that resonates with institutional investors seeking pure-play Bitcoin exposure. Market Implications Twenty One's approach could accelerate corporate Bitcoin adoption by providing a clearer framework for measuring success. With an unrealized gain of over $1.3 billion already accumulated, the company serves as a real-time case study in Bitcoin treasury management. For investors, Twenty One represents a new category: Bitcoin-native companies that measure success in Bitcoin terms rather than fiat. This could appeal to those who believe traditional accounting methods undervalue Bitcoin-holding companies. The broader market implications are significant. As more companies adopt Bitcoin treasuries and measure performance in Bitcoin per share, it could create additional demand pressure on Bitcoin's fixed supply—potentially validating Mallers' bullish price predictions. Twenty One's public debut will test whether investors are ready for this new paradigm. If successful, it could mark the beginning of a fundamental shift in how we measure corporate value in an increasingly Bitcoin-denominated world. Read Next: 'Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones. Image: Shutterstock This article Strike CEO's New Venture Takes Aim at Bitcoin's Biggest Corporate Holders With Revolutionary 'Bitcoin Per Share' Strategy originally appeared on Sign in to access your portfolio
CNBC
an hour ago
- CNBC
Crypto firms urge UK to form national stablecoin strategy to avoid falling behind U.S.
The U.K. should establish a national stablecoin strategy to enable adoption of the tokens and avoid falling behind the U.S. on the disruptive new technology, several major crypto firms said Wednesday. In an open letter addressed to Finance Minister Rachel Reeves, 30 crypto industry figures said that the U.K. "must act now to avoid being a rule-taker rather than a rule-maker in the digital asset era." "To ensure the UK is at the forefront, we believe a proactive, coordinated national strategy is needed - one that positions stablecoins not as a risk to be contained, but as a financial infrastructure to be responsibly embraced," the letter said. The U.K. Treasury department was not immediately available for comment when contacted by CNBC. Stablecoins are a type of cryptocurrency that is pegged to an existing government-backed currency. There are several stablecoins in issuance, however the most commonly known are Tether's USDT and Circle's USDC — both of which are tied to the U.S. dollar. The entire stablecoin market is worth over $280 billion, according to CoinGecko data. But for stablecoins pegged to the British pound, their combined market capitalization stands at just £461,224 ($621,197). Crypto industry insiders have taken issue with Britain's regulatory stance on stablecoins, saying it puts the nascent industry — and, in turn, the U.K.'s financial services landscape — at a disadvantage. One aspect of the U.K.'s approach that worries the industry is the legal definition of stablecoins as "crypto-assets with reference to fiat currency." "This definition focuses on form rather than function," they said in the open letter Wednesday. "This is akin to defining a cheque as paper with reference to currency, when both are essentially negotiable instruments backed by regulated issuers." A national stablecoin strategy would strengthen the U.K.'s role as a global financial center, generate new fee and foreign exchange revenue streams and support demand for gilts through new digital channels, the signatories to the letter said. The letter was signed by industry executives from Coinbase, Kraken, Copper, Fireblocks, BitGo and VanEck. Still, stablecoins are not without their concerns. In 2022, a stablecoin named terra and its sister token luna both collapsed to $0 after a failure in the cryptocurrencies' underlying technology. That also caused the value of USDT to temporarily fall below its $1 peg. USDT is currently worth $1. In a research note published Wednesday, HSBC's head of digital assets research, Daragh Maher, wrote that stablecoins could help bridge the gap between traditional finance and digital assets. "They are basically the cash equivalent of digital assets," Maher argued. "They are the reference or base currency for nearly every crypto asset. They can also be used for transferring money using blockchain pay rails rather than traditional banking methods." However, he added that regulatory issues remain the biggest hurdle to stablecoin adoption. "The key to capitalising on the potential of stablecoins lies in creating an appropriate regulatory environment for the sector," said Maher.
