Energy company makes breakthrough in quest to build miniature nuclear reactors: 'Already validated'
Thermal Energy Storage system that helps small modular nuclear reactors adapt to changing grid needs, reported StockTitan.
This system tackles a problem faced by small modular reactors (SMRs), which create up to 300 megawatts of power using modular building blocks.
While SMRs offer steady power flow, they struggle to alter their output in response to changing grid needs. Brenmiller's new device solves this problem by retaining heat during low-use periods and releasing it when consumers need more power.
The company has proved this concept functions well in the real world. Brenmiller successfully installed its bGen
system in Italy alongside Enel, a large European power company, to lower carbon output from combined heat and power units.
"We believe that our bGen
system, already validated in real-world grid and industrial settings, is naturally suited to support SMR decarbonization with minimal modifications," Brenmiller Energy chairman and CEO Avi Brenmiller told StockTitan.
The heat bank has beneficial traits that may improve how nuclear plants operate. It can soak up heat without active control, handle changing power needs, and clear away leftover heat. These perks may boost energy output, plant safety, and adoption of this clean power choice.
Nuclear fission generates power by splitting uranium atoms, producing heat that converts water into steam, which in turn drives power-generating turbines. Unlike burning dirty fuels, nuclear plants don't emit carbon when running, which helps fight the temperature spikes and extreme weather events that result from heat-trapping pollution. However, nuclear fission does produce radioactive byproducts that require careful monitoring.
Brenmiller's news releases as governments warm up to nuclear power. The U.S. Department of Energy requested $900 million in funding for SMR plants, while the World Bank dropped its ban on funding nuclear projects. Several countries in Europe are reexamining nuclear as a way to slash their carbon output and generate the energy they need.
For your home or workplace, this clean tech development might mean lower power bills and fewer outages. Imagine keeping the lights on and your machines operating even when wind and solar power become unreliable.
However, some experts say we should be careful with cutting-edge nuclear tech. Many new reactor styles "do not offer obvious improvements over LWRs [light-water reactors] significant enough to justify their many risks," according to the Union of Concerned Scientists. Their study notes that while some designs might be safer in some ways, all pose new challenges that require extensive testing to solve.
Would you feel safe living close to a nuclear power plant?
Absolutely
It's not my first choice
Depends on how close
No way
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
Join our free newsletter for weekly updates on the latest innovations improving our lives and shaping our future, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Liverpool REJECTED Alexander Isak agreement
Liverpool fans have known for a long time that asking prices are a rough valuation of a player. Teams rarely get the exact amount they're after. A negotiation takes place and eventually, each side has to make a compromise in order to get what they want. It's a fundamental business principle. 🔴 Shop the LFC 2025/26 adidas home range 🚨2025/26 LFC x adidas range🚨 LFC x adidas Shop the away range TODAY LFC x adidas Shop the home range today! LFC x adidas Shop the goalkeeper range today LFC x adidas Shop the new adidas range today! Valuations alongside 'gentlemen's agreements' and 'promises' are easily bypassed and it's easy for teams to become hypocritical - this is an idea that Anfield Watch has explored in more depth through the prism of Newcastle's approach for Yohan Wissa, in connection with their Alexander Isak situation. Earlier this year, in a high profile move for Florian Wirtz, the Reds successfully managed to agree a deal of £100m plus £16m in add-ons instead of caving in and paying Leverkusen's £126m valuation. As such, it should come at no surprise that Isak was never going to leave for £150m and while a deal looks to be off this summer, insider information has been revealed regarding how much Newcastle were willing to sell him for, had they have subsequently brought in a new striker this summer. 13% discount for Isak was available According to Craig Hope, the 'not for sale' stance coming out of Tyneside was actually a massive lie. In his latest report, he said: "The club have pursued alternatives to Isak all summer. Had one of Joao Pedro, Liam Delap, Hugo Ekitike or Benjamin Sesko been signed, Newcastle would have explored his sale. "Sources believe a deal in the region of £130m plus add-ons would, in the end, have seen an agreement reached between them and Liverpool. However, with each passing day and target gone, that likelihood has decreased." As such, the Reds would have needed to put up more money, but both sides would have compromised, which is exactly how all pieces of transfer business unfold. As said, it's a negotiation. To suggest that Liverpool have rejected an agreement to sign him is perhaps a little twisted, since the club had received no encouragement that a new bid would have been successful, new strikers needed to be signed at Newcastle before the green light to his move could have been signalled. But since that's not happening, you can't help but wonder if a £130m bid would at all be tempting at this stage, despite him not having been replaced. After all, since he's gone AWOL, the Magpies don't exactly have a striker at the club despite keeping him. His prerogative is to not play for them again. On the basis that we've been left waiting so long for a second bid, it would certainly be wishful thinking to consider a move like that being sanctioned by FSG, which in turn would be Liverpool rejecting an attempt at reaching an agreement, primarily because of how far-fetched it would be. Reason currently suggests that January might be the most opportune moment to consider Isak again, once he and Newcastle have had a chance to stew on their incredibly toxic circumstances. A further discounted move from the £150m pipe-dream might then be promising and Liverpool would have a lot more time to finalise all the details, with Newcastle more open to hearing their approach.
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Google Loosens Play Store Grip in Europe
This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG) is loosening its grip on European app developers after regulators cracked down on its Play Store practices. Google said it's rolling out changes to its external offers program, giving developers more leeway to steer users toward their own platforms instead of being locked into Google's payment system. To qualify, developers still have to meet eligibility rules and sign up for the program. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Signs with NVDA. The shift comes after the European Commission ruled in March that Google was favoring its own services like Shopping, Hotels, and Flights in search results, while also blocking developers from directing customers elsewhere. Regulators accused the company of unfairly boosting its own ecosystem and overcharging rivals in the process. Google insists it's walking a fine line. Clare Kelly, senior competition counsel for Google in Europe, said the updates could carry risks for users, but stressed the company is trying to balance compliance with safety. Still, Brussels is watching closely, and Google's Play Store revenue model could look a lot different if these changes will want to see how the company adapts as EU oversight intensifies heading into 2025.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Google Loosens Play Store Grip in Europe
This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG) is loosening its grip on European app developers after regulators cracked down on its Play Store practices. Google said it's rolling out changes to its external offers program, giving developers more leeway to steer users toward their own platforms instead of being locked into Google's payment system. To qualify, developers still have to meet eligibility rules and sign up for the program. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Signs with NVDA. The shift comes after the European Commission ruled in March that Google was favoring its own services like Shopping, Hotels, and Flights in search results, while also blocking developers from directing customers elsewhere. Regulators accused the company of unfairly boosting its own ecosystem and overcharging rivals in the process. Google insists it's walking a fine line. Clare Kelly, senior competition counsel for Google in Europe, said the updates could carry risks for users, but stressed the company is trying to balance compliance with safety. Still, Brussels is watching closely, and Google's Play Store revenue model could look a lot different if these changes will want to see how the company adapts as EU oversight intensifies heading into 2025.