How common are wild wallabies in East Anglia?
Where do wallabies come from?
Wallabies are primarily found in Australia and nearby islands, and are members of the Macropod family along with kangaroos.
They are typically small to medium-sized and have powerful hind legs that they use to bound along at high speeds and jump distances.
Their diet typically consists of grass, herbs, roots, tree leaves, and other foliage.
Why are there wallabies in the UK?
A research paper in 2020 by Holly M. English of University College Dublin and Anthony Caravaggi of the University of South Wales looked into wallabies in the UK.
They believed wallabies were likely first brought to the UK for zoos as well as for private collections in the late 19th Century.
From then, it is believed that during the World Wars, some were released into the countryside as people were unable to look after them.
Some of those wallabies that were released went on to form a population in the Peak District; however, they slowly died out over the years.
Are there any large populations left in the UK?
There is a large population of wallabies living on the Isle of Man.
It is thought there are likely up to 1,000 of them living in an area of the isle called the Ballaugh Curragh.
It is believed they were brought to a wildlife zoo in 1965 before some managed to escape and went on to breed.
Surveys in 2023 and 2024 revealed the huge numbers living in the area with the use of thermal-imaging cameras.
The study found there was a strong correlation with wallaby presence being linked to "cover of some sort", primarily woodland.
Can wallabies survive in the wild?
Helen Pearson, head of animal studies at Suffolk Rural, which has its own wallabies, said they could survive "quite well" in the UK.
"They all come from Australia," she explained.
"They live in shrubland out there, so as much as you think Australia is quite hot, they cope quite well in our climate. They're really hardy animals.
"I know that on the Isle of Man, there is a wild population of wallabies because of how well they can survive.
"Unfortunately, it does make them an invasive species because they are not native to here."
While the animals are non-indigenous to the UK, it is unknown the impact they could be having on native animal and plant life, according to the 2020 research paper.
Where could this wallaby have come from?
It is currently unknown just where the wallaby on the Suffolk and Norfolk border has come from.
"This one in particular in Suffolk, at one point it would have been in captivity, but I obviously don't know how long ago or if it's just escaped, or if it's been there for a long time," Ms Pearson said.
"My guess, if you've only just seen it, then it's just escaped, but I don't know where from."
Mr Pearson believed the wallaby was of the same kind as the ones at the college, a red-necked wallaby also known as a Bennett's wallaby.
Have there been any other sightings in the area?
Ms Pearson said she had not heard of any wild wallaby sightings in Suffolk before.
However, the 2020 research paper mapped sightings of wallabies across the UK, and it found 95 confirmed sightings between 2008 and 2018, most of which were in the south of England.
There were also 64 media reports of sightings during that time.
A map of their findings suggested there had been some sightings in both Norfolk and Suffolk over the years, as well as in nearby Essex, but exact locations were not mentioned.
While this is the first reported wallaby sighting in some time, there were other wallaby sightings near Halstead in Essex in 2018, as well as in Glemsford in Suffolk.
At the time, it was believed they had escaped the year prior from a travelling carnival.
There was also a captive wallaby named Sheila that escaped her home in Norwich in 2023, but she was later found.
Is it illegal to release wallabies into the wild?
It is considered illegal to release a wallaby into the wild under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981.
This is because they are not native to the UK, and the Act protects wild animals and plants in the UK.
Anyone caught doing this could face imprisonment or a fine.
What should you do if you spot the wallaby?
Ms Pearson offered advice to anyone who sees the wallaby again.
"Try and, if possible, keep eyes on it from a distance if you can because as soon as you lose sight of it, it could be another week until someone sees it," she said.
"Out there in the woodlands, fields and things, it could very easily disappear quite quickly.
"I used to be a zookeeper, and when things like this happen, you want to know that someone can see it at all times.
"Keep eyes and ring maybe the RSPCA or local vet, and hopefully they can assemble a team.
"I wouldn't approach it; they've got a really big kick on them, which could cause you some injuries, so it's best to leave it alone."
Suffolk Police also encouraged anyone who saw it to contact them.
Follow Suffolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
More sightings of wallaby roaming the countryside
Video shows wallaby running in English countryside
Survey shows wild wallaby population likely 1,000
Related internet links
Suffolk Rural

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Met urged to scrap Carnival facial recognition plan
Civil liberty and anti-racism groups have called on the Metropolitan Police to drop plans to use live facial recognition (LFR) technology at this year's Notting Hill Carnival. In a letter to Met Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley, 11 organisations described LFR as "a mass surveillance tool that treats all Carnival-goers as potential suspects and has no place at one of London's biggest cultural celebrations". They said the decision to reintroduce the technology at Carnival was "deeply disappointing" and argued it could be "less accurate for women and people of colour". The Met Police says LFR is accurate and balanced across ethnicity and gender, and insists it will help keep people safe. The groups - which include Liberty, Big Brother Watch and the Runnymede Trust - highlighted an ongoing judicial review brought by Shaun Thompson, a black Londoner who says he was wrongly identified by the system and detained. The letter states: "There is no clear legal basis for your force's use of LFR. No law mentions facial recognition technology and Parliament has never considered or scrutinised its use. "Notting Hill Carnival is an event that specifically celebrates the British African Caribbean community, yet the [Metropolitan Police] is choosing to use a technology with a well-documented history of inaccurate outcomes and racial bias." The letter also raised concerns over a 2023 National Physical Laboratory study, which found the NeoFace system used by the Met was less accurate for women and people of colour depending on the algorithm that has been set. The study's authors found the system could show bias at lower thresholds, though at the higher settings the Met says it uses, performance was found to be equitable across ethnicity and gender. These thresholds are confidence levels the system uses to decide a match - lower ones flag more people but risk more mistakes and bias, while higher ones are stricter and more balanced. Campaigners said there was no legal obligation for the force to avoid the lower thresholds, and argued policing resources would be better spent on safety measures at the carnival. Deputy Assistant Commissioner Matt Ward, who is leading this year's policing operation at the carnival, said LFR had led to more than 1,000 arrests since the start of 2024 and that independent testing showed the system was "accurate and balanced with regard to ethnicity and gender" at the thresholds used by the Met. Notting Hill Carnival takes place next weekend and has previously attracted up to two million people. It has come under increased scrutiny after two people were murdered at last year's event. Facial recognition tech for Notting Hill Carnival 'Cancelling Carnival won't stop knife crime' 'City Hall should run Notting Hill Carnival' Mr Ward said the force had received the letter and would respond in due course. "Carnival's growing popularity and size creates unique challenges. Around 7,000 officers and staff will be deployed each day," he said. "Their priority is to keep people safe, including preventing serious violence, such as knife crime and violence against women and girls. "It is right that we make the best use of available technology to support officers to do their job more effectively." Mr Ward said the LFR cameras will be used on the approach to and from Carnival and not within the event boundaries. He said they will "help officers identify and intercept those who pose a public safety risk before they get to the crowded streets". BBC News has contacted the carnival's organisers for comment. Listen to the best of BBC Radio London on Sounds and follow BBC London on Facebook, X and Instagram. Send your story ideas to Related internet links Liberty Human Rights Metropolitan Police
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
The Reason Why Everyone's Confused About UPFs – and What the Current Science Actually Says
The term 'ultra-processed food' (or UPF, for short) has launched into the nutritional spotlight in recent years, with study after study linking the food group to obesity, heart disease, type 2 diabetes, and a multitude of other chronic conditions. And in the UK, we eat a lot of ultra-processed foods. A recent landmark study showed that UPFs made up a whopping 53% of people's energy intake in the UK, coming second only to the US, where UPFs comprised 55%. This trend has led some researchers to claim that ultra-processed foods are 'a primary causal driver of the obesity pandemic'. But is the study of ultra-processed food actually a genuine scientific breakthrough in understanding diet and disease? Or is it just a fancy new label for foods we already knew were unhealthy? What we know now is there's a lack of a clear definition for ultra-processed foods – and we could sure use one. What Are Ultra-processed Foods? The definition of ultra-processed foods has shifted a bit since the term was first coined by Brazilian researchers in 2009, but now the term basically involves a food product meeting two specific criteria. The first is that the main components of the food are a result of multiple stages of industrial processing. Examples: white sugar, white flour, vegetable oil. The second is that the food has additives not commonly used in at-home cooking. This includes preservatives like BHT, emulsifiers like soy lecithin, stabilising agents like modified corn starch, food dyes, thickening agents, and the ever mysterious 'artificial flavours'. That's a tough definition for the average person to remember, understand, and apply to their food choices. Research actually bears this out. Even people who claim to know what ultra-processed foods are often misidentify which foods are actually ultra-processed. To make things even more confusing, some foods fall into an ultra-processed grey area. Let's take bacon, for example. While bacon certainly has additives thanks to its preservatives, whether it undergoes multiple stages of industrial processing is more nebulous. As a result, bacon has been classified as ultra-processed in some scientific papers, but not ultra-processed in others. Whole-grain bread, certain aged cheeses, and tomato sauce – healthy by most definitions – have also been slapped with an ultra-processed label, only adding to consumer confusion. The (New) Science for Ultra-processed Foods Not only is the definition of ultra-processing a bit fuzzy, there's also some debate as to why ultra-processed foods promote worse health outcomes in the first place. Because not all ultra-processed foods are harmful (see whole-grain bread and tomato sauce, but also yoghurt and dark chocolate), researchers have tried to explain why only some foods categorised as ultra-processed are linked to disease. One hypothesis is that (of all things) eating speed is a central factor. Due to their processing, ultra-processed foods are often softer and easier to chew (think peanut butter vs. peanuts), which makes people eat them faster. Rapid consumption may outpace the brain's ability to signal fullness, causing people to overeat, which may eventually lead to obesity and its associated diseases. But this is only a guess. The science that has been done on eating speed as a major factor in overeating tends to be underwhelming. Another hypothesis is that food additives are the key. Some research suggests that emulsifiers commonly found in UPFs (including polysorbate 80 and carboxymethylcellulose) might harm gut health and set off a cascade of inflammation leading to disease, or that taste enhancers, like MSG and added flavours, might override satiety signals and promote overeating. But the existing evidence for these claims is weak. Plus, given that there are hundreds (if not thousands) of food additives in use, studying the long-term effects of individual additives is challenging. But here's another take: The problem with ultra-processed foods might not be due to ultra-processing at all. The (Old) Science Behind Ultra-processing and Health Before ultra-processed food was ever a buzzword, research had established that certain processed foods were low in beneficial nutrients (fibre, potassium) and high in other not-so-great-for-you things like saturated fat, sugar, and salt. This nutritional imbalance alone could explain why ultra-processed foods are dangerous for our health – with no need to bring processing into the discussion. In fact, when studies have actually analysed ultra-processed foods separately, the biggest offenders for health tend to be soda, processed meat products like hot dogs, take-out style foods like pizza and french fries, and refined grains. These are foods that most dietary guidelines and health professionals have long recommend limiting. Given this, perhaps avoiding ultra-processed foods is just a modern repackaging of the same dietary advice we've heard a million times before. So where does that leave us now –and for the future? The Path Forward for Ultra-processed Food There's a real concern over the lack of clear definition for 'ultra-processed foods'. We've seen it before with health buzzwords like 'healthy', 'all-natural', and 'plant-based'. If ultra-processed food means many different things, does it mean anything at all? After decades of fixating on individual nutrients – from fat and cholesterol to carbohydrates and gluten – it's certainly refreshing that the discussion around ultra-processed foods is a more top-down approach to figuring out what makes us sick. But it's far from perfect right now. You Might Also Like The 23 Best Foods to Build Muscle 10 of the Best Waterproof Boots to Buy in 2019 6 Ways to Improve Your Mental Health
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Experts thrilled after capturing footage of massive ocean creature in unexpected location: 'This is a really exciting spot'
Experts thrilled after capturing footage of massive ocean creature in unexpected location: 'This is a really exciting spot' A rare humpback whale was spotted off the British coast of Kent, according to the BBC. The sighting was reported to the Kent Dolphin Project, which solicits local footage of whales, porpoises, and dolphins to monitor population health. Volunteers were quite excited by the find. Humpback whales were previously endangered, but conservation efforts have helped populations rebound. There have been other recent sightings of humpbacks in Cornwall and Sussex (you can see footage of this particular sighting here, via the BBC). Humpback whales serve a vital purpose in oceanic ecosystems. As predators, they keep prey populations like krill in check. The waste they produce feeds phytoplankton, which serve a vital role in sequestering carbon. Whales themselves are so massive that their bodies sequester a significant amount of carbon. That carbon can stay locked below the waves when they die and sink to the ocean floor. While the sighting is good news, some threats linger. Ghost netting continues to be a threat to humpbacks in the area. Warming surface temperatures are disorienting them. Ship strikes cause a lot of harm. The Kent Wildlife Trust is using the fresh sighting to fight plans to install new undersea cabling. The Sea Link project will, on the one hand, help transmit low-emission energy from production to the British public. Similar UK projects have aimed to connect growing wind power to the grid. On the other hand, the cables may interfere with wildlife such as humpback whales and dolphins that traverse the area. Activists remained excited about the sighting of the humpback whale in Kent. It could prove the growing health of the lengthy Atlantic migration routes. "This is a really exciting spot," said Max Renton from Adonis Blue Environmental Consultants on the footage. "While it's not yet possible to confirm whether these are the same individuals, sightings like these highlight the importance of ongoing efforts to understand and protect our marine life." Do you think America has a plastic waste problem? Definitely Only in some areas Not really I'm not sure Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet. Solve the daily Crossword