logo
What you eat may impact your lung cancer risk, according to a new study

What you eat may impact your lung cancer risk, according to a new study

CTV News2 days ago
There are many reasons to avoid ultra-processed foods, including a link with heart disease, diabetes and obesity, but an increased risk of lung cancer may be yet another, a new study suggests.
Ultra-processed foods contain ingredients 'never or rarely used in kitchens, or classes of additives whose function is to make the final product palatable or more appealing,' according to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Those ingredients — found in items such as sodas, chips, packaged soups, chicken nuggets and ice cream — can include preservatives against mold or bacteria, artificial coloring, emulsifiers to stop separation, and added or altered sugar, salt and fats to make food more appealing.
People who eat the most ultra-processed foods are 41 per cent more likely to be diagnosed with lung cancer than those who eat the least, even after accounting for other factors such as smoking, according to the study published Tuesday in the journal Thorax.
For this study, researchers analyzed data from more than 100,000 people who completed the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey's Food Frequency Questionnaire on their dietary habits and compared the information with medical records for lung cancer diagnoses.
On average, people had nearly three servings a day of ultra-processed foods, most commonly lunch meat, diet or caffeinated soft drinks, or decaffeinated soft drinks, the study authors wrote.
'Industrial processing alters the food matrix, affecting nutrient availability and absorption, while also generating harmful contaminants,' the researchers added. They specifically highlighted acrolein, which can come from burning tobacco, wood, plastics and gasoline and from cooking fats and oils at high temperatures, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Packaging materials also may be part of the problem, they suggested.
The study is observational, meaning that while the methods were clear and strong, the research still can't definitively prove that the foods cause lung cancer –– just that there is a connection between the two, said Dr. David Katz, a specialist in preventive and lifestyle medicine and founder of the nonprofit True Health Initiative, a global coalition of experts dedicated to evidence-based lifestyle medicine. He was not involved in the research.
'This study strongly suggests that (ultra-processed foods) may contribute to lung cancer risk,' he said.
Lung cancer isn't just about smoking
Lung cancer is a common form of cancer, with an estimated 2.4 million new cases worldwide in 2022, according to the World Health Organization.
Smoking is the main contributor to lung cancer risk, but people who don't smoke can still get it, which suggests other factors are at play, Katz said.
The authors adjusted for factors, meaning that they accounted for other possible things that could increase lung cancer diagnoses, including whether or not a person smoked, but it's important to note that the measurements were not nuanced, said Dr. Fang Fang Zhang, The Neely Family Professor and chair of the division of nutritional epidemiology and data science in the Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University in Boston. She was not involved in the research.
'Because smoking is a very important risk factor for lung cancer, adjusting smoking in a crude way could leave a large room for residual confounding,' she said in an email. 'It will be important to adjust for the intensity (e.g., cigarettes/day) and duration (e.g., years of smoking) or the cumulative exposure of smoking (e.g., pack-years). However, the authors found that the association between ultra-processed food consumption and lung cancer risk was stronger among never-smokers.'
Why foods impact lung cancer
There hasn't been a lot of research into ultra-processed foods and lung cancer risk, but a lot of existing evidence shows how important diet quality is for predicting premature death from all causes in the United States, Katz said.
Often, ultra-processed food consumption is associated with a lower diet quality, such as a higher intake of saturated fats, chemicals, salt and sugar, as well as higher calorie consumption, he added.
These factors 'can drive inflammation –– a primary pathway in the development and progression of cancer –– and damage the microbiome, impairing immune system function,' he said in an email. 'This combination of excess inflammation and impaired immunity gives rogue cells the upperhand. … This scenario is where cancer begins.'
Ultra-processed foods tend to be low in omega-3s, said Dr. Tom Brenna, professor of pediatrics, human nutrition and chemistry at Dell Medical School of the University of Texas at Austin. Omega-3s are essential, healthy fats that the body can't produce on its own, according to the National Institutes of Health Office of Dietary Supplements.
'Omega-3s limit shelf life, so if you're going to ultra-process something … then you kind of want to get rid of omega-3s,' said Brenna, who was not part of the research.
Additives in ultra-processed foods, carcinogens formed during processing or chemicals from food packaging might also be at play, Zhang said.
'However, these pathways are not well understood and warrant further investigations,' she said.
Ultra-processed foods vs. whole foods from nature
The study adds lung cancer risk to the list of reasons to avoid ultra-processed foods and increase diet quality, Katz said.
Health and diet quality improve when people eat mostly whole, unprocessed foods and largely plants such as vegetables, fruits, whole grains, beans, lentils, nuts and seeds, he added.
If you want to make a change, Zhang recommends starting by reading food labels.
'Avoid foods with long ingredient lists with unfamiliar names — these are more likely to be additives, preservatives, and artificial flavors,' she said. 'Prioritize whole food and prepare meals using whole or minimally processed ingredients whenever possible.'
Instead of focusing on what you won't eat, try prioritizing adding foods directly from nature into your diet, Katz added.
'If you are used to eating a lot of UPFs, transition to less of them, more 'real' foods one better choice at a time,' he said in an email.
It may take a minute for your taste buds to adjust to more wholesome foods, but if you give yourself a couple of weeks to get used to it, you can come to prefer the taste of more natural ingredients, he said.
'Once that happens, maintaining a healthier diet becomes much easier,' Katz added.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What you eat may impact your lung cancer risk, according to a new study
What you eat may impact your lung cancer risk, according to a new study

CTV News

time2 days ago

  • CTV News

What you eat may impact your lung cancer risk, according to a new study

There are many reasons to avoid ultra-processed foods, including a link with heart disease, diabetes and obesity, but an increased risk of lung cancer may be yet another, a new study suggests. Ultra-processed foods contain ingredients 'never or rarely used in kitchens, or classes of additives whose function is to make the final product palatable or more appealing,' according to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Those ingredients — found in items such as sodas, chips, packaged soups, chicken nuggets and ice cream — can include preservatives against mold or bacteria, artificial coloring, emulsifiers to stop separation, and added or altered sugar, salt and fats to make food more appealing. People who eat the most ultra-processed foods are 41 per cent more likely to be diagnosed with lung cancer than those who eat the least, even after accounting for other factors such as smoking, according to the study published Tuesday in the journal Thorax. For this study, researchers analyzed data from more than 100,000 people who completed the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey's Food Frequency Questionnaire on their dietary habits and compared the information with medical records for lung cancer diagnoses. On average, people had nearly three servings a day of ultra-processed foods, most commonly lunch meat, diet or caffeinated soft drinks, or decaffeinated soft drinks, the study authors wrote. 'Industrial processing alters the food matrix, affecting nutrient availability and absorption, while also generating harmful contaminants,' the researchers added. They specifically highlighted acrolein, which can come from burning tobacco, wood, plastics and gasoline and from cooking fats and oils at high temperatures, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Packaging materials also may be part of the problem, they suggested. The study is observational, meaning that while the methods were clear and strong, the research still can't definitively prove that the foods cause lung cancer –– just that there is a connection between the two, said Dr. David Katz, a specialist in preventive and lifestyle medicine and founder of the nonprofit True Health Initiative, a global coalition of experts dedicated to evidence-based lifestyle medicine. He was not involved in the research. 'This study strongly suggests that (ultra-processed foods) may contribute to lung cancer risk,' he said. Lung cancer isn't just about smoking Lung cancer is a common form of cancer, with an estimated 2.4 million new cases worldwide in 2022, according to the World Health Organization. Smoking is the main contributor to lung cancer risk, but people who don't smoke can still get it, which suggests other factors are at play, Katz said. The authors adjusted for factors, meaning that they accounted for other possible things that could increase lung cancer diagnoses, including whether or not a person smoked, but it's important to note that the measurements were not nuanced, said Dr. Fang Fang Zhang, The Neely Family Professor and chair of the division of nutritional epidemiology and data science in the Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University in Boston. She was not involved in the research. 'Because smoking is a very important risk factor for lung cancer, adjusting smoking in a crude way could leave a large room for residual confounding,' she said in an email. 'It will be important to adjust for the intensity (e.g., cigarettes/day) and duration (e.g., years of smoking) or the cumulative exposure of smoking (e.g., pack-years). However, the authors found that the association between ultra-processed food consumption and lung cancer risk was stronger among never-smokers.' Why foods impact lung cancer There hasn't been a lot of research into ultra-processed foods and lung cancer risk, but a lot of existing evidence shows how important diet quality is for predicting premature death from all causes in the United States, Katz said. Often, ultra-processed food consumption is associated with a lower diet quality, such as a higher intake of saturated fats, chemicals, salt and sugar, as well as higher calorie consumption, he added. These factors 'can drive inflammation –– a primary pathway in the development and progression of cancer –– and damage the microbiome, impairing immune system function,' he said in an email. 'This combination of excess inflammation and impaired immunity gives rogue cells the upperhand. … This scenario is where cancer begins.' Ultra-processed foods tend to be low in omega-3s, said Dr. Tom Brenna, professor of pediatrics, human nutrition and chemistry at Dell Medical School of the University of Texas at Austin. Omega-3s are essential, healthy fats that the body can't produce on its own, according to the National Institutes of Health Office of Dietary Supplements. 'Omega-3s limit shelf life, so if you're going to ultra-process something … then you kind of want to get rid of omega-3s,' said Brenna, who was not part of the research. Additives in ultra-processed foods, carcinogens formed during processing or chemicals from food packaging might also be at play, Zhang said. 'However, these pathways are not well understood and warrant further investigations,' she said. Ultra-processed foods vs. whole foods from nature The study adds lung cancer risk to the list of reasons to avoid ultra-processed foods and increase diet quality, Katz said. Health and diet quality improve when people eat mostly whole, unprocessed foods and largely plants such as vegetables, fruits, whole grains, beans, lentils, nuts and seeds, he added. If you want to make a change, Zhang recommends starting by reading food labels. 'Avoid foods with long ingredient lists with unfamiliar names — these are more likely to be additives, preservatives, and artificial flavors,' she said. 'Prioritize whole food and prepare meals using whole or minimally processed ingredients whenever possible.' Instead of focusing on what you won't eat, try prioritizing adding foods directly from nature into your diet, Katz added. 'If you are used to eating a lot of UPFs, transition to less of them, more 'real' foods one better choice at a time,' he said in an email. It may take a minute for your taste buds to adjust to more wholesome foods, but if you give yourself a couple of weeks to get used to it, you can come to prefer the taste of more natural ingredients, he said. 'Once that happens, maintaining a healthier diet becomes much easier,' Katz added.

Why there hasn't been a formal declaration of famine in Gaza
Why there hasn't been a formal declaration of famine in Gaza

Winnipeg Free Press

time2 days ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

Why there hasn't been a formal declaration of famine in Gaza

The leading international authority on food crises said Tuesday that the 'worst-case scenario of famine is currently playing out in Gaza.' It predicted 'widespread death' without immediate action. The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification, or IPC, said Gaza has been on the brink of famine for two years, and that recent developments, including 'increasingly stringent blockades' by Israel, have 'dramatically worsened' the situation. Even though Israel eased a 2 1/2-month blockade on the territory in May, aid groups say only a trickle of assistance is getting into the enclave and that Palestinians face catastrophic levels of hunger 21 months into the Israeli offensive launched after Hamas' Oct. 7 attack. Hundreds have been killed by Israeli forces as they try to reach aid sites or convoys, according to witnesses, health officials and the United Nations' human rights office. The military says it has only fired warning shots. The IPC warning stopped short of a formal declaration of famine. Here's why: The IPC and aid groups says Gaza's hunger crisis is worsening Gaza's population of roughly 2 million Palestinians relies almost entirely on outside aid. Israel's offensive has wiped out what was already limited local food production. Israel's blockade, along with ongoing fighting and chaos inside the territory, has further limited people's access to food. The U.N. World Food Program says Gaza's hunger crisis has reached 'new and astonishing levels of desperation.' Nearly 100,000 women and children are suffering from severe acute malnutrition, and a third of Gaza's population is going days without eating, Ross Smith, the agency's director for emergencies, said Monday. Gaza's Health Ministry said Tuesday that more than 100 people have died while showing signs of hunger and malnutrition, mostly children. It did not give their exact cause of death. The ministry, part of the Hamas-run government, is staffed by medical professionals and its figures on war deaths are seen by the U.N. and other experts as the most reliable estimate of casualties. Famine occurs when these conditions are met The IPC was first set up in 2004 during the famine in Somalia. It includes more than a dozen U.N. agencies, aid groups, governments and other bodies. Famine can appear in pockets — sometimes small ones — and a formal classification requires caution. The IPC has only declared famine a few times — in Somalia in 2011, and South Sudan in 2017 and 2020, and last year in parts of Sudan's western Darfur region. Tens of thousands are believed to have died in Somalia and South Sudan. It rates an area as in famine when all three of these conditions are confirmed: — 20% of households have an extreme lack of food, or are essentially starving. — At least 30% of children 6 months to 5 years old suffer from acute malnutrition, based on a weight-to-height measurement; or 15% of that age group suffer from acute malnutrition based on the circumference of their upper arm. — At least two people, or four children under 5, per 10,000 are dying daily due to starvation or the interaction of malnutrition and disease. Gaza poses a major challenge for experts because Israel severely limits access to the territory, making it difficult and in some cases impossible to gather data. The IPC said Tuesday that data indicate famine thresholds have been reached for food consumption in most of Gaza, and for acute malnutrition in Gaza City. Famine declarations usually come from the UN or governments While the IPC says it is the 'primary mechanism' used by the international community to conclude whether a famine is happening or projected, it typically doesn't make such a declaration itself. Often, U.N. officials together with governments will make a formal statement based on an analysis from the IPC. But the IPC says once a famine is declared it's already too late. While it can prevent further deaths, it means many people will have died by the time a famine is declared. It's not always clear that hunger is the cause of death Most cases of severe malnutrition in children arise through a combination of lack of nutrients along with an infection, leading to diarrhea and other symptoms that cause dehydration, said Alex de Waal, author of 'Mass Starvation: The History and Future of Famine' and executive director of the World Peace Foundation. 'There are no standard guidelines for physicians to classify cause of death as 'malnutrition' as opposed to infection,' he said. When famine occurs, there are often relatively few deaths from hunger alone. Far more people die from a combination of malnutrition, disease and other forms of deprivation. All of these count as excess deaths — separate from violence — that can be attributed to a food crisis or famine, he said. The war has made it hard to get accurate information Israel's offensive has gutted Gaza's health system and displaced some 90% of its population. With hospitals damaged and overwhelmed by war casualties, it can be difficult to screen people for malnutrition and collect precise data on deaths. 'Data and surveillance systems are incomplete and eroded,' said James Smith, an emergency doctor and lecturer in humanitarian policy at the University College London who spent more than two months in Gaza. 'Which means that all health indicators — and the death toll — are known to be an underestimation,' he said. Even when famine is declared, the response can be lacking A declaration of famine should in theory galvanize the international community to rush food to those who need it. But with aid budgets already stretched, and war and politics throwing up obstacles, that doesn't always happen. 'There is not a big, huge bank account' to draw on, said OCHA's Laerke. 'The fundamental problem is that we build the fire engine as we respond.' Aid groups say plenty of food and other aid has been gathered on Gaza's borders, but Israel is allowing only a small amount to enter. Within Gaza, gunfire, chaos and looting have plagued the distribution of food. The international pressure led Israel to announce new measures over the weekend, including daily humanitarian pauses in fighting in parts of Gaza and airdrops of food. Israel says there's no limit on how many aid trucks can enter Gaza. U.N. agencies say Israeli restrictions, and the breakdown of law and order, make it difficult to distribute the food that does come in. 'Only a massive scale-up in food aid distributions can stabilize this spiraling situation, calm anxieties and rebuild the trust within communities that more food is coming,' the World Food Program said. 'An agreed ceasefire is long overdue.' ___ Associated Press writers Bassem Mroue in Beirut and Edith M. Lederer at the United Nations contributed.

‘Worst-case scenario of famine' is happening in Gaza, food crisis experts say
‘Worst-case scenario of famine' is happening in Gaza, food crisis experts say

CTV News

time3 days ago

  • CTV News

‘Worst-case scenario of famine' is happening in Gaza, food crisis experts say

TEL AVIV, Israel — The 'worst-case scenario of famine is currently playing out in the Gaza Strip,' the leading international authority on food crises said in a new alert Tuesday, predicting 'widespread death' without immediate action. The alert, still short of a formal famine declaration, follows an outcry over images of emaciated children in Gaza and reports of dozens of hunger-related deaths after nearly 22 months of war. The international pressure led Israel over the weekend to announce measures, including daily humanitarian pauses in fighting in parts of Gaza and airdrops. The United Nations and Palestinians on the ground say little has changed, and desperate crowds continue to overwhelm and unload delivery trucks before they can reach their destinations. The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification, or IPC, said Gaza has teetered on the brink of famine for two years, but recent developments have 'dramatically worsened' the situation, including 'increasingly stringent blockades' by Israel. A formal famine declaration, which is rare, requires the kind of data that the lack of access to Gaza and mobility within has largely denied. The IPC has only declared famine a few times — in Somalia in 2011, South Sudan in 2017 and 2020, and parts of Sudan's western Darfur region last year. But independent experts say they don't need a formal declaration to know what they're seeing in Gaza. 'Just as a family physician can often diagnose a patient she's familiar with based on visible symptoms without having to send samples to the lab and wait for results, so too we can interpret Gaza's symptoms. This is famine,' Alex de Waal, author of 'Mass Starvation: The History and Future of Famine' and executive director of the World Peace Foundation, told The Associated Press. What it takes to declare famine An area is classified as in famine when all three of the following conditions are confirmed: At least 20% of households have an extreme lack of food, or are essentially starving. At least 30% of children six months to 5 years old suffer from acute malnutrition or wasting, meaning they're too thin for their height. And at least two people or four children under 5 per 10,000 are dying daily due to starvation or the interaction of malnutrition and disease. The report is based on available information through July 25 and says the crisis has reached 'an alarming and deadly turning point.' It says data indicate that famine thresholds have been reached for food consumption in most of Gaza — at its lowest level since the war began — and for acute malnutrition in Gaza City. The report says nearly 17 out of every 100 children under the age of 5 in Gaza City are acutely malnourished. Mounting evidence shows 'widespread starvation.' Essential health and other services have collapsed. One in three people in Gaza is going without food for days at a time, according to the World Food Program. Hospitals report a rapid increase in hunger-related deaths in children under 5. Gaza's population of over 2 million has been squeezed into increasingly tiny areas of the devastated territory. The IPC's latest analysis in May warned that Gaza will likely fall into famine if Israel doesn't lift its blockade and stop its military campaign. Its new alert calls for immediate and large-scale action and warns: 'Failure to act now will result in widespread death in much of the strip.' What aid restrictions look like Israel has restricted aid to varying degrees throughout the war. In March, it cut off the entry of all goods, including fuel, food and medicine, to pressure Hamas to free hostages. Israel eased those restrictions in May but also pushed ahead with a new U.S.-backed aid delivery system that has been wracked by chaos and violence. The traditional, UN-led aid providers say deliveries have been hampered by Israeli military restrictions and incidents of looting, while criminals and hungry crowds swarm entering convoys. While Israel says there's no limit on how many aid trucks can enter Gaza, UN agencies and aid groups say even the latest humanitarian measures are not enough to counter the worsening starvation. In a statement Monday, Doctors Without Borders called the new airdrops ineffective and dangerous, saying they deliver less aid than trucks. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said no one is starving in Gaza and that Israel has supplied enough aid throughout the war, 'otherwise, there would be no Gazans.' Israel's military on Monday criticized what it calls 'false claims of deliberate starvation in Gaza.' Israel's closest ally now appears to disagree. 'Those children look very hungry,' U.S. President Donald Trump said Monday of the images from Gaza in recent days. ___ Sam Mednick And Cara Anna, The Associated Press Anna reported from Lowville, New York.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store