logo
ECB should keep steady hand, hold rates close to current levels, Schnabel says

ECB should keep steady hand, hold rates close to current levels, Schnabel says

RTÉ News​12-05-2025
The European Central Bank should stop cutting borrowing costs as turmoil in the global economy is fuelling price pressures and inflation was at risk of exceeding the bank's 2% target in the medium term, ECB board member Isabel Schnabel has said.
The ECB cut interest rates seven times in the past year as inflation has been rapidly retreating, and policymakers have already started to lay the groundwork for another cut on June 5, taking the deposit rate to 2%.
Schnabel, an outspoken policy hawk, poured cold water on those expectations, making an explicit argument for keeping rates unchanged since they are already low enough not to hold back the economy.
"Now is the time to keep a steady hand," Schnabel told a conference at Stanford University. "The appropriate course of action is to keep rates close to where they are today – that is, firmly in neutral territory."
Financial markets see a 90% chance of a rate cut in June and see another cut or two in subsequent months, indicating that Schnabel's view goes counter to investor bets.
The complication for policymakers is that short-term and medium-term inflationary forces are quite different.
In the near term, inflation could even dip below the ECB's 2% target given lower energy costs, a strong euro, anaemic economic growth and high uncertainty created by the US administration's trade war, Schnabel argued.
But monetary policy affects the economy with long lags and by the time further policy easing really impacts the economy, the drag on inflation may have faded, replaced by quite different forces that push up costs, she argued.
Inflation could be boosted by an expected government spending surge, driven by Germany's pledge to boost defence and infrastructure investment. But more importantly, trade fragmentation, a byproduct of US-imposed tariffs, could also push up costs and boost prices.
"Over the medium term, risks to euro area inflation are likely tilted to the upside, reflecting both the increase in fiscal spending and the risks of renewed cost-push shocks from tariffs propagating through global value chains," Schnabel said.
Schnabel even challenged the argument that US tariffs without European retaliation are net deflationary for the euro area.
"Even if the EU does not retaliate, higher production costs transmitted through global value chains could more than offset the disinflationary pressure coming from lower foreign demand, making tariffs inflationary overall," Schnabel argued.
Retaliation, as already outlined by the bloc, would only magnify this process and keep pressure on prices further out.
By keeping a steady hand, the ECB could buy insurance against a wide range of possible outcomes and this approach would be robust enough to deal with different scenarios, Schnabel argued.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump says he thinks Putin is ready to make deal for peace in Ukraine
Trump says he thinks Putin is ready to make deal for peace in Ukraine

Irish Independent

time2 hours ago

  • Irish Independent

Trump says he thinks Putin is ready to make deal for peace in Ukraine

Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky and his European allies have intensified their efforts this week to prevent any deal between the US and Russia emerging from Friday's summit in Alaska that leaves Ukraine vulnerable to future attack. 'I think President Putin will make peace, I think President Zelensky will make peace,' Mr Trump told reporters at the White House. 'We'll see if they get along.' Mr Trump has downplayed talk of a ceasefire emerging from the summit and speculated about a possible second meeting to come, involving more leaders. 'I think it's going to be a good meeting, but the more important meeting will be the second meeting that we're having. We're going to have a meeting with President Putin, President Zelensky, myself, and maybe we'll bring some of the European leaders along. Maybe not. I don't know that.' Putin earlier spoke to his most senior ministers and security officials as he prepared for a meeting with Mr Trump in Anchorage, Alaska, at 11.30am Alaskan time (8.30pm Irish time) that could shape the endgame to the largest war in Europe since World War II. In televised comments, Putin said the US was 'making, in my opinion, quite energetic and sincere efforts to stop the hostilities, stop the crisis and reach agreements that are of interest to all parties involved in this conflict'. This was happening, Putin said, 'to create long-term conditions for peace between our countries, and in Europe, and in the world as a whole – if, by the next stages, we reach agreements in the area of control over strategic offensive weapons'. His comments signalled that Russia will raise nuclear arms control as part of a wide-ranging discussion on security when he sits down with Mr Trump. A Kremlin aide said Putin and Mr Trump would also discuss the 'huge untapped potential' for Russia-US economic ties. A senior Eastern European official, who requested anonymity to discuss sensitive matters, said Putin would try to distract Mr Trump from Ukraine at the talks by offering him possible progress on nuclear arms control or something business-related. 'We hope Trump won't be fooled by the Russians; he understands all [these] dangerous things,' the official said, adding that Russia's only goal was to avoid any new sanctions and have existing sanctions lifted. Mr Trump said there would be a press conference after the talks, but that he did not know whether it would be joint. He also said in an earlier interview with Fox News that there would be 'a give and take' on boundaries and land. 'This meeting sets up like a chess game,' Mr Trump said. 'This meeting sets up a second meeting, but there is a 25pc chance that this meeting will not be a successful meeting.' Mr Trump said it would be up to Putin and Mr Zelensky to strike an agreement, saying: 'I'm not going to negotiate their deal.' Russia controls around a fifth of Ukraine, and Mr Zelensky and the Europeans worry that a deal could cement those gains, rewarding Putin for 11 years of efforts to seize Ukrainian land and emboldening him to expand further into Europe. An EU diplomat said it would be 'scary to see how it all unfolds in the coming hours. Trump had very good calls yesterday with Europe, but that was yesterday'. Mr Trump had shown willingness to join the security guarantees for Ukraine at a last-ditch virtual meeting with European leaders and Mr Zelensky on Wednesday, European leaders said, though he made no public mention of them afterwards. Today's summit, the first Russia-US summit since June 2021, comes at one of the toughest moments for Ukraine in a war that has killed tens of thousands and displaced millions since Russia's full-scale invasion in February 2022. Speaking after Wednesday's meeting, French president Emmanuel Macron said Mr Trump had said the transatlantic Nato alliance should not be part of any security guarantees designed to protect Ukraine from future attacks in a post-war settlement. However, Mr Trump also said the US and all willing allies should be part of the security guarantees, Mr Macron added. Expanding on that, a European official told Reuters that Mr Trump said on the call he was willing to provide some security guarantees for Europe, without spelling out what they would be. On Wednesday, Mr Trump threatened 'severe consequences' if Putin does not agree to peace in Ukraine and has warned of economic sanctions if his meeting today proves fruitless.

What's the beef between this previous and current presidential hopeful?
What's the beef between this previous and current presidential hopeful?

The Journal

time4 hours ago

  • The Journal

What's the beef between this previous and current presidential hopeful?

PRESIDENTIAL HOPEFUL GARETH Sheridan, a millionaire most people in the country had not heard of before this week, kick-started his campaign today with a jaw-dropping accusation. Sheridan held the first press conference of his presidential campaign in Dublin's Shelbourne Hotel this morning and chose to open it by claiming that there has been a coordinated attack on his character. He claimed that this attack came from people associated with Seán Gallagher, the businessman and former Dragon's Den star who came second in the 2011 presidential election. The Journal put Sheridan's claims about Gallagher today to a spokesperson for Seán Gallagher, but has not received a response. So far, Gallagher has chosen not to comment on his relationship with Sheridan or on his departure from Nutriband. Addressing his past business relationship with Gallagher, Sheridan mused at the outset of his press conference today: 'Perhaps somebody is taking our breakup a little bit worse than me'. The Journal / YouTube Speaking directly to the journalists gathered in the Shelbourne Hotel in Dublin for his launch, Sheridan said the coverage they have given of his campaign so far has been 'commendable'. He continued: 'But, just one thing I wanted to bring to your attention is that there seems to be somewhat of a coordinated attack taking place on my character by people associated and in Seán Gallagher's circle.' He quickly followed this up by adding: 'Now, I'm not saying for a moment that Seán is behind this or involved in any way. 'At MacGill [Summer School] a couple of weeks ago he actually encouraged participation, asked the media to be nice to candidates that were brave to come forward and actually put their name in the ring. Advertisement 'But some of you in the room know what I'm talking about. That's all I'll say about that.' The Journal / YouTube So what the hell has gone on between the pair to merit such a statement from Sheridan at the outset of his campaign? The background How do Sheridan and Gallagher know each other? Sheridan, the 35-year-old multi-millionaire, is the founder and former CEO of US-based pharma company Nutriband. Seán Gallagher became chairman of the firm in 2018 and departed four years later in 2022. Asked about their relationship during a radio interview on Monday, Sheridan said he had not been in contact with Gallagher to get any advice about running for office. What do we know about Gallagher leaving the company? Sheridan and his company, Nutriband, only really gained mainstream recognition in Ireland earlier this week when he announced his bid for the Áras. Since then, journalists have been looking into the presidential hopeful, and there have been numerous reports on both him personally and on his company. Some of these related to Gallagher's departure from the company. On Tuesday, there were reports of 'mystery' surrounding his exit , but by Wednesday morning, the Irish Independent had reported that Gallagher had left the company's board over a row related to a $180,000 corporate box. Related Reads Millionaire Áras hopeful launches presidential campaign in the Shelbourne - here's what he said The millionaire millennial seeking the presidency: How did Gareth Sheridan get so rich? Catherine Connolly is using American-style grassroots fundraising for her presidential campaign According to the report, Gallagher raised concerns about the box at the Orlando Magic basketball arena, and in a statement to the Irish Independent, Sheridan insisted that the box makes a 'great return'. The statement from Sheridan further explained that communication broke down between the company and Gallagher in 2022, ahead of his resignation. What was the breakdown in communication about? Sheridan used his press conference today to shed some further light on this breakdown and on the pair's relationship. He explained that ahead of Nutriband being listed publicly on the stock exchange in 2021, it had received advice that it would be better to have a chairperson with capital markets experience. 'We proposed this to Seán. We asked him to voluntarily step aside on the same remuneration,' Sheridan said. He then explained that Gallagher was not agreeable to this, communication broke down, and a new chairperson was voted in by a majority of shareholders. 'I wish Seán nothing but the best in whatever he's working on now. I'd just like to be very upfront and make sure that you're aware of the situation that we're facing. Perhaps somebody is taking our break-up a little bit worse than me,' Sheridan said. Sheridan has not yet formally received a nomination to run in this year's presidential election. To date, Catherine Connolly is the only candidate formally in the race following the unexpected withdrawal today of Fine Gael's Mairead McGuinness. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... Our Explainer articles bring context and explanations in plain language to help make sense of complex issues. We're asking readers like you to support us so we can continue to provide helpful context to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay. Learn More Support The Journal

Johnny Ronan's planned 17-storey mixed use scheme for Dublin's docklands is rejected
Johnny Ronan's planned 17-storey mixed use scheme for Dublin's docklands is rejected

The Journal

time9 hours ago

  • The Journal

Johnny Ronan's planned 17-storey mixed use scheme for Dublin's docklands is rejected

AN COIMISIÚN PLEANÁLA has upheld Dublin City Council's rejection of Johnny Ronan's RGRE planned 17-storey mixed use scheme for Dublin's docklands. In February, Ronan's Ronan Group Real Estate (RGRE) lodged plans for the redevelopment of global banking giant Citigroup's current European headquarters at 1 North Wall Quay in Dublin's docklands. The scheme involves the demolition of Citigroup's existing six-storey office building and the development of four buildings in its place, ranging in heights of nine storeys to 17 storeys. According to the plans, the scheme would include office accommodation, arts/ community/cultural uses and a retail/café/restaurant unit. RGRE firm NWQ Devco Limited was seeking a ten-year planning permission The council comprehensively rejected the scheme in April, resulting in applicants NWQ Devco Ltd appealing the refusal to An Coimisiún Pleanála (ACP). In refusing planning permission, ACP has found that the scheme's excessive height, bulk, massing and form would constitute an overly dominant and isolated tall building that would be at odds with the surrounding context and would seriously injure the amenity of the Liffey Quays and key views along the river corridor. The ACP refusal order pointed out that the planned site is a prominent and sensitive location which fronts onto the River Liffey and within the Liffey Quays conservation area and is in close proximity to neighbouring properties. Advertisement The development was to be located at Citigroup's current European headquarters at 1 North Wall Quay in Dublin's docklands. Dublin City Council Dublin City Council ACP found that the proposed development would result in significant adverse impacts to residential amenity due to the unacceptable and unjustified loss of daylight and overshadowing of a principal shared amenity space. ACP also found that the scheme did not meet the criteria for exceptional circumstances for enhanced height, density and scale for Landmark Tall Buildings. In the second part of the board order refusing planning permission, signed off by Planning Commissioner Mary Henchy, ACP stated that having regard to the age, form and condition of the existing office building and the results of the Whole Carbon assessment, the commission found that the wholesale demolition of the existing building would be both premature and unjustified and would set an unwelcome precedent for the demolition on similar sites in Dublin. As a result, the commission found that the scheme was contrary to a policy in the City Development Plan that supports and promotes the retrofitting of existing buildings. Clarion Quay Management (CQE) Company CLG was a third party appellant in the support of the Council refusal and its appeal to ACP was aimed at protecting the residential amenity of dwellings and maintaining and improving safe and uncongested access to other uses of CQE. The RGRE appeal included an Arthur Cox submission which stated that the application submitted meets the criteria for 'exceptional circumstances' that would allow planning permission to be granted for a landmark building. The letter stated that it appears that the City Council did not engage in any analysis or consideration of the 'exceptional circumstance' and whether it is met by the development. Architects of the scheme, Henry J Lyons, contended that the scheme as submitted is appropriate for the context of the site.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store