EU court rules against environmentalists trying to block Spanish wind farms
Companies developing wind farms in Galicia and regional authorities welcomed the decision, which is a setback to opponents' strategy of using the courts to block plans they say encroach on the environment and the lives of local people.
The court rejected the environmentalists' argument that the public's rights to consultation had been violated.
The decision affects dozens of planned wind projects that were approved by the regional government and then halted by the highest regional court after locals and environmental groups filed hundreds of lawsuits.
Carmen Bouso from the regional government's environment department said the court's decision "clearly and emphatically supports" the procedures used to approve wind energy projects and the government's full respect of the public's rights to participate in the process.
She urged regional judges to resume their consideration of lawsuits that they had put on hold pending the ruling of the European court.
The AEE, a Spanish wind industry group, welcomed the ruling as "a key step toward restoring legal certainty" in the region.
"Now it's time to act quickly and responsibly so that the projects that have been stalled until now can resume operations as soon as possible," AEE General Director Juan Virgilio Marquez said.
Galician activist group Adega, a leading opponent of wind projects in the region, said the ruling was disappointing and went "against the right to real and effective public participation".
The group vowed to keep on fighting and said it believed other legal issues beyond the scope of Friday's ruling meant many wind projects would still not be able to proceed.
There are 92 wind farms targeted by legal actions in Galicia, 86 of which have been halted before construction started, according to data provided by regional authorities. They involve an estimated investment of 3 billion euros ($3.42 billion) and have a total planned capacity of almost 2.5 gigawatts (GW).
($1 = 0.8762 euros)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
38 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Are YOU a pension planner, putting it off - or relying on your partner? Take our quiz
Nearly half of adults believe they are 'pension planners' who are on top of contributions and what they need for a decent retirement, new research reveals. Some 44 per cent of people feel confident enough to describe themselves this way, but 22 per cent admit to burying their heads in the sand and being unsure where to begin. The rest fall in the middle and declare themselves neither a 'planner' nor a 'procrastinator' when it comes to sorting out their finances to be prepared for retirement. Men are more likely to think of themselves as a 'planner', with 54 per cent identifying with this role compared with 35 per cent of women, according to Aviva which carried out the research. 'While this might suggest a confidence or engagement gap, it's also possible that men are more likely to say they are financially knowledgeable, or that women are simply more candid about their uncertainties,' says the pension firm. Aviva also says income is a factor in shaping people's habits, with 33 per cent of people earning £35,000 or less a year saying they are pension planners. But that rises to 66 per cent of those earning between £75,000 and £100,000 and reaches as high as 80 per cent at the top end of the income scale. Less prevalent confidence among lower earners could reflect affordability concerns or a sense of disengagement, while higher earners feel more able to take control of their finances, suggests Aviva. Meanwhile, among 45 to 54-year-olds - a key age when preparing for retirement - 32 per cent called themselves 'planners', 29 per cent said they were 'procrastinators' and the rest said neither. Aviva surveyed more than 2,000 adults, of whom around 1,370 were dating, living together, married or in a civil partnership. In this group, 22 per cent said their partner was a planner, 12 per cent called them more of a procrastinator, 28 per cent said they were neither, 26 per cent said both of them were clued up on pensions and 13 per cent said neither were on top of matters. The results suggest a gap in communication and self-awareness in couples, which means there is room for more collaborative conversations, according to Aviva. How to sort out your pension: A five step guide 1) Add up what you have saved so far If you are worried about whether you will have saved enough, investigate your existing pensions . Broadly speaking, you need to ask work schemes the following questions. - The current fund value. - The current transfer value - because there might be a penalty to move. - Whether the pension is in a final salary or defined contribution scheme. Defined contribution pensions take contributions from both employer and employee and invest them to provide a pot of money at retirement. Unless you work in the public sector, they have now mostly replaced more generous gold-plated defined benefit - career average or final salary - pensions, which provide a guaranteed income after retirement until you die. Defined contribution pensions are stingier and savers bear the investment risk, rather than employers. - If there are any guarantees - for instance, a guaranteed annuity rate - and if you would lose them if you moved the fund. - The pension projection at retirement age. You can use a pension calculator to see if you will have enough - check ours below. Pension calculator: When can you afford to retire? When can you afford to retire and how much do you need to get the lifestyle you want? This is Money's pension calculator, powered by Jarvis, uses benchmark PLSA Retirement Living Standards amounts to help you work out what your retirement could look like - and what you need to save. 2) Check what you will get in state pension You should add the forecast figures to what you anticipate getting in state pension, which is currently £230.25 a week or nearly £12,000 a year if you qualify for the full rate. Get a state pension forecast here. 3) Work out whether this will be enough You can use a pension industry-devised standard for a minimum, moderate and comfortable retirement to see how close you will get. This year's figures are £21,600, £43,900 or £60,600 a year respectively for a couple, with the first one doable if you have two full state pensions coming in. However, they do not include income tax, housing costs if you are still paying a mortgage or rent, and potentially care costs in later life. Others in the finance industry suggest a different approach which is to think about what you earn now and what proportion of that income - the target replacement rate - you want to aim for in retirement. You need to bear in mind that you will no longer have work-related costs such as travel, clothes and lunches, but you are likely to spend more on hobbies, socialising and holidays. 4) Think about tidying up your pensions Savers often collect a number of pension pots during their working lives as they move jobs but many never bother combining them. Doing this can save on paperwork and costs. But merging pensions is not always advisable because you can risk losing valuable benefits attached to employer schemes. Read our guide to merging pensions to ensure you won't be penalised. 4) Find any lost pots If you have lost track of old pots, the Government's free pension tracing service is here. Take care if you do an online search for the Pension Tracing Service as many companies using similar names will pop up in the results. These will also offer to look for your pension, but try to charge or flog you other services, and could be fraudulent. Here's our guide to finding lost pensions.
Telegraph
38 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Labour's hopes of a building boom are fading
The Government's entire economic strategy can be summed up in one phrase: planning reform. This is front and centre of every response to poor GDP figures, in every speech on the economy and high up in any list of government 'achievements'. It doesn't seem to matter that taxes on business have gone up massively and employment regulation is about to do the same. That is all fine because of planning reform. In her Spring Statement for instance, the Chancellor stated that these reforms would mean the Government was now 'within touching distance of delivering our manifesto promise to build 1.5 million homes in England in this Parliament'. The result of all this housebuilding would be, according to the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), an increase in GDP worth 'an additional £3.4bn' by 2029/30. Delivering this level of housebuilding is therefore crucial to the Government's economic and political success. The early signs are not good, and this should be a major cause for concern in the Treasury. First, the OBR's assumptions for this economic impact are nothing short of heroic. They state that net additions to the housing stock will increase from 192,000 this year to 305,000 by 2029/30. A near-60pc increase and a 40-year high in terms of net additions. They are also forecasting a booming property market with transactions rising from 1m in 2023 to 1.472m in 2029. Turnover rate in the housing market will apparently rise to 4.58pc by 2029. Other than the Covid market surge in 2021 – when stamp duty was eased – that would be the highest annual turnover rate in 20 years. No one in the industry thinks these forecasts are realistic. And for good reason. The Home Builders Federation's recent housing pipeline report shows that the number of residential planning approvals actually fell by 37pc during the first quarter of 2025. The 50,610 units that these approvals will deliver was the lowest quarterly figure in nearly 12 years. In certain key regions things are even worse. Data from Molior shows that in London, where Labour has been in charge for years, just over 2,000 private homes began construction during the first half of this year. That is just 4.9pc of the Government's 44,000 half-year target. It could be fairly argued that the Government's planning reforms have yet to kick in. The OBR says most of the increase will happen from 2026/27. But things do not look good on that front either. Molior is forecasting that London will deliver just over 5pc of the 176,000 homes that the Mayor is targeting over the next two years. And if that were replicated across the country it would be nothing short of disastrous. If things continue along at the sort of rate we've seen since Labour came to power, rather than that which is currently in the OBR forecast, it will only be a matter of time before they look again at the numbers. They do in fact warn that their projections for housebuilding contain 'several significant uncertainties' including constraints within the sector and local opposition to the reforms. To that they should add other government policies because since these reforms were announced ministers have done everything they can to hamper them. They've already watered down some of their plans in the face of backbench opposition so environmental and nature campaigners will still be able to easily block new developments. Any hope that Government backed affordable housing would help reach the target have been ended after the Spring Statement confirmed most of the £39bn trumpeted for this programme is back loaded into the next parliament. There's actually less money for affordable housing in the next crucial few years. Added to all of this, the Government is actively making it more expensive to build new homes. New levies, inherited from the previous Government, will add a few thousand pounds to the cost of each new home. And Treasury officials have managed to slip through a massive increase to the landfill tax, something the previous government rejected, that will halt many brownfield developments in their tracks. So unless we see some new, additional and radical planning reforms for the OBR to take into account, at some point they will revise down the number of net additions they are currently forecasting. At which point the Government won't have an economic strategy left. The minor planning reforms they have half implemented will count for nothing. Instead of a housebuilding boom that delivers the economic growth that the Chancellor has promised, we are going to see the sector limp along like the rest of the economy because this Government simply doesn't understand that tax and regulation matter.
The Guardian
39 minutes ago
- The Guardian
In wartime, demonstrations in Ukraine can never be more than a peaceful protest
Once a decade, Ukraine has a moment in which street protests redefine the country's political direction. The Orange revolution of 2004; the Maidan revolution of 2014; and now, over the past 10 days, the first major wave of protest since the start of Russia's full-scale invasion. A series of unexpectedly boisterous and well-attended demonstrations forced Volodymyr Zelenskyy to execute a swift U-turn on his decision to scrap the independence of two anti-corruption bodies. On Thursday, MPs reversed the contentious changes they had adopted a week previously. Outside the parliament building, crowds whooped and cheered as the result of the vote was announced. The size, scope and demands of this latest protest movement have been much more modest than those of its revolutionary predecessors, but the spectacle has been no less remarkable, given the context of full-scale war in which it has taken place. The final, celebratory gathering came only hours after the latest massive Russian airstrike had hit Kyiv, killing at least 28 people including three children. Hardly anyone had managed a good night's sleep before arriving at parliament armed with banners and high spirits. This wartime context to a large extent inspired the protests: a common sentiment that when people are laying down their lives for the country on the frontline, the government has to live up to a certain set of values. But it also limited their scope. There was none of the revolutionary enthusiasm of Maidan present here; instead, there was a sober acknowledgement that all-out political unrest would only play into Russia's hands. 'There were some people chanting for impeachment and the vast majority of others said, 'Shut up, we do not undermine the legitimacy of the president, what happened is that the legitimate president made a mistake,'' said Inna Sovsun, an MP from the opposition Holos party who attended several protests. Dmytro Koziatynskyi, whose post on social media provided the initial spark for the protest, dismissed any comparisons to Maidan for exactly this reason. 'Even if they don't pass the law, this will never become anything other than a peaceful protest,' he said, in an interview before the parliamentary vote. Koziatynskyi was a masters student in the Czech Republic before returning to Ukraine after the full-scale invasion in 2022 and signing up to become a combat medic. After three years on various parts of the frontline, he left the army in May and now works for an NGO. When he saw the news last week that parliament had rushed through a law curtailing the independence of two bodies specially designed to go after high-level corruption, he found it 'insulting', he said. 'People are not fighting so that our government can do some crazy stuff, that destroys all our achievements since 2014,' he said. He penned an angry post on social media calling on people to protest against the new law. He expected 'maximum 100 people, mostly friends and acquaintances' to join the protest. By the second night there were about 10,000 people outside the Ivan Franko theatre, the nearest point to the presidential office that is accessible to the public. Most of those who came out were young – this has been a protest wave dominated by gen Z, with friends competing for the wittiest slogan or meme reference on their handwritten placards. On Wednesday evening, a man leading the singing of the Ukrainian national anthem through a loudspeaker was holding a sign that bore a single word: 'Cringe'. Suddenly, the fate of two relatively small institutions – the national anti-corruption bureau, known as Nabu, and the specialised anti-corruption prosecutor's office, Sapo – had become the issue of the day among Ukrainian teenagers. Nabu and Sapo were established after the Maidan revolution as part of a drive against the long-running scourge of corruption in Ukraine, financed partly with US money. Some western observers agree that there are problems with Nabu and Sapo: too many cases opened and not enough of them brought to a conclusion, for one. In theory, some streamlining would make sense; in practice, Zelenskyy's move looked a lot like bringing independent investigators under political control. With the Trump administration no longer pushing an anti-corruption agenda, and Europe on summer holidays, Zelenskyy's team appears to have felt they could push the bill through quickly, without anyone paying much attention. That might have been the case were it not for the protests. But the images of thousands of young people demanding the law's repeal forced European politicians to take a stand, and several leaders spoke privately to Zelenskyy to tell him he needed to find a way out of the self-inflicted mess. Sign up to Headlines Europe A digest of the morning's main headlines from the Europe edition emailed direct to you every week day after newsletter promotion 'This became a major breach of trust. It's problematic both from an EU accession point of view and in that it makes it much harder for friends of Ukraine to continue making the case that the country needs support,' said one diplomatic source in Kyiv. Zelenskyy's response was swift and decisive, even if somewhat embarrassing for the MPs of his Servant of the People party, who were instructed to vote against the very thing they had been ordered to vote for the previous week. Now that the status quo has been re-established, there are two very different readings of the whole episode. One sees a leader using wartime powers to try to stifle independent institutions, too out of touch to predict the obvious backlash. Another reflects on how, even in wartime, Ukrainian society is still capable of expressing democratic sentiment, and its leaders still able to react swiftly to it. Koziatynskyi, whose post started off the protest wave, leans towards the second view. 'The protests showed that Ukrainian democracy is as strong as possible in times of a full-scale war, and our society is mature enough to have a dialogue with the government, and the government is able to listen,' he said. Zelenskyy's five-year presidential term should have ended last year, but almost all Ukrainians, including his fiercest opponents, agree that elections are both legally and technically impossible during wartime. With Russia's nightly attacks continuing, and a hope that Donald Trump might finally start getting tougher on Russia, that consensus has not changed. Nobody wants upheaval, but the outburst of protest may yet change the political atmosphere. 'Legally, everything will go back to how it was; politically, it's more complicated,' said Sovsun. 'It's unpredictable what this might have done to Ukrainian society. We have basically lifted the unspoken rule that we don't protest during martial law.'
