9 Expert Lifestyle Hacks to Lower Blood Sugar
Balancing your blood sugar is not easy. It can involve constantly reading nutrition labels, monitoring how many carbs are in the foods you're eating, and other detail-oriented tasks. But there are some larger, less granular lifestyle hacks you can focus on that can make a difference in having lower blood sugar. We spoke to dietitians and diabetes educators to find out what lifestyle shifts they recommend.
One of the simplest hacks is to stay hydrated. In fact, folks who get admitted to the hospital with high blood sugar immediately get an IV with fluids to help dilute it. Drinking enough water can help you maintain better blood sugars during times of stress and after meals, when it may be higher than usual.
Getting enough high-quality sleep is associated with better blood sugars. Similarly, getting poor quality sleep or not enough has been shown to increase cortisol levels and increase blood sugar the following day. Focusing on your sleep hygiene is another hack for better balance.
'It may surprise you that one of the things that impacts blood sugar the most has nothing to do with what you eat,' notes dietitian and diabetes educator Erin Palinski-Wade, RD, CDCES. 'Poor sleep has been shown to elevate stress levels and worsen insulin resistance, making it harder to manage blood sugar. On top of that, just one poor night of sleep can alter hunger and satiety hormones, increasing appetite and cravings for simple sugars.'
If you're a soda lover, but want a healthier beverage alternative, there are several options on the market. OLIPOP, a prebiotic soda, has 9 grams of fiber per can and only 2 to 5 grams of sugar, depending on the flavor (vs. 39 grams and no fiber in a can of regular cola). If you're looking for a hydrating beverage without any sugar or fiber, consider a bubbly water such as Spindrift.
Related: 7 Expert-Approved Ways to Avoid a Blood Sugar Spike
Typically, protein and fiber get all the love when it comes to blood sugar management, but healthy fat is just as important — and it's time to set aside the old fears we learned years ago about dietary fat and weight. Of all of the macronutrients, fat takes the longest to digest, meaning it will keep you more full and help stabilize your blood sugar by slowing down digestion and absorption. Choose heart healthy fats like salmon, avocados, and pistachios.
Dates, prunes, and other dried fruit can provide natural sweetness with fiber and a lower glycemic index. This means that foods with natural sugars will not raise your levels as much as those with refined sugars. Plus, these foods have a range of health benefits like boosting bone and gut health.
'Use pureed prunes as a replacement for added sugar in baked goods,' says Palinski-Wade, who is a consultant for Sunsweet Growers. 'This simple swap preserves the sweetness and texture of the recipe while cutting added sugar, reducing overall carbohydrates, and increasing fiber.'
Even just a few minutes of exercise after eating can significantly reduce blood sugar levels. When we move our muscles, our body absorbs blood sugar and puts it to use, effectively lowering the amount in the bloodstream. Exercise also increases insulin sensitivity and can help keep your blood sugar more regulated for hours or days later, depending on the activity that you do.
'My approach to balancing blood sugar focuses on adding things in, not taking things away,' says dietitian Christine Byrne. 'One fantastic hack that doesn't involve modifying your food intake is to get in about 10 minutes of physical activity after a meal. Going for a walk is a great option, but it's not the only one. Household chores like cleaning the kitchen, vacuuming, or folding clothes are also a way to get your body moving post-meal and keep your blood sugar levels more balanced.'
Choosing balancing foods is the number one hack for better blood sugars after meals and snacks. Protein, fat, and fiber are the main nutrients that help stabilize blood sugar and prevent major spikes.
'To help balance blood sugars, I always start with a foundation of eating every few hours, including a combination of fiber-rich foods plus a protein,' says Taylor Aasand, MPH, RDN, CEDS. 'Some examples include an apple with peanut butter, hummus and whole grain crackers, or a protein bar made with whole grains.'
Related: 5 'Healthy' Breakfast Foods That Are Spiking Your Blood Sugar
Taking a fiber supplement with each meal can help slow down meal absorption and prevent a spike.
'Add 3 grams of psyllium husk with breakfast, lunch, and dinner. Take it with your meal and plenty of water, and always consult with your medical team before adding a new supplement to your regimen,' says Aasand.
It's not only what you eat, but also the order in which you eat various foods can help. If you eat your protein-rich and fiber-filled foods first, the carbohydrates on your plate will be absorbed more slowly, leading to a smaller peak in blood sugar levels.
'One simple hack for better blood sugar balance is eating your vegetables first,' says Haley Bishoff, RD, LD. 'Vegetables are high in fiber, which can aid in slowing the digestion of carbohydrates, leading to a slower insulin response and less blood sugar spikes. Be sure to include vegetables, fruits, whole grains, beans, and legumes for better blood sugar balance.'
Read next: 5 Ways to Control Blood Sugar That Don't Involve Food
The post 9 Expert Lifestyle Hacks to Lower Blood Sugar appeared first on Clean Plates.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Missouri's Historic Abortion Victory Is Crumbling Before Our Eyes
Just a few months ago, Missouri voters approved a ballot measure to protect abortion rights. That measure, known as Amendment 3, added a 'reproductive freedom' amendment to the state constitution. It was crafted to offer stronger legal protections for abortion than existed under Roe v. Wade, according to campaigners, and to end the state's near-total abortion ban, which had been triggered by the Supreme Court's 2022 decision to overturn Roe. Those who voted for it believed that the amendment would allow them to override such past anti-abortion court rulings and to block anti-abortion lawmakers' future efforts—in essence, to reclaim their own rights and political voice. But as of May 27, by way of a two-page order from the state's Supreme Court, the abortion ban voters had been told they defeated was back. The ruling came as a 'surprise' to pro-choice and anti-abortion groups alike, the Missouri Independent reported this week. With it, the Supreme Court of Missouri has effectively allowed the state to enforce a raft of anti-abortion laws that had been challenged by two Planned Parenthood affiliates, which argued that such laws now violated the state constitution, thanks to Amendment 3. After last week's ruling, Planned Parenthood health centers in the state—Missouri's only abortion clinics—canceled upcoming appointments and advised patients that they could instead go to neighboring Kansas or Illinois, where abortion is legal. For now, those patients, and any Missourian who needs an abortion, have found themselves right back where they would have been had Amendment 3 never been on the ballot. The sudden loss of abortion access is an inarguable blow for Missouri's reproductive rights movement. But it's also something more troubling: a sign of flaws in the post-Roe strategy chosen by large national reproductive rights groups like Planned Parenthood and state chapters and affiliates of such groups, including the ACLU and Reproductive Freedom for All (formerly NARAL). For these groups, abortion rights ballot measures have been seen as a path forward in a hostile legal environment, a way to restore access without relying on the courts. Campaigns would go direct to the people, giving energized supporters a tangible goal to work toward, along with some optimism, amid an otherwise crushing assault on reproductive freedom and bodily autonomy. The speed with which Missouri's ballot measure has gone from being a historic victory to yet another legal battle reveals that such election night wins may prove to be far more qualified and complicated to hold onto than campaigners had hoped. For some advocates in Missouri who had worked on Amendment 3, however, there was nothing all that surprising in the state Supreme Court's ruling. They saw it as a reality check. 'There is no way to responsibly sugarcoat what's playing out in the state,' the What's Next for Missouri coalition told me in a statement from the group. The coalition was founded by longtime Missouri reproductive justice advocates, as well as former staff of Planned Parenthood affiliates in Missouri who quit over their concerns about the ballot measure. 'Amendment 3 was a limited and symbolic win,' the coalition said. 'In reality, it has failed to protect pregnant people's bodily autonomy. Inaccessible abortion is just the tip of the iceberg.' Voters in Missouri may have declared that abortion was their constitutional right, but abortion was not going to return overnight to Missouri. In November, state Attorney General Andrew Bailey offered his legal opinion on which anti-abortion laws might still be enforceable. After stating that Amendment 3 'just barely' won by a 'tight margin,' he opined that 'the result may be very different if a future constitutional amendment is put up for a vote,' and detailed circumstances in which he believed some of the laws could still be enforced. In other words, he was not going to accept that Amendment 3 automatically invalidated state anti-abortion laws—and to be fair, the Amendment 3 campaign seems to have anticipated just such a reaction. Not long after the election, the two Planned Parenthood affiliates that have health centers in Missouri challenged many of those laws as 'presumptively unconstitutional,' citing Amendment 3. Their petition, filed in the circuit court of Jackson County by Planned Parenthood Great Plains and Planned Parenthood Great Rivers-Missouri, also requested that the court temporarily block such laws while the case played out. That included the total abortion ban triggered after Roe, as well as laws meant to restrict abortion access even if it were not technically banned, such as mandatory waiting periods and mandatory ultrasounds. In a pair of rulings in December and February, Judge Jerri Zhang granted the affiliates' request for a temporary injunction on most of those laws, after which Planned Parenthood clinics in Missouri began to offer abortion again, with significant limits: only procedural abortion up to 12 or 13 weeks, no medication abortion, in just three clinics across the entire state, operating at limited capacity. Other restrictions remained, including some that were not part of Planned Parenthood's challenge. Mandatory parental involvement laws were later challenged by the practical abortion support organization Right By You, in April. There were also restrictions that Amendment 3 did not touch: The ballot measure allows for abortion to be banned past fetal viability, the legal line after which a fetus is thought to be able to survive independently. This means that people having later abortions were left out of the promises of Amendment 3 from the start. Missouri Attorney General Bailey appealed Judge Zhang's decision, seeking to block abortion in the state during the court challenge—an appeal enabled by a new law giving the state attorney such power to sue to halt injunctions, signed just days before. Meanwhile, the Missouri General Assembly voted to put a new abortion ban on the ballot, an effort to overturn Amendment 3. The constitutional right protecting abortion that voters believed they had succeeded in installing was being rapidly undermined across multiple fronts—by the state attorney general, in the courts, and in the legislature. This legal undermining depends in part on voters not knowing that it's even happening. The proposed anti-abortion ballot measure language did not refer to Amendment 3, nor to banning abortion, hiding its ban behind claims of ensuring women's 'safety during abortions.' For good measure, it added a ban on gender-affirming care for minors—care that is currently banned in the state. Democrats in the state legislature had tried to block the anti-abortion ballot measure proposal from advancing, but Republicans broke their filibuster with 'a rare procedural maneuver to shut down debate and force a vote on a measure that would repeal Amendment 3,' as St. Louis Public Radio reported. Amendment 3 campaign leaders forcefully denounced both the new ballot measure and the legislature's underhanded attempt to reverse the will of Missouri voters. 'This deceptive amendment is a trojan horse to reinstate Missouri's total abortion ban,' Tori Schafer, director of policy and campaigns at the ACLU of Missouri, said in a statement. At protests on the steps of the state Capitol in Jefferson City, Amendment 3 supporters were now fighting to hang onto their victory, as they have had to many times this session. 'This past November, more than 1.5 million Missourians made their voices heard at the ballot box,' Mallory Schwarz, executive director of Abortion Action Missouri, said. 'Missourians are used to fighting back and are prepared to keep showing up.' Two weeks later, abortion access in the state would be all but nonexistent again, after Missouri Supreme Court Chief Justice Mary Russell ordered Judge Zhang to vacate her temporary injunction and to reevaluate the Planned Parenthood affiliates' request, this time using a stricter standard. The ACLU of Missouri, which is co-counsel in the legal challenge, told The New Republic that it had 'immediately' responded to the order by sending correspondence to the court, 'highlighting that our arguments met this standard.' Tom Bastian, ACLU of Missouri director of communications, added that while the group 'can't predict when the court will act, we anticipate new orders … granting the preliminary injunctions blocking the ban and restrictions, once again allowing Missourians access to abortion care.' For now, then, those Missourians will be doing what they did before election night, before Dobbs: going out of state or self-managing their abortion with pills. In this, the reality for abortion in Missouri looks a lot like it did back when the near-total ban passed. The difference is that now more than $30 million has been spent on a ballot measure meant to reverse that ban. As the legal scholar Mary Ziegler pointed out this week, it is possible that Missourians' abortion rights will prevail, that Planned Parenthood will get its injunction, or even that the new anti-abortion ballot measure may fail. However, as she wrote, 'what is happening in Missouri is still a sign about the limits of ballot measures.' Advocates in other states should be asking: What is such a 'win' worth? The legal battle over Amendment 3 is nothing new, as Planned Parenthood's initial filing in this legal challenge acknowledged. 'The State of Missouri has spent decades attempting to eliminate or severely reduce abortion access,' its petition stated. 'This means that Plaintiffs have spent decades challenging these laws.' The lengths that Missouri lawmakers have been willing to go since the election, unfortunately, indicate that this is not a fair fight in fair courts. 'It's time for simple honesty,' What's Next said to me this week. People will have unreliable and irregular access to abortion 'until we shift power away from fascist politicians.' The reality is that this fight for the constitutional right to abortion was playing out at the same time that our constitutional rights were being ignored and undermined on a regular basis. Before we fundraise millions more dollars to replicate the fight in other states—fundraising that will be justified as 'restoring' access to abortion by making it a right—we might consider other, more immediate ways to give people what they need. That money might be better spent on paying for actual abortions, as abortion funds across the country do, helping people in the many states with abortion bans to access care. In a legal system that cannot be counted upon, there may be no more direct way of supporting a fundamental right.
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
6 "Bad" High-Protein Foods You Should Eat to Gain Muscle If You Have Diabetes, According to Dietitians
Reviewed by Dietitian Karen Ansel, M.S., RDNProtein can help build muscle, improve insulin sensitivity and help manage blood sugar. Some high-protein foods have been unfairly categorized as off-limits for diabetes. Dietitians say many of these muscle-building proteins may have diabetes you've been diagnosed with diabetes, it can often feel like you're on a diet of don'ts. A nagging voice in your head might constantly warn you away from a slew of foods that are high in sugar, carbs or even fat. Yet many foods traditionally thought of as 'bad' for diabetes are actually loaded with high-quality protein that can help you build muscle. And since more muscle mass means better insulin sensitivity and a stronger, faster metabolism, getting plenty of protein is a key part of a healthy diabetes diet. If you have diabetes and have been avoiding these protein-rich foods, dietitians say it's time to welcome them back to the table. Depending on the nutrition advice you've received, you might believe that eating anything but low-fat dairy is a big no-no for diabetes. But diabetes expert Erin Palinski-Wade, RD, CDCES, says a higher fat percentage in yogurt isn't as worrisome as you might think. 'People with diabetes are often told to opt for non-fat dairy,' she says. However, full-fat Greek yogurt's combo of slowly-digested fat plus roughly 21 grams of protein per cup can make it a filling option that helps stabilize blood sugar, she says. In fact, some studies have shown people who consume more calories from dairy fat may have a lower risk of diabetes, especially when compared to calories from carbohydrates. Gone are the days when health experts recommended steering clear of nuts due to their fat content. Current evidence shows that nuts are an excellent choice in a diabetes-friendly diet. One top-notch option: pistachios. 'Pistachios can be a good plant-based protein source for people with diabetes,' says Palinski-Wade. A 2-ounce serving of pistachios delivers roughly 12 grams of protein. One small study found that volunteers with prediabetes who consumed 2 daily ounces of pistachios (1 ounce before breakfast and another ounce before dinner) for 12 weeks experienced improvements in blood sugar, visceral fat and markers of heart health. Despite its generally positive reputation, shellfish has received criticism for its high cholesterol content, says Sheri Gaw, RDN, CDCES. This has led some people with diabetes (and, therefore, increased risk of heart disease) to avoid shellfish like crab, clams, shrimp and oysters. However, Gaw says people with diabetes can say yes to shellfish on a regular basis. 'Shellfish is a low-saturated fat, high-quality protein that promotes blood sugar control,' she explains. There's more good news. One study found that two weekly servings of fish or shellfish may help protect people with a history of cardiovascular disease from future cardiac events and cardiovascular disease-related death. Try a 3-ounce serving of canned crab for 15 grams of protein. Believe it or not, beef can be beneficial for health, even for people with diabetes. It all comes down to choosing the right cut. While fatty cuts aren't advised, Gaw says the high protein content of a lean cut of beef like chuck, sirloin, round or top loin can help build muscle while keeping dietary fat to a minimum. Three ounces of trimmed sirloin steak, for example, contains roughly 17 grams of protein with a reasonable 3 grams of saturated fat. Ever heard that soy is a bad actor for your health? While rumors abound that soy increases breast cancer risk, impairs mineral absorption or adversely affects male sex hormones, research has shown that these soy myths simply aren't true., , Truth is, soy is actually a healthy choice for muscle-building, especially if you prefer a plant-based meal plan. 'Soy foods are sometimes avoided for containing phytoestrogens and being processed, but foods like tofu are a great source of plant-based protein,' says diabetes expert Vandana Sheth, RDN, CDCES. 'Tofu contains all the essential amino acids and supports muscle growth without blood sugar spikes.' One cup of cubed tofu contains an impressive 18 grams of protein. When it comes to diabetes, there's a lot of confusion around beans and lentils. Their relatively high carb content can give the impression that they're off-limits for people with blood sugar issues. But Shah says these legumes have a unique saving grace, specifically their fiber. 'While they are higher in carbs, they have a lower glycemic load because of their high fiber content,' she explains. This means they won't raise your blood sugar quickly. In fact, many dietitians consider beans to be among the best high-fiber foods for diabetes. Try a cup of cooked lentils for 18 grams of plant-based protein plus a bonus 16 grams of blood sugar-regulating fiber. As beneficial as protein is, you need to combine it with resistance training to effectively build muscle. The resulting increased lean mass can deliver a surprising number of diabetes-related health benefits, like these: Better blood sugar control. Muscle is where the majority of glucose uptake happens, says Palinski-Wade. 'This means that having more muscle mass makes it easier for the body to use glucose after eating, improving blood sugar control,' she adds. Easier weight management. Muscle burns more calories than fat, so having more muscle can help with weight management, an important aspect of diabetes care, Sheth says. Improved insulin sensitivity. Protein's ability to help with weight management may also prevent the buildup of visceral fat, the harmful fat that wraps around your internal organs, says Palinski-Wade. Research has found that reducing visceral fat may promote better insulin sensitivity. If you're living with diabetes, it may be time to rethink your go-to list of high-protein foods. Research reveals that lean protein may help build muscle, manage weight, and improve insulin sensitivity and blood sugar control. Dietitians say that some of the high-protein foods people with diabetes sometimes avoid–such as full-fat yogurt, nuts, shellfish, beef, soy, beans and lentils—can actually be a part of a healthy eating plan for diabetes and can help build the muscle you need. If you could use more muscle-building strategies, check out our 7-Day Bodyweight Training Plan for Beginners, Created by Certified Trainers. Read the original article on EATINGWELL
Fast Company
29-05-2025
- Fast Company
Liquid Death takes aim at prebiotic sodas with some toilet humor
Liquid Death has taken the old-timey Pepsi Challenge taste test concept to some pretty strange places for its flavored sparkling waters. Back in 2022, it pitted its $1.99 cans of Liquid Death against tallboys of luxury liquids like lobster béarnaise sauce ($50), liquified Japanese wagyu cheeseburger ($51), Spanish squid ink ($58), and beluga caviar ($580). Cue the dry heaves. And in 2023, it responded to a tweet that said, 'I'd rather lick sweat off a fat guy's back than drink Liquid Death,' with a spot entitled—you guessed it —' Better Than Back Sweat? ' Now the brand is taking aim at prebiotic sodas like Olipop with a new taste test ad called 'Toilet Taste Test.' Here we have several brave members of the public coming to test the chuggability of a Liquid Death flavored sparkling water against a mug of unnamed prebiotic soda. Each subject tastes the Liquid Death first, then is asked to try the prebiotic soda while sitting on the toilet since it claims the prebiotic soda contains six times the fiber in a fiber-based laxative. Subject responses are . . . revealing. 'Not quite prairie-dogging but feeling some motion.' 'Number 2 might make me number two.' Watch the (soda) throne The prebiotic soda market has been forecasted to hit $3.5 billion by 2032. In February, Coca-Cola launched Simply Pop, and a month later PepsiCo acquired Poppi for $1.95 billion. Popular brand Olipop (which contains 6 g of fiber per can) was valued at $1.85 billion in February, after raising $50 million in its latest funding round. Liquid Death was valued at $1.4 billion, following its latest funding round last March. According to the company, 2024 retail sales were $333 million, up from $263 million in 2023. While it's not the most obvious competitor to the heavy metal and comedy-infused canned water brand, Liquid Death has always positioned itself as a healthy alternative to traditional sugar-filled soda. 'The Toilet Taste Test' is a clear indication of what brands it deems a threat to its own growth trajectory. By taking aim at the taste and consequences of fiber, the brand not only found the funny, but also took a direct hit on what many see as prebiotic soda's Achilles heel. It's also a perfect example of the brand's consistently funny take on advertising. At the Fast Company Grill at SXSW in March, Liquid Death's senior VP of marketing Dan Murphy told me the goal for all of its content was to make sure it 'doesn't smell like an ad' and creates engagement with consumers and the media. 'The metrics you should look for are saves and shares,' Murphy said. 'If somebody's going to go back and watch that again, if somebody's sharing that with a friend, there's that viral coefficient that is telling you you're doing it right.'
