Taiwan's leader wants dialogue with China, but warns of need for stronger defences
Taiwan's
president William Lai has marked his first year in office with an offer of dialogue to Beijing and a warning that the self-governing island must strengthen its defences.
Mr Lai said he wanted co-operation, but it must be a dialogue of equals, free of coercion.
'I, too, am committed to peace. Because peace is priceless and war has no winners. But when it comes to seeking peace, we cannot have dreams or illusions,' he said.
'Taiwan is happy to have exchanges and co-operation with
China
as long as there is reciprocal dignity. Using exchanges to replace hemming in, dialogue to replace confrontation.'
READ MORE
Beijing, which claims sovereignty over Taiwan and describes Mr Lai as a separatist, has stepped up military drills around the island since he took office last year.
Mr Lai has taken a more assertive approach to cross-strait relations than his more predecessor Tsai Ing-wen, initiating a security crackdown on advocates for closer ties with the mainland.
His government last March deported three Chinese women, all of whom were married to Taiwanese men, for advocating unification with the mainland by force.
Tens of thousands of opposition supporters demonstrated in the capital Taipei last month, accusing Mr Lai of attempting to initiate a dictatorship and to eliminate democratic freedoms.
He has seen his approval rating fall as he struggles with a parliament where his Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) does not command a majority, with added pressure in the form of an uncertain geopolitical landscape.
The
United States
has long been Taiwan's strongest unofficial ally, but
Donald Trump
has accused the island, which leads the world in producing advanced semiconductors, of 'stealing' the US's microchip industry.
Mr Trump announced a 32 per cent 'reciprocal' tariff on Taiwan before suspending it for 90 days, along with those on most other countries.
On Tuesday Mr Lai played down the implications of Mr Trump's action, which has fuelled fears on the island that the US president could abandon Taiwan as part of a grand bargain with Beijing.
'There are bound to be frictions between friends, but they can eventually be reconciled,' Mr Lai said.
'Even if there are differences of opinion, as long as there is a foundation of trust and sincere dialogue, they can understand each other better and deepen their friendship.'
Mr Lai said the Taiwan government would support firms adversely affected by the tariffs.
He also announced the establishment of a sovereign wealth fund to help companies expand globally as part of an effort to counteract Beijing's campaign to discourage its trading partners from doing business with Taiwan.
Mr Lai extended an olive branch to the opposition, announcing that he would instruct his national security team to brief the chairs of the main opposition party, the Kuomintang (KMT) and the smaller Taiwan People's Party (TPP).
The KMT said that one briefing would not solve the island's problems, but it acknowledged that the president had taken 'a small step' towards easing frictions.
'We also hope that president Lai will have more courage and take a big step to stop judicial persecution and political hatred,' the party said.
The KMT, which favours a warmer relationship with Beijing, holds most local government positions as well as controlling the national parliament with the help of the TPP.
Mr Lai's DPP needs to win six seats to regain a parliamentary majority and it has used Taiwan's expansive electoral recall legislation to attempt to unseat 30 KMT legislators.
The KMT targeted 15 DPP legislators for a recall vote, but its campaign ran into controversy amid reports that party activists had forged the signatures of dead people in the petition.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Independent
2 days ago
- Irish Independent
Ireland added to ‘monitoring list' of countries watched closely around US dollar manipulation
No major US trading partner manipulated its currency in 2024, the Treasury Department said on Thursday in the first semi-annual currency report of President Donald Trump's new administration, although its "monitoring list" of countries warranting close attention grew to nine with the addition of Ireland and Switzerland. Countries that meet two of the criteria - a trade surplus with the US of at least $15 billion, a global account surplus above 3pc of GDP and persistent, one-way net foreign exchange purchases - are automatically added to the list. Ireland and Switzerland were added due to their large trade and current account surpluses with the US. The Swiss National Bank on Friday denied being a currency manipulator, but said it would continue to act in Switzerland's interests as the strong Swiss franc helped push inflation into negative terrain last month. "The SNB does not engage in any manipulation of the Swiss franc," it said. "It does not seek to prevent adjustments in the balance of trade or to gain unfair competitive advantages for the Swiss economy." Treasury said China, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore, Vietnam, Germany, Ireland and Switzerland were on its monitoring list for extra foreign exchange scrutiny. While it did not label China a currency manipulator for now despite "depreciation pressure" facing its currency, the yuan, Treasury issued a stern warning to China, saying it "stands out among our major trading partners in its lack of transparency around its exchange rate policies and practices." "This lack of transparency will not preclude Treasury from designating China if available evidence suggests that it is intervening through formal or informal channels to resist (yuan) appreciation in the future," Treasury said in a statement. Trump in his first term labelled China a manipulator in August 2019, a move made then - as now - amid heightened US-China trade tensions. The Treasury Department dropped the designation in January 2020 as Chinese officials arrived in Washington to sign a trade deal with the US. Thursday's report was released hours after Trump spoke with China's leader Xi Jinping for the first time since returning to the White House amid an even more tense trade standoff between the world's two largest economies, and more recently a battle over critical minerals. The countries struck a 90-day deal on May 12 to roll back some of the triple-digit, tit-for-tat tariffs they had placed on each other since Trump's January inauguration. The latest report covers the final full year of the administration of Trump's predecessor, Democrat Joe Biden, who over his four-year term never labelled any trading partner a currency manipulator but raised similar concerns over China's behaviour and lack of transparency. Last year was marked generally by broad-based dollar strengthening, with the greenback gaining 7pc in 2024 against a basket of major trading partners' currencies. That dynamic made it less likely that Treasury would find evidence of consistent one-way actions by countries to weaken their currencies for competitive advantage, since most currencies were broadly weakening anyway, Treasury officials said. That could change over the course of this year, with the dollar already down by roughly 9pc since Trump returned to the White House and launched a trade war that has global investors rethinking their commitments to US assets. In the current environment, it might be more tempting for countries to step in to try to prevent or reverse the continued strengthening of their currencies, and Treasury officials said they would be watching closely for such behaviour. In the case of China more specifically, Treasury officials said they were looking at broadening their surveillance to include monitoring of the activities of sovereign wealth and state pension funds for any indication these entities were acting on Beijing's behest in the foreign exchange market. They said there was no current evidence of that but it had been a tactic used by others in the past.
Irish Times
2 days ago
- Irish Times
Can belated economic sanity save the US from a Liz Truss-style fiasco?
The US approach to trade restrictions is a roller coaster. The tactic so far has been to announce a big increase in tariffs on its trading partners, then some degree of rowing back pending negotiations, then some new threats if negotiations aren't going fully the US's way. Now the US courts have intervened to at least delay proposed tariffs. It's not clear where all this will land. China confronted US tariffs that escalated to more than 100 per cent with its own countermeasures. Then negotiations opened and there has, for now, been significant rowing back . Alongside higher tariffs on steel and cars, the opening salvo against the EU was for 20 per cent tariffs, scaled back to 10 per cent while negotiations opened. The latest threat from the Trump administration is for 50 per cent tariffs on imports from the EU , unless agreement on a trade deal is reached by midsummer. Trade deals are complex and the window for reaching a deal is very short. The short-term effects of these threats are destabilising, both for exporters to the US and for US producers relying on imported inputs. READ MORE The objective of the US administration is, presumably, to see US production replace imported goods. However, unless US firms have spare capacity to replace imports, they need to build such capability. [ EU-US tariff talks: What happens next? Opens in new window ] No sane US firm will invest in new factories until it is clear what the final outcome will be from the negotiations with different big trading partners. In many cases, it could take years to bring such investments on stream – possibly only after the next US presidential election. If Trump's successor were to pursue a different trade policy, import-replacing investment might struggle to make money. The Republic of Ireland exported more than €50 billion of pharmaceuticals to the US last year. New US pharma capacity would be needed to replace imports from Ireland. Firms are unlikely to decide to invest in new factories in the US until they know what the final trade landscape will be. Then, if new plants are built, they will need regulatory approval to produce the relevant drugs in the United States, likely also taking years. Thus, it could take considerable time before pharmaceutical production could switch from Ireland to the US. How to manage your pension in these volatile times Listen | 37:00 Recent studies by the EU Commission and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) have looked at the possible effect of the US-initiated trade war on the EU and the US economies. The studies suggest that the trade war is likely to be particularly damaging for the US, with a much more muted impact on the EU. That is because the tariffs will raise the cost of US imports for US consumers and producers. In turn, this will lead to higher inflation, which could require the US central bank, the Fed, to raise interest rates, slowing the economy further. The EU research suggests that the unilateral imposition of tariffs by the US, just through their effects on trade, would reduce US national income by 1 per cent next year, while the impact on the EU would only be 0.2 per cent. Retaliatory action by the EU and others would raise the United States' loss to 1.5 per cent. The EU analysis also indicates that the US costs would be magnified by any increase in interest rates needed to choke off inflation. If the Fed were to raise rates to counter rising inflation, this could provoke a Trump response, overturning the Fed's vital independent role in setting interest rates. If this were to happen, the loss of faith in US economic policy would be likely to have even more serious consequences. However, the United States faces a further problem. US government debt is 120 per cent of gross domestic product (GDP), back to where it was in 1945 after the second World War. In the OECD, only the Greek, Italian and Japanese governments are more indebted. Nevertheless, the Trump administration plans to implement big tax cuts for the coming years. While serious cuts in expenditure, affecting social and health services, are also promised, the net effect will still mean borrowing of 6 per cent to 7 per cent of GDP each year, adding rapidly to the already high debt burden. The lesson we learned from the fiscal crisis in the 1980s, and again 15 years ago in the financial crash, is that if your national debt goes above 100 per cent of national income, you face big challenges borrowing at reasonable rates. Current US policy raises the possibility of a Liz Truss type event , where government interest rates rise significantly due to the prospect of an ever-increasing government debt burden. Hopefully, before this happens, sanity will prevail in US economic policy.
Irish Times
2 days ago
- Irish Times
Epsom Derby is the original, but sadly it is not the best any more
The Epsom Derby is the original. But sad to say it's not the best any more. When it comes to mile-and-a-half Derby races on grass, the most commercially relevant of them all is already done and dusted for this year. Last Sunday's Tokyo Yushun, the Japanese Derby, was won by Croix Du Nord. A champion two-year-old, Croix Du Nord won what is unquestionably Japanese racing's most coveted prize. 【🇯🇵 Tokyo Yushun (Japanese Derby) (G1), Tokyo, 2400m, 3yo No Geldings, approx US$ 4.61m】 Winner: Croix du Nord(JPN) J: Yuichi Kitamura T: Takashi Saito Sire: Kitasan Black Dam: Rising Cross — JRA World Racing (@JRA_WorldRacing) Post-race euphoria underlined the prevailing sentiment of this being the pinnacle of the sport in what is perhaps the strongest and most vibrant racing nation of all. The same kind of comments will be dutifully trotted out after Saturday's Derby at Epsom. They'll sound rote in comparison. The Epsom Derby is trading on past glories. The currency of Federico Tesio's line about the thoroughbred existing because of the Epsom winning post has faded in the face of modern commercial bloodstock realities. In stark, bottom-line terms, winning the Derby has become a double-edged sword. Its prestige is rooted in tradition, but where's the future in that? READ MORE As Saturday is the 246th Derby there's probably little surprise about it looking a bit tired. The crowd for the Tokyo classic was capped at 80,000. About 25,000 will be in Epsom, far removed from historic tales of London decamping to the Hill for the day. The Tokyo Yushun was worth almost €4 million in prize money, more than double its English counterpart. But it is the discrepancy between the two Derby prizes in terms of their primary purposes that is stark. Champions still win at Epsom. City Of Troy a year ago was the best of his generation. A decade ago, Golden Horn proved himself an outstanding racehorse. But in the identification of potential top stallions, Blue Riband glory at Epsom is all but a black mark. Proven mile-and-a-half ability is prized in Japan's racing and breeding industries. The class to carry speed over a distance is the ultimate. The 2023 world champion Equinox is a prime example. Croix Du Nord is all but priceless now, his status as an elite stallion prospect assured. The commercial imperative around tomorrow's winner will be very different. Almost inevitably the first instinct for those involved in any Epsom Derby winner is to prove the horse is just as good, if not better, at a shorter trip. A mile-and-a-half has become associated with stamina and that's a financial mood killer in the breeding shed. Adam Kirby riding Adayar home in 2021 to win the Derby at Epsom. Photograph: Alan Crowhurst/Getty The 2021 Derby winner Adayar was so commercially dubious in Europe he was immediately packed off to stud in Japan. It was a well-trodden route in the past when Japan's industry was growing. Now the Japanese are mostly fine with their own produce. Serpentine the year before ended up gelded, the first Derby winner in a century to face such a fate. Anthony Van Dyck (2019) wound up being fatally injured in the Melbourne Cup. Last year, Darley moved its 2018 hero Masar to a National Hunt stud in Ireland. The vastly less lucrative business of serving jumps mares is also what Wings Of Eagles (2017), Harzand (2016) and Golden Horn are now doing. In the stallion business, middle-distance talent too often turns into sales-ring poison. The last Epsom Derby hero to prove himself a proper top-notch stallion on the flat is Camelot (2012). The instinct for many is to blame Coolmore Stud's commercial instincts for such a situation. The Irish-based operation does exert a massive hold on the global bloodstock game. But it ignores how John Magnier's support for the Derby has been crucial over the last two decades. Without it, the race's relevance would be on an even slippier slope than it is. That Coolmore's prepotent sire Galileo was a proper mile-and-half racehorse in his day seems to have gone over a lot of heads. So, too, does the impact of so much breeding for what often turns out to be cheap speed. The nature of the programme that made Europe the focal point for turf racing worldwide has been undermined. Looking back at Golden Horn's post-Epsom racing career, his trainer John Gosden said recently: 'Of course what do we all do now; we have to go straight to the Eclipse to prove they're not mile-and-a-half horses. And yet the Japanese, they don't mind. Deep Impact ran over two miles. What is this speed, speed, speed with us? We're getting worse than the Americans.' Deep Impact, Japan's most famous racehorse, won the Tokyo Yushun 20 years ago on route to Triple Crown glory. It included Japan's St Leger over almost two miles. In 2020 his son Contrail did the same. It underlines how skewed middle-distance priorities are here; perhaps also how it's no coincidence about the best in Japan increasingly being the best in the world. It's 20 years, too, since the French Derby was dropped in distance to reflect modern European breeding realities. Last Sunday, hours after Croix Du Nord, Aidan O'Brien won it with Camille Pissarro. He said afterwards: 'It's a very important race, and it makes him a very important horse.' Chantilly is a long way from Tokyo. But the prevailing Derby sentiment was similar. A similar narrative will be dutifully spun about tomorrow's Derby. But those words will sound hollow. Short-sighted attitudes to middle distance breeding are having their long-term impact. The odds are the mile and a half Derby winner that will be instrumental in developing a sport's flourishing future is tucked up in his box 10,000 kms away from Epsom. Somethin g for the Weekend It will be the biggest Derby field since 2003 which reflects how open it looks. DAMYSUS (3.30) was at the back of a slowly run Dante and did well to finish second to Pride Of Arras. He looked inexperienced at York, but was the last one off the bridle. Reported progress since can see him in the mix. Gavin Cromwell sends FIERY LUCY (3.10) for Listed contest in Musselburgh on Saturday and the three-year-old can progress for her comeback run at Leopardstown to beat last year's winner, Jabaara.
