EU lifts sweeping energy, transport sanctions on Syria
EU foreign ministers decided on Monday to suspend a series of far-reaching sanctions against Syria to help the country's economic recovery and reconstruction after nearly 14 years of civil war.
The Council decided to remove five financial entities (Industrial Bank, Popular Credit Bank, Saving Bank, Agricultural Cooperative Bank and Syrian Arab Airlines) from the list of entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and to allow funds and economic resources to be made available to the Central Bank of Syria.
The EU has also suspended sectoral measures in the oil, gas, electricity, and transport sectors and introduced exemptions to the ban on banking relations between Syrian banks and financial institutions in the EU to facilitate transactions for humanitarian and reconstruction purposes, as well as for the energy and transport sectors.
The bloc will monitor the country's situation to guarantee that suspensions remain appropriate with Kaja Kallas, the EU's top diplomat, stressing that "if everything does not go right, then we are also ready to put the sanctions back".
"Any kind of government needs to be all-inclusive and taking into account all the different groups that are in Syria,' she said.
Most of the EU's sanctions were imposed following Bashar al-Assad's violent crackdown on Syrian protesters in 2011, including broad restrictions on trade, financial transactions, and key industries such as energy and transport.
The sanctions led to the collapse of EU-Syria economic relations, with trade flows worth €396 million in 2023.
The regime of Bashar al-Assad was toppled in December last year by the Islamist group Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), which has since been calling for the lifting of wide-ranging sanctions to help the war-torn country's economy.
There have also been calls to remove HTS and its leader Ahmed al-Sharaa from international terrorist lists, but the Council decided to maintain such lists in relation to the al-Assad regime, as well as those on arms trafficking, dual-use goods, the chemical weapons sector, and illicit drug trafficking, among others.
The EU's blacklist, which was renewed in November, covers 318 individuals and 86 entities. All are subject to an assets freeze and a travel ban.
More than 90% of Syrians live below the poverty line and at least 16.5 million people across Syria rely on some form of humanitarian assistance to meet their basic needs, according to a report by the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA).
Last week, Human Rights Watch (HRW) warned that sweeping EU, US, and UK sanctions on Syria are hampering the country's economic recovery and preventing millions of Syrians from accessing essential services such as electricity, health care, water, and education.
'Rather than using broad sectoral sanctions as leverage for shifting political objectives, Western governments should recognize their direct harm to civilians and take meaningful steps to lift restrictions that impede access to basic rights,' said Hiba Zayadin, senior Syria researcher at HRW.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
France 24
19 minutes ago
- France 24
Hundreds of civilians were tortured by Wagner mercenaries in Mali: report
The victims, who were interviewed by a consortium of reporters led by investigative outlet Forbidden Stories, spoke from a refugee camp in neighbouring Mauritania about waterboarding, beatings with electrical cables and being burned with cigarette butts. The investigation revealed that the use of illegal detentions and systematic torture, which sometimes led to death, was similar to that which occurred in Ukraine and Russia. The investigation, which was conducted in conjunction with France 24, Le Monde and IStories, identified six detention sites where the Russian paramilitary group held civilians between 2022 and 2024, but the actual number could be much higher, it said. Mali's ruling junta, which seized power in coups in 2020 and 2021, broke off ties with former colonial power France and pivoted towards Russia for political and military support after coming to power. The country never officially admitted Wagner's presence, insisting it only worked with Russian instructors. Nonetheless, last week a Telegram channel affiliated with Wagner announced that the Russian paramilitary group was leaving Mali. Its personnel will be reintegrated into its successor, Africa Corps, another paramilitary group with links to the Kremlin, according to diplomatic and security sources who spoke with AFP. For more than three years, Mali had relied on Wagner in its fight against jihadists who have killed thousands across the country. The paramilitary group's brutal methods on the ground in Mali have been regularly denounced by human rights groups. A UN report accused Mali's army and foreign fighters of executing at least 500 people during a March 2022 anti-jihadist sweep in Moura -- a claim denied by the junta. Western governments believe the foreign fighters were Wagner mercenaries. Last April, bodies were discovered near a Malian military camp, days after the army and Wagner paramilitaries arrested dozens of civilians, most from the Fulani community.
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
Top defence CEO touts need for €100 billion EU defence fund
The EU is wrangling over a provision of Donald Trump's so-called "Big Beautiful Bill" for the US budget that could see European companies taxed higher than others in retaliation for certain taxes imposed on US enterprises overseas, the vice-chair of the European Parliament's tax subcommittee has told Euronews. The German European People's Party MEP Markus Ferber said the European Commission has raised the proposed legislation—already approved by the House of Representatives—in ongoing tariff negotiations with the Trump administration. 'We are concerned because within this 'One Big Beautiful Bill' there are special taxes aimed at jurisdictions that impose taxes on the US,' Ferber told Euronews. He added that jurisdictions like the EU, which have already implemented the OECD agreement establishing a global minimum tax of 15% on multinationals, are directly targeted. 'It could also affect member states that have introduced a digital services tax,' he noted. The OECD agreement, approved by 140 countries - though as yet unratified by the US - introduced a global minimum tax of 15% on the profits of multinational companies, regardless of where those profits are declared, with effect from 1 January 2024. The EU has transposed the agreement into law and applies it to multinationals operating within the Union, to the ire of the Trump administration. Meanwhile countries such as Denmark, Portugal and Poland have implemented digital services taxes targeting US tech giants, while others are in the process of creating one. The US is now looking to retaliate against taxes it deems unfair through a provision of the "Big Beautiful Bill' which would hit foreign investors with a bump in US income tax by five percent points each year, potentially taking the rate up to 20%, in addition to existing taxes. The Commission is concerned, officials said. According to Ferber, the EU executive has put this provision of the US budget bill on the negotiating table. 'But we are not sure yet that the US agreed to put it in the basket,' the MEP said. For several weeks, the EU and the US have been discussing a resolution to the trade dispute that has been ongoing since mid-March. The US impose 50% tariffs on EU steel and aluminium, 25% on cars and 10% on all EU imports. For its part, the EU has prepared countermeasures targeting around €115 billion worth of US products. These measures are either suspended until July or still awaiting approval by EU member states. EU countries pooling tens of billions of their defence spending into a joint EU fund could help finance necessary flagship projects and close capability gaps faster, the incoming head of Europe's largest defence industry association told Euronews, recognising it would however require political leadership. Micael Johansson, the CEO of Swedish defence and security company Saab, said on Wednesday that steps taken by the European Commission to turbocharge defence spending in the EU go in the right direction but that more needs to be done to facilitate countries and companies developing and acquiring new systems together. The EU executive's 'Readiness 2030' plan for defence, unveiled in March, relies on two main financial pillars: the relaxation of fiscal rules for defence spending which the Commission estimated could see €650 billion poured into the sector over the coming four years; and a €150 billion loan instrument called SAFE. Johansson, who will from 15 June take the helm of the Aerospace, Security and Defence Industries Association of Europe (ASD) which represents some 4,000 companies, said that these financing options remain primarily in the hands of each government and based on their own immediate needs. "Maybe it's wishful thinking, but if countries actually would be prepared to spend portions of their defence budget into a fund (...) that would create a common fund which could be worked upon in terms of launching flagship projects," he told Euronews on the sidelines of a European Defence and Security Summit in Brussels. He suggested that the European Defence Industrial Programme (EDIP), a regulation first tabled in early 2024 that is still making its way through the EU lawmaking process, could be the right place for this fund. The regulation currently plans for €1.5 billion from the EU budget to be spent on strengthening the European defence industrial base over the 2025-2027 period, but Johansson said that in order to finance big projects, "a hundred billion euros" might be more appropriate. He acknowledged however that this "is a big step". "I don't really know how to accomplish that. It's political decisions, of course". Defence is a hugely sensitive topic that falls under national competencies in the EU, with member states fiercely protective of their homegrown champions in the sector. But this has led to a deeply fragmented market, suboptimal interoperability between the different systems and an industry less agile to respond to crises. The EU and its member states, 23 of which are also NATO allies, are currently scrambling to plug holes in the bloc's defences and have identified seven priority capability areas including ammunition, drone and anti-drone systems, air defence, military mobility, and electronic warfare among others. European companies will be able to meet most of the continents' needs, Johansson said, but lag behind their US counterparts in some key areas such as integrated air missile systems, long-range strike capabilities, and autonomous systems like sophisticated, high-end drones. With Washington increasingly sending mixed messages over its long-term commitment to Europe's defence as it seeks to pivot some of its resources in the Indo-Pacific region, these "flagship" projects could benefit from a more European approach and joint financing, Johnasson said. This could be through member states or companies creating so-called coalitions of the willing to develop common systems. "But this is not easy because there is a trade-off between national sovereignty and creating interdependencies," he told Euronews. The Commission's defence proposal plans for more collaboration between member states with several of them required to pool their orders together in order to access financing through the SAFE instrument. The EU executive is meanwhile set to unveil a new proposal next week for the defence sector aimed at slashing red tape. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz welcomed Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen at the Federal Chancellery in Berlin on Wednesday. Topping the agenda for the two leaders was Russia's invasion of Ukraine, immigration bilateral ties and global trade and politics. Commenting on recent Russian attacks on Ukraine, Merz stressed that anyone with a reasonably clear view must recognise that 'Russia is a threat to the security' of the entire NATO alliance. As the NATO leaders' summit in the Hague nears, the German chancellor emphasised that 'Russia is a risk to security on both sides of the Atlantic.' Merz noted that the allies are set to discuss a 'historic' increase in defence spending at the summit in light of the threat the Kremlin poses to Europe. 'We will strengthen the European pillar of NATO together,' said Merz. Frederiksen echoed a similar sentiment, as she highlighted the need to bolster the continent's defences as quickly as possible. 'We have to rebuild our European Defence Industry and of course the German Industry is key for us,' said the Danish leader. 'Rearm Europe, do it fast,' added Frederiksen. The two leaders also discussed immigration, where they expressed similar views regarding the need to impose stricter policies. 'We cannot accept everyone who wants to come to Europe, it has to be a democratic decision who can enter our democratic societies', said Frederikse. Chancellor Merz praised the migration policy of Denmark, saying 'What Denmark has achieved in recent years is truly exemplary and together we are also moving towards new and stricter asylum rules in the European Union.' Regarding the repatriation of migrants, Merz said noted that, if necessary, 'there will also be corresponding changes to the legal basis'. Merz and Frederiksen also spoke about the highly volatile and unstable global trade environment, exacerbated by US President Donald Trump's global tariffs, which have spiralled stock markets internationally. The German leader welcomed the announcement of a new US-China trade deal, after the two nations agreed on a framework of a new deal to ease tensions and resolve trade disputes. 'I therefore welcome the fact that there has been such an agreement between America and China, and I very much hope that we will succeed in reaching similar agreements with America, for example regarding tariffs, in the near future,' said Merz. The pair also discussed the ongoing threat to Greenland, after Trump renewed his interest in 'taking ownership' of the arctic island; an overseas territory of Denmark. "The principle of the inviolability of borders is enshrined in international law and is not up for discussion,' said Merz. 'We stand closely by our Danish friends on these issues and will continue to do so.' Frederiksen once again shot down Trump's remarks, insisting that Greenland is not for sale and its sovereignty is non-negotiable. "Sovereignty of states, the territorial integrity, and by the way the future of Greenland can only be decided in Greenland by the Greenlandic people." She added that she thought Trump was "serious" when it comes to Greenland "and I have to say that so are we."
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
EU court upholds ban on deep-sea fishing in Atlantic
A ban on deep-sea fishing in parts of the Atlantic rich with marine life has been upheld by the EU's General Court. It means these areas will remain restricted to help preserve vulnerable species and ecosystems. The decision comes after the same court ruled last month in a German case that Marine Protected Areas must be protected from bottom trawling. Separate legal actions were filed by the Spanish government and fishermen from Galicia and Asturias who challenged a 2016 EU rule that banned fishing with nets and longlines in 87 areas of the Atlantic off the coasts of Spain, Ireland, Portugal and France. When the rules came into effect in 2022, Spain sued the European Commission, claiming that it failed to consider the economic damage to fishermen. It also questioned the scientific methods used to determine how banned fishing gear and protected areas were chosen. The rules were adopted by the EU to conserve fish stocks in the deep sea and to protect marine life from fishing gear being dragged along the sea floor. Among other things, these regulations outlaw the controversial fishing practice of bottom trawling below a depth of 800 metres in these parts of the north-east Atlantic. Species found at depth in the oceans, such as alfonsinos, black scabbardfish, roundnose grenadier, red seabream and some shark species, collapse quickly because they are vulnerable to fishing and slow to reproduce, according to the EU. The court stressed that the decision to protect these areas was in line with EU law. In its ruling, it said that the 87 areas were chosen because of the 'proven or provable presence of protected species'. Due to the vulnerability of these areas, it said that regulators were not required to assess whether some kinds of fishing gear were less damaging or the economic impact on fishermen. The ruling also allows the European Commission to continue using scientific input from the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea in determining future conservation areas. Lawyers from environmental organisation ClientEarth say the ruling is likely to have a positive impact on other legal cases on bottom trawling happening across the EU. 'There is now too much evidence about the damage wrought by wide-scale, repeat bottom trawling to ignore,' says ClientEarth ocean lawyer Francesco Maletto. 'We are heartened to see the EU's General Court again uphold the principles of legal protection, keeping these areas of the ocean safe from harm, and ensuring healthy fish and marine wildlife populations.' ClientEarth and others have launched legal action against multiple national governments, as well as bringing complaints to the EU itself, over the failure to tackle harmful fishing taking place in Marine Protected Areas. At last count, no EU country had a definitive roadmap to ban bottom trawling in zones designated for official protection. After footage of bottom trawling from the film Ocean with David Attenborough shocked the world, calls for action have heightened. Some commitments to ban the practice have emerged from the UN Ocean Conference this week in Nice, with the UK and France making initial commitments to crack down on the practice.
