Why Trade Wars Lead to Real Wars-and This Time May Be No Different
"Freedom of trade among the nations is an essential factor in securing and maintaining the peace of the world," the Free Trade League of America said in a passionate appeal.
"History gives evidence that wars have very largely been the result of the struggle for markets, of protests against tariff barriers and prohibitions."
The year was 1921 and the appeal went unheeded.
Tariffs and trade barriers, including those imposed by the United States in the years to follow, shaped a global environment that helped put the world on the road to World War II. Even more directly, the U.S. oil embargo on Japan in mid-1941 was a spur for the attack on Pearl Harbor that brought the United States into the war.
From at least the time of Ancient Greece, tariffs and trade restrictions have been a factor behind wars. As U.S. President Donald Trumpimposes tariffs worldwide and particularly on America's greatest rival, China, the question is whether it will happen again.
"Considering how quickly we've seen U.S.-Canadian relations sour since Trump's announcement of punitive tariffs just a few months back, it's easy to imagine how, historically, trade conflicts can heighten nationalist tensions, geopolitical rivalry, and enhance the possibility of military conflict," said Exeter University historian Dr. Marc-William Palen, author of Pax Economica: Left-Wing Visions of a Free Trade World.
"Of course, this gets into a gray area surrounding correlation versus causation, but most peace workers and anti-imperialists since the mid-19th century have argued that protective tariffs, embargoes, and sanctions lead to trade wars and quickly turn allies into enemies."
Among the earliest examples were the economic sanctions and trade restrictions imposed by Athens before 430 B.C. on the city-state of Megara, an ally of Sparta, under the so-called Megarian Decree: a factor in the ensuing Peloponnesian wars.
Other wars linked to tariffs, trade and taxes include those between the English and Dutch in the 17th century, the American Revolutionary War and the war of 1812-after the British stopped Americans accessing lucrative foreign markets. Palen also cited the tariff war between Austria-Hungary and Serbia as a factor in the lead-up to World War I.
"History is littered with examples of trade disputes escalating into armed conflict," says the website of the World Trade Organization, which was set up after World War II in part to avoid a repeat of the pre-war trade tensions. "It's a claim that should not be exaggerated, but there is truth in it."
As in the case of the once dominant United States and rapidly militarizing China, trade wars may be part of an overall competition for power and therefore as much an indicator of hostilities to come as a cause of them.
"It is easier to find example of wars leading to trade barriers than the reverse. And wars are typically the product of many factors, so it is important not to exaggerate the impact of trade barriers as a causal factor," Kevin O'Rourke of CNRS and Sciences Po in Paris told Newsweek. "Nonetheless, trade barriers can heighten tensions between countries, heighten nationalism, and empower those seeking confrontation."
Whether or not that was the intention, Trump's imposition of increasing tariffs on China has been met by defiance rather than discussion.
"In essence, what China now declares is that it is prepared to fight to the end: trade war, tariff war, technology war, or real war," Victor Gao of the Center for China and Globalization, a Beijing think tank, told Al Arabiya television.
Disconnecting markets as a result of a trade war can also remove an obstacle to conflict, in that closely bound economies may be less likely to go to war because of the risk of damage that either would face.
If the damage has already been done and economies have essentially decoupled from each other already, then there is less additional risk to consider through outright confrontation. With threats of U.S. tariffs as high as 245 percent, the risk to trade is not that it becomes more expensive but that it ceases altogether.
Trade restrictions are also a sensitive subject for China, with Communist Party leaders long pointing to the "century of humiliation" China endured after its markets were forced open by British and other Western imperial powers seeking to sell opium and other goods in the 19th century.
Trump now accuses China of restricting its domestic market for U.S. and other foreign exporters, as well as of intellectual property theft, currency manipulation and subsidies to give it an unfair economic advantage that is taking U.S. jobs and also helping it fund a military buildup that challenges the United States.
"China's historical memory is longer than most. Ever since the European imperial powers used gunboats to force open and carve up Chinese markets across the 19th century, subsequent Chinese governments have remained quite sensitive to any perceived coercive Western trade policies directed against them," Palen.
"While the growing tariff war between the U.S. and China doesn't make military conflict certain, it does make the possibility more likely."
Related Articles
US Ally Sends Ships to New China-Funded Naval BaseDonald Trump Issues Warning to China Over 'Cheating' Around TariffsBoeing Jet Returns to US From China as Trade War BitesRobots Race Humans in World's First Bipedal Half-Marathon
2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
19 minutes ago
- Axios
MAGA's blue-collar base waits patiently for populist payoff
President Trump 's second term has been a payday for the powerful, exposing a disconnect in his promise to deliver for "the forgotten man" of America's working class. Why it matters: The populist paradox at the heart of MAGA — a movement fueled by economic grievance and championed by a New York billionaire — has never been more pronounced. Trump's blue-collar base remains fiercely loyal, energized by his hardline stances on immigration, trade and culture — and patient that his economic "Golden Age" will materialize. But so far, the clearest financial rewards of Trump's tenure are flowing upward — to wealthy donors, family members, insiders and the president himself. The big picture: Trump's inner circle has shattered norms around profiting from the presidency, dulling public outrage to the point where even the most brazen access schemes draw only fleeting scrutiny. Take crypto: The top holders of Trump's meme coin were granted an exclusive dinner last month at the president's Virginia golf club, where some paid millions for access. The White House refused to release the guest list, but wealthy foreigners — including a Chinese billionaire who faced SEC charges under the Biden administration — were among those revealed to be in attendance. Trump's sons, meanwhile, are spearheading a family crypto venture that has raked in hundreds of millions of dollars. Trump Media, the parent company of Truth Social, is raising $2.5 billion to buy Bitcoin. All of this — plus a flurry of lucrative real estate deals overseas — is playing out as Trump presides over U.S. foreign policy and the fate of crypto regulation. Zoom in: Now take Trump's relationship with his donors. His Cabinet is the wealthiest in American history, stocked with mega-donors whose combined net worth reaches well into the billions — even discounting estranged former adviser Elon Musk. Trump has granted pardons or clemency to a stream of white-collar criminals and wealthy tax cheats, many of whom hired lobbyists, donated to the president or raised money on his behalf. The Wall Street Journal found that the biggest corporate and individual donors to Trump's inauguration later received relief from investigations, U.S. market access and plum postings in the administration. The other side: Trump officials wholly reject the premise that the administration's policies don't benefit the working-class Americans who voted for the president en masse. The White House points to cooling inflation, plummeting border crossings, and the tariff-driven re-shoring of manufacturing as evidence of Trump delivering on his core promises. They frame his crypto push, AI acceleration and deregulatory agenda as driving forces behind a pro-growth tide that will lift all boats — including for middle- and working-class Americans. Reality check: Inflation may remain benign for now, but there are growing signs businesses are experiencing higher prices and passing some or all of those costs directly through to consumers, Axios managing editor for business Ben Berkowitz notes. While companies have made encouraging public statements about re-shoring, in almost all of those cases it's too soon for any shovels to be in the ground. What to watch: Trump's "One, Big, Beautiful Bill" is packed with populist red meat, including the extension of his first-term tax cuts, the elimination of taxes on tips and overtime, and $1,000 " Trump Accounts" for newborns. "All his hopes and dreams on that front are pinned to that reconciliation bill," one MAGA operative told Axios, characterizing it as "the bulk" of Trump's legislative agenda for the middle class. "The president expects the Senate to quickly pass the One, Big, Beautiful Bill, codifying huge tax cuts that will mean permanent savings for hardworking Americans," White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers said. Between the lines: Several independent analyses project that the wealthiest Americans would benefit most from the bill. A Penn Wharton study that found the top 10% of earners would reap 70% of the legislation's total value. The Congressional Budget Office projects that Medicaid work requirements and other health care cuts would leave about 11 million people uninsured by 2034. Millions could also be forced off of food stamps. "Medicaid, you gotta be careful," former Trump adviser Steve Bannon said on his "War Room" podcast in February. "Because a lot of MAGAs are on Medicaid, I'm telling you. If you don't think so, you are dead wrong." Factory investments in red districts are expected to suffer most from the bill's rollback of clean energy credits included in President Biden's Inflation Reduction Act. The bottom line: Inside the MAGA movement, there's little concern about who's getting rich as long as Trump keeps fighting the culture wars, deporting immigrants and tearing down liberal institutions.


CNN
22 minutes ago
- CNN
Sellers: US under Trump is ‘drifting towards authoritarianism' – full interview
CNN Political Commentators Bakari Sellers, Xochitl Hinojosa, Kristen Soltis Anderson, and Republican Rep. Nicole Malliotakis join CNN's Dana Bash to respond to President Trump's decision to federalize thousands of National Guard troops and deploy them to Los Angeles.


CNN
23 minutes ago
- CNN
GOP Sen. Johnson: Trump's bill ‘just doesn't go far enough' to cut spending
Republican Sen. Ron Johnson tells CNN's Dana Bash that "nothing's really changed" in his criticism of President Trump's spending and tax cut bill.