logo
Madras High Court CJ Shrivastava promises to make the court continue to remain a voice for the voiceless

Madras High Court CJ Shrivastava promises to make the court continue to remain a voice for the voiceless

CHENNAI: Emphasising the need for compassion in the administration of justice, the new Chief Justice of Madras High Court Manindra Mohan Shrivastava on Tuesday said he would ensure the court continues to remain the voice for the voiceless and the refuge for the oppressed and marginalised sections of society.
Addressing the welcome ceremony held in the court premises, he said his foremost duty is to 'preserve and enhance the dignity and independence' of the court.
'The judiciary must remain ever alert not only to protect individual liberty but also to ensure access to justice is not an abstract Constitutional promise but a live reality for the people, especially the poor, the voiceless and the marginalised sections, " he stated.
He emphasised the 'need for compassion in the administration of justice' and said the law in its abstract can sometimes seem distant, but when it touches lives it heals, empowers and restores. Law without justice is a wound without cure.
Stating that he would strive for maintaining judicial independence and ensuring the constitutional values and rule of law are upheld, the CJ promised to work in to enhance the dignity of the High Court and strive to make the judicial process more efficient, transparent and more accessible to the common man.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

We have forgotten the past, aberration of last 33 years should not haunt us anymore: Advocate GA Lone
We have forgotten the past, aberration of last 33 years should not haunt us anymore: Advocate GA Lone

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

We have forgotten the past, aberration of last 33 years should not haunt us anymore: Advocate GA Lone

Prominent advocate from Jammu and Kashmir Ghulam Ahmad Lone said the situation in the region has haunted lawyers for long and only four to five lawyers from J&K and Ladakh have been elevated to the bench of the High Court in the last 33 years. Lone, was speaking in presence of Chief Justice of India Bhushan Ramkrishna Gavai and other legal luminaries at the North Zone Regional Conference organised by the National Legal Services Authority (NALSA) in collaboration with the High Court of J&K and Ladakh and J&K Legal Services Authority at the Sher-e-Kashmir International Convention Centre on the banks of Dal Lake in Srinagar. 'The Bar Association worked in harmony with the High Court since its inception in 1928 and provided justice to all without fear, favor or ill will…unfortunately we had an aberration in the last decade of the 20th century (in J&K). The whole apparatus was affected so were the lawyers. We have changed now but those aberrations are still haunting us,' said Lone. He further explained, 'they are haunting us because in the last 33 years there are only four to five lawyers from J&K and Ladakh who have been elevated to the bench of the High Court.' He said CJI's remarks that lawyers from this region (J&K and Ladakh) were as brilliant as lawyers from other parts of the country was encouraging and if that is so the 'past aberrations should no longer haunt the lawyer community.' 'We are one with you. We want to work in harmony and with dedication and uphold principles of law and constitution. We are committed to that,' said Lone adding, 'we make a pledge here that we have forgotten the past.' He quoted famous Persian poet-philosopher and jurist Maulana Rumi saying, 'Yesterday I was clever and I wanted to change the world. Today I am wise and I want to change myself.' Lone also delved into the history of J&K and genesis of the legal system here which he claimed was formally introduced by the Dogra rulers of the region. 'Kashmir, as per Raj Tarangini of Kalhana, is a civilization and culture since 2000 to 3000 BC. We then witnessed a Sufi movement that proclaimed omnipotence and omnipresence of God and taught us to respect people irrespective of race, culture, caste, language or religion. We still uphold those principles,' said Lone. He further added that the region witnessed 'several invasions by Mughals, Afghans and Sikhs.' 'None of them left any legacy. They came, ruled the region and left. They did not give us any legal jurisprudence or any legal system. It is not mentioned in any history book,' said Lone adding, 'then after 1846 Dogra rulers were the first to introduce administrative, judicial and revenue systems here and provided laws, which we are still following.' 'Dogra rulers started the High Court in 1928. They also formed the Board of Judicial Advisors, who would hear appeals against the High Court,' said Lone, adding, 'You would understand the system of justice and fairness we had that the then Maharaja has not even once, to my knowledge, objected to decision of their (High Court and Board) and accepted their orders despite being a monarch.'

‘You are a comedy piece': Courtroom drama between Madras High Court judge, advocate who accused him of casteism
‘You are a comedy piece': Courtroom drama between Madras High Court judge, advocate who accused him of casteism

Indian Express

time4 hours ago

  • Indian Express

‘You are a comedy piece': Courtroom drama between Madras High Court judge, advocate who accused him of casteism

In a dramatic culmination of courtroom tension, the Madras High Court on Monday referred to the Chief Justice a contentious matter involving contempt allegations against Advocate S Vanchinathan, who had earlier accused Justice G R Swaminathan of caste and communal bias in his judicial conduct. The Division Bench of Justices Swaminathan and K Rajasekar, which had summoned the lawyer for an in-person explanation, declared that it would no longer proceed with the matter and, instead, directed the Registry to place the entire record before the Chief Justice. 'This matter may now be placed before the Hon'ble Chief Justice,' Justice Swaminathan said toward the end of the hearing, acknowledging repeated concerns over conflict of interest, including appeals from eight retired judges of the Madras High Court who had earlier urged the Bench to step back. Vanchinathan, a practising advocate and human rights activist based in Madurai, appeared in court on Monday in response to a summons issued on July 24. The court had sought a direct answer from him on whether he stood by his remarks in various media interviews and social media posts, where he allegedly accused Justice Swaminathan of favouring advocates from Brahmin backgrounds and targeting lawyers from Scheduled Caste communities. The Bench had asked, 'Do you continue to maintain your allegation that one of us is casteist in the discharge of judicial functions?' Vanchinathan declined to answer orally and requested that the court put its question in writing. In response, the Bench issued a formal questionnaire and posted the matter for July 28 — the day's hearing that eventually ended with the matter being transferred. On Monday, Justice Swaminathan asked Vanchinathan in open court regarding the allegations and also over what he described as a sustained smear campaign. 'For four years, you have been slandering me. We are also conscious of the rules of procedure. We are not fools,' the judge said. 'We will not be intimidated or cowed down. Judicial independence is supreme.' At one point during the hearing, he said, 'You are a comedy piece. I don't know who called you all revolutionaries. You are all comedy pieces.' While the court maintained that it had not officially initiated contempt proceedings, it observed that the line between criticism of judgments and personal attacks had been crossed. '(It is) most unfortunate that some retired judges are rendering opinions while the matter is pending before us,' Justice Swaminathan said. The Bench claimed that the proceedings against Vanchinathan 'have nothing to do' with the complaint he filed with the Chief Justice of India. The court said that its action was only a response to Vanchinathan's recent media interviews and online posts, which it said cast aspersions on the judge's integrity. The Bench also described Vanchinathan's recent public meeting and comments as 'tentatively amounting to contempt', though it stopped short of initiating any formal action, noting again that the matter was now being left to the discretion of the Chief Justice. Several advocates staged a demonstration in support of Vanchinathan, demanding that the contempt matter be dropped.

Delhi HC seeks ED reply on plea of Kashmiri separatist leader's wife to quash case
Delhi HC seeks ED reply on plea of Kashmiri separatist leader's wife to quash case

Hans India

time5 hours ago

  • Hans India

Delhi HC seeks ED reply on plea of Kashmiri separatist leader's wife to quash case

New Delhi: The Delhi High Court on Monday sought Enforcement Directorate's response on an application filed by Bilquies Shah, wife of Kashmiri separatist leader Shabir Shah, seeking quashing of a 2007 money laundering case related to alleged terror financing. Justice Sanjeev Narula issued notice to ED for its response and posted the hearing for September 26. Bilquies is accused of receiving Rs 2.08 crore from co-accused Mohd Aslam Wani. Advocate M S Khan, appearing for Bilquies, said the predicate offence related case, based on which the ED lodged the present FIR, was against Wani, who was acquitted of all offences except for possession of arms by a trial court in November 2010. The High Court in October 2017 upheld the trial court 2010 order. 'Consequently, the allegations by the prosecution regarding the generation of proceeds of crime from criminal activities related to the scheduled offence do not hold water. This perfectly aligns with the legal principle that if the underlying scheduled offence does not stand, the related proceedings under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) also falls flat,' Khan argued. The High Court on July 23 issued notice to ED on a similar plea of Wani. 'Issue similar order,' the court said on Monday. Charges against Wani and Shabir Shah were framed in January 2017, and later in 2021 Bilquies was arrayed as an accused by a supplementary chargesheet in the case. Khan said despite the nearly seven years, only four of the 33 witnesses were examined. The ED action against the two was in relation to a August 2005 case, in which Delhi Police's Special Cell arrested Wani, a dealer who claimed that he passed on Rs 2.25 crore to Shah. In 2010, a Delhi court cleared Wani of terror funding charges but convicted him under the Arms Act. The ED registered a criminal case under PMLA against Shah and Wani. Wani was arrested allegedly with Rs 63 lakh, received through 'hawala' channels from the Middle East, and a large cache of ammunition, on August 26, 2005. He allegedly told the police that Rs 50 lakh was to be delivered to Shah and Rs 10 lakh to Jaish-e-Mohammad area commander in Srinagar, Abu Baqar, and that the rest was his commission. Wani, who hails from Srinagar, also claimed delivering around Rs 2.25 crore to Shah and his kin in multiple instalments.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store