logo
Rural schools feel pinch from Trump admin's cuts to mental health grants

Rural schools feel pinch from Trump admin's cuts to mental health grants

Time of India8 hours ago

Washington: In parts of rural upstate New York, schools have more than 1,100 students for every mental health provider. In a far-flung region with little public transportation, those few school counsellors often are the only mental health professionals available to students.
Hennessey
Lustica
has been overseeing grant-funded efforts to train and hire more school psychologists, counsellors and social workers in the Finger Lakes region, but those efforts may soon come to end - a casualty of the
Trump
administration's decision to cancel school mental health grants around the country.
"Cutting this funding is just going to devastate kids," said Lustica, project director of the Wellness Workforce Collaborative in the Seneca Falls Central School District. "The workforce that we're developing, just in my 21 school districts it's over 20,000 kids that are going to be impacted by this and not have the mental health support that they need."
The $1 billion in grants for school-based mental health programs were part of a sweeping gun violence bill signed by President Joe Biden in 2022 in response to the school shooting in Uvalde, Texas. The grants were meant to help schools hire more psychologists, counsellors and other mental health workers, especially in rural areas.
Under the Biden administration, the department prioritised applicants who showed how they would increase the number of providers from diverse backgrounds, or from communities directly served by the school district. But President
Donald Trump
's administration took issue with aspects of the grant programmes that touched on race, saying they were harmful to students.
"We owe it to American families to ensure that taxpayer dollars are supporting evidence-based practices that are truly focused on improving students' mental health," Education Department spokesperson
Madi Biedermann
said.
School districts around the US cut off training and retention programmes
Lustica learned of her grant's cancellation in April in a two-page letter from the Education Department, which said the government found that her work violated civil rights law. It did not specify how.
Lustica is planning to appeal the decision. She rejected the letter's characterisation of her work, saying she and her colleagues abide by a code of ethics that honours each person's individuality, regardless of race, gender or identity.
"The rhetoric is just false," Lustica said. "I don't know how else to say it. I think if you looked at these programmes and looked at the impact that these programs have in our rural school districts, and the stories that kids will tell you about the mental health professionals that are in their schools, it has helped them because of this programme."
The grants supported programmes in districts across the country. In California, West Contra Costa Unified School District will lose nearly $4 million in funding. In Alabama, Birmingham City Schools was notified it would not receive the rest of a $15 million grant it was using to train, hire and retain mental health staff.
In Wisconsin, the state's Department of Public Instruction will lose $8 million allocated for the next four years. The state had used the money to boost retention and expand programmes to encourage high schoolers to pursue careers in school-based mental health.
"At a time when communities are urgently asking for help serving mental health needs, this decision is indefensible," state superintendent Jill Underly said in a statement.
In recent House and Senate hearings, Democrats pressed Education Secretary Linda
McMahon
on the end of the grants and the impact on students. McMahon told them mental health is a priority and the grants would be rebid and reissued.
"Anyone who works or spends time with kids knows these grants were funding desperately needed access to mental health care services," American Federation of Teachers president
Randi Weingarten
said in a statement. "Cancelling the funding now is a cruel, reckless act that puts millions of children at risk."
Grant programmes put more mental health specialists in schools
The strains on youth mental health are acute in many rural school districts.
In one upstate New York district, half the students have had to move due to economic hardship in the last five years, creating instability that can affect their mental health, Lustica said. In a survey of students from sixth through 12th grade in one county, nearly half reported feeling sad or depressed most of the time; one in three said their lives lacked clear purpose or meaning.
"We've got huge amounts of depression, huge amounts of anxiety, lots of trauma and not enough providers," Lustica said. "School is the place where kids are getting a lot of the services they need."
Some families in the region are unable to afford private counselling or are unable to get their children to appointments given transportation challenges, said Danielle Legg, a graduate student who did an internship as a school social worker with funding from the grant programme.
"Their access to mental health care truly is limited to when they're in school and there's a provider there that can see them, and it's vital," Legg said.
In the past three years, 176 students completed their mental health training through the programme Lustica oversees, and 85% of them were hired into shortage areas, she said.
The programme that offered training to graduate students at schools helped address staffing needs and inspired many to pursue careers in educational settings, said Susan
McGowan
, a school social worker who supervised graduate students in Geneva City School District.
"It just feels, to me, really catastrophic," McGowan said of the grant cancellation. "These positions are difficult to fill, so when you get grad students who are willing to work hand in hand with other professionals in their building, you're actually building your capacity as far as staffing goes and you're supporting teachers."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Are U.S. Presidents selling war for profit?
Are U.S. Presidents selling war for profit?

India Today

timean hour ago

  • India Today

Are U.S. Presidents selling war for profit?

Behind the pomp of presidential summits and NATO handshakes lies an uncomfortable truth—America's foreign policy isn't driven by diplomacy, but by the defence lobby's bottom line. From Obama's Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech to Trump's brash missile marketing, every US president has doubled as the world's most powerful arms dealer. The numbers don't lie. Defence giants like Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and Raytheon pump over 80 million annually into lobbying, with nearly 280 million flowing to political campaigns since 1990. This isn't charity—it's investment in influence. Every dollar spent returns tenfold in government contracts and overseas sales NATO's latest pledge makes this crystal clear. By 2035, member states must spend 5% of GDP on "defence"—a windfall wrapped in security rhetoric. Buried in the fine print: 3.5% goes directly to military kit, much of it stamped "Made in USA." European taxpayers will fund American factories whilst their own public services face the revolving door spins faster than a Chinook's rotors. Pentagon officials become corporate executives, senators join defence boards, and generals turn consultant. This ensures continuity regardless of election results—the real winners remain never bothered with subtlety, openly flogging Patriot missiles at NATO summits like a market trader hawking knockoff watches. Biden played the statesman whilst quietly expediting record arms transfers to Ukraine. Obama collected his peace prize then approved 135 billion in weapons sales. Different styles, identical tragedy became America's opportunity. Every HIMARS rocket fired was a billboard for US firepower. Every Patriot battery deployed was a sales demonstration. Zelensky's desperate pleas for seven more systems weren't just about survival—they were free advertising for American defence human cost is staggering, but so is the opportunity cost. Half of America's discretionary budget feeds the military machine whilst schools crumble and hospitals close. NATO's spending spree threatens similar austerity across isn't foreign policy—it's product placement with geopolitical consequences. When the next crisis erupts, remember: someone dies, but someone else gets rich. In America's war economy, that's not a bug—it's the entire bloody point.- Ends

Trump halts trade talks with Canada over digital tax, threatens new tariffs
Trump halts trade talks with Canada over digital tax, threatens new tariffs

India Today

timean hour ago

  • India Today

Trump halts trade talks with Canada over digital tax, threatens new tariffs

US President Donald Trump announced Friday that the United States is immediately ending all trade talks with Canada, citing the country's digital services tax as the reason for the abrupt a post on Truth Social, Trump called the tax "a direct and blatant attack on our country" and accused Canada of mirroring similar measures implemented by the European Union. 'Based on this egregious Tax, we are hereby terminating ALL discussions on Trade with Canada, effective immediately,' Trump president added that his administration would notify Canada within the next seven days of the new tariffs it will face to continue doing business with the United States. The digital services tax, which took effect in June 2024, imposes a 3% levy on revenues earned by large companies from digital services provided to Canadian users. The measure applies to online advertising, social media platforms, digital marketplaces, and sales involving user data. The first tax payments are scheduled to be collected on further criticized Canada's overall trade practices, calling it 'a very difficult Country to TRADE with,' and claimed that Canadian tariffs on US dairy products can reach as high as 400 per move to terminate trade talks comes amid ongoing tensions between the two countries, following a series of tariffs imposed by the Trump administration earlier this responded with retaliatory duties on American goods. Although both sides have expressed a desire to renegotiate their trade framework, progress has US-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), negotiated during Trump's first term, is scheduled for review and possible renegotiation by 2026. However, Trump and Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney had previously aimed to reach a revised agreement by July 21, 2025.- EndsTune InMust Watch

Donald Trump says terminating trade talks with Canada over digital services tax, warns of new tariff
Donald Trump says terminating trade talks with Canada over digital services tax, warns of new tariff

Hindustan Times

timean hour ago

  • Hindustan Times

Donald Trump says terminating trade talks with Canada over digital services tax, warns of new tariff

United States President Donald Trump announced that he is terminating all trade discussions with Canada over the latter's Digital Services Tax on American tech companies, calling it 'direct and blatant attack' on the US. Canada's Digital Services Tax, which Trump called 'direct and blatant attack' on the US, is set to take effect from Monday.(File/AP) Calling Canada, US' neighbour, a 'very difficult country to deal with', Trump added that he plans to retaliate with another tariff on Canada which will be announced within the next seven days. In a post on TruthSocial on Friday, Trump wrote, 'We have just been informed that Canada, a very difficult Country to TRADE with, including the fact that they have charged our Farmers as much as 400% Tariffs, for years, on Dairy Products, has just announced that they are putting a Digital Services Tax on our American Technology Companies, which is a direct and blatant attack on our Country.' 'They are obviously copying the European Union, which has done the same thing, and is currently under discussion with us, also. Based on this egregious Tax, we are hereby terminating ALL discussions on Trade with Canada, effective immediately,' he added. "We will let Canada know the Tariff that they will be paying to do business with the United States of America within the next seven day period. Thank you for your attention to this matter!' Canada's Digital Services Tax is set to take effect from Monday. What is Canada's Digital Services Tax? Canada's Digital Services Tax (DST) is a 3% tax on revenue from specific digital services provided to Canadian users, enacted through the Digital Services Tax Act, which received royal assent on June 20, 2024, and took effect on June 28, 2024. The digital services tax applies at a rate of 3% on revenue earned from 'certain digital services that rely on engagement, data, and content contributions of Canadian users' and 'certain sales or licensing of Canadian user data', according to the government of Canada. The tax will hit US tech giants such as Amazon, Google, Meta, Uber, and Airbnb and will levy a 3% tax on the money they make from Canadian users. The tax will be applied retroactively on revenues earned since January 1, 2022, meaning that the US companies will owe about $2 billion by the end of this month, reported AP.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store