logo
Here's what to know about clean energy in Republican megabill headed to Trump

Here's what to know about clean energy in Republican megabill headed to Trump

Time of India7 hours ago
Congress passed a massive tax and spending cuts package Thursday that curbs billions of dollars in spending across clean energy. That means people will be paying a lot more for home solar, energy efficiency and other green technologies - and the nation's efforts to address climate change just got a lot more challenging.
The bill that awaits President
Donald Trump
's signature supports mining, drilling and production of the oil, coal and gas that are largely driving Earth's warming and the increasingly deadly and costly extreme weather that comes with it. Producing and burning these fossil fuels also contributes to air pollution and human health problems.
At the same time, the bill slashes tax credits for clean technologies including wind and solar energy. That will likely mean delay or cancellation of countless projects, affecting thousands of jobs and driving up household energy costs.
Here are four things to know about what the bill means for clean energy:
Cuts to home energy credits will make updates more costly
The climate law passed during former President
Joe Biden
's term included tax credits for systems and projects at home - like solar and batteries - that save homeowners money over time and significantly cut greenhouse gas emissions.
These systems have gotten cheaper over the years but they're still hefty upfront expenses that some homeowners would struggle to absorb without the credits. An average rooftop solar installation can run $20,000 or more; the credit has covered almost one-third of that. An average heat pump typically costs several thousand dollars; the tax credit reimbursed up to 30% of the cost, or $2,000.
The U.S. Treasury Department said more than 2 million families claimed more than $2 billion of the credit for upgrades such as windows, insulation, heating and cooling systems in tax year 2023 returns. More than 1.2 million families claimed more than $6 billion in the credit for solar installations, solar water heating, geothermal heat pumps and battery storage and other improvements that same year.
The bill ends both tax credits at the end of this year.
"No one asked Congress to make their energy bills even higher," said
Steven Nadel
, executive director of the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, a nonprofit that advocates for cutting energy waste. "Taking away incentives for energy-saving improvements would raise monthly bills for families and businesses."
But Republican lawmakers hailed the measure. Republican Sen.
Mike Crapo
of Idaho, the chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, said it helps unleash American energy and will save taxpayers money.
"Extending good tax policy, delivering targeted relief and reining in wasteful spending is the best way to restore economic prosperity and opportunity for all Americans," he said.
Electric vehicle credits disappear
The bill eliminates credits of up to $7,500 for buyers of new electric vehicles and up to $4,000 for buyers of used
EVs
.
That's likely to hurt the growth of a technology that is seen as critical to cutting down on a big source of Earth's warming. Transportation is the largest single source of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions - 28% in 2022, according to the Environmental Protection Agency.
EV sales have grown steadily, making up about 8% of new car sales in the U.S. last year, according to Motorintelligence.com. Biden had set a target for half of all new vehicles sold in the U.S. to be electric by 2030.
But that purchase may be harder for consumers to swallow without a credit. EVs sold for an average of $57,734 in May, while new vehicles overall sold at an average of $48,799, according to Kelley Blue Book.
The credits go away after Sept. 30.
Big wind and solar projects will struggle to qualify for tax credits
For large-scale wind and solar, the bill speeds up the timelines projects must meet to qualify for a tax credit. The industry says it will be nearly impossible for many projects to meet those accelerated timelines, putting massive projects from Colorado to Texas to Arizona at risk.
The bill allows a full tax credit for wind and solar developments that start construction within a year of the law's enactment. But projects that begin more than a year after the bill's passage have to be operational by the end of 2027 or they won't get a credit.
Atlas Public Policy, a policy consultancy, said roughly 28 gigawatts of wind and solar projects are planned to be operational after the start of 2028 but haven't begun construction yet. Under the bill, they're unlikely to qualify for a credit.
Wind provides about 10% of the electricity generated in the U.S., according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, with a goal of 20% by 2030. Solar is at about 4%, with the industry's target at one point to reach 30% by the end of the decade.
Clean energy advocates, developers and investors say wind and solar are crucial for the nation's renewables ambitions, and tax credits help to make them viable. But
Trump
has pulled the U.S. out of the Paris agreement, which calls on signatories to try to keep global temperatures from warming 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) above pre-industrial times.
Instead, the bill supports traditional fossil fuels such as oil, natural gas and coal, as well as nuclear power. Proponents say it will increase reliability since the wind doesn't always blow and the sun doesn't always shine.
"Americans need reliable and affordable energy, wasteful spending needs to be cut, and our country needs to be able to build again," said Sen.
Shelley Moore Capito
, R-W.Va, applauding the bill.
Experts say watch out for higher energy prices
But others say Americans can expect to see higher utility bills. That's unwelcome news at a time when the nation's growth in data centers, driven by demand for artificial intelligence, are sending energy use higher, and when climate change is fueling more frequent extreme weather.
Nonpartisan and energy groups estimate the bill's passage could increase average annual electricity costs by more than $100 per household by next year. If fewer solar and wind projects are added to the grid because there is less incentive and it is too expensive for developers to do so without credits, some states could see increases of more than $200.
"At a time when energy demand is surging and families are already struggling to make ends meet, this bill would raise costs, make the grid less reliable, and make the U.S. more dependent on foreign oil," said
Lori Lodes
, executive director of climate action advocacy group Climate Power. "It threatens our power supply just as extreme weather and record demand are putting historic strain on the grid, forcing brownouts and blackouts across the country."
The loss of tax credits might not immediately impact project plans. But increased uncertainty makes it more difficult to invest in innovative new technologies and maintain national security.
___
Alexa St. John is an Associated Press climate reporter. Follow her on X: @alexa_stjohn. Reach her at ast.john@ap.org.
___
Read more of AP's climate coverage at http://www.apnews.com/climate-and-environment
___
The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US Supreme Court sides with Trump administration in controversial deportation case
US Supreme Court sides with Trump administration in controversial deportation case

Hindustan Times

time24 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

US Supreme Court sides with Trump administration in controversial deportation case

The Supreme Court on Thursday cleared the way for the deportation of several immigrants who were put on a flight in May bound for South Sudan, a war-ravaged country where they have no ties. The Supreme Court majority wrote that their decision on June 23 completely halted Murphy's ruling.(Bloomberg) The decision comes after the court's conservative majority found that immigration officials can quickly deport people to third countries. The majority halted an order that had allowed immigrants to challenge any removals to countries outside their homeland where they could be in danger. The court's latest decision makes clear that the South Sudan flight can complete the trip, weeks after it was detoured to a naval base in Djibouti, where the migrants who had previously been convicted of serious crimes were held in a converted shipping container. It reverses findings from federal Judge Brian Murphy in Massachusetts, who said his order on those migrants still stands even after the high court lifted his broader decision. Department of Homeland Security Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said the flight would be completed quickly, and they could be in South Sudan by Friday. The Supreme Court majority wrote that their decision on June 23 completely halted Murphy's ruling and also rendered his decision on the South Sudan flight 'unenforceable.' The court did not fully detail its legal reasoning on the underlying case, as is common on its emergency docket. Two liberal justices, Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson, dissented, saying the ruling gives the government special treatment. 'Other litigants must follow the rules, but the administration has the Supreme Court on speed dial,' Sotomayor wrote. Justice Elena Kagan wrote that while she disagreed with the original order, it does countermand Murphy's findings on the South Sudan flight. Attorneys for the eight migrants have said they could face 'imprisonment, torture and even death' if sent to South Sudan, where escalating political tensions have threatened to devolve into another civil war. 'We know they'll face perilous conditions, and potentially immediate detention, upon arrival,' Trina Realmuto, executive director of the National Immigration Litigation Alliance, said Thursday. The push comes amid a sweeping immigration crackdown by Trump's Republican administration, which has pledged to deport millions of people who are living in the United States illegally. The Trump administration has called Murphy's finding 'a lawless act of defiance.' McLaughlin called Thursday's decision 'a win for the rule of law, safety and security of the American people." Authorities have reached agreements with other countries to house immigrants if authorities can't quickly send them back to their homelands. The eight men sent to South Sudan in May had been convicted of crimes in the US and had final orders of removal, Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials have said. Murphy, who was nominated by Democratic President Joe Biden, didn't prohibit deportations to third countries. But he found migrants must have a real chance to argue that they could be in danger of torture if sent to another country, even if they've already exhausted their legal appeals. The men and their guards have faced rough conditions on the naval base in Djibouti, where authorities detoured the flight after Murphy found the administration had violated his order by failing to allow them a chance to challenge the removal. They have since expressed a fear of being sent to South Sudan, Realmuto said.

‘We'll see what happens': Trump hopeful of Hamas decision on Gaza ceasefire in 24 hours
‘We'll see what happens': Trump hopeful of Hamas decision on Gaza ceasefire in 24 hours

Hindustan Times

time24 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

‘We'll see what happens': Trump hopeful of Hamas decision on Gaza ceasefire in 24 hours

US President Donald Trump said on Friday it would probably be known in 24 hours whether the Palestinian militant group Hamas has agreed to accept what he has called a "final proposal" for an Israel-Hamas ceasefire in Gaza. President Donald Trump, center, speaks with reporters as, from left, Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins, Rep. Zachary Nunn, R-Iowa, Rep. Randy Feenstra, R-Iowa, and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem listen as they arrive on Air Force One, Friday, July 4, 2025, at Joint Base Andrews, Md. (AP) The president also said he had spoken to Saudi Arabia about expanding the Abraham Accords, the deal on normalization of ties that his administration negotiated between Israel and some Gulf countries during his first term. Trump said on Tuesday Israel had accepted the conditions needed to finalise a 60-day ceasefire with Hamas, during which the parties will work to end the war. He was asked on Friday if Hamas had agreed to the latest ceasefire deal framework, and said: "We'll see what happens, we are going to know over the next 24 hours." A source close to Hamas said on Thursday that the Islamist group sought guarantees that the new US-backed ceasefire proposal would lead to the end of Israel's war in Gaza. Two Israeli officials said those details were still being worked out. Dozens of Palestinians were killed on Thursday in Israeli strikes, according to Gaza authorities. The latest bloodshed in the decades-old Israeli-Palestinian conflict was triggered in October 2023 when Hamas attacked Israel, killing 1,200 and taking about 250 hostages, Israeli tallies show. Gaza's health ministry says Israel's subsequent military assault has killed over 56,000 Palestinians. It has also caused a hunger crisis, internally displaced Gaza's entire population and prompted accusations of genocide at the International Court of Justice and of war crimes at the International Criminal Court. Israel denies the accusations. A previous two-month ceasefire ended when Israeli strikes killed more than 400 Palestinians on March 18. Trump earlier this year proposed a U.S. takeover of Gaza, which was condemned globally by rights experts, the U.N. and Palestinians as a proposal of "ethnic cleansing." ABRAHAM ACCORDS Trump made the comments on the Abraham Accords when asked about U.S. media reporting late on Thursday that he had met Saudi Defense Minister Prince Khalid bin Salman at the White House. "It's one of the things we talked about," Trump said. "I think a lot of people are going to be joining the Abraham accords," he added, citing the predicted expansion to the damage faced by Iran from recent U.S. and Israeli strikes. Axios reported that after the meeting with Trump, the Saudi official spoke on the phone with Abdolrahim Mousavi, chief of Iran's General Staff of the Armed Forces. Trump's meeting with the Saudi official came ahead of a visit to Washington next week by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. (Reporting by Kanishka Singh and Nandita Bose in Washington; Editing by Clarence Fernandez and Stephen Coates)

Vijayendra dismisses K'taka Minister Priyank Kharge's remark to ban RSS as 'foolish'
Vijayendra dismisses K'taka Minister Priyank Kharge's remark to ban RSS as 'foolish'

Hans India

time25 minutes ago

  • Hans India

Vijayendra dismisses K'taka Minister Priyank Kharge's remark to ban RSS as 'foolish'

Bengaluru: Commenting on the repeated statements by Karnataka Minister Priyank Kharge about banning the RSS if the Congress comes to power at the Centre, state BJP President B.Y. Vijayendra dismissed the remarks as foolish. He was speaking to the media at the BJP state office, Jagannath Bhavan, in Bengaluru on Friday. When asked about Priyank Kharge's statement that the RSS would be banned if Congress came to power at the Centre, Vijayendra responded: "We won't respond to such foolish remarks. Prime Minister Narendra Modi has become Prime Minister for the third time, and his popularity is increasing. The country is progressing rapidly.' If someone makes irresponsible speeches, India would not have become the fourth-largest economy in the world, he stated. "The way Prime Minister Narendra Modi ji has worked for development and led the country over the past 11 years has earned him this position. If Priyank Kharge dreams at night of Congress coming to power at the Centre, we have no objection," the BJP leader said. Criticising the IAS Officers' Association for meeting the CM demanding action against BJP MLC N. Ravikumar, Vijayendra questioned, "When the Chief Minister behaved in a way that insulted IAS officers, where was the IAS Officers' Association? Why didn't they file a complaint against the Chief Minister at that time?' He further said, 'I have taken note of the media reports regarding MLC Ravikumar's statement. He has also issued a clarification in this regard. Later, it was reported that the IAS Officers' Association met the Chief Minister and submitted a complaint." "Some Congress leaders also met the Chief Secretary yesterday and filed a complaint. An FIR has reportedly been registered,' Vijayendra said in response to a question. 'Keep MLC Ravikumar's issue aside for a moment. Chief Minister Siddaramaiah himself attempted to slap a senior police officer in a public rally in Belagavi. Where was the IAS Officers' Association then? The same Chief Minister, at another official event, insulted a Deputy Commissioner by saying, 'Hey, stand up!' Where was the IAS Officers' Association then?' he questioned further. 'Let this too be debated. The public is observing everything,' he added. "Many are praying and trying hard to become Chief Minister. They're planning to call Karnataka Congress in-charge Randeep Singh Surjewala to conduct ground-breaking ceremonies and foundation stone events. Let's wait and see what unfolds in the coming days," he said, responding to another question on Congress infighting. "It doesn't matter to us who becomes CM if Siddaramaiah resigns. What's important is that the people of Karnataka are fed up with this Congress government. This government has no concern for the farmers who are in distress," Vijayendra criticised. "This Congress government is unable to provide houses to the poor or implement the Ganga Kalyana scheme. What does it matter who is CM? Nothing is developing. For the first time in the state's history, after the Congress came to power, the government is unable to pay salaries to its employees," he slammed. Even in the Police Department, salaries cannot be disbursed on time. In the Irrigation Department, salaries have not been paid properly for the last 2–3 months. The same situation prevails across all departments," Vijayendra stated. "People are now wondering if such a bankrupt government can even survive," he added. "Regardless of who is CM, the situation will not improve," he remarked. "Not just BJP leaders, but even the general public is talking about a change of government in the state. Even ruling party MLAs are speaking out. In response to Ramanagara MLA Iqbal Hussain's statement, I ask – what is the Chief Minister's reply to that?" he questioned. MLA Iqbal Hussain, even after being served notice by the party not to issue statements on leadership, stated that Dy CM D. K. Shivakumar should become the CM. "Union Minister and our senior leader Pralhad Joshi is working on resolving some internal issues in certain districts of our party. I personally requested him to look into these minor matters. Accordingly, he is taking time to understand and resolve the issues," Vijayendra concluded.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store