EC announces Vice President poll on 9 September, nominations by 21 August
The schedule for the election states that the notification will be issued on 7 August, and the last date for making nominations is 21 August. The nominations will be scrutinised on 22 August, and the polling date as well as counting date would be 9 September.
New Delhi: Ten days after the resignation of Jagdeep Dhankhar as Vice President of India, the Election Commission has announced that elections for the post will be held on 9 September.
On Thursday, the Election Commission had said it had finalised the electoral college for the vice-presidential election.
Dhankhar had resigned from office on 21 July, citing health concerns. His letter read: 'To prioritise healthcare and abide by medical advice, I hereby resign as the Vice President of India, effective immediately, in accordance with Article 67(a) of the Constitution.'
Dhankhar, who assumed office in August 2022, expressed his 'deep gratitude' to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, saying: '(The) Prime Minister's cooperation and support have been invaluable, and I have learned much during my time in office.'
He also extended his gratitude to President Droupadi Murmu for her 'unwavering support and the soothing, wonderful working relationship' during his tenure as Vice President. Dhankhar also served as governor of West Bengal in the past.
'It has been a privilege and satisfaction to witness and partake in India's remarkable economic progress and unprecedented exponential development during this significant period. Serving in this transformative era of our nation's history has been a true honour,' his letter added.
(Edited by Nida Fatima Siddiqui)
Also Read: Dhankhar's resignation: How Modi-Shah's 'capable' BJP has served another strong message to RSS
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
17 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Abhishek Banerjee takes lead after new role, holds organisational meets
Synopsis Following his appointment as Trinamool's Lok Sabha leader, Abhishek Banerjee is actively engaging in organizational affairs, aiming to resolve internal conflicts and fortify the party's presence in North Bengal, particularly targeting areas where the BJP holds sway, in preparation for the 2026 assembly elections. He is also focusing on booth-level organization and fair practices. After taking over as Trinamool's leader of Lok Sabha, there is a distinct shift in the party leadership with its national general secretary Abhishek Banerjee taking a more active role in organisational matters, holding meetings with various districts, including Jalpaiguri and Malda leadership, trying to iron out factional feud and target the North Bengal seats, ahead of the 2026 assembly is also focussing on organisational structure and strengthening of the North Bengal districts where BJP has a stronghold. He has held several meetings with Jalpaiguri district party leadership and Malda, where there are warring sections within the Trinamool. On Tuesday, he also held a virtual meeting with several districts and outlined the role of the Trinamool Congress leadership about the proposed Special Intensive Revision, similar to what happened in Bihar, and directed them to identify the booth level officers (BL0s). Abhishek has given a message to party leaders to inform Trinamool state president or his office in case any biased or undemocratic activity is found, sources new role assumes significance ahead of the 2026 polls and amid a feud between Trinamool MPs - Kalyan Banerjee and Mahua Moitra.
India Today
24 minutes ago
- India Today
Trump doubles tariff on India: Should government, opposition unite on tariff war? Experts debate
As US President Donald Trump announces an extra 25 per cent trade tariff on India for purchasing Russian oil, we raise these questions: Should the government and opposition unite on Trump's tariff war? Should the government of India be tackling Donald Trump head-on? What should be India's political response? Watch as BJP and Congress spokespersons share their views.
New Indian Express
35 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Remedy for paradox of having umpteen proofs but no identity
The Election Commission's special intensive revision of electoral rolls in Bihar and proposal to extend it to other states have stirred the hornet's nest of identity yet again. But identity challenges being faced by Indians run far deeper than the EC's periodic revisions. For many, it's 'a million mutinies a day' as different authorities periodically unleash their own dream projects on identifying or improvising on the identification of their subjects. Consider the nationwide systems. The passport system commenced in 1920 and was revamped in 1967. In 2024, there were 9.3 crore valid passports. Electoral identification dates back to the first general elections of 1951-52. The first major attempt to issue an Electoral Photo ID Card (EPIC) was initiated by the EC during 1993-96. In 2024, there were 97 crore voters with EPICs for many of them. The Permanent Account Number was introduced by the Central Board of Direct Taxes in 1972, initially as an option but made mandatory for taxpayers from 1976. The latest data says there are 78 crore PAN cards. In the mid-2000s came the brilliant idea of a unique ID for every resident—Aadhaar—using biometric imprints. The Unique Identification Authority of India was set up in 2009 and the first Aadhaar card issued in 2010. After a checkered trajectory, the UIDAI has issued Aadhaar cards to about 135 crore residents. EPIC and passports are treated as universal proofs of identity, date of birth, and address. However, they do not offer universal coverage. EPIC is for citizens above 18 years, while passports cover only about 6.5 percent of the population. PAN, though available to a wider demography, is primarily a specific-purpose identifier for tax and financial transactions, and not an address proof. Aadhaar, with the largest coverage, has become just another ID. While it is accepted for its biometric features, it is neither a proof of nationality nor of date of birth. There are also about 5 dozen other IDs accepted by various state-level authorities. All these IDs suffer from duplication and fakery due to the incentive structures in our ground-level governance systems. Recent reports of the CBI unearthing 8.5 lakh 'mule accounts' across certain banks, likely the tip of an iceberg, and the growing incidence of identity theft in financial crimes reveal deeper structural vulnerabilities of the fragmented and often unreliable identity architecture.
