Sheikh Mohammed launches AI UAE government system to save over 250,000 hours per year
Introduced by His Highness Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Vice President and Prime Minister of the UAE and Ruler of Dubai, the new system aims to improve service delivery.
It will use AI-powered data analytics, predictive capabilities and in-depth analysis to assist with strategic planning and improve the government's ability to predict future challenges.
The new system aims to help the government help achieve its 'We the UAE 2031' vision, which targets four main pillars –society, economy, diplomacy and ecosystem.
Government efficiency is at the heart of the new system which aims to optimise resource use, improve service quality and monitor timely implementation of national strategies and plans.
It is predicted that it will process over 150 million data points every month, provide leadership with over 50,000 proactive insights annually and save over 250,000 hours per year.
.@HHShkMohd: We have launched a new performance measurement system in the Federal Government designed to support decision-making, track the progress of plans and strategies, and enhance the government's ability to anticipate future challenges and opportunities through the use of… pic.twitter.com/HY5Fid0sqg
— Dubai Media Office (@DXBMediaOffice) July 9, 2025
The system is based on an intelligent government performance management framework that leverages AI tools and algorithms to monitor and enhance performance.
AI will help the UAE government with in-depth analysis, executive summaries and predictive performance management.
200 government employees in performance management and data analysis will be trained to use the system, which is set to support over 250,000 users.
Real-time data will be used to predict future performance and generate flexible reports that support government decision-making. By doing this, it will allow the UAE government to be better prepared for any future challenges and opportunities.
The UAE's government performance system has evolved since its 2008 launch as the Adaa System. It progressed to Adaa 2.0 in 2013, then Adaa 3.0 in 2019, and now culminating in the latest generation: the Proactive Government Performance System.
In other Dubai news
Parking at Dubai public parks is changing
What we know so far
Emirates reveals top trending summer getaways
The airline also revealed who's travelling to Dubai this season
DXB launches new Greet & Go airport pick-up service
This is how it works
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
a day ago
- The Guardian
‘Tackle racism in whatever form': Labor to wait for university discrimination review before antisemitism response
The federal government will defer its response to Jillian Segal's contentious plan to address antisemitism on campuses until after it has received a broader review of racism at universities and a separate report from the Islamophobia envoy, the education minister has confirmed. Jason Clare outlined the process to reporters on Wednesday, saying he wanted to 'tackle racism in whatever form it comes'. The antisemitism envoy's 20-page plan, released last Thursday, made a range of recommendations for the higher education sector, including launching a 'university report card' and withholding government funding from universities that 'facilitate, enable or fail to act against antisemitism'. The powers would also allow public grants provided to university centres, academics or researchers to be terminated 'where the recipient engages in antisemitic or otherwise discriminatory or hateful speech or actions'. Peak Jewish groups backed the envoy's plan, with the Executive Council of Australian Jewry saying the measures were'urgently needed'. But some academics, human rights groups and peak bodies have expressed concerns that moves could be weaponised to stifle free speech and dissent. Speaking to reporters on Wednesday, Clare said racism existed at universities 'in all its ugly forms', not just antisemitism. He said he would wait until a report from the special envoy in combating Islamophobia was handed down in August, and a broader review into racism at universities was released by the Australian Human Rights Commission in October, before his government responded to Segal's plan. 'Before we consider those recommendations to their final conclusion, I want to look at the recommendations of the special envoy on Islamophobia, and I also want to see the work of the race discrimination [commissioner],' Clare said. 'I think that's fair, I think that's the right thing to do. But it's not just antisemitism and it's not just Islamophobia. Ask Indigenous kids at university today and they'll say 'well, don't forget me'.' 'I do think I need to look at all of those reports that might make different recommendations. I want to tackle racism in whatever form it comes.' Asked if providing the capacity for the federal government to intervene in funding mechanisms might echo the Trump administration's intervention into universities including Harvard and Columbia, as the Jewish Council of Australia has argued, Clare said he made 'no comment on that'. 'Teqsa, the regulator, has powers here already,' he said. 'They're different in kind to what's being recommended in this report, but they enable Teqsa to go in and either put conditions on a university or to penalise them, to apply to a court to issue fines.' The federal government first tasked the Australian Human Rights Commission with undertaking a study into racism at universities in May 2024, with initial consultations taking place amongst First Nations, Jewish, Muslim and other 'negatively racialised communities'. The race discrimination commissioner, Giridharan Sivaraman, said when the interim report was released in December that one of the 'catalysts' of the project was the need to respond to the 'alarming increase in antisemitism on university campuses over the last 12 months'. 'Themes emerging from our consultations so far include … dissatisfaction with complaints mechanisms, the disconnect between universities' policies on racism and their practice, and the challenge of finding a common language and understanding around racism,' he said. Labor MP Ed Husic on Wednesday raised concern with the envoy's recommendation of wider adoption of the IHRA definition of antisemitism, which is contested in some quarters due to concerns it was being used to conflate antisemitism with criticism of Israel, and is already facing pushback from Labor MPs and rank-and-file members. Husic said the government should be 'very careful' about such a move, adding: 'it's not antisemitic to criticise the actions of the government of Israel.' Prime minister Anthony Albanese and home affairs minister Tony Burke have not indicated which parts of the plan the government will take up, but Labor sources downplayed the prospect of terminating university funding. It is widely expected the government could focus its response on the education and prevention measures in Segal's plan. The Coalition has endorsed Segal's plan, but also not nominated specifically which measures it would support. In comments to Guardian Australia, shadow home affairs minister Andrew Hastie urged the Labor government to focus on a judicial inquiry into antisemitism at universities, a visa crackdown and a dedicated law enforcement taskforce. Hastie said the Coalition would 'work constructively' with the government on its response. He also said a Coalition priority would be 'preventing taxpayer money going to organisations with extremist views.' 'The Special Envoy's plan makes it clear that there is an antisemitism crisis gripping Australia, and it is past time the prime minister stopped admiring the problem and started showing leadership,' Hastie said.
The Guardian
a day ago
- The Guardian
Social services department warned Tanya Plibersek she faces uphill battle amid ‘political polarisation'
Tanya Plibersek has an uphill battle to justify and prioritise Australia's multibillion-dollar social services system, her department has warned, against a backdrop of 'rising geopolitical tensions and political polarisation'. The Department of Social Services, which is responsible for a quarter of federal government spending, delivered the warning to the new social services minister about the flow-on effects of global uncertainty in a brief dated 13 May and obtained by Guardian Australia under freedom of information laws. Uncertainty, prompted by current conflicts, their aftermath and escalations in trade hostilities could worsen income inequality and weaken resilience, the department warned in its incoming government briefing, sent after the May federal election. 'The frequency and intensity of economic and environmental shocks are pushing more people into more vulnerable situations, increasing the risk of entrenched disadvantage,' the brief said. 'This can compound with regional vulnerabilities due to extreme weather events, industry shutdown and existing economic inequality.' There were also concerns that intergenerational inequalities were growing, with the department warning more young Australians are relying 'on family for financial support and/or housing well into adulthood' and delaying milestones including education, employment, family and home ownership. While the brief noted there had been advances in women's and First Nations people's workforce participation and the gender pay gap, the department said including people with disability, social attitudes towards LGBTQ+ people, and valuing multiculturalism and the contribution of migrants were central policy concerns. The department acknowledged a stronger focus on security and managing economic risk could place pressures on the minister to 'justify and prioritise payments, programs and services'. 'This will require increased focus on policies that demonstrate value for money and lead to improvements in employment, social inclusion and overall wellbeing,' the advice said. 'Achieving this will require reforms to be disciplined and have a robust evidence base, taking advantage of opportunities to improve productivity and impact. It will also require unlocking existing opportunities in sectors experiencing employment growth such as the care and support economy.' A government spokesperson said it is 'absolutely devoted to delivering on our election commitments', including expanding paid parental leave to six months and cracking down on financial abuse in domestic violence. 'The government appreciates candour and frank and fearless advice from its departments and agencies,' the spokesperson said. The department is responsible for approximately $198bn, or 25%, of all commonwealth expenditure in 2025-26, which will increase to $206bn over the next four years. The majority of its spending, about $153bn, is on personal benefits. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion In a more detailed breakdown of the challenges Australia is facing, the department noted social cohesion was declining 'rapidly' after peaking during the Covid-19 pandemic, referencing studies by the Scanlon Institute. Loneliness in certain cohorts, such as young men aged between 15 and 24, could see them targeted by extremist groups, which can be linked to misogyny and violence against women, the briefing noted. Community concern about the inadequacy of income support payments was also addressed, with the brief acknowledging that increases to rent support payments since 2023 have failed to address housing stress for many recipients. The department stated that low- and middle-income taxpayers are 'subsidising the retirement incomes of seniors with significant wealth in addition to their homes' under social security reform. The age pension is provided to couples with incomes of almost $100,000 a year or assets of almost $1.05m, in addition to their principal home, which can be of unlimited value, the department noted. 'Age pensioners generally maintain or grow their assets in the last five years prior to their death. By contrast, a single job seeker without children who has more than $11,500 in liquid assets must wait 13 weeks before any income support becomes payable,' the department said.
The Guardian
2 days ago
- The Guardian
US supreme court allows Trump to resume gutting education department
The US supreme court on Monday cleared the way for Donald Trump's administration to resume dismantling the Department of Education as part of his bid to shrink the federal government's role in education in favor of more control by the states. In the latest high court win for the president, the justices lifted a federal judge's order that had reinstated nearly 1,400 workers affected by mass layoffs at the department and blocked the administration from transferring key functions to other federal agencies. A legal challenge is continuing to play out in lower courts. The court's action came in a brief, unsigned order. Its three liberal justices dissented. A group of 21 Democratic attorneys general, school districts and unions behind a pair of legal challenges had warned in court papers that Trump's shutdown efforts threatened to impair the department's ability to perform its core duties. Created by Congress in 1979, the Department of Education's main roles include administering college loans, tracking student achievement and enforcing civil rights in schools. It also provides federal funding for needy districts and to help students with disabilities. Federal law prohibits the department from controlling school operations including curriculum, instruction and staffing. Authority over these decisions belongs to state and local governments, which provide more than 85% of public school funding. The department's Republican critics have portrayed the department as a symbol of bureaucratic waste, underlining the need for smaller federal government in favor of greater state power. In March, Trump sought to deliver on a campaign promise to conservatives by calling for the department's closure. 'We're going to be returning education, very simply, back to the states where it belongs,' Trump said on 20 March before signing an executive order to close the department to the 'maximum extent' allowed by law. Trump said that certain 'core necessities' would be preserved, including Pell grants to students from lower-income families and federal funding for disadvantaged students and children with special needs, though he said those functions would be redistributed to other agencies and departments. Trump in March directed that the department transfer its $1.6tn student loan portfolio to the Small Business Administration and its special education services to the Department of Health and Human Services. Although formally eliminating the department would require an act of Congress, the downsizing announced in March by US education secretary Linda McMahon aimed to slash the department's staff to roughly half the size it was when Trump took office in January. Sign up to This Week in Trumpland A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration after newsletter promotion Boston-based US district judge Myong Joun, an appointee of Democratic former president Joe Biden, concluded in a 22 May ruling that the mass firings would 'likely cripple the department'. He ordered the affected workers to be reinstated and also blocked the administration's plan to hand off department functions to other federal agencies. The plaintiffs, Joun wrote, are 'likely to succeed in showing that defendants are effectively disabling the department from carrying out its statutory duties by firing half of its staff, transferring key programs out of the department, and eliminating entire offices and programs'. The Boston-based first US circuit court of appeals on 4 June rejected the Trump administration's request to pause the injunction issued by the judge. In a court filing asking the supreme court to lift Joun's order, the justice department accused him of judicial overreach. The plaintiffs warned that mass firings at the department could delay the disbursement of federal aid for low-income schools and students with special needs, prompting shortfalls that might require cutting programs or teaching staff. They also argued in court papers that Trump's shutdown effort would undermine efforts to curb discrimination in schools, analyze and disseminate critical data on student performance, and assist college applicants seeking financial aid.
