Unity On Cash Row Judge, Face-Off On Op Sindoor: Parliament Meets Tomorrow
Over 100 MPs have signed their consent to bring an impeachment motion in Parliament against Justice Yashwant Varma, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju said, a day before the Monsoon Session begins. The judge hit headlines when a huge sum of unaccounted cash was recovered from his Delhi home after a fire in March.
The cash recovery triggered allegations of massive corruption within the Judiciary, prompting the Supreme Court to start an inquiry. A three-member panel has recommended his impeachment, and the judge has challenged this in the top court.
The cash recovery row has also played out against the backdrop of some voices in the ruling dispensation accusing the Supreme Court of judicial overreach, and stressing the supremacy of Parliament.
According to the Constitution, a Supreme Court judge can be removed from office only through a Presidential order on the grounds of "proved misbehaviour or incapacity". A motion for impeachment in such a case will be admitted only if it has the support of at least 50 members in the Rajya Sabha or at least 100 in the Lok Sabha. This motion would need the support of two-thirds of the MPs in the House for passage.
Earlier, Mr Rijiju said corruption in the judiciary is an "extremely sensitive" matter and all political parties are united on this issue.
Main opposition Congress, sources have said, has also joined cause with the ruling BJP on this front. About 35 Lok Sabha MPs, including Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi, have signed the proposal to bring the impeachment motion against the judge, the sources added.
Monsoon Session Begins Tomorrow
Mr Rijiju told the media that during the all-party meeting held a day before the new Parliament session begins, 40 representatives from 51 parties were present. "They presented their views and we requested everyone to ensure that the House runs smoothly. It is a shared responsibility - both the ruling and opposition sides must contribute. We will take up the suggestion of giving more time to smaller parties in the BAC (Business Advisory Committee) meeting, in accordance with the rules."
The Opposition is expected to mount a spirited offensive against the government over the Pahalgam terror attack and ask tough questions regarding Operation Sindoor and US President Donald Trump's claims of having brokered the ceasefire between India and Pakistan.
"We are ready to discuss all important issues, including Pahalgam and Operation Sindoor - but it must be as per parliamentary rules. We have listened to all suggestions from the opposition members," the Parliamentary Affairs Minister said today.
On the Opposition's allegations that Prime Minister Narendra Modi often skips Parliament, Mr Rijiju said, "The Prime Minister is always present in the House, except during foreign visits or in rare special situations. Constantly dragging the Prime Minister into every issue is not appropriate. Whenever a particular department is being discussed, the minister concerned is present to respond," he said.
The government has listed 15 bills for this session. These include key legislation on taxation, shipping, sports governance, and geo-heritage preservation.
Opposition Preps Attack
At the all-party meeting today, Congress MP and its Deputy Leader in Lok Sabha, Gaurav Gogoi, demanded that the Prime Minister address Parliament and respond to key questions on the Pahalgam attack, the government's foreign policy, and the unrest in Manipur. "Why hasn't the Prime Minister visited Manipur yet? We want focused discussions on national security and foreign affairs," he said.
Supriya Sule (NCP), too, questioned why the terrorists who gunned down innocents in Pahalgam had not been caught yet. She also slammed a Maharashtra minister allegedly seen playing rummy in the Assembly. "Farmers are dying by suicide, and ministers are busy playing games. He must resign," she said.
AAP's Sanjay Singh raised Trump's comments on Operation Sindoor and the Special Intensive Revision of voter list in poll-bound Bihar. BJD's Sasmit Patra expressed anguish over a student's self-immolation in Odisha and alleged that law and order in the BJP-ruled state had completely broken down. Samajwadi Party's Ramgopal Yadav alleged a foreign policy failure at the Centre and raised questions on the voter list revision in Bihar.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
44 minutes ago
- Indian Express
To boost surveillance, Govt taps global firms for high-resolution satellite imagery
With high-resolution satellite imagery proving to be indispensable in evolving battlefield situations, the government is learnt to have reached out to multiple global commercial earth-observation satellite players for sourcing it. The initiation of talks with these satellite imagery providers comes in the wake of Operation Sindoor in May, where it has been inferred that China provided live inputs through satellite support to Pakistan. Senior Army officials have since said that when the DGMO-level talks were on, Pakistan flagged information about 'specific vectors' on the Indian side that were being primed and readied for action, likely from satellite inputs facilities by China. 'We are in talks with commercial satellite imagery providers. We have to deepen our surveillance measures,' an official told The Indian Express. The objective of these discussions is to extend the surveillance envelope and be able to do real-time surveillance at the time of conflicts for more efficient military actions, officials said. The move likely includes Maxar Technologies, which operates some of the world's most advanced Earth observation satellites that can capture images with 30-centimetre resolution, detailed enough to discern targets such as infrastructure, buildings, artillery gun systems and even vehicles. When contacted by The Indian Express, Maxar's spokesperson said they 'don't comment on contract negotiations'. While India's satellites, including the Cartosat and RISAT, have played a big role in helping defence forces to strategise, track enemy mobilisation and confirm strike impact, while maintaining real-time situational awareness which prevented any major damage to the country's military assets, these domestic satellites face some limitations in their capabilities. The Cartosat-3 satellite was designed to offer resolution of up to 30-centimetre, but is claimed to provide good quality imagery at about 50 centimetres. Also, Cartosat-3 operates alone, which limits how frequently it can scan the same area, something that is crucial during fast-paced military engagements where the battlefield is limited to a specific sector. Visibility is crucial, which the Pakistanis are believed to have with Chinese inputs. India's satellites, including the Cartosat and RISAT, have played a big role in helping defence forces to strategise and maintain real-time situational awareness, but there are some limitations in their capabilities. The move to rope in global players is aimed at plugging these gaps. India is already working on upgrading its satellite capabilities and has fast-tracked deployment of 52 surveillance satellites under the SBS (Space Based Surveillance)-III programme after Operation Sindoor, to enable efficient and enhanced monitoring of land and sea borders, with stronger imaging and all-weather functionalities. 'They will start launching the satellites from next year onwards and the deployment of all satellites will be completed by 2029,' the official said. In October last year, the Union Cabinet approved $3.2 billion for the SBS-III programme to develop next-generation satellites over the next decade. Under the programme, ISRO will manufacture and launch the first 21 satellites, while private companies will handle the remaining 31. The Defence Space Agency will oversee the operation of the newly launched satellite system. Aanchal Magazine is Senior Assistant Editor with The Indian Express and reports on the macro economy and fiscal policy, with a special focus on economic science, labour trends, taxation and revenue metrics. With over 13 years of newsroom experience, she has also reported in detail on macroeconomic data such as trends and policy actions related to inflation, GDP growth and fiscal arithmetic. Interested in the history of her homeland, Kashmir, she likes to read about its culture and tradition in her spare time, along with trying to map the journeys of displacement from there. ... Read More Anil Sasi is National Business Editor with the Indian Express and writes on business and finance issues. He has worked with The Hindu Business Line and Business Standard and is an alumnus of Delhi University. ... Read More
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Justice Varma plea 'irrelevant' amid impeachment motion, say legal experts
Justice Yashwant Varma's petition challenging the findings of the Supreme Court's inquiry committee has been labelled "irrelevant" by legal experts, after Union Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju revealed that over 100 MPs have already signed a notice to the Speaker in connection with the cash discovery row — the requisite number to move an impeachment motion against a sitting judge in the Lok impending impeachment motion in the Monsoon Session of Parliament is expected to take priority over judicial proceedings, legal experts told India Today TV. Former judges and senior advocates highlighted the procedural precedence of a parliamentary inquiry in such matters."No one can interfere in a parliamentary inquiry," Senior Advocate Dushyant Dave told India Today TV, highlighting the distinct separation of powers mentioned in the Constitution. He further emphasised that "Parliament and court matters operate in different spheres," suggesting that the Supreme Court is unlikely to intervene at this stage. After the Supreme Court's in-house committee recommended Justice Varma's removal following its probe, the focus now shifts to the Lok Sabha, where an impeachment motion for his removal is set to be introduced."When the judge admits that money was found in his house, the rest becomes irrelevant," said a legal expert, indicating that the parliamentary inquiry will centre on these admissions. Despite this, Justice Varma "has the right to be heard by the Parliament Inquiry Committee," which could potentially clear his the impeachment process in Parliament, retired Justice Siddharth Mridul told India Today TV, "If there is an impeachment motion, that motion and the committee that is appointed to conduct an inquiry clearly provide all the steps that need to be followed. The impeachment motion process is to take action against a judge who refuses to resign."Justice Mridul pointed out that the in-house inquiry committee's findings are akin to a preliminary probe report, meant "to satisfy the CJI that there is cause to investigate the judge."Meanwhile, legal experts questioned the reasoning behind Varma's approach to the Supreme Court, with one stating, "I don't see why this petition has come to court. If the judge wants to clear his name, he has to go through the procedure provided by the Constitution."Dave found it "inconceivable for the Supreme Court to interfere in Parliament's inquiry process at such an early stage." Emphasising that there is no connection between an in-house inquiry and a parliamentary inquiry, Dave said, "MPs could have initiated impeachment based on the video that surfaced."Serious questions have been raised regarding police conduct in the case. Observers noted "serious, gross lapses by the police" and asked, "Why was the money allowed to disappear?"advertisement"Corruption is rampant in Judiciary -- nobody wants to publicly discuss it," said Dave, pointing to the need for systemic the impeachment process unfolds, the potential consequences are significant. "If Parliament's committee gives a clean chit, then that will be final," Dave said, highlighting the ultimate authority of Parliament in judicial impeachment matters. The decision now rests with Parliament, said legal experts, with Justice Mridul saying the in-house panel report is now "irrelevant" as only Parliament, and not the courts, can decide the fate of judges.- EndsMust Watch
India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
Meet Ukraine's First Woman PM – Rising From The Rubble, She Now Takes The Helm Of A Wartime Nation
The story so far: Kyiv woke to a warm July morning on 17, its sunlight spilling over the golden dome of the Verkhovna Rada. In front of the Parliament building, Yulia Svyrydenko took her place no longer as a minister or economic strategist, but now Ukraine's new prime minister. A nation under siege by war, which is scarred by loss and tested by time, turns to her leadership with cautious hope. She becomes Ukraine's 19th prime minister at a defining moment. As June ends, so does Denys Shmyhal's five-year tenure. What follows is a transition of power, vision, voice and urgency. Svyrydenko steps in not as a populist, nor a wartime orator, but as a calm and calculated technocrat. She is an economist by training, a builder of frameworks and a problem-solver in the middle of crisis. Her path to this moment has been decades in the making. Born on Christmas Day in 1985 in Chernihiv, Svyrydenko was a standout student at Kyiv's State University of Trade and Economics. With a master's degree in antitrust management, she started in the private sector before transitioning to public service in 2011. Her early years saw her posted to China and later advising regional governments on economic growth. By 2019, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy took notice. He brought her into a socio-economic working group during early peace dialogues, later elevating her to deputy head of the Presidential Office. In November 2021, months before Russia's full-scale invasion, she became deputy prime minister and minister of economy. Then came war. Instead of retreating, she helped Ukraine navigate one of its darkest periods. She played a pivotal role in securing a U.S.-Ukraine Reinvestment Fund in 2022, unlocking funding for rebuilding and tapping into Ukraine's mineral wealth. This year, she carried Ukraine's case to Rome, securing 11 billion euro in recovery pledges from Western partners. President Zelenskyy formally nominated her on July 14. Three days later, 262 members of Parliament voted in favour. She became the first woman to lead Ukraine's government during wartime. Her mandate is steep. Ukraine faces a $19 billion fiscal hole. Artillery shells continue to fall. But she has already laid out her battle plan – deeper fiscal reforms, deregulation, privatisation and a push to manufacture at least half of Ukraine's military equipment domestically within six months. She aims to speed up EU integration and deepen military ties with the United States. In her first message on X, she wrote, 'Our Government sets its course toward a Ukraine that stands firm on its own foundations – military, economic and social. My key goal is real, positive results that every Ukrainian will feel in daily life. War leaves no room for delay.' It is a great honor for me to lead the Government of Ukraine today. Our Government sets its course toward a Ukraine that stands firm on its own foundations — military, economic, and social. My key goal is real, positive results that every Ukrainian will feel in daily life. War… — Yulia Svyrydenko (@Svyrydenko_Y) July 17, 2025 With that, a new chapter begins.
