CareTrust REIT Inc (CTRE) Q1 2025 Earnings Call Highlights: Record Growth and Strategic UK Expansion
Normalized FFO: Increased 67.4% to $77.8 million.
Normalized FAD: Increased 66% to $80.8 million.
Normalized FFO per Share: Increased $0.07 or 20% to $0.42 per share.
Normalized FAD per Share: Increased $0.06 or 16.2% to $0.43 per share.
Investment Total: Year-to-date investments totaled approximately $82 million at a yield of approximately 10%.
Cash Rental Revenues: Projected to be approximately $284 million for the year.
Interest Income: Approximately $90 million, with $76 million from the loan portfolio and $14 million from cash invested in money market funds.
Interest Expense: Approximately $24.3 million, including $4 million of amortization of deferred financing fees.
G&A Expense: Approximately $33 million to $37 million, including $11.7 million of deferred stock costs.
Leverage: Net debt to normalized EBITDA ratio of 0.5 times; expected to be below 2.5 times post-UK transaction.
Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio: 15.2 times.
Warning! GuruFocus has detected 6 Warning Signs with CTRE.
Release Date: May 02, 2025
For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript.
CareTrust REIT Inc (NYSE:CTRE) announced the strategic acquisition of Care REIT, marking its entry into the UK market and the largest deal in its history.
The acquisition diversifies CTRE's business in terms of operator concentration, geography, payer sources, and asset classes.
CTRE completed three new investments totaling over $47 million at a yield of approximately 10% during the first quarter.
Normalized FFO increased 67.4% over the prior year quarter to $77.8 million, and normalized FAD increased by 66% to $80.8 million.
CTRE's liquidity remains strong with a net debt to normalized EBITDA ratio of 0.5 times and a fixed charge coverage ratio of 15.2 times.
The acquisition of Care REIT involves assuming existing debt of approximately $259 million, which CTRE plans to refinance.
There is uncertainty regarding potential Medicaid cuts, which could impact CTRE's portfolio.
The UK acquisition pipeline is still developing, and it may take time to mature to the level of the US pipeline.
Interest expense increased due to the line draw for the escrow account related to the UK transaction.
CTRE's guidance assumes no additional investments or further debt or equity issuances this year, which could limit growth opportunities.
Q: Can you comment on the potential impacts of policy and provider taxes on your portfolio? A: David Sedgwick, President and CEO, stated that there is no change in their outlook on potential Medicaid cuts. They are monitoring the process, and there is bipartisan support for Medicaid, especially for seniors in nursing homes.
Q: What conditions lead you to choose debt investments over property acquisitions? A: David Sedgwick explained that acquisitions are prioritized, but debt investments are considered strategic if they can build relationships with key operators, potentially leading to future acquisitions.
Q: Are there any changes to the earnings or FAD accretion from the Care REIT transaction? A: David Sedgwick mentioned that they will provide detailed answers regarding the transaction's financial impact once the deal is officially announced.
Q: What is the expected investment pipeline volume for the UK market, and what yields are you seeing? A: David Sedgwick noted that the UK pipeline will take time to mature. They are currently looking at various deals with cap rates ranging from 7% to 9%, depending on the specifics.
Q: How are the properties performing relative to initial underwriting, and what is the outlook for PAC? A: David Sedgwick stated that they have no updates on PAC beyond the data and coverage ratios provided, and they are awaiting further disclosures.
Q: Does the UK acquisition put you on the map for new relationships, and will you start lending there? A: David Sedgwick confirmed that the acquisition has generated significant interest from operators in the UK, but they are not currently looking to lend in that market.
Q: How is the US skilled nursing facility (SNF) market changing, and is there less capital available? A: James Callister, Chief Investment Officer, stated that the market remains unchanged with consistent deal flow and competitive landscape, with no significant shifts in capital availability.
Q: What is the status of the term loan related to the UK acquisition, and what are the expected costs? A: William Wagner, CFO, explained that the term loan will be an amendment to their existing credit facility, with pricing just inside their revolver, and it will not be in pounds.
For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript.
This article first appeared on GuruFocus.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Investing £5k of savings can generate a passive income of…
Buying dividend shares is a rapid and simple way to start earning a passive income. As with every investment, there are risks involved. But such threats can be managed through prudent decision-making and portfolio diversification. And when done well, the subsequent income stream can be quite lucrative, especially in the long run. So let's say an investor has £5,000 of capital sitting in a savings account. How much passive income can this money generate overnight and over the long term? The amount generated depends on which dividend stocks an investor decides to buy. Most tend to stick with simple index tracker funds. And right now, the FTSE 100 index offers a respectable 3.4% yield. That means, overnight, a £5,000 could generate a passive income of £170 a year. Obviously, that's not a groundbreaking sum, especially since many savings accounts offer similar returns right now at much lower levels of risk. However, there's also capital gains to take into consideration. And when combined with the dividend yield, the FTSE 100's historically generated close to an 8% annualised return for investors. Let's assume this trend continues over the next decade. What does this mean for an investor's passive income if they decide to reinvest any dividends between now and 2035? Without any additional capital, the original £5,000 will have grown to around £11,100. And if the yield's still 3.4%, that means the passive income stream will reach £377.40. That's a notable improvement. But what if we can do even better? Instead of relying on an index fund, investors can take matters into their own hands and invest in individual stocks directly. And right now, there are plenty of FTSE 100 constituents offering significantly higher yields. Take Aviva (LSE:AV.) as an example to consider. Today, the insurance giant already offers a more impressive payout with a 5.9% yield. So a £5,000 investment would instantly unlock an annual passive income of £295. But those who hopped on the bandwagon just five years ago are already earning considerably more. Following the appointment of CEO Dame Amanda Blanc in 2020, the company has undergone a significant transformation. It divested its non-core business ventures, raising over £8bn while simultaneously streamlining operations. Pairing this increase in efficiency with boosted activity within the annuity market, courtesy of higher interest rates, shareholders have been immensely rewarded. The Aviva share price has more than doubled, turning a £5,000 investment into £10,400. And at the same time, dividends were hiked by an average of 18% a year, turning an already substantial 5.3% yield at the time into a 12.2% payout. As such, a £5,000 initial investment in 2019 is now generating a passive income of £1,268.80. Sadly, Aviva shares aren't guaranteed to replicate this success between now and 2030. The company's still attempting to digest its £3.7bn acquisition of Direct Line Group. And with the UK government flirting with new mandates to force pension funds to invest more in UK assets, compliance-related costs of evolving regulation could create new headaches that impede performance. Nevertheless, Aviva serves as a good example of how stock picking opens the door to potentially superior returns in the long run. The post Investing £5k of savings can generate a passive income of… appeared first on The Motley Fool UK. More reading 5 Stocks For Trying To Build Wealth After 50 One Top Growth Stock from the Motley Fool Zaven Boyrazian has no position in any of the shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Motley Fool UK 2025
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Man United announce surprising third quarter profits for 2025
Manchester United have announced that they have made a profit in the third quarter fiscal results of 2025. There were fears for the company's economic situation after an interview by Sir Jim Ratcliffe in March where he claimed the club would have run out of money in December if not for his investment. Advertisement Nonetheless, United have made a strong start to the transfer window by agreeing to pay Matheus Cunha's £62.5 million release clause and offering north of £60 million for Brentford's Bryan Mbeumo. Through clever accounting, it also seems that United will not have the PSR problems that most thought they would have and that they will have more wiggle room . The club have released their quarter results on the official website and have claimed that 'the company recorded an operating profit £0.7m in the quarter compared to an operating loss of £66.2m in the third quarter of 2024. What's more, 'total revenues increased 17.4% in the quarter with increases across all three key revenue streams, driven by additional matches played in the quarter as a result of strong performance in the UEFA Europa League and high demand for the club's hospitality offering.' Advertisement Commercial revenue has seen an increase of 7.3% in the third quarter last year from £69.6 million to £74.7 million. Moreover, broadcasting revenue has grown from £37.5 million to £41.3 million, which accounts for a 10.1% growth. Matchday revenue has also seen a big jump from £29.6 million to £44.5 million owing to greater European involvement this year. Overall, The Muppetiers YouTube channel analysed that the club could actually break even this year if the current course is continued. It is claimed that fourth quarter projections could grow in broadcast, commercial and matchday revenue. To sum up, United are on course to lose a lot less money as they lost £29 million in 2023, a staggering £130 million last year but may even make a profit this year according to The Muppetiers. Advertisement United are still not totally in the clear though despite their improvements on the spreadsheet. Debt is still a concern and that will only continue to grow as United plan for an active transfer window to replenish their ailing squad. The BBC reported that around '£1.2bn has been spent on debt interest, debt repayments, dividends and fees to the Glazer family since their takeover 20 years ago.' Furthermore, the club is certainly lacking in cash flow. According to The Athletic, the cash reserves have fallen to £73.2 million. Therefore, player sales will still be essential in spite of the improving financial situation. The Muppetiers predict that the Red Devils can perhaps spend £200 million net with no issues in the transfer window but without sales, this could put the club on the precipice for next summer. Advertisement It was also reiterated that cash flow remains the biggest problem, therefore the structuring of deals over instalments is probably a greater sticking point in negotiations than overall price. All in all, United fans will hope that after months of bad press over their new owners, that finally, the club has something to be cautiously optimistic about over its financial future. Featured image by Justin Setterfield via Getty Images Follow us on Bluesky: @
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Reform declares war on all gold-plated public sector pensions
A Reform UK government would radically overhaul gold-plated public sector pensions to stop them bankrupting Britain. Richard Tice told The Telegraph he would put everything on the table and end the taxpayer 'rip off' if his party won the next general election. Reform's deputy leader said the party would consider moving all public sector employees out of their 'Rolls-Royce' pension plans and into the defined contribution schemes almost all private sector workers have. Britain currently hands £54bn a year to public sector retirees and another £35bn in pension contributions to current state workers, with both groups entitled to guaranteed, inflation-linked payments for life. It comes after Reform pledged to axe defined benefit council pensions, which a recent Telegraph investigation revealed now costs some local authorities more than half of what they raise in council tax. Britain currently has more than three million public sector pensioners, the vast majority of whom are retired NHS workers, teachers, civil servants and members of the armed forces. Their schemes are all unfunded, meaning the contributions that come in from employers and employees are immediately used to pay current retirees, rather than being prudently invested to pay future pensions. However, contributions have fallen short of the amounts paid out, with taxpayers funding a £49bn shortfall over the past decade alone. Historically, they also haven't covered the cost of new pension rights built up by current workers. John Ralfe, a pensions consultant, calculated that the shortfall between contributions and future pensions was £208bn between 2013-23 – and it will be met by current and future taxpayers. The system, which would be illegal in the private sector, has built up pension liabilities running into the trillions. Speaking to The Telegraph, Mr Tice said action was needed where successive governments had failed. He said: 'We've got to have these conversations over the next few years and wake people up as to why we're in such a financial mess. Public sector pay and benefits have soared and yet productivity has collapsed, and it's a catastrophe. 'I want to be honest with the country. I want to say, 'if we don't sort this out, this will be a major factor in the country going bankrupt'. It's that serious.' He also confirmed that Reform would consider moving every public sector worker into the type of defined contribution schemes that almost all private sector workers are members of. He added: 'Everything has got to be on the table. The old rule was that public pay was less than the private sector because they had a more generous pension scheme, but successive governments have lifted pay in the public sector and therefore the old deal is no longer valid. 'Bluntly, there's been a failure to be honest about this. The public sector has pulled the wool over the eyes of the taxpayer. We're going to talk about it for the next four years: that taxpayers are being ripped off and it can't go on.' Last week, Mr Tice said that Reform-controlled councils would stop offering the generous pension scheme to new employees and reduce pay rises for existing workers to balance out the cost of funding their retirements. The Local Government Pension Scheme, the largest funded scheme in the UK, already spends £15bn a year on paying pensions across Britain. A recent Telegraph investigation uncovered five local authorities that stuff more than half of their council tax into staff pension pots. Another 19 fork out more than a third, while 60 spend more than a fifth on funding the generous schemes. It came after a series of Telegraph revelations about the cost of public sector pensions. Last year, we calculated that Britain's current bill was £4.9 trillion, with each household on the hook for £173,000. In October, we reported that another £20bn would be added to taxpayer-funded pension payouts after they rose another 1.7pc following September's inflation figure. Last month, we showed how the latest public sector pay rise would cost another £1bn in pension contributions alone. We also revealed how taxpayers have been handed extra pension bills of £45bn for Royal Mail, £1.7bn for the Environment Agency and more than £300m for retired train drivers. Switching public sector workers to defined contribution pensions could send the taxpayer's annual bill plummeting to around £4.5bn, saving almost £28bn a year, calculations have shown. However, Barry McKay, of pensions firm Barnett Waddingham, warned it would be difficult to make the change. He said: 'If you move to defined contribution, those contributions paid by existing workers would go into a pot somewhere to be invested and grow for the benefit of each worker, but in doing so there would be no money coming in to pay existing pensions. 'The Treasury would have to find a huge amount of money to pay the existing pensioners from somewhere else, because they don't have the contribution income any more. That leaves a massive hole in the Treasury accounts.' He added: 'There is a problem that we're effectively stuck with defined benefit.' Neil Record, a pensions expert and former Bank of England economist, said: 'The only practical solution to public sector pensions' increasingly intolerable burden on taxpayers is for the Government to offer a cash alternative, as an option, to all public sector employees. 'My guess is that in return for an approximately 30pc pay rise, most public sector employees would choose to give up accruing new pension rights as long as their existing rights were fully honoured.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
