Oklahoma Sen. James Lankford releases ‘Playbook for DOGE'
Oklahoma's senior U.S. Senator James Lankford has released what he calls a 'Playbook for DOGE,' the Department of Government Efficiency headed by Elon Musk. It's the latest in a series of annual 'Federal Fumbles' reports Lankford has released since 2015.
'As a founding member of the Senate DOGE Caucus, my goal is to create a roadmap for DOGE, identifying key areas within the federal government and solutions to fix them,' Lankford said in the report.
Lankford released the 26-page football-themed document exclusively to Fox News. In it, he highlights improper payments in Medicaid, SNAP benefits and unemployment insurance.
Lankford also claims 'the Taliban have directly received nearly $11 million in American taxpayer dollars' from USAID since 2021. The report he references from the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction finds the Taliban-controlled Afghan government collected that much money in taxes, fees and duties from non-governmental organizations receiving U.S. funds.
Like that finding, many of the improper payments Lankford cites were uncovered by federal inspectors general — watchdogs for agency impropriety or wrongdoing. President Donald Trump fired around a quarter of all federal inspectors general by email last week. Some of the firings are already being challenged in court for potentially violating laws that protect those inspectors from retaliation for their investigations.
Lankford's playbook also calls out environmental regulation for keeping the U.S. 'behind in the rankings.' He highlights the U.S.'s lengthy permitting process for new mining operations and includes two different sections on a stalled plan to install electric vehicle chargers along the nation's interstates.
Lankford also excoriates the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which receives money from Congress and distributes funds to NPR and PBS stations, for 'undercutting the home team.'
'Taxpayers should not be forced to pay for news that harms the reputation of our country,' Lankford said.
Lankford isn't the only Oklahoma politician hoping to influence DOGE's actions. Gov. Kevin Stitt recently announced DOGE-OK to pare back government spending at the state level. Stitt said that's also intended to work as a playbook for Musk as he looks for ways to cut federal funds for states.
'My theory is we need to help him with that,' Stitt said at a press briefing Wednesday. 'We need to say, 'Okay, Elon, if you're going to cut 10% of what you're giving to the state of Oklahoma, here's the scalpel approach. Here's how we think we can do it efficiently.''
This article was originally published by KOSU.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
5 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump caught Democrats in a trap — torn by their Medicaid lies
This week, President Donald Trump officially launched his push to remove illegal aliens from state Medicaid rolls by cross-checking them against federal databases, a move that's sure to send Democrats running to the courts yet again. But when it comes to illegal immigrants and welfare, Democrats have a serious problem — and it's not just their continuing slide in favorability. It's that they just can't make up their minds about whether or not those here illegally are receiving federal Medicaid dollars at all. Advertisement When Congress was debating Trump's One Big, Beautiful Bill Act, one of the left's oft-repeated refrains was that there was no need to ban illegal aliens from Medicaid's rolls — because giving them its benefits was already against the law. They conveniently forgot to mention the 12 states that explicitly expanded non-emergency Medicaid coverage to illegal immigrants, and the other gaping loopholes being exploited nationwide. But in June, Trump made a move that forced Democrats drop the act and show their hand: His Health and Human Services Department began sharing Medicaid data from four states and Washington, DC, with US Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Advertisement Cue the outrage. Within days California Attorney General Rob Bonta, New York AG Letitia James and 19 other blue states filed suit in federal court to block the data-sharing — and gave up the game in the process. Democrats love to lie in the court of public opinion — but in a courtroom, you've got to tell the truth. And by suing to stop Team Trump, they practically confessed: Illegal aliens are on Medicaid, and blue states are desperate to keep it that way. Advertisement Since then HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (or CMS) Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz have doubled down, expanding their partnership with ICE to include nationwide Medicaid data. To help their effort, Rep. Wesley Hunt (R-Tex.) demanded that Gov. Kathy Hochul cough up the data on Medicaid-receiving illegal immigrants in the Empire State, citing her legal obligations to regularly report enrollment and eligibility data to the federal government. The Democrats' lawsuits continue their track record of fighting beyond the limits of their power to protect illegal aliens — in this case by keeping their Medicaid data 'safe' — while endangering law-abiding Americans. Their claims that no illegal aliens take advantage of Medicaid benefits also fly in the face of Medicaid's own records. Advertisement Between 2021 and 2023, taxpayers spent at least $16 billion on emergency services for illegal immigrants, CMS has reported, with federal taxpayers covering more than 70% of those costs. Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters When you add in the billions likely spent on non-emergency services in direct circumvention of federal law, the total figure of Medicaid resources going to illegal aliens is incalculable — an enormous transfer of wealth from Americans to non-citizens who shouldn't be here at all. Welfare benefits like Medicaid have been some of the strongest magnets spurring mass migration into this country and encouraging people to illegally stay. Halting those perks, as Trump and Republicans in Congress are rightly doing, will do much to turn the magnet off. Stealing from Medicaid is especially grievous because the program is intended to help America's most vulnerable, including low-income children and people with disabilities. When illegal aliens or other ineligible people take Medicaid, they not only suck up taxpayer resources, they reroute precious resources from legitimate Medicaid recipients who already have to compete for a limited pool of providers. It's downright despicable — yet Democrats in Congress and in at least 20 blue states seem more than happy to run interference to ensure that it continues. Advertisement Some Democrats are begging for their party to moderate after November's resounding defeat. Some — like New York City primary voters — are sprinting further to the left. If they want to appeal to the majority of voters in the coming midterms, though, they need to get their Medicaid stories straight. Advertisement More important, they need to get their priorities straight. Instead of robbing from taxpayers to give to law-breakers, Democrats should protect Medicaid for the Americans who truly need it. They could do that by following the lead of Republicans like Gov. Jeff Landry of Louisiana, who just signed a law referring illegal aliens fraudulently receiving welfare to ICE so they can be deported. If Democrats can't make up their minds about illegal aliens and welfare, the American people will make up their minds about the Democrats — and keep rejecting them at the ballot box. Hayden Dublois is the Data and Analytics Director for the Foundation for Government Accountability.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
NM Gov declines GOP's invite to visit ICE detention center
Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham, pictured in June at the Roundhouse, won't take New Mexico Republican lawmakers up on an invite to join a tour of the Otero County Processing Center in Southern New Mexico, where an average of 863 ICE detainees are currently held, according to a spokesperson. (Photo by Danielle Prokop / Source NM) Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham's 'busy schedule' Monday means she won't join Republican lawmakers on a tour of New Mexico's biggest immigration detention center, a spokesperson for the governor told Source New Mexico on Thursday. New Mexico Republicans shared a letter on social media Wednesday announcing some members would be touring the Otero County Processing Center on Monday, and they invited the governor to come along. The detention center in Chaparral currently houses most of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement detainees in the state, and its population has increased since President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown began this year. The governor's chief lawyer told an interim legislative committee in July that the governor was considering adding a measure to the agenda at an upcoming special session that would ban immigration detention facilities in New Mexico. Medicaid, ICE detention on agenda for forthcoming special legislative session 'Before we take any action with such far-reaching implications (for example, putting New Mexicans out of work and risking millions of federal funding), it is essential that we have a clear first-hand understanding of the conditions within these facilities and the operations that take place there,' Republican lawmakers Rep. Andrea Reeb and Sen. Crystal Brantley wrote in the letter. The letter went on to invite the governor to tag along for the visit at 8 a.m. Monday. 'We believe your participation would be instrumental in ensuring that any decisions made are fully informed and in the best interests of the people of New Mexico,' the Republicans wrote. In an email Thursday afternoon, Michael Coleman, the spokesperson for the governor, told Source that the governor won't join the tour and also hasn't decided yet whether she'll add an ICE detention facility agenda to the special session call. 'The governor has a busy schedule on Monday and won't be joining in the tour,' Coleman said. 'We're still working to determine a special session agenda, and no final decision has been made on this particular issue.' He also said the governor hasn't yet decided on a date for the special session, which her lawyer said she anticipated would happen later this month or in September to address federal funding cuts Congress recently enacted in the 'Big Beautiful Bill' act. Other crime-related measures could also be on the governor's call. Senate GOP spokesperson Brandon Harris told Source New Mexico earlier Thursday that delays around background checks likely mean reporters won't be able to join the lawmakers during their tour, but they intend to hold a news conference or otherwise provide an update to the public about the tour. That could be on social media or at a previously scheduled meeting of the interim Courts, Corrections and Justice Committee also occurring Monday in Las Cruces. But the governor, who hadn't responded to the GOP's invite as of 1:30 p.m. Monday, would be able to join if she wanted, he said. 'If anyone could probably get expedited [approval],' it's the governor, Harris said. 'If she wanted to, she probably could.' The GOP's letter said the CCJ committee canceled a long-promised tour of the facility, citing concerns about background checks. As of Aug. 4, the average daily inmate population at Otero County Detention Center is 863, an increase of about 60 inmates, on average, since December last year, according to the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse. The other two New Mexico facilities in Torrance and Cibola counties have average daily populations of 444 and 223 ICE detainees, respectively, according to TRAC. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
JD Vance Torches Report Showing How Bad Trump's Budget Is
Vice President JD Vance on Thursday baselessly dismissed a recent report that exposed the regressive nature of the administration's economic agenda. During a Thursday visit to Georgia, a reporter with Atlanta News First asked the vice president to justify the fact that, according to a new report from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, Trump's spending plan will exacerbate the wealth gap. According to the report, the so-called One, Big Beautiful Bill Act will cost the poorest Americans an estimated $1,200 per year from 2026 to 2034, while furnishing the richest with an extra $13,600. Vance's reply? Sometimes, he said, the CBO's reports are 'absolutely atrocious, and I think this is a good example of a very atrocious report.' To defend the claim, he pointed to the bill's temporary no-tax-on-tips and no-tax-on-overtime provisions (which were, according to the Washington Center for Equitable Growth, 'designed in ways that limit their benefits for less affluent taxpayers'). Most importantly, Vance said, Trump's policies will keep jobs in the United States. But rather than explain how, he provided a quite circular argument: 'That is the very best thing for the people at the bottom of the income ladder, and that's why we have the economic policies that we do.' The vice president went on to tout the president's mass deportation campaign. Last month, when Vance was rallying for the bill's passage, he described its impact on the federal budget (as measured by the CBO) and its historic cuts to the social safety net ('the minutiae of the Medicaid policy,' as he put it) as 'immaterial,' in light of the billions it puts toward Trump's draconian immigration agenda.
