China's economy lags in July under pressure from tariffs and a weak property market
Uncertainty over tariffs on exports to the United States is still looming over the world's second-largest economy after President Donald Trump extended a pause in sharp hikes in import duties for 90 days, beginning Monday, following a 90-day pause that began in May.
As officials worked toward a broader trade agreement, China reported earlier that its exports surged 7.2% in July year-on-year, while its imports grew at the fastest pace in a year, as businesses rushed to take advantage of the truce in Trump's trade war with Beijing.
But that also reflected a lower base for comparison, and manufacturers have slowed investments, hiring and production as they watch to see what comes. Chinese manufacturers also have ramped up shipments to Southeast Asia, Africa and other regions to help offset lost business in the U.S.
Still, annual growth in industrial output fell to 5.7% in July from 6.8% in June, the National Bureau of Statistics said.
Investments in factory equipment and other fixed assets rose a meager 1.6% in January-July, compared with 2.8% growth in the first half of the year.
Property investments plunged 12% in the first seven months of the year, with residential housing investment dropping nearly 11%.
Prices for newly built housing in major cities fell 1.1%, as a prolonged downturn in the property industry lingered.
The meltdown in the housing market hit just as the COVID -19 pandemic began, sapping one of the economy's main drivers of growth and causing dozens of developers to default on their debts.
Monday Mornings
The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week.
The crisis rippled throughout the economy, destroying jobs for millions of people.
The government has sought to ensure that most housing that was paid for gets built, but sales remain weak despite a series of moves meant to entice families into back into the market.
Since most Chinese families have their wealth tied up in property, the anemic housing market has been a major factor crimping consumer spending. In July, retail sales rose 3.7%, the slowest rate in seven months and down from a 4.8% increase in June.
The unemployment rate rose to 5.2% from 5% as university graduates began looking for work.
While consumer prices rose 0.4% in July from the month before, prices at the wholesale level slipped 3.6% from a year earlier in another indicator of relatively weak demand.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
7 hours ago
- CTV News
Housing woes & U.S. relationship fears top Canadian concerns
Watch Nik Nanos unpacks home prices, affordability, and why Trump and U.S. ties are now Canada's leading worry.
Calgary Herald
10 hours ago
- Calgary Herald
Varcoe: Alberta agriculture minister chides Ottawa over slow response to Chinese canola tariffs
Article content 'It's blatantly obvious that the whole canola situation and the instability with trade with China started with the EV tariffs,' said Sigurdson. Article content 'What we see is an EV tariff that is meant to protect Central Canada businesses, affecting western Canadian agricultural producers. And we're calling on the federal government for immediate action to resolve this before harvest.' Article content In a report this week, ATB Financial said the duty and tariffs from China hike the price of Canadian canola so high that they effectively block it from the massive market. Article content It also comes amid increasing global trade uncertainty that escalated this year with the U.S., although Alberta agricultural products have largely avoided tariffs from the Donald Trump administration, said ATB deputy chief economist Rob Roach. Article content Article content Alan Hampton, who farms north of Drumheller, said Friday the timing of the new Chinese tariffs is 'terrible' as harvest activities will be widespread within weeks. Article content 'Canola prices have dropped by about a buck-and-a-half a bushel in a week. My estimated unrealized loss is probably in the neighbourhood of $40,000. We don't know where the bottom is at,' Hampton said. Article content 'It's not something that farmers have brought upon themselves. I feel the government should be coming up with some type of compensation package.' Article content The federal government has been lambasted by critics in recent days for its slow reaction to the Chinese tariffs that initially began this spring, while assistance has gone to other sectors hit by U.S. tariffs. Article content At a news conference Thursday morning in Saskatchewan, federal Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre accused the prime minister of remaining 'silent.' Article content 'There is a tariff dispute with the Chinese government. The money raised by the Canadian government in that dispute (from EVs) should go back to the people who are paying the bills … our canola producers,' he said. Article content Earlier in the week, the premiers of Saskatchewan, Manitoba and Alberta spoke out. Article content On Friday, Calgary Chamber of Commerce CEO Deborah Yedlin also issued a statement, encouraging the federal government to 'immediately provide financial support to Canadian canola farmers and to stabilize economic relations with China.' Article content I spoke yesterday with @PremierScottMoe about China's preliminary anti-dumping duties on Canadian canola seed. If maintained, these unjustified duties will have significant impacts on many Canadian farmers. Premier Moe and I focused on a series of measures to support hard-working… — Mark Carney (@MarkJCarney) August 14, 2025 Article content On X, the prime minister said Canada doesn't dump canola and noted he'd spoken with Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe about finding ways to support farmers. Article content 'The premier and I agreed to engage directly with industry leaders in the near term to discuss the options,' he said. Article content 'We will advance a constructive dialogue with Chinese officials to address our respective trade concerns, while diversifying our trade abroad and supporting our canola producers at home.' Article content In the interim, there doesn't appear to be an easy way out of the trade dispute. Article content With ongoing trade negotiations with Washington, it makes it difficult for the federal government to also focus on striking a quick resolution with Beijing on canola, said Philippe Rheault, director of the China Institute at the University of Alberta. Article content 'In the short term, it's going to force the Carney government to start triangulating when it comes to trade, as opposed to allowing itself the luxury of going in a sequential manner where they try to deal with the Americans first and the Chinese after,' he said. Article content
Globe and Mail
10 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
Trump's economic meddling suggests a new kind of pay-to-play corporatism
U.S. President Donald Trump has long taken a transactional approach to economic management. He has threatened tariffs against trading partners to extract concessions, and pushed them to purchase American energy, soybeans and Boeing Co. BA-N jets to maintain access to the world's largest consumer market. Recently, the President has found a new group to shake down: American companies. This week chipmakers Nvidia Corp. NVDA-Q and Advanced Micro Devices Inc. AMD-Q agreed to pay the U.S. Treasury 15 per cent of the profits earned from selling certain advanced semiconductors in China in return for export licences. With never-ending tariff drama, the Canadian economy limps along Earlier this year, Mr. Trump demanded the U.S. government get a 'golden share' – giving it certain veto powers – as a condition for approving Nippon Steel Corp.'s NPSCY takeover of U.S. Steel Corp., and the administration is in talks to take a direct stake in Intel Corp. INTC-Q, according to media reports. The President has also called for Intel's chief executive officer to step down and said Goldman Sachs should fire its chief economist. These interventions in the private sector are happening alongside attacks on institutions that underpin well-functioning markets. Mr. Trump has threatened to fire Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell for not lowering interest rates. And he sacked the head of the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics last week following an unflattering jobs report and is seeking to install a MAGA loyalist. The United States is not about to abandon market capitalism for state-centric planning, economists say. But the President does seem to favour a pay-to-play economy in which foreign countries and domestic companies pay tribute to the White House for special privileges, and business decisions are increasingly influenced by political considerations. That, economists warn, is a recipe for slower economic growth, less innovation and lower living standards over time. Past American presidents, from both parties, have used their bully pulpit alongside more aggressive measures, such as antitrust investigations, to bend the private sector, said Ryan Bourne, an economist at the Cato Institute, a libertarian-oriented think tank. 'The difference this time is that we've got to a position where the President is making deals with specific firms and demanding specific individuals resign, and telling specific companies how they can advertise their prices, and tying licences to export, effectively, to direct payments to the Treasury,' Mr. Bourne said. 'I think that the best way to think about this as a kind of economic framework is kind of like maximalist corporatism,' he said. That model is more familiar in emerging-market economies, in which weak institutions let politicians skim off the top and direct business to well-connected insiders, or in state-centric systems, such as China, where governments play a major role in allocating capital. The U.S. is hardly China – although Mr. Trump has said he'll personally direct the hundreds of billions of dollars' worth of investments other countries have promised to make in the U.S. as part of recent trade deals. And American institutions, particularly the courts, remain a check on government overreach. But there is a risk that President Trump's private-sector deal-making will distort business decisions and undercut smaller companies. 'I really worry about the competitive landscape with this,' said Mr. Bourne. 'You can come to a deal with Nvidia, AMD, Apple, these massive global companies. But the idea that some small manufacturer being squashed by tariffs is going to be able to get an audience with the President, specific exemptions or carveouts, is for the birds.' Economists also worry about Mr. Trump's attempt to exert more control over institutions, such as the Fed and the BLS, which help create the conditions for private markets to operate. Mr. Trump has walked back his threats to fire Mr. Powell, whose term as Fed chair ends in May, and financial markets have largely discounted the possibility. But the President and his top officials continue to call for huge interest rate cuts, muddying the water for the independent central bank as it tries to balance the inflationary impact of tariffs against a possible economic slowdown. Meanwhile, Mr. Trump's decision to fire the BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer – after a monthly employment report that revised down recent job creation numbers – and replace her with E.J. Antoni, chief economist of the Trump-aligned Heritage Foundation, has led some economists to worry about the quality of U.S. government data going forward. Opinion: How the new policy elite have caricatured the dismal science John Sabelhaus, a visiting fellow at the Brookings Institution and a former Fed statistician, said it would be difficult for a Trump loyalist, or anyone else, to rig U.S. economic data. Information about the labour market comes from too many different sources, at the state and national level, as well as from the private sector, to fudge over an extended period, he said. The bigger concern is 'that they're going to gut the BLS, and that they'll just stop producing the numbers that you need, and we lose the ability to measure the economy,' he said. Statistical agencies have already been starved of funding for years, and that trend could accelerate, he said. 'Operating in a market environment involves having the information, and we're destroying that. So, the ability of companies to make good rational decisions is really at risk.' In all of this, it's not clear whether Mr. Trump is pursuing an ideological agenda or simply trying to shore up his power and secure 'wins' he can sell to the American public, said Michael Strain, director of economic policy studies at the American Enterprise Institute, a conservative, market-oriented think tank in Washington. 'Xi Jinping wanted to create a model of corporatism, state capitalism, and was very good at doing that … I think it's going beyond the evidence to argue that President Trump wants to inaugurate a state capitalist regime,' said Dr. Strain, referring to China's President. 'It's probably more likely that President Trump doesn't have strong views on different economic systems and just kind of wanted to shake down Nvidia.' Dr. Strain said that Mr. Trump's approach to the economy is currently ascendant in Washington, but it doesn't necessarily run deep within the rest of the Republican Party. 'If you put all 53 Republican senators in a room and you ask them in an anonymous poll: 'How many of you think that Nvidia should be shaken down to hand over 15 per cent of their Chinese sales revenue? How many of you think the U.S. should have a golden share in Nippon Steel? How many of you think the President should be able to ignore the law and not enforce the TikTok legislation that passed both houses?' You get 52 of them who would say this is all crazy,' said Dr. Strain. But publicly, politicians formerly committed to free markets and private enterprise have largely kept their heads down and avoided criticizing the powerful President. 'If you look, you can already see people standing up,' Dr. Strain said. 'But it's not most of them.'
