logo
Student Loan Forgiveness Case Resumes At Supreme Court—What To Know

Student Loan Forgiveness Case Resumes At Supreme Court—What To Know

Forbes23-06-2025
The Supreme Court said Monday that a case over a Biden-era student loan forgiveness rule will resume—after the Trump administration briefly put the litigation on hold—which could affect thousands of borrowers who want to have their loans discharged after their schools closed or defrauded them.
The Guardian or Authority of Law, created by sculptor James Earle Fraser, rests on the side of the ... More Supreme Court on Sept. 28, 2020 in Washington. (Photo by) Getty Images
The Supreme Court agreed Monday to resume Department of Education v. Career Colleges and Schools of Texas, a dispute over a 2022 rule that streamlines the process for borrowers to have their federal loans discharged if their schools closed or engaged in misconduct.
While borrowers have always been able to try to get out of defaulting on their loans by alleging misconduct by their school, the 2022 rule—created after a huge influx of complaints led to a significant backlog—defined clear grounds for borrowers to be able to have their loans discharged before they default on them, making the process of challenging them much easier.
Under the rule, known as 'Borrower Defense Loan Discharge,' borrowers can challenge their loans if their school commits misconduct through misrepresentation, substantial omission of fact, breach of contract or aggressive or deceptive recruitment, if if there's a court ruling that the school violated the law, or the Department of Education takes away the school's ability to participate in federal student loan programs based on any misconduct.
The rule also allows loans to be discharged if a borrower's school closed while they were enrolled or if they withdrew from the school less than 180 days before it closed, and makes it easier for groups to collectively seek relief from student loans, such as on behalf of borrowers who attended a specific school during the same years.
A federal appeals court struck down the 2022 rule and made it even harder for borrowers to get out of paying their loans due to misconduct, saying they could only present those defenses in court after already defaulting on their loans.
The Biden administration asked the Supreme Court to overturn the appeals court's ruling and the court agreed in January to take up the case for oral arguments, but the Trump administration then put the case on pause for a few months while it considered whether it agreed with the Biden administration's argument—ultimately saying in May it does agree and the court should resume the case.
The Supreme Court still hasn't scheduled the case for oral arguments yet, though it's expected to be heard at some point during the court's next term, which runs from October through June 2026. A decision in the case would be announced by the end of June 2026. Can Borrowers Challenge Their Loans Now While The Case Is Pending?
The Education Department is not adjudicating any requests while the litigation is pending for borrowers to have their loans discharged for either misconduct or a school closing. Borrowers can still submit an application for relief under the rule in the meantime, but must continue paying their loans until the program resumes—if it does—and they're notified the application was successful and their loans are discharged. If their loans are discharged, then borrowers may be able to have the loan payments they previously made refunded, per the Department of Education's guidance, in addition to no longer having to make loan payments going forward. Borrowers should consult their loan servicer to determine their specific eligibility for a refund.
If the Supreme Court rules against the government and upholds the appeals court ruling, that would mean borrowers whose schools committed misconduct or closed would likely only be able to use that as a defense if they default on their loans, rather than being able to use it preemptively as a way to have their loans forgiven. The Biden administration warned that would lead to a huge backlog of complaints and strain the government's resources, should thousands of borrowers now have to present their cases in court, and would harm borrowers by forcing them to default on their loans in order to possibly get relief. 'Taxpayer resources would be spent resolving hundreds of thousands of collection suits in which there is no real controversy because both the lender and the borrower agree that the borrower has a valid defense to repayment,' the Biden administration argued, also claiming 'vulnerable borrowers who are subject to fraudulent schemes would be saddled with debt that they cannot discharge without first risking wage garnishment, credit-report damage, and offsets against federal benefits.' The Trump administration told the Supreme Court it will aim to create a replacement rule that would be similar in trying to streamline the process for seeking loan forgiveness, should the high court strike the 2022 rule down. Key Background
The 2022 rule making it easier for borrowers to challenge their loans was part of a broader slew of measures on student loan forgiveness that came out during the Biden administration. The Biden administration broadly sought to relieve student debt, but faced challenges in its efforts to provide more universal loan relief, with the Supreme Court ultimately striking down the government's program to provide sweeping forgiveness to tens of millions of federal borrowers. The administration instead implemented a series of more targeted measures aimed at specific groups of borrowers, saying in January it had approved $188.8 billion in student loan forgiveness. The Trump administration's decision to continue the lawsuit over the Borrower Defense Loan Discharge program comes as top officials have otherwise been largely opposed to student loan forgiveness, with Education Secretary Linda McMahon saying in April that 'American taxpayers will no longer be forced to serve as collateral for irresponsible student loan policies.' The White House has made several changes to the federal student loan program, most notably by trying to move it to the Small Business Administration and by resuming collections on defaulted loans. President Donald Trump's signature policy bill would also broadly overhaul student loans and student loan repayment plans, including by abolishing current income-driven repayment plans and imposing caps on new student loans. That legislation passed the House but is still pending in Congress, with the Senate expected to begin voting on it this week. Forbes How Trump's Spending Bill Could Impact Student Loans—Including Higher Payments And More Restrictions By Alison Durkee Forbes Trump Resumes Defaulted Student Loan Collections Today—Impacting Millions Of Borrowers. Here's What To Know. By Alison Durkee Forbes Trump's Presidency And Student Loans: What Move To Small Business Administration Means For Borrowers By Alison Durkee
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Woman Who Said 'Females' Should Not Hold Elected Office Now Wants To Be Elected To Office
Woman Who Said 'Females' Should Not Hold Elected Office Now Wants To Be Elected To Office

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Woman Who Said 'Females' Should Not Hold Elected Office Now Wants To Be Elected To Office

Mylie Biggs, daughter of Rep. Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.), is running for a seat in the Arizona state legislature despite once having opined that a woman's rightful place is in the home, the Phoenix New Times reported Wednesday. It was not some throwaway, long-ago remark — Mylie Biggs allowed the words 'I don't know if females should be in office' to escape her mouth in a podcast episode released exactly one year ago, on Aug. 6, 2024. The New Times appeared to have gone back to investigate Biggs' public commentary after she announced her candidacy on X in late June. Like her father, she is running as a Republican. Biggs made her remarks about female politicians during an appearance on 'The Matty McCurdy Program,' which bills itself as a place for 'real conversations about life.' 'Honestly, I don't know if I would vote for any female. I don't know if females should be in office,' she said with a laugh. Biggs got on the topic after referring to then-Vice President Kamala Harris as a 'DEI hire' and saying that the only woman she would vote for would be right-wing commentator Candace Owens. Then Biggs doubled down. 'I don't think women should hold office, in general. Like, it's a man's position. That's my stance. I think women should, you know, run the home,' she said. Her male companions offered no objection. 'There's so many videos on even TikTok where so many girls are waking up and are like, whoever fought for my right to work, like, I hate them,' Biggs said. 'I hate a 9-to-5 schedule,' she went on. 'Like, I get home and I don't want to do anything else. Women aren't built for this. I just want to be a wife. I just want to be a mom.' 'I'm not trying to be sexist in any way,' she added, after earlier stating that a woman in high public office would likely not garner respect from leaders of countries in the Middle East. The problem, Biggs asserted, is that 'modern feminism' has 'transformed incredibly in the past few years.' It started with the right to vote — in 1920 — 'and went rampant from there,' she claimed. Biggs has not yet publicly addressed the New Times story. She did not immediately reply to a request for comment from HuffPost. When she announced her intent to run on X, Biggs included a quote from former President Ronald Reagan about liberty and personal freedom: 'It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children's children what it was once like in the United States where men were free.' 'My parents taught me to love my country, the Constitution, and to value my freedoms,' Biggs wrote. 'I've watched so many good people in my life serve this country in the military and in public office. I too seek to serve.' The New Times reported that Biggs has filed paperwork signaling her intent to run but missed a campaign finance deadline. Rep. Andy Biggs once occupied the very same state Senate seat that his daughter now seeks, representing a swath of Maricopa County — which was central to President Donald Trump's attempt to overturn the results of the 2020 election. The elder Biggs has been a staunch supporter of Trump, going so far as to defend the president's supporters' riot on Jan. 6, 2021, and to use his vote to shield Trump from the release of investigative material related to sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Read more . Related... A Race In Arizona Poses A Stiffer Test For Democrats' Youth Movement Trump Names His MAGA 'Heir,' Reveals Which Republican Will 'Most Likely' Succeed Him Kelly, Gallego Urged To Get Tougher On Trump In Arizona Town Hall Solve the daily Crossword

Japan urges US to swiftly implement auto tariff cut
Japan urges US to swiftly implement auto tariff cut

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Japan urges US to swiftly implement auto tariff cut

TOKYO (Reuters) -Japan's top trade negotiator Ryosei Akazawa requested that the U.S. swiftly implement measures agreed upon in a bilateral trade deal, including lowering automobile and auto parts tariffs, Japan's government said on Thursday. The request was made during Akazawa's 90-minute meeting with U.S. Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick in Washington on Wednesday, Japan's government said in a statement. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store