
Inflating invalid vote numbers: Lack of respect for law among ward officials appalling
A thorough investigation should be conducted to uncover the facts. It will also be necessary to severely punish the officials involved.
It has been discovered that during vote counting in Ota Ward, Tokyo, for the House of Councillors election, about 2,600 invalid votes were added to the results in both the electoral district and the proportional representation segment. This is suspected to be a violation of the Public Offices Election Law, namely voting manipulation.
According to the ward, a mistake was made in connection with the absentee voting system, which is used by people who are unable to make it to the polls due to travel, business trips and other reasons. The actual number of absentee voters was 3,229, but the staff mistakenly calculated the number to be over 5,800.
On July 20, the voting and vote counting day, staff received a report about the total number of absentee ballots, but they misunderstood this figure as referring only to absentee ballots received on July 20, and added to it the number of absentee ballots that had arrived by the previous day.
As a result, the staff mistakenly believed that more than 384,600 people had voted, even though the actual number of voters in Ota Ward was 382,000, and they subsequently miscalculated that there were about 2,600 votes missing during the vote counting process.
The ward's election commission decided that the disparity in votes had to be made up, so they added 2,600 invalid votes to the actual number to make the numbers match.
It is utterly unacceptable to tamper with the number of votes cast in an election, which is the foundation of democracy. The lack of respect for the law among the staff is appalling.
The director general of the commission received a report from staff members immediately after the vote count was completed saying that the shortage had been made up by inflating the number of invalid ballots. However, the director general did not mention this until questioned by senior ward officials earlier this month.
It is inevitable that questions would arise over the staff allegedly covering up the situation.
At a press conference, Ota Ward Mayor Akimasa Suzuki apologized and emphasized that the inflated numbers were invalid votes and would not affect the candidates' vote counts or the election results. Ward officials said that a third-party committee would be established to investigate the matter and the ward has already consulted with police.
During the official campaign period of the upper house election, false information spread on social media claiming that pencils were placed at polling stations so that votes could be altered later. There were also numerous unfounded posts claiming that the vote count would be manipulated.
The fact that incorrectly inflating vote numbers actually occurred could give momentum to claims similar to conspiracy theories. It is necessary to avoid a situation in which voters lose trust in elections and stop voting.
(From The Yomiuri Shimbun, Aug. 10, 2025)

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Yomiuri Shimbun
10 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Budget Request Ceilings: Where Is The Mechanism To Curb Spending?
How can the ballooning national budget be curbed without cutting existing expenditures? Government ministries and agencies must not request funds without carefully reviewing the necessity of projects. The government has approved at a Cabinet meeting the budget request ceilings, which will serve as guidelines for ministries and agencies when submitting their budget requests for next fiscal year. Ministries and agencies will submit their requests by the end of August in accordance with the guidelines, after which the budget compilation process will begin in earnest. The government has decided to approve a 20% increase from last year in 'discretionary expenses' for public works and other projects. These funds can be allocated at the discretion of each ministry or agency for important policy measures such as countermeasures against rising prices. A key feature of this year's ceilings is the shift away from a long-standing mechanism in which cuts in existing expenditures were a prerequisite. Under this mechanism, which the government had used through last year, if discretionary expenses were reduced by 10%, then requests for important policy areas could be increased by up to three times the amount of cuts made in discretionary expenses. The shift is said to reflect growing opinion within the ruling parties that the mechanism, which operated on a presumption of spending cuts, was based on deflation-era thinking. However, given the nation's fiscal conditions, there is likely no leeway to abandon the mechanism that curbs expenditures. The initial budget has exceeded ¥110 trillion for three consecutive years since fiscal 2023, and the outstanding amount of government bonds has topped ¥1.1 quadrillion. With the arrival of a 'world with interest rates,' the burden of interest payments on government bonds will become even heavier. Social security expenditures keep rising due to the aging population, and budget constraints are increasingly severe. The national budgets swelled due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and the government set a policy to 'return to normal times' in 2023. Where has that policy gone? So-called budget request ceilings are essentially a mechanism to contain the budget. There have been cases in which a cap was placed on the total amount of requests, or a 3% reduction was imposed on public works expenditures in a method called 'minus ceilings.' The role of budget request ceilings has become merely symbolic. This time, the government has said it plans to continue allowing budget requests without specifying amounts for important policies. Requests without specifying amounts are an exception for cases in which the content or scale of a policy cannot be foreseen. Since the pandemic, there has been a growing tendency to overly make such requests, and concerns remain that the requested amounts could effectively become unlimited. The Finance Ministry should rigorously evaluate policies whose effectiveness is low. As a result of the House of Councillors election, the ruling parties became a minority in both the House of Representatives and the upper house. Pressure for tax cuts, including reducing the consumption tax rate, and to expand spending without the support of adequate fiscal resources will certainly intensify. Due partly to rising prices, tax revenue for fiscal 2024 posted a new record high for the fifth consecutive year. However, fiscal soundness will never be achieved if spending is increased as well. (From The Yomiuri Shimbun, Aug. 11, 2025)


The Mainichi
2 days ago
- The Mainichi
Japan right-wing party Sanseito's talk of prewar imperial rescript in teaching stirs unease
TOKYO -- The right-wing populist party Sanseito, which gained seats in the July 20 House of Councillors election, has quietly stirred waves in Japan's education sector by advocating "respect for the Imperial Rescript on Education." The Imperial Rescript on Education, issued in 1890 by Emperor Meiji, outlined the virtues that the "subjects" of the Japanese Empire were expected to uphold. It served as the spiritual backbone of national education, and its recitation was compulsory in Japanese schools before World War II. After Japan's defeat in the war and the promulgation of a new Constitution that established sovereignty of the people, the House of Representatives adopted a resolution abolishing the Imperial Rescript on Education on the grounds that it undermined fundamental human rights based on its concepts of the rule of a sovereign and a mythological national structure, and the House of Councillors passed a resolution confirming its invalidity. For a long time after the war, it was regarded in educational circles as a taboo educational philosophy. However, Sanseito has proposed its own constitutional draft stating that "the Imperial Rescript on Education and other historical imperial edicts must be respected in education," though it remains unclear whether this could actually be carried out. At a press conference on July 22 following the election results, Minister of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology Toshiko Abe countered the idea, stating, "It is unacceptable to use the Imperial Rescript on Education in ways that contradict the Constitution and the Basic Act on Education." It is unlikely that the current administration would revive such an approach either. Nevertheless, there are growing concerns within the education ministry. "There is a very strong sense of crisis. I don't want to believe that voters understood such extreme claims when they voted ..." said one official, expressing caution regarding a passage from the "New Japanese Constitution (draft)" published on Sanseito's website. In its public pledge, Sanseito proposes the "abolition of managed education focusing on deviation scores." It also promises appealing measures such as "expansion of scholarships," "development of educational environments that cater to individuality," and "improvement of compensation packages for teachers." On the other hand, Article 9, Section 4 of its proposal states: "The Imperial Rescript on Education, historical imperial edicts, patriotism, food and health, regional festivals and great figures, and traditional events must be respected in education." Similar instances have occurred in the past. In 2006, the first administration of former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe revised the Basic Act on Education to include a new objective of "fostering the value of respect for tradition and culture and love of the country and regions that have nurtured us," which drew criticism. Under the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) government, moral aspects like filial piety and family love have often been emphasized, and the appropriateness of incorporating such aspects in educational materials has become an issue. The issue is not limited to Sanseito; there are also a considerable number of people within the LDP's right wing who share similar views. The aforementioned ministry official remarked, "It's hard to imagine that the increase in Sanseito's seats will immediately lead to discussions in the Diet about reviving the Imperial Rescript on Education, but Sanseito might claim that since they have increased their seats they have gained public support, including for their constitutional proposal." In upcoming sessions of the Diet, important educational bills, such as the tuition-free policy for private high schools, the introduction of digital textbooks, and the promotion of 35-student classes in junior high schools, are expected to be deliberated. It remains to be seen whether there will be room for Sanseito's proposals in these discussions. A mid-level official at the ministry views some of Sanseito's claims as having an element of agitation, noting, "It's uncertain how far they intend to go in implementing them as policies." However, the official added, "There is a need to closely monitor whether changes in the political power balance will lead to educational policies being used as bargaining chips."


Yomiuri Shimbun
2 days ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Inflating invalid vote numbers: Lack of respect for law among ward officials appalling
Trust in elections will be undermined if local government officials, who are in a position to oversee fair elections, have tried to arbitrarily adjust the number of votes. A thorough investigation should be conducted to uncover the facts. It will also be necessary to severely punish the officials involved. It has been discovered that during vote counting in Ota Ward, Tokyo, for the House of Councillors election, about 2,600 invalid votes were added to the results in both the electoral district and the proportional representation segment. This is suspected to be a violation of the Public Offices Election Law, namely voting manipulation. According to the ward, a mistake was made in connection with the absentee voting system, which is used by people who are unable to make it to the polls due to travel, business trips and other reasons. The actual number of absentee voters was 3,229, but the staff mistakenly calculated the number to be over 5,800. On July 20, the voting and vote counting day, staff received a report about the total number of absentee ballots, but they misunderstood this figure as referring only to absentee ballots received on July 20, and added to it the number of absentee ballots that had arrived by the previous day. As a result, the staff mistakenly believed that more than 384,600 people had voted, even though the actual number of voters in Ota Ward was 382,000, and they subsequently miscalculated that there were about 2,600 votes missing during the vote counting process. The ward's election commission decided that the disparity in votes had to be made up, so they added 2,600 invalid votes to the actual number to make the numbers match. It is utterly unacceptable to tamper with the number of votes cast in an election, which is the foundation of democracy. The lack of respect for the law among the staff is appalling. The director general of the commission received a report from staff members immediately after the vote count was completed saying that the shortage had been made up by inflating the number of invalid ballots. However, the director general did not mention this until questioned by senior ward officials earlier this month. It is inevitable that questions would arise over the staff allegedly covering up the situation. At a press conference, Ota Ward Mayor Akimasa Suzuki apologized and emphasized that the inflated numbers were invalid votes and would not affect the candidates' vote counts or the election results. Ward officials said that a third-party committee would be established to investigate the matter and the ward has already consulted with police. During the official campaign period of the upper house election, false information spread on social media claiming that pencils were placed at polling stations so that votes could be altered later. There were also numerous unfounded posts claiming that the vote count would be manipulated. The fact that incorrectly inflating vote numbers actually occurred could give momentum to claims similar to conspiracy theories. It is necessary to avoid a situation in which voters lose trust in elections and stop voting. (From The Yomiuri Shimbun, Aug. 10, 2025)