logo
Jewish non-profit chief says Musk will spur violence with his ‘Nazi salute'

Jewish non-profit chief says Musk will spur violence with his ‘Nazi salute'

The Guardian26-01-2025
The head of a prominent US Jewish civil rights body said Elon Musk's repeated fascist-style salute during Donald Trump's inauguration could act as a spur for violent extremists.
'The salute itself should be enough to warrant condemnation and attention,' said Amy Spitalnick, adding that so should 'the ways extremists see an action like this and take it as license for their own violent extremism'.
Spitalnick is chief executive of the Jewish Council for Public Affairs, a progressive non-profit founded in the 1940s and headquartered in New York City. On Monday, she watched with the rest of the world as Musk, the world's richest person and a key Trump ally, spoke in Washington at the new president's inaugural rally – and gave two fascist-style salutes.
Musk and his followers have sought to brush off the affair, but to Spitalnick, 'there was nothing ambiguous' about the salutes, no matter how many attempts are made to describe them as 'Roman' or anything else.
'There's a long history here,' she said. 'The fact that Nazi salutes are now a regular part of our political discourse is how I got involved with all of this. Before JCPA, I led the non-profit [Integrity First for America] that brought a lawsuit over [the far-right march in 2017 in] Charlottesville and against [the activist] Richard Spencer and a variety of other defendants who are clear neo-Nazi extremists.
'You know: 'Gave the Roman salute' is just the euphemistic way of saying 'Nazi salute'.'
To Spitalnick, 'most people today don't have a full understanding of what the term 'fascist' even means, and so naming it for what it is – the Nazi salute – feels important right now.'
It's also important, she says, not to dismiss the fallout as just another online spat, an attempt to distract opponents with outrageous behavior. Not only has Musk expressed support for Alternative für Deutschland, a German far-right party widely accused of Nazi-esque views, but he chose to throw out his right arm on day one of an administration that has thrown out executive orders advancing draconian policies on immigration, equality and more.
Musk's salute found a warm welcome on far-right sites – much as when in November 2023 he endorsed a post on his own platform, X, that said Jewish people promote 'hatred against whites' and support immigration by 'hordes of minorities'. After condemnation from advertisers and the Biden White House, Musk apologized: saying it 'might be literally the worst and dumbest post I've ever done', he visited Auschwitz, the Nazi death camp in Poland, in a show of contrition.
To Spitalnick, that apology rang hollow: 'There was some engagement with Prime Minister [Benjamin] Netanyahu [of Israel] and others that was used as attempted cover for not just his own embrace of antisemitism and extremism but the ways in which he's let it run rampant on X, and given the ways in which it's normalized, not just on social media but in our politics more broadly, we can't excuse that. We can't give it cover in any way.'
This time, Musk has not apologized. On Thursday, he continued a run of joking posts about his behavior at Trump's parade with a series of Nazi-themed puns, including: 'Some people will Goebbels anything down!'
Nor have all pressure groups condemned Musk's salutes. The Anti-Defamation League, which fights antisemitism and which Musk previously threatened to sue, said merely that he 'made an awkward gesture in a moment of enthusiasm, not a Nazi salute'.
The JCPA 'fundamentally disagrees', Spitalnick said, 'and we work closely with the ADL on a variety of fronts. They do critical work. And in this case, to me, there was no question what the intent, and even more importantly the impact, of this action was.
'It was at a presidential event, and [Musk] is someone who has a presidential appointment, an office in the executive building. He is not a random third party. He is a senior member of the Trump administration who gave a Nazi salute from the presidential podium. And there's no world in which that doesn't lead to more hate and extremism that will make Jews and so many other communities less safe.'
Sign up to Headlines US
Get the most important US headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning
after newsletter promotion
Musk is working for a president who reportedly praised and admired Hitler; whose own vice-president once called him 'America's Hitler'; and whose opponent in last year's election, Kamala Harris, called 'a fascist' and an admirer of dictators.
Spitalnick acknowledges that after an election featuring a flood of such invective, which Trump won regardless, the public may decide Musk's apparent fondness for fascist-style salutes is not worthy of serious attention.
But she has fought the far right before – and won. The Charlottesville lawsuit was brought by nine plaintiffs who alleged physical harm and emotional distress arising from the Unite the Right rally, a pro-Trump protest in Virginia in August 2017. In November 2021, a jury awarded the plaintiffs $24m, later substantially reduced.
In the second Trump administration, Spitalnick says, the courts will again provide an arena for progressives to fight back.
She 'worked in the New York attorney general's office during the first Trump administration, and over and over again, our office and a number of other state AGs won cases against his administration, not just on constitutional grounds and administrative procedural grounds but on a variety of other grounds. The law is the law, and we have to fight like hell to protect the law and protect our justice system and our broader democratic norms.'
Amid outcry over Musk's salutes, Spitalnick says, those who oppose the billionaire and his boss should remember 'that when people feel like it's just been a barrage of bad over the last few days, the response is just beginning'.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Four dead in mass shooting at popular Bangkok food market
Four dead in mass shooting at popular Bangkok food market

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

Four dead in mass shooting at popular Bangkok food market

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.

Columbia's $221 million deal with Trump may predict what comes next
Columbia's $221 million deal with Trump may predict what comes next

The Herald Scotland

time3 hours ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Columbia's $221 million deal with Trump may predict what comes next

Closer look: Details of Columbia settlement Learn more: How other colleges are dealing with pressure. "It is our hope that this is going to be a template for other universities around the country," said Education Secretary Linda McMahon. "Numerous other Higher Education Institutions that have hurt so many, and been so unfair and unjust, and have wrongly spent federal money, much of it from our government, are upcoming," Trump posted on Truth Social in announcing the settlement. A number of high-profile universities have had federal money withheld while being investigated by the administration. Which colleges have been targeted? Can't see our graphics? Click here to view them. The administration is investigating a number of U.S. universities, including high-profile institutions like Harvard, on accusations that include antisemitism amid protests of the war in Gaza after Hamas invaded Israel in 2023. Those investigations have been going on since March. They include: Columbia University Accusation: Jewish students weren't protected from antisemitism and discrimination. Jewish students weren't protected from antisemitism and discrimination. When: March 2025. A settlement was announced July 23. March 2025. A settlement was announced July 23. Columbia will pay: $221 million in legal settlements. $221 million in legal settlements. Columbia will get: $400 million in federal funds reinstated. University of Pennsylvania Accusation: Violating administration policy on transgender athletes. Violating administration policy on transgender athletes. When: March 2025 March 2025 Penn could have lost: $175 million in federal funds had been suspended. $175 million in federal funds had been suspended. Status: Funding was restored in July 2025 after Penn apologized and changed its policy. Brown University Accusation: Failing to stem antisemitism on campus. Failing to stem antisemitism on campus. When : April 2025 : April 2025 Brown may lose: Administration has paused $510 million in federal contracts and grants. Administration has paused $510 million in federal contracts and grants. Status: Pending Cornell University Accusation: Failing to protect civil rights and failing to restrain antisemitism and racial discrimination. Failing to protect civil rights and failing to restrain antisemitism and racial discrimination. When? April 2025 April 2025 Cornell may lose: $1 billion in federal funding has been halted. $1 billion in federal funding has been halted. Status: Pending Northwestern Accusation: Failing to protect civil rights and fight antisemitism and racial discrimination. Failing to protect civil rights and fight antisemitism and racial discrimination. When? April 2025 April 2025 Northwestern could lose: $790 million in federal funding has been halted. $790 million in federal funding has been halted. Status: Pending Princeton University Accusation? Failing to restrain antisemitism on campus. Failing to restrain antisemitism on campus. When? April 2025 April 2025 Princeton could lose: Nearly $210 million in federal research grants have been suspended. Nearly $210 million in federal research grants have been suspended. Status: Pending Harvard Accusation: Failing to fight antisemitism on campus. Failing to fight antisemitism on campus. When? June 2025 June 2025 Harvard may lose: $2.6 billion in federal grants. $2.6 billion in federal grants. Status: Harvard is appealing in federal court. New investigations announced Additional investigations by the State Department and the Department of Education were reported on July 23. The State Department is investigating whether Harvard is still eligible to be a sponsor for the Exchange Visitor Program. The Education Department said it will investigate whether five universities that have scholarships specified for undocumented students are discriminating against those born in the United States. The universities are: University of Louisville University of Nebraska, Omaha University of Miami University of Michigan Western Michigan University The administration has accused elite universities of antisemitism and ideological indoctrination, according to The New York Times. But it has made no secret of its disdain for many universities, especially the richest and most selective ones. CONTRIBUTING Zachary Schermele and George Petras SOURCE USA TODAY Network reporting and research; Reuters; Center for American Progress;

Why couldn't Britain have dealt with the EU like Trump?
Why couldn't Britain have dealt with the EU like Trump?

Spectator

time3 hours ago

  • Spectator

Why couldn't Britain have dealt with the EU like Trump?

The more you look at the trade deal negotiated between the US and the EU, the more you want to ask: why couldn't Britain have dealt with the EU like that? Why has every UK Prime Minister since Theresa May acted so feebly in the face of the EU's tactics and ended up getting such a poor deal out of the EU? Trump has get pretty much everything he wanted. Goods imported into the US from the EU will in future be subject to tariffs of 15 per cent – half the rate that Trump had threatened but far higher than existed prior to 'Liberation Day' on 2 April. What has Ursula von der Leyen got in return? Nothing at all, other than the punitive tariffs being dropped. She has agreed to lowering tariffs on imports from the EU, in some cases to zero. She has also agreed to the EU buying more products from the US, including liquified natural gas (LNG), making a mockery of the EU's net-zero policy. Like Britain, the EU has wound down its fossil fuel industry on the pretext that it is yesterday's energy and we won't need it for much longer as we transition to clean renewables – but then it commits itself to buying increased quantities of LNG from the US. Say what you like about Trump, but it is easy to argue that he has proven a far stronger defender of his country's interests than Theresa May, Boris Johnson, Rishi Sunak or Keir Starmer. Britain is nearly as important a destination for EU exports as the US: in 2024, 21 per cent of its exports went to the US and 14 per cent to Britain. Yet no Prime Minister has properly used this leverage to give Britain any advantage. May got nowhere in the end but would have committed Britain to becoming a rule-taker from the EU. Johnson agreed to place an internal UK border down the Irish Sea. Sunak did a little better in trying to resolve this, but then Starmer has put us back closer to where May wanted to take us: agreeing to EU rules on plant and animal products while having no say in the making of those rules. Why did UK Brexit negotiators never threaten punitive tariffs on German cars and French wine? Instead – and in spite of Theresa May's mantra of 'no deal is better than a bad deal' – we acted as if no deal was never an option. Simultaneously, we treated Trump – whose first presidential term lasted throughout the Brexit negotiations – as a kind of oaf who was destroying America's reputation. Had our leaders emulated him rather than scorned him we would be in a lot better position now. It all starts to look a bit different, however, if you look at Trump's trade negotiations from the point of view of consumers rather than producers and ask instead: has Trump really scored such a victory? If you are an American motorist who fancies a new car, your choice has just narrowed, and many of the options available have just increased in price. It is not just consumers, either, who may feel this is not quite the victory for the US it might look like on the surface. Most manufacturers rely on international supply chains. While tariffs may help snuff out some of their competition, they will in future face higher prices of raw materials and components. This does not appear to feature all that much in Trump's mercantilist mind. To him – and not just him, because many world leaders seem to think the same – exporting stuff is a strength and importing stuff a weakness. When you think of things that way, the US has been cheated by the lopsided tariffs which have long existed between the US and the rest of the world. Yet the fact remains that the US has done extremely well out of its low import tariffs. Its economy has grown far faster than those of its more protectionist rivals. So yes, it is easy to admire Trump's negotiating tactics. The whirlwind of the past few months, with threats followed by negotiations and flattery, has been a wonder to watch. It is sad that UK leaders have lacked the courage to act in such a brazen fashion towards the EU. Yet that doesn't mean that the US will end up being the big winner from higher import tariffs. On the contrary, overall the US economy is likely to grow less strongly as a result.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store