What Was That Lame Response to Chinese Fighter Jets' Reckless Behavior?
Two encounters occurred west of Japan's Okinotorishima Island. First, a Chinese fighter jet tracked the MSDF patrol aircraft for approximately 40 minutes on June 7. Then, a J-15 repeated the aggression by tracking Japan's MSDF plane for roughly 80 minutes on June 8. On each day, the Chinese fighters came within about 45 meters of Japan's patrol plane. Moreover, on June 8, the Chinese jet cut across the path of the MSDF aircraft about 900 meters ahead of it.
These Chinese military flight maneuvers were extremely dangerous and unusual and are totally unacceptable.
All monitoring and surveillance activities by the MSDF aircraft complied with international rules. They presented no threat or problem whatsoever. China should admit and apologize for its wrongdoing in flying its fighter jets in an aggressive and hazardous manner near the Japanese propeller patrol plane. Chinese Navy aircraft carrier "Shandong" (Provided by the Ministry of Defense Joint Staff Office) Chinese Navy aircraft carrier "Liaoning" (Provided by the Ministry of Defense Joint Staff Office)
Vice-Minister of Foreign Affairs Takehiro Funakoshi conveyed Japan's serious concerns about the incidents to Chinese Ambassador to Japan Wu Jianghao. He also called for China to prevent any recurrence of such incidents.
However, it was a Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson who responded. For the ministry, the spokesperson asserted China's activities were fully consistent with international law and practices and called on Japan to stop its "dangerous behavior" of "close-range reconnaissance."
It goes to prove the old adage, "A thief is by nature defiant."
Moreover, an unrepentant Chinese military will likely repeat its provocations.
Yoshihide Yoshida, Chief of Staff of the Joint Staff of Japan's Self-Defense Forces, directly responded to the matter. At a press conference, he stated: "We will be implementing even stricter vigilance and surveillance. We recognize that [the approach] was intentional. If we relax our vigilance and surveillance, it will only encourage. We will firmly maintain our will and capability to deter , "
Yoshida's statement evinces his strong determination to defend the country. We look to him and the SDF to fulfill their mission. Minister for Foreign Affairs Takeshi Iwaya
The reactions of Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba and Foreign Minister Takeshi Iwaya, however, have been pathetic. Such an aggressive approach by foreign combat aircraft is a problem comparable to an airspace violation. Why didn't the Prime Minister and foreign minister lodge firm protests with Beijing rather than just expressing "serious concern?"
Remonstrations were made to the Chinese side at levels below the Vice Minister for Foreign Affairs from June 10. That was two days after the second incident. Yet, the vice minister himself did not make a request for another two days, until June 12. That was five days after the first incident. It was also the day after the Ministry of Defense made the incidents public. Any national leader who cannot express the nation's rightful anger is not fit to represent the country. That includes the Prime Minister and the foreign minister.
United States Ambassador to Japan George Glass wrote about the incident on the social media platform X.
The recent dangerous maneuver by a Chinese fighter jet that put Japanese crewmembers' lives in peril must be another of Beijing's "good neighbor" efforts. Whether it's harassing Philippine ships, attacking Vietnamese fishermen, or firing flares at Australian aircraft, Beijing… pic.twitter.com/40A9AdpAHm — ジョージ・グラス駐日米国大使 (@USAmbJapan) June 12, 2025
He outright stated that the dangerous maneuvers by the Chinese fighter "put Japanese crewmembers' lives in peril." Moreover, he labeled the Chinese aircraft's actions "reckless aggression."
It is high time that Japan's Prime Minister, Cabinet members, and other politicians speak out so forthrightly.
This incident occurred while two Chinese aircraft carriers, the Shandong and Liaoning, were deployed simultaneously in the Western Pacific. It was the first time for such a joint mobilization.
The Liaoning was also the first Chinese aircraft carrier to operate east of the Second Island Chain, which stretches from Japan's Ogasawara Islands to the US territory of Guam.
Unless it puts more effort into Pacific Ocean defense, Japan will be putting itself at risk.
(Read the editorial in Japanese .)
Author: Editorial Board, The Sankei Shimbun
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
2 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Japan and China commemorate World War II anniversary on different dates
BENXI, China (AP) — Eighty years after the end of World War II, Japan and China are marking the anniversary with major events, but on different dates and in different ways. Japan remembers the victims in a solemn ceremony on Aug. 15, the day then-Emperor Hirohito announced in a crackly radio message that the government had surrendered, while China showcases its military strength with a parade on Sept. 3, the day after the formal surrender on an American battleship in Tokyo Bay. Japan occupied much of China before and during WWII in a devastating and brutal invasion that, by some estimates, killed 20 million people. The wartime experience still bedevils relations between the two countries today. A museum in the Chinese city of Benxi highlights the struggles of anti-Japanese resistance fighters who holed up in log cabins through fierce winters in the country's northeast, then known as Manchuria, before retreating into Russia. They returned only after the Soviet Union declared war on Japan and launched an offensive into Manchuria on Aug. 9, 1945 — the same day the U.S. dropped an atomic bomb on Nagasaki — adding to the pressure on Japan to surrender. Nowadays, it is China's military that raises alarm as it seeks to enforce the government's territorial claims in the Pacific. When Japan talks of building up its defense to counter the threat, its militaristic past gives China a convenient retort. 'We urge Japan to deeply reflect on its historical culpability, earnestly draw lessons from history and stop using hype over regional tensions and China-related issues to conceal its true intent of military expansion,' Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun said last month. Japan's surrender broadcast Hirohito's prerecorded surrender broadcast on Aug. 15, 1945, was incomprehensible to many Japanese. He used arcane language and the sound quality was poor. What was important, historians say, was that the message came from the emperor himself. Hirohito was considered a living god, and the war was fought in his name. Most Japanese had never heard his voice before. 'The speech is a reminder of what it took to end the wrong war,' Nihon University professor Takahisa Furukawa told The Associated Press in 2015. The current emperor, Hirohito's grandson Naruhito, and the prime minister are set to make remarks at the annual ceremony in Tokyo on Aug. 15, broadcast live by public broadcaster NHK. At last year's event, Naruhito expressed deep remorse over Japan's actions during the war. But on the same day, three Japanese cabinet ministers visited Tokyo's Yasukuni shrine, drawing criticism from China and South Korea, which see the shrine as a symbol of militarism. China marks Victory Day Japan surrendered on Sept. 2, 1945, in a ceremony on board the American battleship USS Missouri. The foreign minister, in a top hat and tails, and the army chief signed on behalf of Hirohito. The signatories on the other side were U.S. Gen. Douglas MacArthur and representatives from China and other nations that had fought Japan. China designated the next day, Sept. 3, as Victory Day. Eleven years ago, the Communist Party stepped up how China marks the anniversary. All of China's top leaders, including President Xi Jinping, attended a commemorative event on Sept. 3. The renewed focus came at a time of rising tension with Japan over conflicting interpretations of wartime history and a still-ongoing territorial dispute in the East China Sea. The next year, China staged a military parade on the 70th anniversary of the end of the war. A decade later, preparations are underway for another grand parade with missiles, tanks and fighter jets overhead. Russian President Vladimir Putin is among those expected to attend.
Global News
8 hours ago
- Global News
Rustad calls for BC Ferries to scrap Chinese vessel contract
The leader of B.C.'s official Opposition is calling for the province to cancel BC Ferries' multi-billion-dollar contract with a Chinese shipyard. The ferry company has faced criticism from all sides since announcing this spring it would purchase its next four vessels from China Merchants Industry Weihai Shipyards (CMI Weihai) after a lengthy open bid process. No Canadian shipyards bid on the project, and the ferry company says the Chinese bid came in at about $1.2 billion cheaper than European competitors. BC Conservative Leader John Rustad said Tuesday that in the wake of China's latest tariffs on Canada, the deal should be scrapped. China announced a 75.8 per cent tariff on Canadian canola products this week, expected to deliver a $5 billion hit to the industry. 1:57 Union demands ferries be built in Canada Rustad said the Chinese move follows similar aggressive trade actions targeting Canadian seafood and wood pulp. Story continues below advertisement 'I think we should break this contract. I think that we need to send a message. We want to be able to have a good trade relationship with China. We want be able make sure that we have the ability to do things, but you don't reward a country that is quite frankly attacking other sectors of our economy,' Rustad said. 'I think there probably would be a penalty and quite frankly I think the board of BC Ferries should be fired for incompetence for actually putting us in this position in the first place.' Rustad further accused the NDP government of 'incompetence' for failing to work with local shipbuilders years ago to ensure they had the capacity to handle upcoming BC Ferries orders, and said if they were already fully committed to other projects the ferry company should have gone with 'some of our allies' like Germany or Poland. B.C. Premier Davide Eby has previously said that he would not override the deal, telling reporters it would cost billions to overturn and delay the procurement of badly-needed vessels. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy In a statement, NDP Saanich South MLA Lana Popham said acquiring the new vessels was urgent. 'People need the new ships, quickly, so they can get where they need to go and aren't left sitting at the terminal parking lot. We are working to ensure future ships for BC Ferries are built here in Canada. Story continues below advertisement BC Ferries has said that cost was a key driver in its new ferry procurement process, and that any additional cost of more expensive vessels would be passed on to passengers. 1:24 'We shouldn't be giving federal tax dollars to subsidize jobs overseas:' Poilievre calls for loan to BC Ferries to be cancelled BC Ferries currently charges $95 for a car and driver plus $15 per passenger one-way on its major southern routes, and has warned that it could be forced to further hike fares by 30 per cent by 2028. Earlier this month, CEO Nicolas Jimenez told the House of Common Transport Committee that while two Canadian shipyards pre-qualified for the process, neither submitted a bid. BC Ferries received six compliant proposals, all from foreign shipyards, and chose the bid with the best overall value, including delivery timeline, technical performance, lifecycle cost, and service-level commitments, he testified. 'This was a choice between a foreign bid or no new ferries,' he told MPs. Story continues below advertisement Domestic shipyards, however, have argued that the bid process essentially excluded them by focusing on cost alone and that they were unable to compete due to pricier local labour. UBC Sauder School of Business economics professor Werner Antweiler said that while there have been many calls for BC Ferries to drop the contract, it would only make sense if there was a realistic alternative. He noted that local shipbuilder Seaspan is already fully booked with contracts for the military and Coast Guard, and that waiting is likely not an option for BC Ferries. 'If you want to receive ships that are affordable and available soon, there seems to be very little other options than going ahead with the contract that has been signed with China CMI,' he said. 2:12 Push for government to support domestic ship building industry 'So I'm not quite sure when people say well, we should build them domestically, what exactly they are proposing who is going to build and when.' Story continues below advertisement He added that cancelling the deal would do little harm to China's larger economy, while risking further increasing trade tensions. BC Ferries is technically an independent company with its own board and executives, though its sole shareholder is the BC government. Antweiler added that given its arms-length status, it would be improper for the provincial government to step in and override decision making. 'It means like really renationalizing BC Ferries and bringing it back under provincial control and making it a Crown corporation,' he said. 'If that is what is being proposed then Mr. Rustad should be clear about if that is where he wants to go.' 1:48 Federal transportation minister calls out province on BC Ferries' contract with China Rustad is not alone in his criticism of the deal. Story continues below advertisement Trades in the province and the union representing BC Ferries workers have both spoken out against it. B.C. Transportation Minister Mike Farnworth said he was 'disappointed' more Canadian shipyards weren't involved, while federal Transport Minister Chrystia Freeland said she was 'dismayed' at the choice and Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre said Canadian tax dollars should not be subsidizing jobs overseas. MPs have launched a probe at the federal transportation committee of a $1 billion loan to BC Ferries from Canada Infrastructure Bank. BC Ferries is not the first Canadian ferry service to receive a ferry from CMI Weihai. Marine Atlantic Ferries, a federal Crown corporation that services Newfoundland, recently took a delivery of a new vessel from the same shipyard.
Winnipeg Free Press
9 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Kinew calls for Ottawa to help canola farmers hurt by China's tariffs
Premier Wab Kinew is calling for 'immediate action' from Ottawa following a sky-high levy placed on Canadian canola seed imports to China. China announced a preliminary anti-dumping duty of 75.8 per cent Tuesday. The tax takes effect Thursday. Canola seed was Manitoba's biggest export to China last year, bringing in $649 million. Farmers are preparing for this year's harvest in the coming weeks. TIM SMITH / THE BRANDON SUN FILES Canola seed was Manitoba's biggest export to China last year, bringing in $649 million. 'The Chinese government has clearly launched these tariffs at this time of year to cause maximum impact and maximum uncertainty,' Kinew said Wednesday, speaking at the Manitoba Legislative Building. He was flanked by heads of the Manitoba Canola Growers and Keystone Agricultural Producers. Financial support from Ottawa is necessary, Kinew asserted. China claimed Canadian companies have been 'dumping' canola into its country, harming its domestic oil market. However, the new fee follows 100 per cent tariffs it placed on Canadian canola oil and meal. Those tariffs were retaliatory to tariffs Canada placed on Chinese electric vehicle imports last October. Revenue that Ottawa generates from the EV tariffs should be funnelled to impacted farmers, Kinew stated. 'Let's see the federal government step up with the same sort of supports that we've seen for the steel industry, for the auto industry and for the lumber industry,' he said, referencing sectors hit with United States tariffs. Producers have spent maximum amounts of money preparing this year's crop, noted Warren Ellis, chair of the Manitoba Canola Growers. 'On Tuesday morning, we lost our second largest customer,' Ellis said. 'It's really critical that solutions come out.' Manitoba counts 7,500 canola farmers. Its canola crop production averages around three million metric tonnes. Canola prices will sag, forecasted Rick White, the president of the Canadian Canola Growers Association. The national organization, like Kinew, is urging financial support from the feds 'if a need arises.' 'China is going to leave a big hole that cannot be filled, definitely not in the short term,' White said. Kinew also called upon Prime Minister Mark Carney's administration to work with the Manitoba government on a plan to negotiate an end to Chinese tariffs. The province extended a 'warm and hearty handshake' upon Carney's election and is seeking a coherent strategy, Kinew said. He's spoken with Alberta Premier Danielle Smith and Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe about the issue, he said. 'I think we're all on the same page that Western Canada's ag industry is one of the engines to our Canadian economy,' Kinew said. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. China bought 15 per cent of Manitoba's agri-food exports last year, making it the province's second largest market. Manitoba is Western Canada's top pork exporter to China and is second, nationally, to Quebec. (China placed 25 per cent tariffs on pork in March.) Up to 5.9 million metric tonnes of Canadian canola seed ships annually to China at a $4 billion value, White said. The Canadian Canola Growers Association is aiming for a 'better policy environment' from Ottawa, enabling a renewable diesel market using canola seed. The industry could generate a need for more than two million metric tonnes of canola seed within Canada, White said. – With files from Carol Sanders and The Canadian Press Gabrielle PichéReporter Gabrielle Piché reports on business for the Free Press. She interned at the Free Press and worked for its sister outlet, Canstar Community News, before entering the business beat in 2021. Read more about Gabrielle. Every piece of reporting Gabrielle produces is reviewed by an editing team before it is posted online or published in print — part of the Free Press's tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press's history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates. Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber. Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.
