Military now won't cut off satellite data used by hurricane forecasters, climate scientists
A plan that would have stopped the flow of essential forecast data from a trio of aging military satellites during the middle of hurricane season has been nixed after widespread pushback.
Statements from the U.S. Navy and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration confirmed on July 29 that data flow from microwave sounders on the trio of Department of Defense Satellites would continue until sometime next year as originally planned, backtracking from earlier announcements in May and June.
The sounders track rain and winds over the oceans and ice, said Walter Meier, a senior research scientist at the National Snow and Ice Data Center at the University of Colorado.
Federal agencies and the military use the non-classified data for an array of computer modeling, but the information is considered vital for providing regular details about the polar regions, scientists told USA TODAY.
Additionally, numerous scientists have pointed out the importance of the microwave satellite data for logging information about moisture inside hurricanes, although NOAA emphasized the agency has a "robust suite" of other hurricane forecasting tools.
For monitoring sea ice, the microwave instruments provide "complete coverage of the polar regions every day and can 'see' at night,' Meier said. They are not affected by what gets reflected or refracted in the atmosphere and have operated continuously since 1987.
'That's almost 38 years-worth of sea ice data being used to track conditions in the Arctic,' he said. Scientists have similar continuity for Antarctica. Losing the microwave data would make it difficult to keep the long-term records intact.
Aging satellites will continue providing data, for now
The three satellites have been flying since at least 2009, Meier said. Typically planned to last three to five years, these missions have 'kind of been living on borrowed time.' So it wasn't a surprise when the military sent out notifications earlier this year that it would stop processing and distributing the data in September 2026.
Just a few weeks later, for reasons that were never fully explained, the military announced it would stop providing the data on June 30, 2025, more than a year earlier than expected. That kicked off frantic discussions among Meier and hurricane forecasters about how to replace that data. In response to a huge backlash, the military extended its deadline to July 30, 2025.
But on July 29, one day before the data transmissions were scheduled to stop, the Navy stated that after "feedback from government partners, officials found a way to meet modernization goals while keeping the data flowing until the sensor fails or the program formally ends in September 2026." The decision was initially reported by Michael Lowry, a meteorologist and hurricane specialist in Miami.
NOAA stated there would be "no interruption" to the Defense Meteorological Satellite Program data and the agency would continue to have access to the data for the duration of the program's life span.
Why satellite moisture data is important for hurricane forecasts
When a hurricane is far out at sea, the microwave sensors are one of the only ways to diagnose a storm's internal structure, said Andy Hazelton, an associate scientist at the University of Miami.
A current NOAA satellite with a microwave instrument has different frequencies, and does not provide the same information, the scientists said, and polar orbiters aren't as effective because they sample less frequently.
Hazelton said things change fast inside tropical cyclones and forecasters need as much data as possible.
Losing the microwave data would degrade hurricane forecasts, said John Cortinas, a former deputy assistant administrator for science with NOAA's Oceanic and Atmospheric Research. 'Typically, fewer observations mean less accuracy.'
Losing half the microwave data available to forecasters decreases the ability to identify the most dangerous storms, the ones that intensify quickly and catch forecasters and the public off guard, said Jeff Masters, a former Hurricane Hunter research scientist and co-founder of Weather Underground.
Rapid intensification: Some hurricanes suddenly explode in intensity
Masters was among those who found it troubling that the loss of data could occur at a time when the frequency 'of this most dangerous type of hurricane is increasing,' There were nine such storms in the Atlantic last year, tying the record for the most in 45 years.
Even the original one-month extension would have been too little time to arrange for, and fine-tune, other instruments to match the previous data for scientific continuity, Cortinas said.
'Fingers crossed'
The satellite instruments, called Special Sensor Microwave Imager Sounders, are fairly low resolution and don't do a whole lot for security and warfighting support, so they aren't a priority for an agency with a mission of national security and defense, Meier said. But he wishes there had been "more recognition of the value of the products to U.S. civilians."
Because the satellites are considered "very old," they're not as secure as they should be or as secure as a new system, Meier said. It's also likely the military didn't feel like it was worth it to upgrade the satellites, he said.
For now, he's keeping his "fingers crossed" that the data will continue to flow and give them an extended period to find a way to replace the microwave data and ensure continuity for long-term sea ice records at the ends of the Earth. One possibility, he previously told USA TODAY, includes an agreement to use data from another government, such as the Japanese Space Agency.
Dinah Voyles Pulver covers climate change, hurricanes, violent weather and other news for USA TODAY. Reach her at dpulver@usatoday.com or @dinahvp on Bluesky or X or dinahvp.77 on Signal.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
6 hours ago
- Forbes
Investigating Weather With New Satellites
It's no surprise to many of us that the world is facing unique kinds of weather challenges right now. Governments around the world are trying to get up to speed on information about changing weather and the life of the biosphere. In the U.S., The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration or NOAA is responsible for much of this research. Among recent NOAA findings is that the United States has experienced 24 weather-related disasters causing over $1 billion dollars in damages, and that the country has been experiencing at least 10 of these a year for a decade. That's part of what has set the stage for ongoing efforts to improve our national response to the climate situation. The NOAA maintains various types of equipment and methods to analyze global weather and predict likely outcomes, while diagnosing the health of the planet. Citing increased disaster risk, the agency has established key goals including disaster response, recovery (restoring essential services and facilities) and mitigation of damage. But how does this work? What tools do we have at our disposal, and how does the public sector work with the private sector to address this? Innovating Weather Investigation Dan Slagen is CMO at a company that is helping to figure out what's happening at a global level. I covered the work of this startup before, in the context of what happens at Davos each year, and our 'under the dome' work with TCS, although the prior post had a bigger focus on deep space and market context. In a recent TED talk, Slagen reviewed more of what's happening with this type of research, and how the company is contributing to more granular understanding. He pointed out the value in observations with model training, inference and initialization, and reinforcement learning. 'Why is weather forecasting so hard?' Slagen asked. Answering his own question, Slagen suggested that there's a critical data problem that he called a 'lack of global coverage,' along with other 'coverage performance limitations.' But new satellites and deployment strategies may help. The Technology One of the interesting parts of Slagen's presentation, to me, was the enumeration of five kinds of data work that support operations. The first one is multi-spectrum imaging, and the second one is high-resolution imaging. These are pretty straightforward. The third one was new to me – It's called radio occultation. On Googling, it turns out that this is the study of planetary landscapes and infrastructure with remote sensing (check out this link from UCAR). Then there's a synthetic aperture radar, which according to the expert sources I reviewed, is a form of active remote sensing that uses the movement of the radar platform (like a satellite or plane) to simulate a large antenna — a "synthetic aperture" — which allows it to capture very high-resolution images. ChatGPT provides this step-by-step explanation of how it works, in plain English, using Wikipedia and government sources: In addition to the above four technologies, Slagen simply named 'telecom.' None of these, he suggested, is specifically designed for atmospheric 3-D research. A Government Directive 'NASA realized (the deficiency) years ago,' Slagen said, 'and they essentially said, 'look, whoever comes up with a new data architecture is going to completely give a step step function change to global weather forecasting forever.' went to work, building a microwave sounder satellite, and now has seven of these in orbit, having launched the most recent one from Cape Canaveral weeks ago. 'We're building a full-blown constellation that is the first commercial constellation on earth,' Slagen added, 'in order to 'see' weather for the first time.' Why is it important? One of Slagen's points is the collective cost of disasters; estimated at $1 billion every 13 days in the U.S. That keeps insurance adjusters busy. 'There are very few things on earth that affect all 8 billion people,' Slagen said. 'Weather just happens to be one of those things.' First of Its Kind As for Slagen's claim that is pioneering private sector work on microwave sounder satellites, when I googled, I also found resources for a similar project undertaken by Northrop Grumman, a publicly traded company on the NYSE. However, digging a little deeper, it appears that the firm created the tech for NOAA, so yes, technically, project represents that first fully private sector initiative of its kind. Watching the rest of the presentation, you can see how all of this contributes to robust weather data: Slagen shows us vibrant color pictures of weather activity, much of which, he explains, is new. We see storm movement in detail, and can forecast what's going to happen in our personal lives as weather events develop. That's a big value in a world where the weather seems to be constantly changing more and more often.
Yahoo
16 hours ago
- Yahoo
That substance in the water of Great Slave Lake is likely just ash, says DFO
A substance spotted in the water of Great Slave Lake on Thursday is likely "a collection of ash," said Fisheries and Oceans Canada. An "unknown, black substance" near Mosher Island was reported to the Canadian Coast Guard's Arctic Region Marine Environmental and Hazards Response (MEHR) team Thursday morning. MEHR collected samples and submitted them for testing. Based on the evidence, they've confirmed that the curvy black line in the water is ash, likely from a burn barrel "or something of that nature," wrote Jeremy Hennessy, a public affairs officer for the Department of Fisheries and Oceans, in an email. Brian Fidler lives next to Yellowknife Bay and noticed the streak in the water when he was looking out his window. Fidler has lived in Yellowknife for almost five years and said he's never seen anything like it before. "It was a beautiful morning. The water was flat, calm," he said. "I noticed the boats in the little bay there and this weird line that came out seemed to trail from the Yellowknife River direction and kind of curl around." Fidler said it looked like the substance was floating towards Jolliffe Island. While the substance didn't give off the "rainbow kind of fuel" that oil spills are typically characterized with, Fidler said he was still concerned because he didn't know what the slick was. "If more is gonna be coming out into the lake, I don't want to see that. I don't wanna put my boat through it," he said. "If it is chemical or petroleum based, it's not good for the environment. It's not good for our lake." An on-water assessment by MEHR indicated that the substance is not oil-based. There are no impacts to Yellowknife's drinking water and it "is not believed to pose any danger to the public or to wildlife in the area," Hennessy wrote.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
How to Watch the First Northern Lights of August Tonight
The aurora borealis will be visible from several parts of the United States on Friday, Aug. 1NEED TO KNOW The northern lights will be active on Friday, Aug. 1, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)'s forecast The rare, colorful display is expected to be visible from Earth in select location across the United States The northern lights have a three on the Kp-index that ranges from zero to nine, which means the auroras can be "quite pleasing to look at" under perfect conditionsThe cosmos are sizzling this August! The month is starting off strong with another round of northern lights, expected to color the night sky across several parts of the United States on Friday, Aug. 1, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)'s forecast. The astronomical event, also known as the aurora borealis, is forecast a three on the Kp-index that ranges from zero to nine. This means that the display can be "quite pleasing to look at" under perfect conditions. Those who reside in the northernmost areas of the U.S. have greater chances at catching a glimpse of the display if the weather aligns, meaning no clouds or rain that could hinder visibility from Earth. It's important to avoid light pollution, too, which could drown out the vibrant hues. Artificial light pollution aside, like city lights, the moon's glow could also negatively impact the auroras. Fortunately, this month's full moon — nicknamed the Sturgeon Moon — doesn't peak until Aug. 9, so it's currently only 49% illuminated as it's amid its waxing crescent phase. The chance to watch the northern lights from several parts of the U.S. is a rare phenomenon, however, there's many many opportunities across the country in the last year alone. Most recently, NOAA's forecast predicted visibility for northern areas on July 30. Now, read on for how to watch the northern lights tonight! When will the northern lights be visible? The northern lights are expected to be visible on Friday evening, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)'s forecast. For the best chances at spotting them, cast your eyes to the sky in the hours before and after midnight, specifically between 10 p.m. and 2 a.m. local time. Note, it's impossible to view the auroras during daylight hours — so darkest is best! Since the northern lights have a three on the Kp-index, the auroras will move further away from the poles and have the potential to be "quite pleasing to look at" under perfect conditions. Where will the northern lights be visible? Skywatchers who live in the northernmost areas of the country have the best chances at viewing the colorful display from Earth tonight. Locations include Alaska, the northeastern tip of Washington, northern Idaho, northern Montana, most of North Dakota, Minnesota and northern Wisconsin. (Be sure to check NOAA's aurora forecast for the most accurate updates throughout the night.) How to watch the northern lights? The best part about the northern lights is that no advanced technology is necessary to spot them from Earth. Simply all that's needed is the naked eye, a dark viewpoint and a state that's in NOAA's predicted aurora viewline. Then, all sky gazers have to do is point their eyes to the sky and look up! How to take photos of the northern lights? If you didn't take a photo of the northern lights, did you really see them in person? Fortunately, many smartphones have the technological capability to capture the auroras with a simple click of a button! All smartphone users have to do is switch on the "Night Mode" settings on the device. Then, point the lens to the sky and snap away! Read the original article on People