
Confidence in UK hits new low while Starmer goes in wrong direction
Read more
The backdrop for this debate is the success of Reform UK last week. Nigel Farage's party won the Runcorn and Helsby by-election, two mayoralties, 677 councillors, and took control of ten councils. The BBC's projected vote share, which extrapolates from local election results to the full country, suggests Reform would win 30% of the vote in a general election, to Labour's 20%. Labour MPs in more conservative and pro-Brexit constituencies have been spooked by Reform's success, and are focused on how they triangulate against Farage's party.
Downing Street appears to agree with those MPs who want Labour to focus on Reform. In the immediate aftermath of the results the Government announced new anti-immigration measures and have stuck by their welfare cuts, signalling no intention to change course and doubling down on their existing bets.
There's a problem with this focus on Reform, though. The geography of the local elections last week has heavily influenced the narrative about the results. They took place in some of the most conservative and pro-Brexit parts of England, so a right-wing party coming first isn't a massive surprise. If elections had been held in part of England where the Liberal Democrats did well last year, or in Scotland and Wales, we would be having a very different conversation.
In national opinion polls, Labour have lost to the Greens and Liberal Democrats more than double the number of voters they've lost to Reform, whose rise is fuelled more by former Conservative voters than anyone else. In Scotland, they've lost more voters to the SNP, Greens, and Liberal Democrats than to Reform, and in Wales they've lost just 5% of their voters to Reform, but a quarter to Plaid Cymru and and eighth to the Liberal Democrats and Greens.
Nigel Farage of Reform UK (Image: free) Labour's problem isn't that they are not enough like Reform. They are bleeding votes to parties all over the political spectrum, more so to the left than to the right. Doubling down on their current direction won't win those voters back and risks alienating even more of them. More than half of Labour's 2024 voters have a favourable view of the Liberal Democrats and Greens, and in Scotland and Wales a significant minority of Labour voters have positive views of the nationalist parties. Not only have they already lost more voters on their left than their right, there's also far more scope for them to lose even more voters on their left flank.
Labour's problem isn't that they aren't tough enough on immigration. They won't hold on to power by aping Reform UK and Nigel Farage. Their problem is that, despite only having been in office for ten months, they nevertheless govern a country that most people think is going in the wrong direction.
In March, Ipsos found the lowest level of economic confidence in the UK that they have ever recorded, having started tracking in the 1970s. Britons are more negative about the state of the economy than they were in the 1980 recession, in the wake of Black Wednesday in 1992, during the Great Recession in 2008, and even at the height of the pandemic. 59% of us think Britain is going in the wrong direction; just 19% of us are happy with the way things are going.
As YouGov's Dylan Difford has put it, the mission of the Labour government should be 'deshittification', both because it's the right one from a policy perspective and because it's the agenda most likely to glue Labour's voter coalition back together. By the time of the next general election, and from the point of view of Scottish and Welsh Labour preferably by the devolved elections next year, Labour need to be able to point to ways in which life has gotten better.
Read more
Immigration crackdowns and salami-slicing the welfare state are not the path to making life better for ordinary Britons, never mind keeping Labour in power or the Union intact. Voters look at Labour's headline policy decisions since the election and see a government taking money out of ordinary people's pockets rather than those of the wealthiest. Despite the UK being a spectacularly wealthy country, most of that wealth sits in very few hands, and we simply do not tax it properly.
The British tax system is a dysfunctional mess that is incapable of mobilising the nation's resources to address the problems we face and needs thoroughly overhauled. But Labour's promises not to increase taxes, which they will ultimately be forced to do and which we knew needed to happen before last year's election, ties their hands behind their backs in this regard.
It also leaves a chasm on Labour's left that smaller parties are happily exploiting. Doubling down on their current strategy won't win their voters back because those voters are going left, not right. Only a change of course can win back the people who put Labour in power last July.
Mark McGeoghegan is a Glasgow University researcher of nationalism and contentious politics and an Associate Member of the Centre on Constitutional Change. He can be found on BlueSky @markmcgeoghegan.bsky.social
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
26 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Lucy Connolly LIVE: Woman jailed for 'set fire to asylum hotels' tweet to be freed
The racist wife of a former Conservative county councillor who called for asylum hotels to be burned down is set to be released from jail today. Lucy Connolly, 42, was sentenced to 31 months in prison after she shared a horrific tweet after the Southport stabbing attack, calling migrants ba*****s as she disgustingly wrote "if that makes me racist so be it". The mum, and wife of ex-Tory councillor Ray Connolly, admitted to inciting racial hatred by publishing and distributing "threatening or abusive" written material on X and was thrown into jail in October. The post, which was viewed 300,000 times before it was deleted, said: "Mass deportation now, set fire to all the f****** hotels full of the bastards for all I care... if that makes me racist so be it."

Western Telegraph
26 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
People have ‘every right' to protest asylum hotels
Chris Philp named three Conservative-led councils which are considering taking legal action against hoteliers whose property is being used to house asylum seekers. His party's leader Kemi Badenoch has written to Conservative council leaders 'encouraging' them to follow Epping Forest District Council's footsteps by launching bids to shut these hotels, if their 'legal advice supports it'. Epping Forest District Council in Essex secured a High Court temporary injunction this week, blocking the use of Epping's Bell Hotel as accommodation for asylum seekers on planning grounds. Mr Philp told BBC Breakfast that Borough of Broxbourne Council in Hertfordshire, Reigate and Banstead Borough Council in Surrey, and Hillingdon Council in London were each considering taking similar legal action. 'So, I think there are many up and down the country who are looking at this following the Epping ruling,' he said. Mr Philp added: 'I think these councils are, you know, sick and tired of having these asylum hotels housing predominantly young men who entered the country illegally in their communities. 'They want to see them closing down and that is why I think they're rightly looking at legal action.' Asked whether there was a 'risk' the High Court's decision 'will encourage more protests and problems in communities outside these hotels', Mr Philp told BBC Breakfast: 'People are understandably angry about the Government, the Labour Government's failings, the border crisis they're presiding over. 'They do have the right to peacefully protest – I do stress the word 'peacefully'. Peaceful protest is lawful, it is every citizen's right to do that. 'Of course, if it isn't peaceful, that is wrong and that should be dealt with by the police, but where protest is peaceful, people have every right to engage in protest.' He had earlier claimed that 'reporting says hundreds of charges have been laid against illegal immigrants being accommodated in these hotels'. At the High Court this week, lawyers for the Home Office warned that a temporary injunction in Epping 'runs the risk of acting as an impetus for further violent protests' elsewhere, after several demonstrations outside the Bell Hotel. Edward Brown KC, for the Government, also warned the move would 'substantially interfere' with the Home Office's statutory duty in potentially avoiding a breach of the asylum seekers' human rights. Speaking on Thursday, minister Catherine McKinnell said Labour had 'inherited a terrible mess from the last government when it comes to the immigration system and particularly the processing of asylum claims – massive backlog'. The education minister told Sky News: '(I) absolutely recognise the concerns that local communities have and we want to work with local communities to find solutions.' Kemi Badenoch has been accused of carrying out a 'pathetic stunt' (Chris Radburn/PA) Pressed on the speed of Government efforts to close asylum hotels, Ms McKinnell said: 'What we've done is doubled the number of asylum claims that have been processed. 'So, that is reducing the number of people who are requiring this accommodation, but also returning people that shouldn't be here. 'We're also committed to ending the use of asylum hotels by the end of this Parliament. 'So, it will take some time to clean up the situation that we've inherited, but, you know, it's really important that we continue to both manage the accommodation that people are currently in and also speed up the process.' A Labour spokesperson described Mrs Badenoch's letter as being a 'pathetic stunt' and 'desperate and hypocritical nonsense from the architects of the broken asylum system', and added there were now '20,000 fewer asylum seekers in hotels than at their peak under the Tories'. The Conservative leader told her party's town hall leaders that whether or not to block a hotel from housing asylum seekers 'will depend on individual circumstances of the case' and continued: 'But it is the Labour Government which is trying to ram through such asylum hotels without consultation and without proper process.' Richard Biggs, Conservative leader of Reigate and Banstead Borough Council, told the PA news agency: 'We are studying the judgment with our lawyers to understand it and if a similar action would work for us. 'We have had some impact and we had a protest outside our hotel in August which was local people having a peaceful protest to express their concerns.' He added that 'wider infrastructure has to be considered when determining planning'. Broxbourne leader Corina Gander previously told PA the decision in nearby Epping appeared to set a 'massive precedent' and the borough council is now seeking advice. Leaders at Labour-led authorities in Tamworth and Wirral have said they are considering the High Court's decision in relation to hotels in their areas. Reform UK leaders in Staffordshire and West Northamptonshire are also considering further action.


Daily Mirror
27 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Asylum hotel use shows small fall this year as Tory failure haunts Labour
The number of asylum seekers in hotels has dropped slightly since March as ministers grapple with the "terrible mess" left behind by the Tories. Data released by the Home Office reveals that 32,059 asylum seekers were being housed temporarily in UK hotels at the end of Labour's first year in Government. This is down from 32,345 three months earlier - but is 8% up from the same point 12 months ago. It comes as pressure grows on Keir Starmer to end the use of hotels - which he has promised to do by the end of this Parliament. But the PM's problems got worse on Tuesday when a High Court judge issued a temporary injunction ordering migrants out of the Bell Hotel in Epping. The Home Office is now braced for a series of similar legal challenges from councils across England, including from Labour town halls. This morning education minister Catherine McKinnell told Sky News: "We inherited a terrible mess from the last government when it comes to the immigration system and particularly the processing of asylum claims - massive backlog." When the Tories were in power, the number of migrants living in more than 400 hotels rocketed to 56,000 and was costing taxpayers over £9million a day. The Conservatives started putting thousands of people in hotels back in 2020 when Boris Johnson was PM, insisting it was temporary. Pressed on the speed of Government efforts to close asylum hotels, Ms McKinnell said: "What we've done is doubled the number of asylum claims that have been processed. So, that is reducing the number of people who are requiring this accommodation, but also returning people that shouldn't be here. "We're also committed to ending the use of asylum hotels by the end of this Parliament. So, it will take some time to clean up the situation that we've inherited, but, you know, it's really important that we continue to both manage the accommodation that people are currently in and also speed up the process. "The backlogs are totally unacceptable, not only for the amount of time that people are wasting, but that people are just not being returned that shouldn't be here as well." Ministers are keen to avoid a repeat of ugly scenes outside asylum hotels across the country. In recent weeks demonstrators have clashed with police in Epping after a man living at the Bell was accused of assaulting a 14-year-old girl. It is unclear where people currently living there will go. Khadar Mohamed, 24, told The Mirror those ensconced inside were 'living in pain and fear' each time locals held protests outside the hotel and that many now were more uncertain about their futures. There are fears of further disorder after Reform chief Nigel Farage called for peaceful protests outside asylum hotels across the country. Brendan Cox, co-founder of campaign group Survivors Against Terror told The Mirror: 'Farage needs to decide if he wants to be a serious politician or is more interested in being a rabble rouser." Mr Cox, whose Labour MP wife Jo was murdered by a far-right terrorist in 2016, continued: "There is a legitimate public debate about the use of hotels for accommodating asylum seekers - calling for protests that he knows full well will intimidate residents, stretch the police and could lead to violence is not the way to address it.' And Kemi Badenoch has breen branded "desperate and hypocritical" after kicking off over the asylum hotel mess her party caused. The under-fire Tory leader called on Conservative-controlled councils to launch legal challenges over hotels in their area. Mrs Badenoch said she was "encouraging" them to "take the same steps" as Epping Council "if your legal advice supports it". A Labour spokesman said her letter was a "pathetic stunt" and "desperate and hypocritical nonsense from the architects of the broken asylum system". Labour said there were now "20,000 fewer asylum seekers in hotels than at their peak under the Tories".