
The Secret Channel Russia and Ukraine Use to Trade Prisoners of War
The device landed in the hands of Brig. Gen. Dmytro Usov, a deputy to the head of Ukraine's HUR military intelligence service, which had just lost two of its men in battles northwest of Kyiv. Russia's invasion of Ukraine was only three weeks old, and the phone presented a way to retrieve their remains.
Usov, a career intelligence officer with a trim gray-streaked beard, scrolled through the deceased's phonebook and pressed 'call' on a contact whose rank suggested this might be a Russian frontline commander.
'Your officer is dead,' he told the stunned Russian after introducing himself. He texted a photograph of the corpse, then offered a deal: the bodies of your men for ours.
What followed has evolved into one of the strangest subplots of Europe's biggest war since the 1940s: a series of swaps that started with a few corpses and then slowly escalated into the regular trade of hundreds of captured prisoners, many skeletal and barely clinging to consciousness.
President Vladimir Putin has refused to meet Volodymyr Zelensky unless the Ukrainian president all but concedes defeat, complicating President Trump's peace summit in Alaska on Friday. The two countries, once part of the same Soviet empire, no longer have embassies with each other, and successive peace talks have broken down.
And yet without fanfare, Ukraine and Russia over the course of their war have managed to exchange more than 10,000 combatants across front lines and secure corridors in neighboring Belarus. They include some 1,200 soldiers traded in recent weeks; another 100 young, wounded and ill combatants are due to cross the border on Thursday, Ukrainian officials say.
Despite being snared in conflict and deadlocked at the negotiating table, both sides speak of their shadowy prisoner exchange channel—run directly by military intelligence officers—as efficient and professional. Their transactions mark a striking paradox: two bitter enemies aligned on almost nothing, yet collaborating time and again on one deeply human issue—prisoners of war.
Military historians have puzzled over the relatively smooth logistics and regular pace of these trades, conducted mid-conflict, a pattern virtually unheard of in modern warfare. By contrast, the Soviet Union held onto German POWs for years after World War II. Some weren't freed until 1956. The United States and North Vietnam didn't begin consistent POW releases until 1973, after two decades of American deepening involvement and a long, grinding peace process. Iran and Iraq, whose war ended in 1988, released their last POWs three days before the 2003 U.S. invasion of Iraq began.
The backstory of how Moscow and Kyiv began trading in a resource they both have—an oversupply of captured men—dates back more than a decade, to the earliest days of Ukraine's violent break from Russia. It hints at a hidden infrastructure that reveals the war is more nuanced than many Americans understand. Mostly, it centers around a tiny handful of military and intelligence officers who now constitute nearly the last thin wire still linking two neighbors that Putin insists are 'one people, a single whole.'
Usov, speaking hours before his agency commenced another historic exchange via Belarus in June, put it a different way: 'Despite the fact that we're enemies, that Russia is the aggressor, we have established a certain level of communication,' he said. 'It's hard to fight them, and it's hard to negotiate with them. But at the same time, we do it honestly.'
Usov used a cellphone found in the pocket of a dead Russian officer to initiate contact with officials on the other side of the war.
To understand how two wartime enemies managed to set aside their differences to retrieve their POWs, The Wall Street Journal spoke to more than a dozen Ukrainian, Russian and European officials, and visited exchange points along the frontline and detention facilities throughout Ukraine. Reporters also spent time in the basement of a military-intelligence office in Kyiv that functions as the nerve center for Ukraine's hunt for soldiers captured by Russia. These sources described trades as a way to ease domestic pressure, demonstrate progress to foreign powers—most recently, the U.S.—and relieve themselves of the burden of feeding and housing thousands of the enemy.
At the center of the web is perhaps the world's top prisoner trader, Vladimir Putin, who last year greenlighted a wide-ranging exchange, freeing a group of dissidents and journalists, including three wrongly held Americans—among them, Wall Street Journal reporter Evan Gershkovich—in return for eight Russian spies, cybercriminals, smugglers and a professional hitman. That trade, on a cordoned off airfield in Turkey, attracted global attention. But it is dwarfed by the lesser-known human commerce underway along the frontlines between Russian and Ukrainian forces.
'If there's a chance to save a human life, returning someone home to their family before hostilities end, and in the process free our own soldiers whom we deeply care about it, then we do it,' said Russia's chief negotiator on Ukraine, Vladimir Medinsky, who used a Russian idiom to emphasise that the neighbors remain mortal enemies: 'As we say in Russia, we don't christen our children together.'
'Five letters in his name'
The seeds of the POW channel were planted more than a decade ago, in the President Hotel in the Belarussian capital of Minsk.
It was 2014 and Ukraine was struggling to reclaim eastern territory seized by Russian-backed militants. Western leaders had pressured its government into talks—to resolve political, economic and cultural disputes.
The negotiators argued over every point, from the spelling of Ukrainian and Russian names to whose troops were shelling where, according to the Swiss diplomat, Tony Frisch, who oversaw the sessions. When he tried to coax the parties to socialize during lunch breaks or have evening drinks at the hotel bar to build a rapport, he was sternly rebuffed.
Several times, Viktor Medvedchuk, the head of a minor pro-Kremlin Ukrainian party who was supposed to be negotiating for Kyiv, made a surprising announcement: He needed to fly to Moscow, to seek guidance from 'a man with five letters in his name.'
When he returned, it was clear Putin wanted to make a trade, and the stage was set for a series of small prisoner exchanges from the end of 2014 into the next year. Prisoners crossed through checkpoints on landmine-littered roads, between Ukraine and the Kremlin-backed paramilitaries.
The two sides fell into dysfunctional haggling over whose captives were worth more, as one Russian delegate refused to speak—at all. In the meantime, the Swiss visited paramilitary prisons with the International Committee of the Red Cross, and met Ukrainian captives who recalled being tortured, choked with plastic bags, their children's lives threatened. Ultimately, over the course of about 125 meetings, the two sides managed to trade 600 prisoners: 'I can tell you, it was sometimes like a discussion in a market in Morocco for sheep or cows,' said Frisch.
Then, as Russian troops amassed around Ukraine's borders in early 2022, meetings were abruptly canceled. On February 22, 2022, Putin yanked all Russian diplomats from Ukraine, blaming 'provocations' and threats to their lives. That same day, he effectively ended the Minsk process, lamenting a lack of results. Two days later, some 150,000 Russian troops streamed across the border.
The long game
Less than a month later, Brig. Gen. Usov was summoned to his boss Kyrylo Budanov's office at HUR's sprawling headquarters: Ukraine's military intelligence agency had no way to contact its counterpart inside Russia.
Old communications lines were shuttered and new attempts were floundering. 'There was no trust. We had battles just outside Kyiv, and we had to convince them to swap people,' Budanov said in an interview. 'But we didn't believe each other.'
The breakdown rendered the Chinese-made Xiaomi cellphone in Usov's hands an unusually precious channel to re-establish communication between two nations rallying troops into a fight that both claimed was now a war of survival.
Ukrainian Military Intelligence chief Kyrylo Budanov said that, early on, 'there was no trust.'
In conversations with the Russians, Usov used his call-sign—Stayer, or marathon-runner—and his real name only sparingly. Trust had to be built painstakingly slowly. He never shared his own number.
Two months into the war, Russia revealed his counterpart: a lieutenant general at Moscow's military intelligence agency, known as the GRU.
In Libya, Gen. Aleksandr Zorin had been Russia's pointman on relations with the pro-Kremlin faction controlling the country's east. He represented Russia in Syrian ceasefire talks with the U.S. in Geneva—and as those talks dragged into the evening, he stepped into the press hall, and delivered pizza to foreign journalists.
Usov found Zorin, who at 56 is his senior by 12 years, frank and straight-talking. Zorin had been born in Soviet Ukraine.
'The way he spoke, and discussed things, corresponded with his general's rank,' Usov said. 'He was head and shoulders above the others I had talked with up to that point.'
That call with Zorin was the start of a long working relationship that would inspire Usov to embrace a new role as negotiator. Two of his great-grandfathers had died in Nazi captivity and he said he felt duty-bound to ensure Ukrainian servicemen did not repeat their fates.
The two senior spies began to assess one another in more regular calls. Usov was learning on the job, studying the complex mechanics needed to safely engineer an exchange, and seeking advice from Jonathan Powell—now the U.K.'s national security adviser, who had once helped end The Troubles in Northern Ireland.
He read a copy of Zorin's doctoral thesis, which he said recounted negotiating conflicts in the Middle East. 'When I read this, I understood how I might establish a working relationship with him,' Usov said. Zorin couldn't be reached for comment and the GRU didn't respond to a request for an interview.
Within a month, Usov was barrelling deep into Russian-held territory to meet Zorin in person in the devastated coastal city of Mariupol, escorted by two Russian Tigr armored vehicles, a white flag fluttering above his car.
The cars wound through streets littered with the corpses of dead civilians. Next to the charred metal and rubble of the port city's steel mill, the Ukrainians stopped to collect one of the commanders of a 2,500-strong garrison of elite Ukrainian fighters who were surrounded inside the plant under constant bombardment to surrender.
That afternoon Usov shook hands with Zorin, who was flanked by four Russian officers, and sat opposite him at a conference room table at a location outside the city, according to a person who was there. The talks dragged on for hours, with both sides fielding calls to their superiors in Kyiv and Moscow. Eventually, Ukraine consented to a surrender: The 2,500 fighters would be taken to Russian prisons.
The question remained of how Ukraine might bring the fighters home.
Kyiv looked for a country that could mediate an exchange, but Switzerland was now on Moscow's 'Unfriendly Countries List,' punishment for joining European sanctions. Instead, it turned to the new Switzerlands of the Middle East: Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey.
On September 21, Turkey brokered the largest swap since Russia's invasion, a choreography that flew five captured Ukrainian commanders to the capital of Ankara while Moscow received Medvedchuk, the pro-Russian politician who had once negotiated in Minsk but had since been arrested for high treason. A separate group of European POWs captured while fighting for Ukraine simultaneously boarded a Saudi jet leaving Russia to find a celebrity businessman there to escort them: Russian oligarch Roman Abramovich.
By now, the two sides had an understanding. The top intelligence officers had met and sized each other up. Foreign governments were standing by to help resolve disputes if necessary. Intelligence chiefs in both countries reported back to superiors in their capitals: This is someone we can work with.
Smuggled lists
In time, those early exchanges birthed a whole new infrastructure. In a leafy district of Kyiv, near hipster cafes and beauty salons, a nondescript three-story building became HUR's Coordination Headquarters for the Treatment of Prisoners-of-War.
On the top floor, Usov and his HUR subordinates meet regularly in a conference room with the families of POWs who come dressed in T-shirts bearing logos of their son or husband's brigade and often harangue the officials over a lack of results.
In the basement, analysts scour Russian websites and social media feeds for clues about POWs' location and condition. They have compiled a vast database that includes 200 data points about each individual including height, eye color and Russian responses to questions from the Red Cross.
Ukrainians released in swaps have smuggled out lists with the names of comrades in a specific cell. Photos of those lists are compiled in evidence to convince the Russians a particular person is in their captivity.
'To get people back, we have to know who we're fighting for,' said Viktoriia Petruk, a 34-year-old who leads the analytics department and spoke for the first time to the media about her work.
Viktoriia Petruk leads a group of HUR analysts who scour websites and social media to feed a database of POWs held by the Russians.
The basement analysts have identified almost 200 detention facilities across Russia and occupied parts of Ukraine where Ukrainian combatants are held often in dire conditions.
Ukraine has five dedicated POW camps, most of them former prisons where the captive Russians earn money sewing, chopping wood, or producing furniture for sale at Ukrainian stores. Kyiv is eager to show Western partners it has moral high ground by treating its prisoners better than Russia.
Logistics have often been fraught. In January 2024, a Russian military plane carrying 65 Ukrainian POWs to a prisoner swap was shot down near the border, a move Moscow blamed on Kyiv, which hasn't taken responsibility for it. During a lull in swaps, and facing political protests from prisoners' relatives, HUR concocted several long-shot schemes to speed things up: offering convicted pro-Russian collaborators and even the bones of long-buried Russian spies for exchange.
Russia didn't take the bait. But when peace talks stalled in Istanbul this Spring, both countries consented to another round, this time bigger than ever before.
On a sunny recent morning, Usov again headed north from Kyiv to greet a fresh cohort of hundreds of exchanged Ukrainian soldiers. Injured men limped and staggered up to the general to thank him, then asked a question: when would be the next round of prisoner trades that might bring their brothers-in-arms home?
Write to Matthew Luxmoore at matthew.luxmoore@wsj.com, Drew Hinshaw at drew.hinshaw@wsj.com and Joe Parkinson at joe.parkinson@wsj.com
The Secret Channel Russia and Ukraine Use to Trade Prisoners of War
The Secret Channel Russia and Ukraine Use to Trade Prisoners of War

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hans India
26 minutes ago
- Hans India
US may hold back secondary tariffs: Trump
Washington: US President Donald Trump on Friday claimed Russia lost India as one of its oil clients after Washington announced a penalty on New Delhi over the purchases but indicated that he may not impose such secondary tariffs on countries continuing to procure Russian crude oil. The President's remarks came even as New Delhi is yet to confirm any halt in oil purchases from Moscow after Washington announced a 25 per cent duty in addition to a 25 per cent tariffs on Indian goods last month. The additional duty is scheduled to come into effect on August 27. The US had threatened sanctions on Moscow and secondary sanctions on countries that buy its oil if no moves are made to end the war in Ukraine. China and India are the top two buyers of Russian oil. "Well, he (Russian President Vladimir Putin) lost an oil client, so to speak, which is India, which was doing about 40 per cent of the oil. China, as you know, is doing a if I did what's called a secondary sanction, or a secondary tariff, it would be very devastating from their standpoint. If I have to do it, I'll do it. Maybe I won't have to do it," Trump said, as he departed for Alaska for a high-stakes meeting with his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin.

Hindustan Times
26 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
A timeline of how Trump's stance of Russia-Ukraine ceasefire changed since meet with Putin in Alaska
US President Donald Trump, who has long called for a ceasefire in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, changed his stance on the subject just hours after his meeting with Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin in Alaska. The Republican, who had threatened Russia of 'very severe' consequences if it did not stop the Ukraine war, has now said that an overall peace deal and 'not a mere' ceasefire agreement would be the way forward to resolve the conflict. US President Donald Trump shakes hand with Russian President Vladimir Putin, as they meet to negotiate for an end to the war in Ukraine, at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska, U.S., August 15, 2025. (REUTERS) When Trump entered his second term as President, he seemed to rely on his personal rapport with the Kremlin leader, believing it could help overcome the complexities of the war that began in February 2022. However, things soon changed between the two over the past few months, with Trump rebuking Putin on multiple occasions, and even threatening a 100% tariff on Russia if Moscow did not come up with a peace deal on the Ukraine crisis. Despite so, the highly-anticipated meeting between the counterparts in Alaska did not yield much in terms of a deal, and following the meeting, the US president altered his stance, saying an overall peace agreement – not the ceasefire he had previously pushed – was now the next step to end the 3 and half-year conflict. How Trump's view of Putin has evolved over time | A timeline After months of unsuccessful attempts to secure a settlement, President Donald Trump shifted to intensifying economic pressure on Moscow by threatening tariffs to secure a peace deal. In June, Trump criticised the Russian leader at the NATO summit, terming his refusal to halt the war 'misguided", and told the reporters: 'I'm very surprised. Actually, I thought we would have had that settled easy.' On July 3, a phone call between Trump and Putin lasted only about an hour, far shorter than their earlier exchanges. According to a senior administration official, the conversation lacked the usual warmth, leaving Trump unsettled and with the sense he was being strung along. Trump later admitted that Putin would often say one thing during their discussions but act differently afterwards. 'I go home, I tell the first lady, 'And I spoke with Vladimir today. We had a wonderful conversation.' She said, 'Oh, really? Another city was just hit.'' Last month, in frustration, Trump declared he was giving Putin 50 days to secure a deal to end the war with Ukraine. He warned that failure to comply would push the US to impose sanctions on some of Russia's biggest energy customers, targeting a key source of Moscow's war financing. On August 13, Trump escalated his stance, warning Russia of 'very severe' consequences if it did not end the war in Ukraine. Asked at the Kennedy Centre whether Russia would face repercussions if Putin refused to halt the conflict after their Alaska meeting, Trump answered: 'yes, they will', clarifying that the measures could include tariffs or sanctions. He added: 'I don't have to say. There will be severe consequences.' As part of this tougher approach, Trump began threatening sanctions against countries purchasing Russian oil, singling out India, a major buyer, by threatening 50% tariffs on Indian goods exported to the US. Days before his meeting with Putin in Alaska, French President Emmanuel Macron had also said that Trump was 'very clear' that the US wants to achieve a ceasefire at the summit, adding that the Republican was clear that 'territorial issues relating to Ukraine ... will only be negotiated by the Ukrainian president.' Alaska meet, then change in stance After a nearly three-hour long talk in Alaska, both Trump and Putin addressed the media, and the US President described the conversation as 'productive', but added that there was no deal agreed upon. Trump later said he and Putin agreed that negotiations should move directly towards a peace deal without first securing a ceasefire, a position at odds with Ukraine and its European allies. Before the summit, he had insisted he would not be satisfied unless a truce was reached. Since returning to the White House from Alaska, Trump has spoken half a dozen times with Putin by phone and also held conversations with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and several European leaders, briefing them on the Alaska talks. Zelensky has confirmed he will travel to the US on Monday. Trump maintains that he and Putin made 'significant progress' toward ending the war, though he has given no details. On Saturday, Trump declared on social media: 'It was determined by all that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a Peace Agreement, which would end the war, and not a mere Ceasefire Agreement, which often times do not hold up.' According to aides quoted by the Wall Street Journal, his revised approach mirrors Moscow's longstanding view that temporary truces are unacceptable and that only a comprehensive settlement addressing Russian interests will suffice. In a Fox News interview with Sean Hannity, Trump suggested he and Putin had discussed 'land transfers and security guarantees for Ukraine' and had 'largely agreed'. He added: 'I think we're pretty close to a deal. Ukraine has to agree to it. Maybe they'll say 'no'.' Pressed on what advice he would give Zelensky, Trump said: 'Gotta make a deal. Look, Russia is a very big power, and they're not.' Reuters reported that Trump's remarks largely echoed Moscow's public positions, which remain unchanged on issues such as vetoing Ukraine's NATO membership. Putin himself signalled no compromise, and Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov confirmed no three-way summit had been discussed. Trump also told Fox News he would delay imposing tariffs on China for buying Russian oil, though he might 'think about it' in a few weeks. Closing the summit, Trump told Putin: 'We'll speak to you very soon and probably see you again very soon.', to which Putin replied in English with a smile: 'Next time in Moscow.' Trump's earlier meetings with Putin According to US officials and others familiar with their communications, Trump and Putin have maintained frequent contact, with several phone calls and messages exchanged through intermediaries. A senior administration official said their conversations are usually cordial. Trump often speaks of his ambition to rebuild US-Russia ties through deeper economic cooperation, while Putin lays out his grievances and demands, particularly international recognition of Moscow's hold over Crimea and the Donbas. Officials note the calls can sometimes last hours, partly due to Putin's long monologues and the need for translations. Despite his usual impatience, aides say Trump listens carefully during these exchanges. The two leaders famously met six times during Trump's first term, including on the sidelines of G20 and APEC summits. Their most high-profile encounter came in Helsinki in July 2018, when Trump appeared to side with Putin's denial of Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. election, contradicting his own intelligence agencies. 'I have great confidence in my intelligence people, but I will tell you that President Putin was extremely strong and powerful in his denial today,' Trump said at the time. 'He just said it's not Russia. I will say this: I don't see any reason why it would be.' (With inputs from Reuters, Associated Press)


Indian Express
26 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Zelenskyy says Russia ‘complicating' peace efforts as Trump pushes Ukraine towards deal with Moscow
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has accused Russia of stalling efforts to end the war by rejecting repeated calls for a ceasefire. 'We see that Russia rejects numerous demands for a ceasefire and still has not specified when it will stop the killings,' he wrote on X. 'This complicates the situation.' He added, 'If they lack the will to implement a simple order to cease strikes, it may require a great deal of effort for Russia to develop the will to achieve much more…' The Ukrainian leader stressed that 'stopping the killings is a key element in ending the war,' while thanking international partners, particularly from Northern Europe and the Baltic states, for their support. He added that coordination with allies was 'ongoing all day' and confirmed that 'discussions are scheduled' ahead of his meeting with Trump. Дякую за підтримку! Всі вказані пункти важливі, щоб можна було досягти дійсно сталого та надійного миру. Бачимо, що Росія відкидає численні вимоги щодо припинення вогню і досі не визначила, коли припинить вбивства. Це ускладнює ситуацію. Якщо в них немає волі реалізувати простий… — Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський (@ZelenskyyUa) August 16, 2025 Zelenskyy is due in Washington on Monday for talks with US President Donald Trump, who has signalled he wants to skip a ceasefire phase and move directly towards a permanent peace deal with Moscow, a major shift from his earlier demands for an immediate truce. Following his conversations with Trump and European leaders, Zelenskyy made clear Ukraine's bottom line. He said any settlement must include 'credible security guarantees,' the release of prisoners of war, and the return of children 'abducted from occupied territories' by Russia. According to reports cited by The Guardian, Trump has indicated support for a plan under which Ukraine would cede the Donbas region, made up of Donetsk and Luhansk, to Russia. Two officials told the paper that Putin demanded Ukraine withdraw from Donbas in return for freezing the front lines in Zaporizhzhia and Kherson. Although Luhansk is almost entirely under Russian control, Ukraine still holds key cities in Donetsk, including Kramatorsk and Sloviansk. The mineral-rich region has been contested for years, with tens of thousands killed defending it. The New York Times, cited by The Guardian, reported that Trump told European leaders after the summit that he believed Zelenskyy could be persuaded to agree to such a deal. European leaders have voiced unease over Trump's approach. Diplomats told CBS that Trump informed them Putin would make 'some concessions' but offered no specifics. A joint statement from leaders including French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said Europe was ready to support peace talks, but insisted that 'international borders must not be changed by force' and that Ukraine must decide its territorial future. UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer praised Trump's efforts as progress, but stressed that any deal must involve Zelenskyy directly. 'The path to peace in Ukraine cannot be decided without him,' he said, according to the BBC. (With inputs from BBC, The Guardian)