logo
Donald Trump's Approval Rating Plunges With Millennials

Donald Trump's Approval Rating Plunges With Millennials

Newsweek2 days ago

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
President Donald Trump's approval rating has collapsed with millennials, according to a new poll.
According to the latest YouGov/Economist poll, conducted between June 6-9 among 1,533 adults, Trump's approval rating among millennials sits at 40 percent, while 53 percent disapprove.
That is down from the previous poll, conducted between May 30-June 2 among 1,610 adults, when 48 percent of millennials approved of Trump's job performance and 46 percent disapproved.
Both polls had a margin of error of about +/- 3 percentage points.
Why It Matters
Millennials, typically defined as people born between 1981 and 1996, represent the largest bloc of the U.S. electorate. Trump had reduced the Democrats' lead among voters aged 30 to 44 by 9 points between 2020 and 2024, from 12 points to 3.
The latest shift in poll numbers appears to be linked to Trump's deployment of the National Guard in Los Angeles following reported violence against law enforcement, specifically Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents carrying out deportation raids in the city. Local Democratic leaders had opposed the move, accusing the Republican president of fueling the disorder.
What To Know
Trump's slipping approval rating among millennials appears to be driven by growing discontent over his handling of key issues like the economy and immigration, according to new polling data.
The latest YouGov/Economist survey shows that Trump's economic approval among millennials fell 5 points in the past week—from 43 percent to 38 percent. His rating on inflation and prices also declined, dropping from 39 percent to 33 percent.
This marks a break from a broader trend of modest recovery in Trump's economic numbers, which had begun rebounding after a sharp dip in April caused by the announcement of his "Liberation Day" tariffs. That policy initially rattled financial markets, leading to a sell-off before stabilizing in subsequent weeks.
However, millennials remain unconvinced. According to the poll, 45 percent of millennials now say they believe the economy is getting worse.
The latest inflation data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, released Wednesday, suggests that price growth remains under control. Both overall and core consumer prices rose just 0.1 percent in May—slower than in April. Year-over-year inflation ticked up slightly to 2.4 percent, but still came in below expectations.
President Donald Trump speaks to reporters after arriving on Air Force One, Tuesday, June 10, 2025, at Joint Base Andrews, Md.
President Donald Trump speaks to reporters after arriving on Air Force One, Tuesday, June 10, 2025, at Joint Base Andrews, Md.
Alex Brandon/AP
On immigration, Trump's support among millennials has also slipped, falling from 51 percent to 47 percent over the past week.
The shift comes as Trump deployed the National Guard and later 700 Marines to Los Angeles, responding to reports of violence targeting law enforcement—particularly Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents carrying out deportation raids. California Governor Gavin Newsom and L.A. Mayor Karen Bass said state and local authorities could handle the situation without the National Guard, but Trump said he was reestablishing law and order after failures by local and state leadership.
The move is part of Trump's pledge to carry out the largest mass deportation operation in U.S. history, which has included sweeping ICE raids nationwide.
Protests have erupted in major cities including Los Angeles, New York, Atlanta, Dallas, and Washington, D.C., in response. Despite the backlash, polling shows Trump's tough-on-immigration stance is resonating with much of the electorate.
In a striking reversal from his first term, Trump now holds a net-positive rating on immigration—a shift from -21 in June 2017 to +1 today—his largest net gain on any issue, according to CNN's Harry Enten.
Millennials, however, appear less receptive. The YouGov/Economist poll found that 48 percent of millennials believe Trump's approach to immigration is too harsh.
Experts say declining millennial support for Trump may reflect both unmet expectations and growing unease with his second-term policies.
Thomas Gift, a political science professor at University College London, told Newsweek millennial voters may simply be "reverting to the mean in expressing more progressive positions on issues."
He noted that while Trump made gains with millennial voters, "most favored [Democratic candidate Kamala] Harris on net." Gift added that many younger voters may now be feeling "buyer's remorse," as the president's promises of "sweeping national renewal, lower prices for everyday items, and an explosion in jobs" have gone largely unfulfilled.
Lucas Walsh, a youth political behavior expert at Monash University, pointed to "a struggling economy, uncertainty and unrest on some university campuses and the chaotic world of the second Trump term" as key drivers.
He told Newsweek that "uncertainty is a through line across these factors," and said a broader distrust in government—"preceding Trump but…inflamed by his intervention in California"—may be deepening youth disillusionment.
Trump's overall approval rating slightly mirrors the downturn. The same poll found his approval rating has dropped to 43 percent (from 45 percent the previous week), while disapproval rose to 52 percent (up from 49 percent).
In other polls, Trump's approval rating appears stable—or even improving.
The latest ActiVote poll shows Trump with 46 percent approval and 50 percent disapproval, up slightly from 45–51 in May. This uptick breaks a steady monthly decline that had persisted since January. Notably, Trump's May numbers outperformed his own first-term average (41 percent) and surpassed Joe Biden's full-term average (41 percent) and final-year rating (40 percent). The ActiVote poll has a margin of error of ±4.4 points.
The Trafalgar Group, in a poll conducted May 30–June 1, gave Trump a net approval of +8 (54 percent approve, 46 percent disapprove). That's up from 46–44 in an Insider Advantage survey conducted April 30–May 1.
Newsweek's poll tracker also shows upward momentum: Trump's average approval stands at 48 percent, while 50 percent disapprove. A week ago, those numbers were 47–49; a month ago, 44–mid-50s.
The latest Quantus Insights poll puts Trump at 49 percent approval—up one point from last month—with disapproval steady at 48 percent.
In the most recent Morning Consult survey, Trump's approval rose to 47 percent (up from 46 percent the prior week), while 51 percent disapprove—for the third week in a row.
The latest CBS/YouGov poll shows no change: 45 percent approve, while 55 percent disapprove—unchanged for the second consecutive month.
What People Are Saying
Thomas Gift, an associate professor of political science and director of the Centre on U.S. Politics at University College London, told Newsweek: "It's important to remember that while Trump made significant progress in courting young voters, most favored Harris on net. What we could be seeing is simply young people reverting to the mean in expressing more progressive positions on issues.
"That's likely exacerbated by unfulfilled expectations. Trump promised sweeping national renewal, lower prices for everyday items, and an explosion in jobs from day one of him taking office. When those promises go unfilled, voters—including the under 30 crowd—will inevitably feel buyer's remorse."
Lucas Walsh, a youth political behavior expert and a professor at Monash University in Australia, told Newsweek: "A combination of factors could explain the downturn in support. A struggling economy, uncertainty and unrest on some university campuses and the chaotic world of the second Trump term will be playing their part. Uncertainty is a through line across these factors as a major concern of young people (just like many older folk).
"A second through line is a long term, declining distrust in governments in general. This precedes Trump, but might be inflamed by his intervention in California. We're seeing brute, masked forces taking people off the streets without due process, plus the additional federal intervention of the National Guard.
"The youth vote has, to a limited extent, swayed more liberal on immigration in the past. But I wonder if more is going on here; namely, young people might be asking: "could this happen to me or someone I know?"
What Happens Next
Trump's approval rating among millennials could fluctuate in the coming weeks, depending on the outcome of key events, namely how expected upcoming demonstrations against ICE actions unfold in Los Angeles and in other major cities.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Republicans, some Democrats and even ex-Gov. Rod Blagojevich weigh in on ex-Speaker Michael Madigan's sentence
Republicans, some Democrats and even ex-Gov. Rod Blagojevich weigh in on ex-Speaker Michael Madigan's sentence

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Republicans, some Democrats and even ex-Gov. Rod Blagojevich weigh in on ex-Speaker Michael Madigan's sentence

In what's become somewhat customary once an Illinois political titan falls, leaders throughout the state responded with condemnation and called for reforms upon hearing Friday that ex-Speaker Michael Madigan was sentenced to seven and a half years in federal prison and fined $2.5 million on federal corruption charges. House Republican leader Tony McCombie of Savanna and Senate Republican leader John Curran of Downers Grove called for bipartisan ethics reforms in the wake of the sentencing, with Curran specifically requesting committee hearings and votes on potential changes — something that didn't happen this session. Madigan's sentencing was 'a stark and shameful reminder of the corruption that has plagued Illinois government for far too long,' McCombie said in a statement. 'Justice was served — but the damage to public trust runs deep.' But Illinois' last prominent statewide politician who went to federal prison, former Democratic Gov. Rod Blagojevich, held back on the chance to take a swipe at a bitter nemesis when Madigan was sentenced. Though the two were Democrats, they feuded for nearly all six years Blagojevich was in office between 2003 and 2009. 'When that guy, Madigan, was on the top of the mountain, they were all kissing his ass,' Blagojevich said. 'Now they're going to be stomping all over his grave. And it's really, it's really sort of an unappealing side of human nature.' Blagojevich said Madigan's conviction underscores the systemic problems in politics and government in the state Capitol. 'Is the system in Springfield corrupt, in many ways, absolutely,' Blagojevich said in an interview with the Tribune while insisting he didn't break the law. 'It's a system, I've been saying this from the beginning, it all too often works for itself on the backs of the people.' Blagojevich — whose 14-year federal prison sentence for corruption was commuted by President Donald Trump, who ultimately also pardoned Blagojevich — didn't want to celebrate Madigan's prison sentence despite the two's often-tense relationship. 'I just don't think it's right for me to kick a man when he's down,' Blagojevich said. 'What's happening now to him, I know what it's like. And it's really easy for these politicians to get on their high horses and start kicking someone, stomping on someone.' Senate President Don Harmon, a Democrat from Oak Park who is facing a potential fine of nearly $10 million from the Illinois State Board of Elections for improper political fundraising, said Friday's sentence represented 'a solemn reminder' that the duty of public office holders is to serve 'and that there is accountability for those who do not.'

Column: Will Tesla suffer if Musk alienates both political wings?
Column: Will Tesla suffer if Musk alienates both political wings?

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Column: Will Tesla suffer if Musk alienates both political wings?

Donald Trump and Elon Musk — two epic disrupters of U.S. politics and the automotive industry, respectively and vice versa. Over the past year, they united over the election and efforts to cut government spending. They parted ways amicably … and then started trashing each other. It escalated quickly with Musk suggesting that the president be impeached and that he is implicated in the Jeffrey Epstein child-prostitution scandal. Musk later reportedly called the president before posting that he regretted some of his words: 'They went too far.' It was a remarkable breakup — incredible drama between the world's most powerful man and the world's richest man, who had been the closest of allies for hundreds of days of campaigning and governing. To the extent that it was a reality TV train wreck, I'd just as soon leave it be. But since the primary business in Musk's remarkable portfolio is nominally an automaker, it actually matters in this industry we cover. Sign up for Automotive Views, Automotive News' weekly showcase of opinions, insights, ideas and thought leadership. Love it or hate it, this disruptive era in which we live is providing us all with some real-life experiments in economics — the likes of which we probably thought we would never see. For decades, basically everyone who went to college was taught in an economics or history class that widespread tariffs would do more harm than good. Trump argues for a different approach, and he's pursuing it. Or he's pursuing it to negotiate for something else. In either case, we're now seeing how that works: So far, there's been a lot of paralysis, especially among suppliers and foreign automakers, but also a big investment announced recently by General Motors. His political strategy has been unorthodox, yet he's won two electoral colleges and one popular vote. He's only the 21st president to win two elections. So he's had success, whether some people like it or not. Same for Musk, of course: He approached the auto industry unlike anyone else — with an expensive electric car — had a couple of near-total collapses, and came out as the world's richest man and CEO of the world's most valuable automaker. That success helped propel his rocket business SpaceX and other ventures such as Starlink satellites and Twitter, which he bought and renamed X. But the disruptive move I'm watching was his decision to be an automaker CEO who got personally and financially involved in partisan politics. While new-vehicle sales skew to the affluent, when you sell something in the millions or tens of millions, a brand or model has to connect with a broad swath of people. And while there can be success with, say, a polarizing design, mass-market brands generally try to avoid alienating large chunks of their potential customer base. I've cited here before the story about Michael Jordan saying he didn't speak out on politics because 'Republicans buy sneakers, too.' In retrospect, he said it was just a funny line among friends. But the thing is that he wasn't wrong, and every business school graduate knows it. Musk, however, is not your typical MBA type. So out of his frustration with former President Joe Biden — who habitually sided with the UAW and its automakers against the U.S.-based global leader in EVs, even as he advocated for a carbon-neutral future — Musk threw an estimated quarter of a billion dollars behind the Trump campaign. That's an unbelievable sum of money to many of us, but when Trump won, it looked like the greatest bet ever. From late October to late December, Tesla stock more than doubled and its market cap approached $1.5 trillion. While Musk's political activism may have upset many of his loyal, environmentally motivated customers, there were a lot of reasons to be bullish on Tesla under Trump. It seemed likely that NHTSA and the SEC would take a more sympathetic view of the company's issues. Beyond that, Musk has refocused the company's future on artificial intelligence, humanoid robots and robotaxis. (Tesla said it plans to launch its service in Austin, Texas, on June 22.) A new administration with a deregulatory inclination toward self-driving cars was a significant tailwind. Now, those advantages for Tesla are gone or at least seemingly diminished. Structures that have legacy automakers paying to buy Tesla's credits for selling emission-free, fuel-efficient vehicles could be eliminated. (And let's not forget that Trump hinted at ending federal contracts with other Musk-affiliated companies.) Turning back to the auto business: The conventional wisdom is that Musk has now alienated all but the most apolitical consumers. Environmentally minded liberals might like EVs, but Musk's support of Trump (and the far-right Alternative for Deutschland party in Germany) has them seeking out other brands' offerings. There might have been an opportunity to become the preferred electric brand of the president's Make America Great Again movement — especially the tech-forward, high-income types and those motivated by the president's endorsement of the brand on the White House grounds. But after this month's blowup — with longtime Trump adviser Steve Bannon arguing to deport Musk — that notion seemed ever more remote. No fans on the left, no fans on the right. Is Elon out in deep water in an electric boat surrounded by sharks with no friends to bail him out? Maybe not. There is significant animus against Musk on the EV-inclined left, especially in the wake of his DOGE team's deep and sometimes chaotic cuts to government entities and programs. Certainly, protests at auto retail outlets are rare. The damage to stores is not acceptable, but it shows the intensity of the situation. But I still have to wonder how far consumers will follow those kinds of feelings. Michiganders, for instance, often assume that Americans prefer to buy American cars made by American (union) workers. But I've been to America, and most of them don't care. They want the best car for their money, whether it's American, German, Japanese or Korean. Some are clamoring for cheap Chinese cars: If Xi Jinping wants to pay for half of their EV, they ask, why not let him? So maybe they won't care about Elon's politics. Tesla sales are down a little this year, but some of that might be attributable to production hiccups. If the Model Y — the bestselling model in the world last year — provides a great value, they'll probably buy it regardless of what they think of the CEO. And now we get to find out. Have an opinion about this story? Tell us about it and we may publish it in print. Click here to submit a letter to the editor. Sign in to access your portfolio

GM to invest US$4 billion to increase US output
GM to invest US$4 billion to increase US output

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

GM to invest US$4 billion to increase US output

General Motors (GM) announced it plans to invest around US$ 4 billion in the next two years to strengthen its US vehicle production operations, in response to the recent import tariff hikes by the Trump-led US government. This new investment plan, which will result in the transfer of some production from Mexico, is in addition to the recently-announced US$ 888 million investment in the company's Tonawanda engine plant in New York State. GM confirmed it plans to increase its annual production capacity in the US to over two million battery-powered and internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles. The plants that will benefit from the new investment include: Orion, Michigan, which will begin production of a ICE full-size SUVs and light duty pickup trucks in early 2027. The Detroit-Hamtramck plant will become the dedicated assembly location for the Chevrolet Silverado EV, GMC Sierra EV, Cadillac Escalade IQ, and GMC Hummer EV pickup and SUV. Fairfax, Kansas City, will produce ICE-powered Chevrolet Equinox from mid-2027 in response to strong demand for the recently redesigned model. The plant is also scheduled to produce the new Chevrolet Bolt EV by the end of 2025, with additional 'affordable' EV models set to follow later on. Spring Hill, Tennessee: GM plans to add the ICE-powered Chevrolet Blazer to the plant's line-up from 2027, to be produced alongside the Cadillac Lyriq and Visiq EVs and the Cadillac XT5. GM's CEO, Mary Barra, said in a statement: 'We believe the future of transportation will be driven by American innovation and manufacturing expertise. Today's announcement demonstrates our ongoing commitment to build vehicles in the US and to support American jobs. We're focused on giving customers choice and offering a broad range of vehicles they love.' The company pointed out that it currently has around fifty vehicle and parts manufacturing plants in 19 US states, including eleven vehicle assembly plants, employing a COMBINED one million people directly and indirectly, including at parts suppliers and dealers. GM's capital spending guidance remained unchanged at between US$ 10 billion and US$ 11 billion for 2025, rising slightly to between US$ 10 billion and US$ 12 billion in 2026 and 2027 to 'reflect increased investment in the US, the prioritization of key programs, and efficiency offsets.' "GM to invest US$4 billion to increase US output" was originally created and published by Just Auto, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store