Media Prima dominates MACC Media Awards, wins in all categories
KUALA LUMPUR: Media Prima Bhd dominated the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) Media Awards 2024 tonight, winning an award in every category.
The New Straits Times (NST) clinched first runner-up in the Best Social Media Content category for a "Beyond The Headlines" podcast segment featuring MACC Chief Commissioner Tan Sri Azam Baki.
NST Associate Editor (Content and Digital) Najmuddin Najib, alongside team members Amalina Kamal, Hana Naz Harun, Jasmine Jasman, and Shahrul Redzuan Zulkifli, received the award and prize of RM6,000 from Azam tonight.
Meanwhile, TV3 triumphed in the Best Audio-Visual category.
Journalist and presenter Siti Khadijah took home first place, winning RM8,000 for her report on 'Seludup Warga Asing, 20 Individu Ditahan Guna Kod Sulit Elak Dikesan.'
The New Straits Times Press (NSTP) also won all prizes in the best article category.
Harian Metro journalists Muhammad Hafis Nawawi and Hafidzul Hilmi Mohd Noor won first place for their report on graft titled 'Wang Ekspres.'
Second place went to Harian Metro journalist Mohd Jamilul Anbia Md Denin for his report titled 'Kejayaan SPRM lumpuhkan sindiket counter setting', and Berita Harian journalist Mohd Abdul Ilah Hafiz Abdul Aziz won third place for his report titled 'Isu Teknikal Bank, Integriti Pegawai Bank, Punca Jenayah Kewangan Berleluasa.'
Azam, in his speech, called for the media to continue reporting responsibly and ethically.
"Your work is not just about reporting incidents, but also shaping history," he said tonight.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
5 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Beng Hock's family not filing judicial review over NFA decision
Teoh Beng Hock's sister, Lee Lan, during a press conference in Kuala Lumpur today. KUALA LUMPUR : The family of Teoh Beng Hock has decided not to pursue a judicial review of the Attorney-General's Chambers (AGC) decision to once again classify his death as requiring no further action (NFA). His sister, Lee Lan, said the decision was made after consulting family members and their lawyer, Ramkarpal Singh. 'The judicial review will take three years to complete. Chances of winning the review are also slim as it would be the first judicial review brought in a criminal case,' she told a press conference at the KL & Selangor Chinese Assembly Hall here today. Last week, the AGC said it found insufficient evidence to bring charges following a fresh investigation by police, thus maintaining its NFA classification. The re-investigation had been ordered by the Kuala Lumpur High Court in November last year, which directed police to re-examine all aspects of the case. Lee Lan had expressed disappointment over the outcome and called for Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim to honour his promise to deliver justice in her brother's case. Beng Hock was found dead on July 16, 2009 after falling from the fifth floor of Plaza Masalam in Shah Alam, Selangor, after being questioned for several hours by officers from the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC). An inquest into his death initially returned an open verdict. However, in 2014, the Court of Appeal ruled that Beng Hock's death was caused by 'one or more unknown persons', including MACC officers. Meanwhile, Teoh Beng Hock Association for Democratic Advancement chairman Ng Yap Hwa raised concerns over the selective presentation of the Court of Appeal's judgment in AG Dusuki Mokhtar's letter. 'His letter stated that the Court of Appeal in 2014, ruled that an unknown person caused Beng Hock's death through unlawful means. 'However, the actual judgment is that one or more unknown persons, including MACC officers, caused his death through unlawful means,' he said at the same press conference. Ng called for Dusuki to clarify why the reference to MACC officers was not included in the official explanation. He also questioned whether this omission indicated that the AGC and police had excluded MACC personnel from the scope of their investigations. Lee Lan again appealed to Cabinet ministers, especially those from DAP, to help her family uncover the truth behind her brother's death. 'When the current ministers were in the opposition bloc, they told us they had no power to help the case. Now that they are in power, they are unable to keep their promises,' she added.
Free Malaysia Today
9 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
AG can still order police probe into Beng Hock's death, says lawyer
Teoh Beng Hock died on July 16, 2009 after being questioned for hours by MACC officers. PETALING JAYA : The attorney-general (AG) can still direct that the police investigate who was responsible for the death of former political aide Teoh Beng Hock under a more serious offence based on a Court of Appeal ruling issued 11 years ago, a lawyer said today. Salim Bashir said investigations could be conducted for culpable homicide not amounting to murder, causing death by negligence, or voluntarily causing grievous hurt. 'The Court of Appeal in 2014 found that Teoh's death was accelerated by the 'unlawful acts of persons unknown' and that the AG could direct the police to conduct further investigations,' he told FMT. He said there is no limitation period within which charges must be brought against a suspect. However, the prosecution must ensure that it is able to call the necessary witnesses and present the required evidence in court to support the charge, he added. Salim was speaking to FMT after two senior DAP leaders called for AG Dusuki Mokhtar to explain in detail why he thinks there is insufficient evidence to prosecute anyone for criminal offences which may have resulted in Teoh's death. Speaking on behalf of the party's central committee, its national chairman Gobind Singh Deo and secretary-general Loke Siew Fook called on the AG to review his decision and push ahead with charges against those responsible without further delay. FMT has contacted Dusuki, who is also the public prosecutor, for his response. Salim, a former Malaysian Bar president, said the AG under Article 145(3) of the Federal Constitution and Section 376 of the Criminal Procedure Code had the discretion whether to prosecute a suspect, and which provision of the law to utilise. Last week, lawyer-activist M Visvanathan told a gathering in solidarity with Teoh's family that three doctors had during an inquiry said that the deceased had injuries to his neck, which occurred before he fell from the fifth floor of Plaza Masalam in Shah Alam. 'These injuries would have been capable of making Teoh immobile or unconscious,' he said when contacted, adding that a judge in the Court of Appeal bench stated that there was no necessity to 'engage Sherlock Holmes to investigate because the circumstances are so credible'. Visvanathan said it was absurd for police to confine their recent investigation to wrongful confinement under Section 342 of the Penal Code as Teoh had been detained by the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) for lawful investigations. Lawyer Rafique Rashid Ali called for the AG to issue a press conference instead of a letter to Teoh's family explaining why he had classified the case as requiring no further action (NFA). 'As the guardian of public interest, the AG should be transparent and accountable as this is a high-profile public interest case, and there needs to be closure to the family's predicament,' he said. Rafique said that in October 1994, then AG Mohtar Abdullah announced through the media that he was not pressing charges against an influential political leader as he had no prima facie evidence to pursue a charge of raping an underaged girl. However, Mohtar said he was not exonerating the suspect of the alleged offence. He said another AG, Apandi Ali, had in January 2016 told the media that then prime minister Najib Razak had been cleared of any criminal wrongdoing in the RM2.6 billion channelled into Najib's bank accounts and finance ministry-owned firm SRC International Sdn Bhd. Apandi said there was 'insufficient evidence' to implicate Najib and ordered MACC to close its three investigation papers. However, in 2018, Najib was charged with corruption in the SRC International and 1MDB case. Teoh died on July 16, 2009 after being questioned for hours by MACC officers. An inquest was held and the coroner returned an open verdict. However, the Court of Appeal ruled that Teoh's death was caused by 'one or more persons unknown', including MACC officers. In 2019, police launched an investigation under Section 342 of the Penal Code for wrongful confinement. In November last year, the High Court ordered the police to complete its long-delayed investigations within six months. Before 2018, two special investigation teams were set up – one in 2011 and the other in 2015 – to look into Teoh's death. Both cases were classified as NFA by the public prosecutor.
Hype Malaysia
12 hours ago
- Hype Malaysia
Activist Fahmi Reza Calls Out Government Over Travel Ban Confusion: 'I'll See You In Court'
Travelling abroad for any reason can be an exciting experience, but discovering that you are barred from leaving the country while passing through immigration is undoubtedly a nightmare. That's exactly what happened to political street artist and activist Fahmi Reza recently. Known for portraying Malaysia's 6th Prime Minister, Najib Razak, as a clown, the 48-year-old was reportedly scheduled to fly to Singapore over the weekend. However, he was informed that he had been blacklisted from both overseas and domestic travel to Sabah, and was therefore unable to leave the country. Here's the full story: According to Fahmi Reza, via an Instagram Story, immigration officers informed him that Bukit Aman had not granted clearance for him to leave the country. When he asked for the reason behind the restriction, they advised him to contact the Bukit Aman police station directly. 'Last week I was blacklisted from entering Sabah and now, I can't travel overseas,' he said on Instagram. His posts quickly went viral, with netizens calling on the government and authorities to provide an explanation for the travel ban imposed on the artist. Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim caught wind of the situation and instructed the police to look into the matter, while denying that the government had imposed any restrictions on Fahmi's movement. Following the PM's statement, Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Razarudin Husain clarified that Fahmi is only on the police movement monitoring list due to his involvement in an investigation, but he is not officially barred from leaving the country. As such, the instructions given by immigration officers were incorrect. Although both the government and police have clarified the issue, the activist remains dissatisfied with the explanation. Fahmi responded by pointing out that not a single government official or agency had taken responsibility for the incident, which he claimed resulted in losses of both time and money. 'You keep saying there is 'no official ban'. But in reality, I was still blocked and denied my right to travel,' he said in a statement on Instagram. He concluded his post by stating that he intends to take the case to court. 'This time, it's the people's turn to drag those in power to court. You always tell me to 'use the right channel', don't you? Fine — see you in court,' he wrote. At the time of writing, neither the government nor the police have responded to Fahmi's desire to sue them. Sources: Instagram, NST, TheStar, MalayMail What's your Reaction? +1 0 +1 0 +1 0 +1 0 +1 0 +1 0
