China, US watch closely from the sidelines as India-Pakistan crisis unfolds
the nuclear-armed neighbours have drawn international attention – particularly from China and the US.
Advertisement
US President
Donald Trump told reporters at the White House on Wednesday that 'if I can do anything to help, I will be there' and claimed to 'get along very well' with both sides.
Underscoring the wider geopolitical stakes of the tensions, China has
tacitly backed its long-time regional ally Pakistan, which has acknowledged deploying Chinese-made fighter jets against India's increasingly Western-supplied arsenal.
While the global powers are unlikely to become directly involved in the conflict, experts pointed to deepening security ties between the US and India on one side and China and Pakistan on the other, as a sign that they are expected to offer various forms of support to their respective partners.
According to senior Indian officials, the US and India maintained 'robust' and 'strong' lines of communication before and after the strikes with Washington expressing 'overwhelming' support for India's fight against terrorism.
Advertisement
The officials said that India briefed US National Security Adviser and Secretary of State Marco Rubio 'at length' about the context and intelligence information behind the strikes just hours after they occurred, stressing that any external mediation or investigation would be futile.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
32 minutes ago
- South China Morning Post
Hong Kong urged to quickly adopt residency rule for subsidised university spots
Hong Kong should immediately introduce a residency period for subsidised university degree places instead of gradually implementing it over two years, to prevent the dependants of non-local talent from exploiting the transition, a concern group has said. The call was issued in a petition from the Hong Kong Local Students Rights Concern Group, but was dismissed by the Education Bureau on Wednesday night, with authorities arguing it would take time to prepare for the city's university entrance exams. The bureau also said it believed that the children of non-local talent would not rush to sit the Diploma of Secondary Education (DSE) exams before the transition period ended. Last month, the government announced that such children would be required to stay in Hong Kong for at least two years to become eligible for resident student benefits at publicly funded tertiary education institutions, as part of efforts to prevent abuse. Authorities said that eligibility would be tightened over a transition period, with a one-year residency requirement to be introduced for the 2027-28 academic year, before the threshold rose to two years for 2028-29, to give people a reasonable amount of time to make plans. The coming policy means candidates sitting their DSE exams next year will be unaffected, while students taking the assessments in 2027 would only be subject to a one-year residency requirement.
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
India to ban ‘harmful' online money games, threatening US$3.6 billion industry
India 's parliament on Thursday passed a bill to ban online games played with money in a move that threatens the survival of the popular fantasy gaming sector, after Prime Minister Narendra Modi 's government flagged the high risk of financial harm. The sudden ban has shocked an industry backed by venture capital firms like Tiger Global and Peak XV Partners and which was set to be worth US$3.6 billion in India by 2029. Executives fear imminent job losses and a complete shutdown of many app-based businesses, which attracted billions from foreign investors. The bill prohibits 'harmful' online money gaming services, advertisements and financial transactions related to them, with the government also citing the psychological harm they can cause. 'It is the duty of the government and the parliament to take strict action against social evils, which keep erupting time and again,' federal IT minister Ashwini Vaishnaw said in parliament on Thursday. India's upper house of parliament passed the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill 2025 after the lower house cleared it earlier this week. The president must sign the bill into law, which, although there is no set date, is considered a formality.
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
Trump's talks with Putin, Zelensky signal end of multilateral security
The recent back-to-back meetings in Alaska and Washington offer a troubling portrait of today's security order. Rather than demonstrating a collective search for peace, these spectacles highlight a drift towards unilateralism, great-power deals and a hollowing out of multilateral security frameworks. The meeting in Anchorage, Alaska , between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin revealed how easily Europe's security can be reshaped behind closed doors, while the hastily arranged gathering at the White House with Trump, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and several European leaders underscored Europe's diminished agency. European leaders were there less to negotiate than to listen, fearful of being sidelined as Trump outlined his vision for ending the war in Ukraine. This series of encounters should be seen less as a move towards peace and more as political performances that expose the growing dysfunction of global governance. At the heart of these meetings lies the question of Europe's future security architecture. In theory, Russia's war in Ukraine could be a catalyst for reimagining European security. In practice, however, neither Alaska nor Washington has yielded any such framework. Past agreements – such as the Dayton Accords that ended the Bosnian war in 1995 or the Minsk agreements intended to halt fighting in eastern Ukraine – offer lessons in both ambition and failure. These agreements, designed for specific conflicts in distinct historical contexts, are ill-suited to today's war in Ukraine. Any settlement now must grapple not only with ceasefire lines but also with the redefinition of security guarantees across Europe, something neither Dayton nor Minsk was built to handle. Without a multilateral mechanism that includes not just the United States and Russia but also the European Union, Nato and regional stakeholders, Europe remains vulnerable to great-power bargains made at its expense.
