logo
Why Is Everything Dry-Clean Only Now?

Why Is Everything Dry-Clean Only Now?

New York Times03-03-2025
In truth, I think the ubiquity of the dry-cleaning label is less about a conspiracy between fashion and launderers and more about fashion companies watching their backs. How to wash clothes, especially special clothes, is one of those skills that became … well, unfashionable back in the middle of the last century, when home ec classes went the way of the dodo.
Given that many consumers are no longer schooled in the art of hand washing silk versus cashmere versus wool, or may simply feel it is not worth their time, it is likely that companies have decided it is wiser and simpler to advise dry cleaning rather than to include complicated care instructions that may not be followed. If that happens, dissatisfied customers may blame them when garments have shrunk, become discolored or been otherwise wrecked when they were placed in the washing machine by mistake.
It's possible there are other reasons for the tags. Alexander Fury, the fashion features director of AnOther magazine, told me that he had spent time working for a young British designer before going into publishing and that the company always added 'dry-clean-only' tags to garments because they were the only tags the brand had. 'I think it was a cost-saving decision,' he said.
That said, it is true that we generally over-clean our clothes and over-dry clean them. Since dry cleaning is done with chemicals, that is not good for the environment or, if you do it too often, the clothes.
It is common wisdom, for example, that jeans rarely need to be washed. Chip Bergh, the former chief executive of Levi Strauss, once told me he never washed his denim, and Daniel Roseberry, the designer of Schiaparelli, told me he almost never washed his suits.
Mr. Roseberry, who worked at Thom Browne for 10 years before joining Schiap, said, 'They told you never to dry clean your suits.'
'It shortens the life span of your clothes dramatically,' he said. 'I know most people wear designer clothes and dry clean them after every use, but it's crazy.'
Instead, he advised simply spot cleaning a stain (the American Cleaning Institute has good suggestions for how) and then hanging the suit up and brushing it down as needed to remove dust and lint.
I decided to poll some other fashion folks to find out how they thought about dry cleaning. There are no hard and fast rules, but many of them, like Nikki Ogunnaike, the editor of Marie Claire, said their approach to each garment depended on their own comfort level with washing.
'Cashmere, generally, I don't think needs to be dry cleaned,' Ms. Ogunnaike said, adding that she usually hand-washed her sweaters or used the lowest machine cycle. 'It really just depends on how sad I'd be if I got it wrong,' she said.
Penny Martin, the editor of The Gentlewoman, went further. She never dry cleans anything, she said — 'even the fanciest things, with paillettes' — because she lives in the countryside and cleaners are an hour's drive away. She simply hand-washes garments in cold water (she uses Soak laundry soap) and then blocks everything carefully to dry.
She also swears by the book 'Garment Goddess' by Laura de Barra for advice on how to clean all kinds of clothes. And she always looks pristine.
For more advice, our sister publication Wirecutter has published a useful guide entitled 'All the things you don't need to dry clean even if the label says you do,' which pretty much sums up the situation, and is a great starting point for making an educated decision about your own wardrobe.
Though, speaking of education, I think every high school should reintroduce home ec (and shop for that matter). After all, given the investment cost of clothes, laundry isn't really a chore — it's a science.
Your Style Questions, Answered
Every week on Open Thread, Vanessa will answer a reader's fashion-related question, which you can send to her anytime via email or Twitter. Questions are edited and condensed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Prince William and Kate Middleton's big move forces two families out of their homes
Prince William and Kate Middleton's big move forces two families out of their homes

Fox News

timean hour ago

  • Fox News

Prince William and Kate Middleton's big move forces two families out of their homes

Prince William and Kate Middleton's upcoming move has forced two families living nearby to vacate their homes. The Prince and Princess of Wales, along with their three children, are gearing up to relocate to Forest Lodge, nestled in Windsor Great Park. Two families living near the eight-bedroom property were asked to vacate ahead of the royal family's move, Fox News Digital has learned. Fox News Digital reached out to Kensington Palace for comment. "Close neighbors have been surprised to be ordered to leave their properties so that no prying eyes can see the Prince and Princess with their children," royal expert Ian Pelham Turner claimed to Fox News Digital. It's understood that there have been no eviction notices, and the tenants have since moved to similar or better housing within the 4,800-acre Great Park. Everyone remains in Crown Estate properties. A "well-connected source" told the U.K.'s Daily Mail that the families "were not expecting it." "They were told to move out," the insider claimed to the outlet. "I guess they were given somewhere else, but they were told they had to move. They were not expecting it." "Those houses are very close to the Lodge, so they're not going to want any Tom, Dick, or Harry living in those houses if there are going to be royals there." Royal expert Richard Fitzwilliams told Fox News Digital that the families were asked to relocate due to "security reasons." He stressed that the residents are still allowed to stay on "Crown Estate Land." "They were reportedly in close proximity to the Lodge," Fitzwilliams explained. "The Prince and Princess of Wales need shelter from the enormous pressures of royal life with a media circus watching everything they do." The tenants lived in cottages that were previously converted from stables on the property and rented out by the Crown Estate. The Daily Mail reported that new shrubs have recently been planted and a metal fence with black mesh privacy screens has also been placed around the front of the home in anticipation of the royal family's arrival. A Kensington Palace spokesperson previously confirmed to People magazine that the Wales family will move in later this year. It is understood that William and Kate are paying for the renovations themselves. William, who is heir to the British throne, receives around $30 million a year from the Duchy of Cornwall Estate. "Some royal skeptics are saying that it is not grand enough for a future king," said Turner. "William and Kate may already be setting the precedent for the future monarch living a much humbler existence." WATCH: KATE MIDDLETON, PRINCE WILLIAM 'PLANNING THEIR LEGACY' AMID 'ENDGAME' The royal family previously moved to Adelaide Cottage in 2022. At the time, the couple's three children – Prince George, Princess Charlotte and Prince Louis – started attending the nearby co-ed prep school Lambrook. Forest Lodge is not far from their current four-bedroom home. Royal insiders told the Daily Mail that William and Kate are hoping for a "fresh start" at the new property. In January of this year, Kate, 43, announced that her cancer was in remission. William's father, King Charles III, was diagnosed with an undisclosed form of cancer in February 2024. "For Kate, there is a tennis court for the game she loves," said Turner. "She can also have relaxing walks in nearby woodlands, which she has stated helps her on her journey after cancer treatment." It is believed that the Wales family will likely remain in their new home even after William ascends to the throne.

Dog Who Endured Trauma and Tragedy Faces Biggest Test Yet: 'Never Give Up'
Dog Who Endured Trauma and Tragedy Faces Biggest Test Yet: 'Never Give Up'

Newsweek

time2 days ago

  • Newsweek

Dog Who Endured Trauma and Tragedy Faces Biggest Test Yet: 'Never Give Up'

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Dog lovers are rallying around a brave rescue Dachshund after her owner shared her heartbreaking story on social media. In a post shared on Reddit, u/frasnet introduced the online pet community to his senior rescue dog, Slinky, alongside three simple words: "never give up." It's an apt statement to include, given everything Slinky has been through. Frasnet, a British national living abroad who requested his real name be omitted from this story, told Newsweek he adopted Slinky in 2022. Their vet estimates Slinky to be around 7 years old when they brought her home. From the moment he laid eyes on her, it was clear Slinky had endured a difficult life. Even so, Frasnet was shocked and saddened at just how difficult it had been. "She was surrendered from illegal breeders with severe gum disease and gave birth to a stillborn puppy," he said. "She had all but 5 teeth removed and suffered nerve damage that affected her tongue and possibly her vocal cords as she doesn't bark normally." Slinky had to undergo reconstructive surgery to plug a hole in her gums that had left her nasal cavity exposed and uncomfortable. Frasnet and his wife already had two dogs, Belle and Zeina, but there was something about Slinky, when they first came across her online adoption profile, that made them determined to adopt. "We both just knew we could help her," he said. "Nobody wanted her. We saw her, listened to her backstory and immediately made arrangements to adopt her." Slinky the rescue dachshund lying on the grass. Slinky the rescue dachshund lying on the grass. Reddit/u/Frasnet Slinky could so easily have fallen between the cracks and ended up being consigned to a future stuck waiting in the shelter for a family that never comes. A 2021 study published in the journal Animals saw researchers attempt to narrow the most commonly seen characteristics of a long-term, shelter dog—a dog living in a shelter for 12 months or more. The results concluded that long-term shelter dogs were more often older in age, male, of large size, and considered a "dangerous breed." Slinky may not have fit all of those criteria, but her age undoubtedly counted against her. Frasnet and his wife preferred to focus their mental energies on making this dog, who had suffered so much, smile again. "It took about 18 months of nurturing to bring her out of her shell; she looked defeated," Frasnet said. "My wife cuddled her constantly, we started to take her on walks and she really started to get a personality." It seemed like Slinky was getting the happy ending she so richly deserved. But everything changed. "In January 2025 she started stumbling and we took her immediately for a checkup," Frasnet said. "Nothing showed on her blood tests or X-ray." It seemed like Slinky was on the mend from whatever illness she had been struck down by, but then a month ago, they noticed she was rapidly losing weight. Further X-rays, blood tests and two biopsies followed before it was confirmed she had cancer. Frasnet didn't waste any time getting Slinky the treatment she needed. "We decided she was losing weight so quickly we didn't have time to investigate and booked her in for surgery," he said. Slinky has had her tumor removed. Slinky has had her tumor removed. Reddit/u/Frasnet Though the operation was essential, Frasnet feared Slinky might not make it. "I made casts of her paws because she was so thin I didn't think she could handle the surgery," he said. But Slinky had already overcome so much and appeared determined to do that again. "She would have died in days without it, but [it] looks like she is pulling through," Frasnet said of the surgery. "She really is a fighter and is not ready to give up." Those words, "never give up," appeared as part of the Reddit post about Slinky's situation. The post has gotten a huge response with over 2,500 upvotes and a slew of comments offering support and encouragement during her cancer journey. "I'm cheering for you, Slinky. You go girl, stay strong," one user wrote. "Sending much love and wishes for healing," a second Redditor said. "May the feisty Doxie spirit carry you through recovery," a third person commented. Though Slinky is recovering well from the surgery, Frasnet is taking things one day at a time. "The mass has been sent for analysis to see what future treatment plan she needs. A lot is unknown right now with the key factor on her immediate healing, which is happening," he said. Right now, the outpouring of support has been much appreciated. Frasnet hopes Slinky's story serves as an important reminder about certain kinds of rescue dogs. "Old, disabled, ill-health animals need love too, especially when humans did this to her, breeding the next insta-pup, the mums just discarded," he said. "It really breaks our hearts how humans can be so horrible to animals that show such love."

The British Pacific Fleet of WWII Finally Gets Its Story Told
The British Pacific Fleet of WWII Finally Gets Its Story Told

Epoch Times

time3 days ago

  • Epoch Times

The British Pacific Fleet of WWII Finally Gets Its Story Told

The raids on Sumatra by the British Pacific Fleet is a little known piece of World War II history. In fact, according to Angus Konstam's new work, 'this is the first history of the Sumatra raids.' Konstam, one of the most prolific maritime historians living, has recently written a concise work on this brief piece of British naval history, entitled 'Sumatra 1944-45: The British Pacific Fleet's Oil Campaign in the Dutch East Indies.' The author, who hails from the UK, is not shy about why the history of these raids is so obscure. They were conducted in the shadow of the behemoth that had become the United States Navy. Catching Up Konstam discusses how the U.S. Navy had controlled the Pacific War and ultimately won it pretty much single-handedly. For their British counterparts, they were significantly behind in the advanced world of naval warfare. The British had long ruled the seas. But after World War I, the Royal Navy could no longer compete, specifically on an economic level, in building its naval fleet. Naval warfare had graduated from the battleship era to the carrier era, primarily because of the advances in aviation.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store