China hails 'substantial progress' in trade talks with US
BEIJING: China hailed on Monday (May 12) "substantial progress" with the United States after talks in Geneva on dialling down their trade war yielded dramatic cuts to import tariffs.
US President Donald Trump had imposed duties of 145 per cent on imports from China last month as part of a global tariff blitz, while Beijing hit Washington with retaliatory duties of 125 per cent.
As well as the blanket levies, China has also been hit with sector-specific tariffs on steel, aluminium and car imports.
Trump has frozen until July "reciprocal" tariffs on a slew of other countries but kept them in place for China.
The two sides said in a joint statement on Monday that they had agreed to slash those levies, with Washington saying US tariffs would fall to 30 per cent and Chinese tolls to 10 per cent.
Shortly after the announcement, Beijing's commerce ministry said "the high-level trade talks between China and the United States have made substantial progress and greatly reduced the level of bilateral tariffs".
"This move is in line with the expectations of producers and consumers in both countries, and in the interest of the two countries and the common interest of the world," a ministry spokesperson said.
"It is hoped that the US side will take these talks as a foundation to keep working with China and completely correct the wrong practice of unilateral tariff rises ... and jointly inject more certainty and stability into the world economy," it said.
The trade dispute between the world's two biggest economies has roiled financial markets and stoked fears that the tariffs could spark a global economic downturn.
"The two sides will conduct rolling consultations on a regular or ad hoc basis in China, the US or agreed third countries," Beijing's commerce ministry said.
The two economic giants may also conduct working-level trade talks "as needed", it added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
38 minutes ago
- Business Times
BYD unleashes an EV industry reckoning that alarms Beijing
[BEIJING] The price war engulfing China's electric vehicle (EV) industry has sent share prices tumbling and prompted an unusual level of intervention from Beijing. The shakeout may just be getting started. For all the Chinese government's efforts to prevent price cuts by market leader BYD from turning into a vicious spiral, analysts say a combination of weaker demand and extreme overcapacity will slice into profits at the strongest brands and force feebler competitors to fold. Even after the number of EV makers starting shrinking for the first time last year, the industry is still using less than half its production capacity. Chinese authorities are trying to minimise the fallout, chiding the sector for 'rat race competition' and summoning heads of major brands to Beijing last week. Yet previous attempts to intervene have had little success. For the short term at least, investors are betting few automakers will escape unscathed. BYD, arguably the biggest winner from industry consolidation, has lost US$21.5 billion in market value since its shares peaked in late May. 'What you are seeing in China is disturbing, because there's a lack of demand and extreme price cutting,' said John Murphy, a senior automotive analyst at Bank of America. Eventually, there will be 'massive consolidation' to soak up the excess capacity, Murphy said. For automakers, relentless discounting erodes profit margins, undermines brand value and forces even well-capitalised companies into unsustainable financial positions. Low-priced and low-quality products can seriously damage the international reputation of 'Made-in-China' cars, the People's Daily, an outlet controlled by the Communist Party, said. And that knock would come just as models from BYD to Geely, Zeekr and Xpeng start to collect accolades on the world stage. For consumers, price drops may seem beneficial but they mask deeper risks. Unpredictable pricing discourages long-term trust – already people are complaining on China's social media, wondering why they should buy a car now when it may be cheaper next week – while there's a chance automakers, as they cut costs to stay afloat, may reduce investment in quality, safety and after-sales service. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Auto CEOs were told last week they must 'self-regulate' and should not sell cars below cost or offer unreasonable price cuts, according to sources familiar with the matter. The issue of zero-mileage cars also came up – where vehicles with no distance on their odometers are sold by dealers into the second-hand market, seen widely as a way for automakers to artificially inflate sales and clear inventory. Chinese automakers have been discounting a lot more aggressively than their foreign counterparts. Murphy said US automakers should just get out. 'Tesla probably needs to be there to compete with those companies and understand what's going on, but there's a lot of risk there for them.' Others leave no room for doubt that BYD, China's No 1 selling car brand, is the culprit. 'It's obvious to everyone that the biggest player is doing this,' Jochen Siebert, managing director at auto consultancy JSC Automotive, said. 'They want a monopoly where everybody else gives up.' BYD's aggressive tactics are raising concerns over the potential dumping of cars, dealership management issues and 'squeezing out suppliers', he said. The pricing turmoil is also unfolding against a backdrop of significant overcapacity. The average production utilisation rate in China's automotive industry was a mere 49.5 per cent in 2024, data compiled by Shanghai-based Gasgoo Automotive Research Institute show. An April report by AlixPartners meanwhile highlights the intense competition that's starting to emerge among new energy vehicle (NEV) makers or companies that produce pure battery cars and plug-in hybrids. In 2024, the market saw its first ever consolidation among NEV-dedicated brands, with 16 exiting and 13 launching. 'The Chinese automotive market, despite its substantial scale, is growing at a slower speed. Automakers have to put top priority now on grabbing more market share,' Ron Zheng, a partner at global consultancy Roland Berger GmbH, said. Jiyue Auto shows how quickly things can change. A little over a year after launching its first car, the automaker jointly backed by big names Zhejiang Geely Holding Group and technology giant Baidu, began to scale down production and seek fresh funds. It's a dilemma for all carmakers, but especially smaller ones. 'If you don't follow suit once a leading company makes a price move, you might lose the chance to stay at the table,' AlixPartners consultant Zhang Yichao said. He added that China's low capacity utilisation rate, which is 'fundamentally fuelling' the competition, is now even under more pressure from export uncertainties. While the push to find an outlet for excess production is thrusting more Chinese brands to export, international markets can only offer some relief. 'The US market is completely closed and Japan and Korea may close very soon if they see an invasion of Chinese carmakers,' Siebert said. 'Russia, which was the biggest export market last year, is now becoming very difficult. I also don't see South-east Asia as an opportunity anymore.' The pressure of cost-cutting has also led analysts to express concern over supply chain finance risks. A price cut demand by BYD to one of its suppliers late last year attracted scrutiny around how the car giant may be using supply chain financing to mask its ballooning debt. A report by accounting consultancy GMT Research put BYD's true net debt at closer to 323 billion yuan (S$58 billion), compared with the 27.7 billion yuan officially on its books as at the end of June 2024. The pain is also bleeding into China's dealership network. Dealership groups in two provinces have gone out of business since April, both of them ones that were selling BYD cars. Beijing's meeting with automakers last week was not the first attempt at a ceasefire. Two years ago, in mid-2023, 16 major automakers, including Tesla, BYD and Geely signed a pact, witnessed by the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers (CAAM), to avoid 'abnormal pricing'. Within days though, CAAM deleted one of the four commitments, saying that a reference to pricing in the pledge was inappropriate and in breach of a principle enshrined in the nation's antitrust laws. The discounting continued unabated. BLOOMBERG
CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
Japan's Q1 GDP contraction narrows on consumption improvement, revised figure shows
TOKYO :Japan's economy contracted in the January-March quarter at a slower pace than initially estimated, government data showed on Monday, with consumption figures revised upwards even as uncertainty on U.S. tariffs clouds the outlook. Gross domestic product shrank an annualised 0.2 per cent in the three months to March, the Cabinet Office's revised data showed, slower than the 0.7 per cent contraction in the initial estimate and economists' median forecast. The revised quarter-on-quarter number translates as flat in price-adjusted terms, compared with a 0.2 per cent shrinkage issued on May 16. Monday's revised data reinforced analysts' concern that the economy was losing steam even before U.S. President Donald Trump's so-called reciprocal tariffs in April 2. Private consumption, which accounts for more than half of the Japanese economy, inched up 0.1 per cent, versus flat in the preliminary reading. The capital expenditure component of GDP, a barometer of private demand-led strength, rose 1.1 per cent in the first quarter, revised down from 1.4 per cent in the initial estimate. Economists had estimated a 1.3 per cent rise. External demand, or exports minus imports, knocked 0.8 per centage point off growth, the same as the initial reading. On the other hand, domestic demand contributed 0.8 per centage point. Japan faces a 24 per cent U.S. tariff starting in July unless it can negotiate a lower rate. It is also scrambling to find ways to persuade Washington to exempt its automakers from 25 per cent tariffs on automobiles, Japan's biggest industry. Policymakers and analysts are concerned global trade tension unleashed by U.S. tariffs may complicate the Bank of Japan's efforts to normalise monetary policy. The BOJ is set to hold a two-day policy meeting early next week.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
What to know about the immigration protests in Los Angeles
The National Guard, police and protesters stand off outside of a downtown jail in Los Angeles on June 8. PHOTO: AFP Los Angeles police officers arrest a person during protests near the Edward R. Roybal Federal Building in Los Angeles on June 8. PHOTO: EPA-EFE Protesters are blanketed in smoke along Alondra Boulevard during a standoff with law enforcement in the Los Angeles County city of Compton. PHOTO: REUTERS Demonstrators kneel with their hands raised in front of Los Angeles Metro Police during a protest in Los Angeles, California, on June 8. PHOTO: REUTERS What to know about the immigration protests in Los Angeles LOS ANGELES - The first of at least 2,000 National Guard troops began arriving in Los Angeles on June 8 morning, ordered in by President Donald Trump to deal with protests against workplace immigration raids after two days of unrest. Any demonstration that got in the way of immigration officials would be considered a 'form of rebellion,' Mr Trump said in his order, issued June 7. The dispatch of troops was an extraordinary escalation that put Los Angeles squarely at the centre of tensions over his administration's immigration crackdown. An expert said it was the first time since 1965 that a president had bypassed a state governor to activate that state's National Guard force for law enforcement or civil unrest purposes. Governor Gavin Newsom of California called Mr Trump's order 'purposefully inflammatory'. He said there was no shortage of law enforcement resources to deal with the protests, and that the federal government was sending the troops because it wanted 'a spectacle'. Protests broke out in Los Angeles on June 6 against a series of raids that appeared to be part of a new phase of the Trump administration's immigration crackdown, in which officials say they will focus increasingly on workplaces. Protesters continued demonstrating downtown and in nearby cities on June 7 as law enforcement officers made arrests and in some cases used crowd-control munitions, tear gas and flash-bang grenades against the protesters. Hundreds of National Guard troops had arrived in Los Angeles by June 8 afternoon, and protests flared up again in the city's downtown. Here's what to know: How have the protests developed? The demonstrations began on June 6 after camouflage-clad federal agents began combing the garment district in Los Angeles in search of people suspected of being immigrants in the country without legal permission. The raid, which spread alarm among workers in the city, incited chaotic scenes between protesters, who chanted and threw eggs, and law enforcement officers, who fired pepper spray and crowd-control munitions. Demonstrations continued on June 7, both downtown and in the greater Los Angeles area, including the largely Latino and working-class city of Paramount, about 24km to the south. Protests there were some of the most volatile in the region, with law enforcement officers using flash-bang grenades and firing crowd-control munitions. A firework sent by protesters explodes near by the Los Angeles Sheriff Department officers during immigration protest in Paramount, California, on June 7. PHOTO: AFP Mr Bill Essayli, the Trump administration's top law enforcement official in Southern California, said more than 100 people were arrested on June 6 and at least 20 more were arrested on June 7, mostly in Paramount. A Department of Homeland Security official added Sunday that US officials had arrested eight people in Paramount on June 7 on federal obstruction charges. Two of the eight were minors and have been released from custody, the official said. The streets of Los Angeles were largely quiet on the morning of June 8 as the first National Guard troops began to arrive downtown at the Metropolitan Detention Centre, where the Los Angeles Police Department had detained a number of protesters on June 7. By early afternoon on June 8, hundreds of demonstrators outside the detention centre were facing off with federal law-enforcement officials in riot gear. The officials – including from DHS and Immigration and Customs Enforcement – fired canisters of tear gas into the crowd. National Guard troops were also gathered in Paramount, near a Home Depot where protesters had clashed with agents on June 7. Who calls in the national guard? The National Guard is the only branch of the military that can be deployed both by state governors and by the president. Governors almost always control deployment in their states. The Guard operates similarly to the Army Reserve force. Most of its members do not serve full time. They generally hold civilian jobs and attend regular training sessions, and are called into active service only when needed. The National Guard is most often called upon during extreme weather events like hurricanes, floods and wildfires. Troops have sometimes been used to quell civil disturbances at the state governor's request. The National Guard is the only branch of the military that can be deployed both by state governors and by the president. PHOTO: AFP One example was in 1992, when Governor Pete Wilson of California asked President George H.W. Bush to deploy the Guard after riots erupted in Los Angeles over the acquittal of four white police officers in the beating of Mr Rodney King, a black man. Before Mr Trump's move, the last time a president activated a state's National Guard troops for such a purpose without being asked to do so by the state's governor was in 1965, according to Ms Elizabeth Goitein, senior director of the Liberty and National Security Program at the Brennan Centre for Justice, an independent law and policy organization. On that occasion, she said, President Lyndon B. Johnson used troops to protect civil rights demonstrators in Alabama. What have officials said? Trump administration officials have criticised the state's political leadership over their handling of the protests, while California's Democratic leaders blasted Mr Trump's order as unnecessary and an inappropriate use of power. Ms Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, said in a statement on the night of June 7 that Mr Trump was deploying the National Guard in response to 'violent mobs' that she said had attacked federal law enforcement and immigration agents. The 2,000 troops would 'address the lawlessness that has been allowed to fester,' she said. A protester walks through smoke from flash-bang smoke grenades fired by federal agents near a Home Depot in Paramount, California, on June 7. PHOTO: EPA-EFE Mr Trump described the demonstrations, which have been largely peaceful, as 'insurrectionist' on social media on June 8. He did not rule out invoking the Insurrection Act, which would allow him to deploy the US military domestically, and told reporters that there were 'violent people' at the protests and that 'we're not going to let them get away with it'. State and local authorities in California and Los Angeles County have not indicated any need for federal assistance. State attorney general Rob Bonta said on social media that local law enforcement 'have the resources they need to meet the moment' and that Mr Trump's order was 'counterproductive'. Governor Newsom called the president's order 'purposefully inflammatory' and said that Trump had activated the National Guard only because his administration wanted 'a spectacle.' Mayor Karen Bass of Los Angeles said the National Guard's presence would 'not be helpful'. She said the city was capable of handling protests, adding that she had been in contact with White House officials and Mr Tom Homan, Mr Trump's 'border czar'. NYTIMES Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
