
Europe's wind farm army
The Baltic Power project will be one of the country's biggest offshore wind farms, generating enough electricity for 1.5 million homes. But its contribution to Europe's security goes beyond supplying power. The 120-metre towers are set to become sentinels, tirelessly scanning the brackish waters and leaden skies for hostile activity.
In this new Cold War, where spying and sabotage threaten Europe's energy and communications infrastructure, and possibly even its territorial integrity, the potential of wind farms for military surveillance is lost on no one.
As the Polish state secretary for EU affairs, Ignacy Niemczycki, told Euractiv on a windy boat ride out to the site: "We are looking at infrastructure differently than we were one year ago."
Wake-up call
When Finland and Sweden joined in 2023 and 2024, defence analysts dubbed the Baltic Sea 'Lake NATO', with members of the military alliance effectively encircling it. But after three years in which the strategically important waters have been plagued by drones, spy ships, aerial stand-offs and blatant sabotage of power and communication cables, the moniker is starting to ring hollow.
There are only two strips of coastline on the Baltic that don't belong to NATO; both are Russian, and the area is becoming a geopolitical flashpoint. Now, more than three years after Russian tanks rolled across the border into Ukraine, the military alliance is looking to rally the serried ranks of offshore wind turbines, like the Baltic Power project, to Europe's defence.
When the Nord Stream 2 gas pipelines were blown up in 2022, it came as a harsh 'wake-up call' to the European Union, says Julian Pawlak, a research associate at Hamburg military university (HSU). Western nations learned the hard way that they 'do not have a complete awareness of the Baltic Sea maritime domain'.
The destruction last Christmas of the Estlink 2 undersea cable linking the Nordic electricity market to the Baltic power grid just before the latter cut ties with Russia was another rude awakening, and prompted NATO to set up a military operation in response.
Making more off wind
NATO has discussed dotting offshore energy infrastructure with surveillance tools for years. In the past, turning oil rigs into military bases has proven unfeasible for cost, security, and engineering reasons, Pawlak says.
That's where wind turbines come in: They are tall, decentralised, and there are hundreds of them off the EU's Baltic coast. Already, wind turbines are equipped with bird sensors and transponders signalling their whereabouts to submarines, says Pawlak.
Baltic Power – situated less than 200 kilometres from the Russian exclave of Kaliningrad – is equipping its new turbine towers with radars and sensors, following a security checklist drafted by Poland's defence ministry, Marcin Godek, the wind farm's operations and maintenance manager, explained in June.
"There is a perfect symbiosis between offshore wind turbines and coastal protection," says Kristof Verlinden, a reserve Belgian coast guard who runs offshore wind farms at the firm, Parkwind. For Verlinden, they are also "sentinels or forward bases looking at the situation 50 kilometres or more from the coast".
More eyes
Wind farms' growing importance also brings greater risk of attack.
'The threats to offshore energy infrastructure are very real,' says Giles Dickson, CEO of lobby group Wind Europe. 'Assets are being attacked physically, not just cyberattacks," he added, pointing to several cable attacks in the Baltic Sea.
The Swedish government recently halted 13 offshore wind farm projects in the Baltic Sea citing 'unacceptable consequences for Sweden's military defence' and interfering with the military. And turbines themselves have previously become the target of surveillance by the Kremlin.
Baltic Power mapped potential threats in the region before beginning construction.
They quickly fell victim to spoofing, where boats pretend to be someone or somewhere that they are not, and incidents of signals jamming meant plans needed to be overhauled, Godek said.
Faced with this new reality, WindEurope has hired ex-military personnel to liaise with NATO.
'You cannot build an offshore wind farm in Belgium now if you do not commit to high levels of data sharing with the military and also commit to host their hardware if they ask you to do so,' said Dickson.
Verlinden said Parkwind has the foundations for the coastguard to install multi-use sensors and detection systems. Employees go to the offshore turbines almost daily and report back any irregularities.
In Belgium, Parkwind holds joint exercises "to train, verify and demonstrate our readiness towards security threats" with the coast guard, Verlinden said. "And we are ready to share our data such as AIS data, cable DAS, give access to our seaward looking cameras."
But the prospect of a web of wind turbines sharing data among themselves, their operators and governments, also raises questions.
Pawlak pointed to the need for lawmakers to clarify whether operators should have access to any information they collect. Close collaboration with the military would raise legal questions that are 'not completely clear', he said.
Birdwatching
Edward Zakrajsek, who handles the European market at radar firm DeTect, said wind turbines have a long history of watching the surrounding area. 'Birds were the first thing, but of course 10 or so years ago private drones hit the market and everyone can fly one now,' he says.
Radars are already 'monitoring even individual birds with a 10-kilometre range 24 hours a day', Zakrajsek said, adding that "drones are about the size of a bird'.
The more offshore wind farms that can be networked together, the better the surveillance data will be, and Zakrajsek said, 'the further out they are the better'.
(rh, vc, jp)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Euractiv
4 hours ago
- Euractiv
OpenAI wants US-wide AI rules with an eye on Europe's rulebook
The company says it wants federal AI rules to avoid 'a patchwork of state rules' Euractiv is part of the Trust Project Maximilian Henning Euractiv Aug 13, 2025 15:00 2 min. read News Based on facts, either observed and verified directly by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. OpenAI is urging California, a trendsetter in US regulation, to align its AI rules with existing national or international frameworks, including the EU's, to avoid conflicting regulations across the country. The EU passed its AI Act last year and introduced a voluntary Code of Practice for providers of large AI models, a non-binding framework signed by almost all major US and European companies, including OpenAI. In a letter to California Governor Gavin Newsom, OpenAI said the state should treat AI companies as compliant with its own rules if they have signed up to the EU's code, or if they work with the US's federal AI Centre. In the letter, OpenAI's chief lobbyist Christopher Lehane recommended policies 'that avoid duplication and inconsistencies' with those of similar democratic regimes. In a blog post accompanying the letter, the company warned the US must choose between setting clear national standards for AI and 'a patchwork of state rules', adding: 'Imagine how hard it would have been to win the Space Race if California's aerospace and tech industries had been tangled in state-by-state regulations'. At a US Senate hearing in May, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said having 50 different regulatory regimes would be 'quite bad' and warned that adopting the EU's approach to AI regulation would be 'disastrous', instead calling for a 'light touch' federal approach. California, the most populous and wealthiest US state, often seeks to set an example for others through its regulation. But tensions over AI rules between Washington and state capitals have been brewing for some time. At the start of July, the US Senate scrapped a decade-long ban on state-level AI laws from President Donald Trump's broad budget bill. Weeks later, the Trump administration published an AI Action Plan seeking to block federal funding for AI in states with 'burdensome AI regulations'. (de)


Euractiv
5 hours ago
- Euractiv
Ukraine willing to discuss territorial issues with Russia, German chancellor says
BERLIN – Kyiv is willing to discuss territorial issues with Russia, amid new 'hope for movement" towards peace in Ukraine, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said on Wednesday. The comments came after a digital summit of European leaders with Donald Trump, during which they discussed the US president's controversial meeting with Vladimir Putin on Russia's war in Ukraine, set to take place in Alaska on Friday. Merz said that Europeans used the call with Trump on Wednesday to underline that "fundamental European and Ukrainian security interests must be maintained in Alaska.' 'There is hope for movement. There is hope for peace in Ukraine,' Merz said during a joint press conference with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in Berlin. Merz outlined the joint European position on the talks, consisting of five points, including – notably – that Kyiv 'is prepared to negotiate on territorial issues." A legal recognition of Russian occupations was "not up for discussion,' he added, however. 'The principle that border must not be changed by force must be upheld," he stressed. The American president had raised eyebrows in Europe when he suggested that Moscow and Kyiv could discuss swapping Ukrainian-held territory against Russian-occupied regions of Ukraine, sparking fears that America and Russia could try and engineer a ceasefire deal in Ukraine's absence. Trump later said, however, that it was not up to him to make a deal and that he would try to get territory back for Ukraine. Zelenskyy previously said that he was not prepared to concede territory to Russia. In Berlin, he stressed that his overall position 'hasn't changed' and that any deal would need to be compliant with Ukraine's constitution. Aligned 'to very large extent' Other joint priorities listed by Merz included that Ukraine would need a seat at the table in future peace negotiations, that a ceasefire would need to precede peace talks, and that 'solid' security guarantees would need to be negotiated. Merz also called for a joint transatlantic approach, that would entail jointly "increasing the pressure... if there is no movement on the Russian side in Alaska." Trump shared this position "to a very large extent,' Merz said. Other European leaders shared the optimistic outlook after the call, that included the heads of state and government of Finland, France, Britain, Italy, Poland, as well as the presidents of the European Commission and European Council, and NATO chief Mark Rutte. French President Emmanuel Macron noted that Trump had agreed during the call that Ukraine must be involved in territorial talks in any ceasefire deal with Russia. Meanwhile, Rutte wrote on X that European and America were 'united in pushing to end to this terrible war." 'The ball is now in Putin's court,' he added. *Magnus Lund Nielsen contributed reporting. (mm)


Euractiv
5 hours ago
- Euractiv
Russia makes biggest Ukraine advance in over a year ahead of Alaska summit
AFP Aug 13, 2025 14:59 2 min. read News Service Produced externally by an organization we trust to adhere to journalistic standards. The Russian army made its biggest 24-hour advance into Ukraine in over a year on Tuesday just ahead of the Trump-Putin summit, according to data from the US-based Institute for the Study of War. Russia took or claimed 110 square kilometres on 12 August compared to the previous day, the largest increase since late May recent months, Moscow has typically taken five or six days to progress at such a pace, although Russian advances have accelerated in recent weeks. The US and Russian presidents, Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin, are to meet in Alaska on Friday. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy acknowledged Tuesday that Russian troops had advanced by up to 10 kilometres (six miles) near the eastern coal mining town of Dobropillia, but that Kyiv would soon "destroy them." Russia said Wednesday that it had taken two villages close to Dobropillia. About 70 percent of Russia's advances in Ukraine so far this year are in the Donetsk region in eastern Ukraine, which the Kremlin claimed to have annexed in September 2022. As of August 12, Moscow controlled or claimed to control 79 percent of the region, up from 62 percent a year ago. The Russian army has also been attempting to seize the mining town of Pokrovsk for more than 18 months, following its capture of Bakhmut in May 2023. The last two major cities held by Kyiv in the region are also at risk. They are Sloviansk and Kramatorsk, which is an important logistical hub for the front. Russian progress in Ukraine has accelerated every month since April. Between August 12, 2024 and August 12, 2025, the Russian army captured more than 6,100 square kilometres, four times more than the previous year, according to the data from the Institute for the Study of War. However, these Russian advances account for less than one percent of pre-war Ukraine's territory, including Crimea and Donbass. Russia currently has full or partial control over 19 percent of Ukrainian territory. (cp)