
Scientists discover hundreds of mysterious giant VIRUSES lurking in the ocean
It's an idea that sounds straight from the latest science fiction blockbuster.
But scientists at the University of Miami have warned that the world's oceans are teeming with 'giant viruses', also known as giruses.
Most viruses are less than 0.5 per cent the width of a human hair – too small to be seen with the naked human eye.
In contrast, the researchers say that the giant viruses are five times bigger, rivaling bacteria in terms of size.
Concerningly, all 230 giant viruses are previously unknown to science.
What's more, their impact on humans remains unclear.
Generally, giant viruses attack tiny organisms such as algae and amoebas in the world's waterways, although they could live on land too.
'The impact of giant viruses is no doubt present across all environments, but special interest has been taken to uncover their impact on aquatic ecosystems,' the experts say.
Most viruses are in the range of 20 to 200 nanometres, but giant viruses can be more than 1,000 nanometres.
For comparison, the width of a human hair is approximately 80,000 to 100,000 nanometres.
Giant viruses were practically unknown to science until the early 21st century, but scientists think they can have a major impact on life on Earth.
In the oceans, they infect various species of single-celled algae – the photosynthetic organisms that are responsible for about half of the Earth's oxygen production.
This viral infection can cause a rapid collapse of algal blooms – accumulations of algae stretching across tens of thousands of kilometers in the ocean – which in turn can substantially affect extensive marine, atmospheric and terrestrial ecosystems.
Although algae blooms can overgrow and become a problem, infection by giant viruses can have the opposite problem – causing their rapid collapse, which can deplete oxygen in the atmosphere.
Where and what types of these giant viruses exist around the world is still understudied, the researchers point out.
To learn more, they used a computer software tool called BEREN to identify the genomes of microbes in seawater samples.
What's the biggest virus?
The largest known virus, called Pithovirus, is 1,500 nanometres in length - so just over one thousandth of a millimetre.
Although Pithovirus is still invisible to the naked eye, most viruses are in the range of 20 to 200 nanometres.
For comparison, the width of a human hair is approximately 80,000 to 100,000 nanometres.
Discovered over a decade ago in the Siberian Permafrost, Pithovirus is thought to have been there 300,000 years and still able to infect living things.
The majority of giant viruses found belonged to either the Algavirales (135) or Imitervirales (81) classification.
Algavirales, typically 100 to 200 nanometres in diameter, get their name because of their ability to specifically infect the photosynthetic, single-celled eukaryotes known as algae.
Meanwhile, the 'genetically complex' Imitervirales have a flexible genetic strategy that potentially allows the virus to survive in a wider variety of hosts.
Because giant viruses contain enormous quantities of genetic material – up to 100 times more than other viruses – some may be able to better manipulate their host during infection.
This is one reason why giant viruses are thought to be more problematic than normal-sized viruses, although the factors that influence one virus being more deadly than another are varied and complex.
'Giant viruses possess genes involved in cellular functions such as carbon metabolism and photosynthesis, traditionally found only in cellular organisms,' said study author Benjamin Minch at the University of Miami.
'This suggests that giant viruses play an outsized role in manipulating their host's metabolism during infection and influencing marine biogeochemistry.'
Another giant virus classification called Pimascovirales includes the largest known virus, Pithovirus, which is 1,500 nanometres in length.
Discovered over a decade ago in the Siberian Permafrost, Pithovirus is thought to have been there 300,000 years ago and be still able to infect living things.
Most of the giant viruses (108) were from the Baltic Sea, a large brackish water body between the Scandinavian Peninsula and the rest of continental Europe, followed by the Antarctic (65).
But others were found in the Arctic, South Pacific, North Atlantic, Sargasso Sea (a specific area of the North Atlantic) and Korea's Jangmok Bay.
Overall, this suggests colder marine environments are richer reservoirs of giant viruses, many of which are likely yet to be discovered.
Cold-adapted marine giant viruses may now be threatened by climate change, further complicating the picture.
The new study, published in the journal Nature npj Viruses, offers further insight into these understudied microorganisms.
Further research could look at where giant viruses exist on land, or whether they're restricted to remote, underpopulated environments.
'This study allowed us to create a framework to improve existing tools for detecting novel viruses that could aid in our ability to monitor pollution and pathogens in our waterways,' Minch added.
WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A BACTERIA AND A VIRUS?
Viral infections, including common colds, are not treated by antibiotics, but bacterial infections, such as strep throat, can require the medications (file photo)
The biggest difference between viral and bacterial infections is the way in which they are treated.
Bacterial infections can usually be killed by antibiotics whereas the medicines to do work against viral infections.
Additionally, viruses are smaller than bacteria.
In order for a virus to multiply it must be attached to a living host, such as a human.
Bacteria thrive in a variety of environments both hot and cold.
Most bacteria are harmless, but ailments such as urinary tract infections and strep throat are caused by bacteria.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Using AI makes you stupid, researchers find
Artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots risk making people less intelligent by hampering the development of critical thinking, memory and language skills, research has found. A study by researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) found that people who relied on ChatGPT to write essays had lower brain activity than those who used their brain alone. The group who used AI also performed worse than the 'brain-only' participants in a series of tests. Those who had used AI also struggled when asked to perform tasks without it. 'Reliance on AI systems can lead to a passive approach and diminished activation of critical thinking skills when the person later performs tasks alone,' the paper said. Researchers warned that the findings raised 'concerns about the long-term educational implications' of using AI both in schools and in the workplace. It adds to a growing body of work that suggest people's brains switch-off when they use AI. 'Human thinking offloaded' The MIT study monitored 54 people who were asked to write four essays. Participants were divided into three groups. One wrote essays with the help of ChatGPT, another used internet search engines to conduct research and the third relied solely on brainpower. Researchers then asked them questions about their essays while performing so-called electroencephalogram (EEG) scans that measured activity in their brains. Those who relied on ChatGPT, a so-called 'large language model' that can answer complicated questions in plain English, 'performed worse than their counterparts in the brain-only group at all levels: neural, linguistic, scoring', the researchers said. The EEG scans found that 'brain connectivity systematically scaled down with the amount of external support' and was weakest in those who were relying on AI chatbots to help them write essays. The readings in particular showed reduced 'theta' brainwaves, which are associated with learning and memory formation, in those using chatbots. 'Essentially, some of the 'human thinking' and planning was offloaded,' the study said. The impact of AI contrasted with the use of search engines, which had relatively little effect on results. Of those who has used the chatbot, 83pc failed to provide a single correct quote from their essays – compared to around 10pc in those who used a search engine or their own brainpower. Participants who relied on chatbots were able to recall very little information about their essays, suggesting either they had not engaged with the material or had failed to remember it. Those using search engines showed only slightly lower levels of brain engagement compared to those writing without any technical aides and similar levels of recall. Impact on 'cognitive muscles' The findings will fuel concerns that AI chatbots are causing lasting damage to our brains. A study by Microsoft and Carnegie Mellon, published in February, found that workers reported lower levels of critical thinking when relying on AI. The authors warned that overuse of AI could leave cognitive muscles 'atrophied and unprepared' for when they are needed. Nataliya Kosmyna, the lead researcher on the MIT study, said the findings demonstrated the 'pressing matter of a likely decrease in learning skills' in those using AI tools when learning or at work. While the AI-assisted group was allowed to use a chatbot in their first three essays, in their final session they were asked to rely solely on their brains. The group continued to show lower memory and critical thinking skills, which the researchers said highlighted concerns that 'frequent AI tool users often bypass deeper engagement with material, leading to 'skill atrophy' in tasks like brainstorming and problem-solving'. The essays written with the help of ChatGPT were also found to be homogenous, repeating similar themes and language. Researchers said AI chatbots could increase 'cognitive debt' in students and lead to 'long-term costs, such as diminished critical inquiry, increased vulnerability to manipulation, decreased creativity'. Teachers have been sounding the alarm that pupils routinely cheating on tests and essays using AI chatbots. A survey by the Higher Education Policy Institute in February found 88pc of UK students were using AI chatbots to help with assessments and learning and that 18pc had directly plagiarised AI text into their work.


Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Life on Mars? Mysterious 'mushroom' is spotted on the Red Planet in photo snapped by NASA's Curiosity rover
Scientists have spent decades scouring the Martian surface for any signs of life. Now, a photo snapped by NASA 's Curiosity rover has sparked speculation that the hunt might finally be over. A picture taken from the Martian surface appears to show a 'mushroom' growing on the Red Planet. The strange discovery has led some alien hunters to declare: ' been found!' The photo was taken by the Curiosity rover on September 19, 2013, but was spotted in the archives by UFO hunter Scott Waring. Mr Waring says: 'This object has a curved bottom part of a stem, same as those on Earth. 'I'm not sure how or why NASA could overlook such a NASA's mission is to find life on other planets and moons.' However, scientists say there is a much simpler explanation. NASA's Curiosity rover was launched to Mars in 2011 with the goal of discovering whether the planet had the right conditions to support microscopic life. To help this search, the rover is equipped with multiple cameras, a drill to gather rock samples, and sets of tools to analyse the chemical compositions of samples. However, despite a decade of searching, Curiosity has never found any evidence that Mars is or ever was home to any form of alien life. But that hasn't stopped wild speculation following many of the rover's discoveries. Following his discovery of this archived image, Mr Waring claims that the rocky structure is a mushroom that has 'clearly pushed up out of the Mars dirt.' He adds: 'NASA should have poked it, bumped it, knocked it over, cut it open with their tools on Curiosity rover or at least use that million dollar laser they burn rocks and dirt with.' And Mr Waring isn't the only one who agrees. Commenters on social media flocked to share their support for his claims. One wrote: Looks like a mushroom to me! NASA know far more about MARS than they let on.' While another boldly claimed: 'What people fail to realize is if life is found on just one other planet in the solar system, then that basically means there is life everywhere in the Universe mathematically.' However, scientists are not convinced by this supposed evidence. Dr Gareth Dorrian, a planetary physicist from the University of Birmingham, told MailOnline that this is simply a 'flat roughly disc-shaped rock sitting atop a smaller stone at the bottom.' 'My best guess would be they were not originally in that position, but like two rocks lying in the desert, one just below the surface and the other on the surface above it,' he explained. 'Over time the wind could gradually blow the sand and dust away and the top one would gradually settle onto the bottom one.' Dr Dorrian points out that wind-driven processes like this on Earth often produce remarkable and strange formations. Alternatively, these 'mushrooms' could be geological structures called concretions, which formed billions of years ago when there was liquid water on Mars. As water flows through sediment, it dissolves the minerals and rearranges them in a more compact form to leave behind a solid block. Since these are harder than the surrounding rock, they are often left standing above the surface. Just like the hoodoo rock spires of the American southwest, these structures often take on a mushroom-like shape as the wind carves away the softer bedrock to leave a thin 'stem'. Part of the reason that Curiosity didn't stop to take any more measurements, as Mr Waring suggests, is that these are common on the Martian surface. Additionally, Dr Dorrian points out that, even if there were life on Mars, the chances of a living organism being found on the Martian surface are extremely low. The atmospheric pressure at the Martian surface is roughly equivalent to that found 20 miles above the surface of Earth, meaning the atmosphere is very thin. This allows a constant stream of ultraviolet and particle radiation in the form of cosmic rays to bombard the surface. Dr Dorrian says: 'This unhealthy combination of radiation is well known to damage complex molecules like DNA and would quickly sterilise the surface where this image was taken.' As if that wasn't bad enough, Dr Dorrian notes that temperature above ground would make it impossible for any organism to survive. Temperatures swing from a comfortable 20°C (68°F) during the day to -100°C (-148°F) at night, well below the freezing point of water and far colder than anywhere on Earth. 'No known forms of life can simultaneously tolerate these extremes of temperatures, radiation levels, and low atmospheric pressure, including mushrooms,' says Dr Dorrian. 'If life does exist on Mars, it is more likely to be found below ground, such as in underground reserves of water, where it would be shielded from the harsh environment at the surface.' That means this photograph almost certainly shows a common and naturally occurring rock formation, rather than life growing in an impossibly harsh environment.


Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Elon Musk posts drug test results after alleged addiction ruined his gig at Trump's White House
Elon Musk has reportedly tested negative for fentanyl, ketamine and a cocktail of other drugs amid rumors of his crippling habit severing his ties to the White House. Musk shared a photo of results on X early this morning with the caption 'lol,' most likely referencing accusations surrounding his drug use. The image shows he tested negative for 22 substances, including benzodiazepines, amphetamines, ecstasy, cocaine, ketamine, opioids, cannabis and fentanyl. He also previously claimed to have been prescribed the powerful anesthetic ketamine for depression. According to the image, the urine test was performed June 11 at Fastest Labs of South Austin in Texas. The results come weeks after a bombshell New York Times report claiming Musk was taking so much ketamine that is had begun affecting his bladder, which could include pain and control issues. He also took ecstasy, psychedelic mushrooms and travelled with a daily pill box that contained about 20 different drugs, including Adderall, sources allege. While the results are negative, urine drug tests can only detect substances for anywhere from one to seven days. Other measures like hair follicle tests can detect substance abuse dating back six months. This means it's possible Musk only stopped taking drugs for a few days, and it's still possible he has a history of drug abuse. Prior to posting the results, the Tesla CEO had shared a post from an X user that read: 'If Elon is on any drugs, I want what he's having.'