Dollar indecisive as investors await more tariff clarity
trade talks
ahead of an August 1 deadline for countries to strike deals with the U.S. or face steep
tariffs
.
The yen mostly held to gains from the previous session following results from a weekend upper house election in Japan that proved no worse than what had already been priced in, as focus now turns to how quickly Tokyo can strike a trade deal with Washington and Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba's future at the helm.
Explore courses from Top Institutes in
Select a Course Category
Cybersecurity
Degree
Technology
MCA
Project Management
others
Operations Management
Artificial Intelligence
MBA
Finance
Digital Marketing
Data Analytics
Design Thinking
Management
healthcare
Others
Healthcare
Data Science
Data Science
Public Policy
CXO
Product Management
Leadership
PGDM
Skills you'll gain:
Duration:
10 Months
MIT xPRO
CERT-MIT xPRO PGC in Cybersecurity
Starts on
undefined
Get Details
The Japanese currency was last a touch weaker at 147.65 in early Asia trade, after rising 1% on Monday in the wake of the election outcome.
The bruising defeat suffered by Ishiba and his ruling coalition also drew just a modest response in the broader Japanese market, which returned from a holiday in the previous session. [JP/] [.T]
"The initial relief for the yen that the ruling coalition did not lose even more seats and that Prime Minister Ishiba plans to hang on to power is likely to prove short-lived," said MUFG senior currency analyst Lee Hardman.
Live Events
"The pick-up in political uncertainty in Japan could complicate reaching a timely trade deal with the U.S., posing downside risks for Japan's economy and the yen."
With just slightly over a week to go before an August 1 deadline on tariffs, U.S. Treasury Secretary
Scott Bessent
said on Monday that the administration is more concerned with the quality of trade agreements than their timing.
Asked whether the deadline could be extended for countries engaged in productive talks with Washington, Bessent said President Donald Trump would make that decision.
Uncertainty over the eventual state of tariffs globally has been a huge overhang for the foreign exchange market, leaving currencies trading in a tight range for the most part, even as stocks on Wall Street have scaled fresh highs.
"Nothing that happens on August 1 is necessarily permanent, so long as the U.S. administration remains willing to talk, as was indicated in Trump's letters from two weeks ago," said Thierry Wizman, global FX and rates strategist at Macquarie Group.
The dollar was last steady after slipping in the previous session due in part to the yen's rise and a dip in U.S. Treasury yields, leaving sterling trading 0.03% lower at $1.3488.
The euro fell 0.12% to $1.1684, with focus also on a rate decision by the
European Central Bank
later this week, where expectations are for policymakers to stand pat on rates.
The European Union is exploring a broader set of possible counter measures against the United States as prospects for an acceptable trade agreement with Washington fade, according to EU diplomats.
Against a basket of currencies, the dollar rose slightly to 97.94, after having fallen 0.6% on Monday.
Also weighing on investors' minds has been worries about the
Federal Reserve
's independence, given Trump has railed repeatedly against Chair Jerome Powell and urged him to resign because of the central bank's reluctance to cut
interest rates
.
"Our base case remains that solid U.S. data and a tariff driven rebound in inflation will keep the FOMC on hold into 2026, and that the resulting shift in interest rate differentials will drive a continued rebound in the dollar in the next few months," said Jonas Goltermann, deputy chief markets economist at Capital Economics.
"But that view is clearly at the mercy of the White House's whims."
Elsewhere, the Australian dollar eased 0.05% to $0.6522, while the New Zealand dollar fell 0.14% to $0.5960.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Japan's Kato Voices Concern With Yen at Weakest Since March
Japan's Finance Minister said he's worried by movements in the yen, which weakened to levels last seen in March following dovish messaging on interest rates from the Bank of Japan. 'The government is deeply concerned about trends in the currency market, including speculative movements,' Finance Minister Katsunobu Kato told reporters on Friday. 'It's important for exchange rates to remain stable, reflecting economic fundamentals,' he added. Kato's comments came after the yen slid past the 150 level against the dollar on Thursday, following the BOJ's decision to leave interest rates unchanged. Governor Kazuo Ueda delivered a largely dovish message during his post-decision press conference on Thursday, cooling speculations about a near-term tightening move. Strategists in Tokyo warned of the risk that the yen could depreciate as far as 155 to the dollar, a level that would put investors on alert for the risk of authorities stepping into the market to support the currency. 'If the BOJ is not going to raise rates, there is a possibility that the yen could fall to 155,' said Marito Ueda, general manager of market research department at SBI Liquidity Market. Then 'intervention is the only option left.' While Kato refrained from commenting on specific FX levels, he acknowledged that he is aware of various views in the market. The yen was trading around 150.70 to the dollar as of 11:40 a.m. in Tokyo. The yen declined about 4.5% in July, defying its seasonal trend as domestic political uncertainties and tariffs weighed on the currency. Just hours before the BOJ decision, traders also dialed back bets on rate cuts in the US by the Federal Reserve, putting further pressure on the yen. 'Ueda was still quite dovish, so I see an even greater chance of the yen weakening past the 155 level against the dollar,' said Tohru Sasaki, chief strategist at Fukuoka Financial Group. 'I also don't think that the Fed will be able to cut rates this year, and if expectations for a cut continue to recede, the dollar will be bought.' What Bloomberg Strategists Say: USD/JPY traders will set their sights on an intervention zone nearer to 155 than current levels, based on this week's inputs from the Fed, BOJ and yield curves. That's implied by the old MOF rule of thumb that a swift 10-yen move should be addressed verbally, then actual yen buying if required. The shot clock is likely to have re-set with last week's dip to a 145 handle, hence the 10-yen projection. — Mark Cranfield, MLIV Strategist. Read more on MLIV. 'Stronger US data and dollar would push up dollar-yen and if it breaks 152, the next level that the pair will aim is 155,' said Shoki Omori, chief desk strategist at Mizuho Securities Co. in Tokyo. Separately, the finance minister said that recent trade agreements between Japan, the EU, and the US have helped reduce uncertainty surrounding trade policy and lowered the risk of it weighing on both the Japanese and global economies. The White House announced executive orders to set Japan's universal tariffs at 15% on Thursday, reflecting an earlier agreement between the two countries. The new rate will be coming into effect Aug. 7. Still, Kato emphasized the need to continue monitoring the impact of new rates. 'The Japanese government will take all necessary measures to mitigate these tariffs impact on Japan's industries and employment,' Kato said. 'We will also thoroughly analyze the effects of tariffs on Japan, based on the series of trade deals and developments in other countries.'
Scroll.in
2 hours ago
- Scroll.in
Enforced during World War I, perfected by modern surveillance: The story of passports and visas
Like many 'extraordinary measures' implemented in times of crisis – often under the guise of security – the supposedly temporary restrictions on free movement at the start of the First World War became permanent features hindering migration. From that time onwards, a growing number of countries required identity documents, passports and visas for travel. When the war ended, negotiations failed to re-open borders. Despite Japanese, Chinese and Indian demands for the free movement of labour, the new League of Nations failed to abolish the new passport system or liberalise controls on international migration. Passports and citizen identification soon became hallmarks of the modern nation state. By the time decolonisation took place in the mid-20th century, passports and visas were widespread. New states followed the example of established ones. All of a sudden, people could no longer cross a border without a document that included their photograph, birthplace and nationality. War, nationalism and state-building required large and elaborate bureaucracies, which were tasked with regulating migration flows. Quotas as well as passports and other new forms of border control were introduced to restrict how many people entered a country, where they come from, and what rights and resources they could access. Political ideas of national security, culture, language and race became as influential for immigration and migrant flows as economic policies had been in the nineteenth century. States increasingly allocated citizenship rights on the basis of nationality, making it necessary to belong to a state to be officially recognised and so able to move and work. A growing preoccupation with managing the movement of people was entwined with exclusionary attitudes based on race and ethnicity. Economic failure and other social problems were blamed on foreigners, and migration began to be seen by some as a form of deviant behaviour. Elaborate hierarchies of race, ethnicity and nation were built across Europe and its settler colonies, drawing on a misreading of Darwin's widely publicised ideas. 'Social Darwinism' was used to justify establishing a highly stratified society with white northern Europeans at the apex. The perceived threat to social order posed by immigrants, along with pseudoscientific theories of race and media-inflamed prejudices, combined to generate a growing suspicion of 'foreigners' during the late nineteenth and early 20th century. These were increasingly given expression in discriminatory immigration policies, expulsions, savage pogroms and populist purges. In 1905, Australia implemented a 'dictation test' which required a prospective immigrant to write down 50 words in any European language of the immigration officer's choosing, including Gaelic. Anyone who failed the test could be deported. The test was used to enforce the recent Immigration Restriction Act, which became a cornerstone of the unofficial 'White Australia' policy. Other countries tightened up their entry requirements. In 1917, France started requiring all foreigners to carry a form of identification with a photograph, indicating the bearer's nationality and occupation. Germany and Britain introduced similar regulations to identify foreigners. The United States also policed its borders more aggressively; in 1917 it too introduced a literacy test that had to be passed by all migrants. In earlier centuries, governments had tried to control who left the country. Migration policies from the mid-1800s began to focus on who was allowed in. The US viewed – and still views – their populations as a valuable source of taxation, labour and military or economic power. Private employers similarly kept their workers close, often coercively. In the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, some European states discouraged or forbade emigration. Feudal Japan prescribed the death penalty for those who left the country without permission. While concerns over people leaving never went away, governments after the First World War became much more preoccupied with restricting entry. The change in attitude also reflected changes in the origins and destinations of migrants and their reasons for moving. With the rapid growth of industry and a gradual decline in birth rates, north-western European economies became migrant destinations rather than sources of labour. While migrants had previously travelled from wealthier countries in Europe to the less prosperous regions of the world and more distant colonies, after the First World War, a growing proportion of migrants came from poorer parts of southern and eastern Europe, typically moving north or embarking for Canada, Australia, Argentina, Brazil and New Zealand. In earlier centuries, private enterprises such as the Dutch East India Company and institutions such as the Church had helped to shape global patterns of migration. Identity cards and passports now allowed nation states to choose who got to come and go. By regulating the free movement of people, governments could also decide what resources, jobs and social services people had access to. There was another, unintended consequence: large groups of people suddenly found themselves without a state from which they could derive rights and protection. The emergence of a more rigid interstate system led to the rise of stateless people and refugees. While wars and famine may have caused them to flee, refugees were also the product of increasingly rigid legal definitions of citizenship and impenetrable borders. A combination of state sovereignty and strict identification of citizens made 'foreigners' legal outsiders, as the sociologist Saskia Sassen has highlighted in her work. Refugees became a distinct, institutionalised category excluded from the rights offered to citizens. Deprived of citizenship, they became trapped in legal limbo, denied the right by many countries to work, vote, travel or access services offered to citizens. In the interwar years, rising nationalism was coupled with protectionism. Industries that felt threatened by rival manufacturers abroad lobbied their governments to impose tariffs on imported products. Similarly, trade unions fearing competition from foreign labour sought to limit migrant numbers and curtail the rights of foreign workers to remain and access social services. In the United States, debates around 'Americanisation' and immigration have driven politics for over 150 years. Under the Burlingame Treaty of 1868, an early version of the 'guest worker' programmes that would appear in other parts of the world, Chinese workers were given the right to work in the US – albeit under certain restrictions. Shifting public attitudes towards foreigners were accompanied by more stringent legislation in the decades that followed. In 1882, the US passed laws curbing the entry of Chinese workers, as well as those perceived to pose potential threats to 'national interests', including 'convicts, lunatics, idiots, and persons likely to become public charges'. Immigration policy became more centralised under institutions dedicated solely to the task of identifying and preventing the entry of a growing list of people deemed unsuitable for entry. The Immigration Act of 1924 charged American consuls overseas with administering quotas, including submitting applicants to financial checks and medical examinations before issuing visas. In practice, the legislation extended the reach of border control to other countries, allowing the United States to restrict entry long before prospective migrants embarked in Europe or elsewhere. This was framed as benefitting travellers and protecting them from having to sell their possessions before attempting futile journeys. As immigrants increasingly attempted to cross into the US by land as an alternative to arriving by sea or by air (planes began to carry commercial passengers soon after the First World War ended), the US Border Patrol was created in 1924.
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Shanti Gold International to debut today; GMP points to mild listing pop
Shanti Gold International is set to make its stock market debut on Friday with market participants eyeing a modest listing premium of 17%, going by the latest grey market premium (GMP) of Rs 34 over the issue price of Rs 199. This puts the estimated listing price around Rs 233 per share. The Rs 360-crore IPO, entirely a fresh issue, saw strong investor interest, getting subscribed over 80 times overall, led by 151.17x in the HNI segment and 117.33x in QIBs. The retail portion drew a relatively lower but still healthy 29.73x demand. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Technology Product Management Others MCA Data Science Public Policy PGDM others healthcare Degree Project Management Design Thinking CXO MBA Cybersecurity Finance Leadership Data Analytics Digital Marketing Operations Management Data Science Management Artificial Intelligence Healthcare Skills you'll gain: Duration: 12 Weeks MIT xPRO CERT-MIT XPRO Building AI Prod India Starts on undefined Get Details by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Villas Prices In Dubai Might Be More Affordable Than You Think Villas In Dubai | Search Ads Get Quote Undo The jewellery manufacturer, known for its 22kt CZ casting gold ornaments and B2B client base , plans to deploy the IPO proceeds towards setting up a new facility in Jaipur, funding working capital, and partial debt repayment. The company operates out of a single facility in Mumbai and caters to over 15 states and one union territory, servicing clients like Joyalukkas and Lalitha Jewellery. Shanti Gold reported a 56% jump in revenue to Rs 1,112 crore and 108% growth in net profit to Rs 56 crore in FY25, showcasing strong operating momentum. Live Events However, at a P/E of 25.69x post issue, analysts caution that the IPO was priced at a premium, given the fragmented and competitive nature of India's gold jewellery market. The stock will list on BSE and NSE, and investors now await to see whether the secondary market can sustain the enthusiasm shown during bidding, especially in light of the tempered GMP. ( Disclaimer : Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of the Economic Times)
