Librarians in UK increasingly asked to remove books, as influence of US pressure groups spreads
Requests to remove books from library shelves are on the rise in the UK, as the influence of pressure groups behind book bans in the US crosses the Atlantic, according to those working in the sector.
Although 'the situation here is nowhere [near] as bad, censorship does happen and there are some deeply worrying examples of library professionals losing their jobs and being trolled online for standing up for intellectual freedom on behalf of their users', said Louis Coiffait-Gunn, CEO of the Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals (Cilip).
Ed Jewell, president of Libraries Connected, an independent charity that represents public libraries, said: 'Anecdotal evidence from our members suggests that requests to remove books are increasing.' The School Library Association (SLA) said this year has seen an 'increase in member queries about censorship'.
Most of the UK challenges appear to come from individuals or small groups, unlike in the US, where 72% of demands to censor books last year were brought forward by organised groups, according to the American Library Association earlier this week.
However, evidence suggests that the work of US action groups is reaching UK libraries too. Alison Hicks, an associate professor in library and information studies at UCL, interviewed 10 UK-based school librarians who had experienced book challenges. One 'spoke of finding propaganda from one of these groups left on her desk', while another 'was directly targeted by one of these groups'. Respondents 'also spoke of being trolled by US pressure groups on social media, for example when responding to free book giveaways'.
It is 'certainly possible that the scale of censorship we're seeing in the US will influence the debate over here', said Jewell. However, the level of influence to date is far from clear, particularly because the nature of censorship requests in the UK seems to differ from those brought forward in the US.
Censorship by pupils in UK schools, including 'vandalising library material, annotating library books with racist and homophobic slurs', and damaging posters and displays was identified in Hicks' study, which she wrote about in the spring issue of the SLA's journal, The School Librarian. Such censorship 'is not something I have seen in the US', she said.
The types of books targeted may also differ. 'Almost all the UK attacks reported in my study centred on LGBTQ+ materials, while US attacks appear to target material related to race, ethnicity and social justice as well as LGBTQ+ issues,' said Hicks.
While the study was small, the 'LGBTQ focus of book challenges was undeniable', wrote Hicks. Challenges were levelled against Alice Oseman's Heartstopper series, about the love story of two British schoolboys, and 'coded' narratives in books such as Billy's Bravery by Tom Percival, about a boy who wants to dress up as his favourite superhero, Nature Girl.
This supports the findings of an Index on Censorship survey last year, in which 28 of 53 librarians polled reported that they had been asked to remove books from library shelves, many of which were LGBTQ+ titles. In more than half of those cases, books were taken off shelves.
However, a 2023 study by Cilip, which found that a third of UK librarians had been asked by members of the public to censor or remove books, did identify themes of race and empire as among the most targeted, along with LGBTQ+.
While there may be differences in how the challenges are playing out, 'this should not take away from the huge impact these attacks are having' in the UK, said Hicks. 'My research demonstrates that UK school librarians are facing equivalent levels of distress and hostility in the face of book ban challenges such as these.'
In the US, book banning measures have been enacted across a number of states in recent years. 'Library leaders in the UK are paying close attention to what's happening in the US and there's definitely a strong feeling of solidarity with American librarians,' said Jewell. Coiffait-Gunn of Cilip added that the profession 'looks on with deep concern at the increasingly polarised and political debate' in the US about 'what people, especially children, are allowed to read'.
One cause for concern in the UK is the 'lack of robust evidence' about how widespread censorship is, said Coiffait-Gunn. 'It's hard to evidence what doesn't happen and which books are not available.' The government does not tally how many school libraries or librarians there are, 'let alone track book bans'.
Most UK libraries follow the Cilip ethical framework, which states that published materials should not be restricted on any grounds but the law, said Jewell. 'That gives them the confidence and assurance to reject demands' for censorship.
'What we must guard against is a climate where libraries avoid stocking certain books – or holding talks or activities – for fear of negative publicity, threats or intimidation,' he added. 'It's vital that libraries feel able to provide access to a wide range of perspectives if they are to facilitate the free exchange of ideas.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
9 minutes ago
- The Sun
Labour put Red Arrows' future at risk by failing to replace ageing Hawk jets, slams Shadow Defence Secretary
LABOUR were accused of putting the Red Arrows future at risk last night by failing to replace their ageing Hawk jets. Shadow Defence Secretary James Cartlidge slammed the government for 'dithering' after The Sun revealed the display team is running out of Hawk T1s. 6 6 6 He said: 'The Sun's revelations on Red Arrow availability show why Labour needs to stop dithering and actually get on with ordering a new RAF training jet. He added: 'They should commit to buying British so that renewal of the Red Arrows supports jobs and investment across the country.' Top Brass admitted the Red Arrows may be forced to cancel air shows to reduce the wear and tear on their surviving aircraft. The Hawk T1s entered service 50 years ago and the factory that made spare parts has closed. Ground crews have been forced to cannibalise parts from old planes to keep the best ones running. RAF sources denied industry claims the fleet could plummet to six working aircraft by 2028. They insisted the Red Arrows could keep 11 aircraft in service until 2030 by scrounging parts from older aircraft. But with a quarter of the fleet in maintenance at any one time, the display team would be unable to fly their trademark Diamond Nine formation. An industry source said the RAF's projections were 'wildly optimistic'. Labour's Strategic Defence Review demanded RAF replace its fleet of Hawk jets as soon as possible. A defence source close to John Healey said: 'We've been clear that we will deliver on all the SDR recommendations, a replacement jet worthy of our iconic Reds is no different.' Incredible moment Red Arrows jets soar over Buckingham Palace in stunning footage captured from inside the cockpit The only British contender is a concept jet known as the Aeralise Fast Jet Trainer. Critics claim Aeralis is Qatari owned and yet to make a prototype. An RAF spokesperson said: 'The Red Arrows will continue to use the Hawk to perform displays and flypasts until their out of service date and have sufficient aircraft in the fleet to do so. 'We continue to work closely with industry partners to ensure an appropriate number of aircraft will be available.' 6 6 6
Telegraph
28 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Cost of Miliband's nuclear plant doubles to more than £40bn
The cost of the Sizewell C nuclear power plant has doubled to more than £40bn as ministers race to strike a funding deal with private investors and the French government. An official cost estimate for the scheme in Suffolk, which would generate enough electricity for 6m homes, was previously put at £20bn. But that has grown to £30bn at constant prices – or £41bn in today's money – with the Government set to shoulder at least half of the upfront cost, according to industry and Whitehall sources. The entire scheme will ultimately be paid for by households and businesses via their electricity bills, including through levies that will begin during construction. The power plant's rising price tag will trigger concerns about future increases as Hinkley Point C, a nuclear development in Somerset, has repeatedly overrun budgets and timescales. On Wednesday, Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, underlined Labour's commitment to the mega project, arguing that she and Ed Miliband, the Energy Secretary, believed pushing ahead was 'the right choice for bills, the right choice for jobs and the right choice for growth'. As part of the spending review, Ms Reeves confirmed £14bn of funding for Sizewell C through 2029 – taking the Government's total promised investment to more than £17bn. The rest will come from a group of private investors, potentially including British Gas owner Centrica, as well as French state nuclear company EDF, which will build and part-own the plant. EDF is expected to put in up to £2bn of extra cash, enough to secure a stake of about 20pc. That will require sign-off at the highest levels, including from the company's board and the Elysée Palace. One potential investor suggested EDF would probably maintain a stake of at least 10pc to ensure market confidence. The company will also benefit from the deal through billions of pounds worth of equipment orders. However, the politics of backing the British plant are complicated in France, where critics believe EDF is already over-exposed to Hinkley Point C and want the state company to focus on projects at home. 'I am sure the French government will try to get something in return for agreeing to put a bit more money in,' the investor added. A final funding deal is expected to be signed off at an Anglo-French summit next month. Other potential investors in the frame include Amber Infrastructure Partners, Brookfield Asset Management and the Canadian pension fund CDPQ – run by former John Lewis boss Dame Sharon White in the UK. On Wednesday, the Government refused to comment on Sizewell C's cost. Whitehall sources insisted that the estimate had not 'doubled', but did not provide further information. Sources close to the process have told the Telegraph that the project is expected to cost £30bn in 2015 prices. This is an increase of 50pc compared with the original £20bn estimate. But the figure rises to £41bn when adjusted for inflation. The £30bn total includes about £10bn in equity that will be raised from investors and another £20bn of debt. 'Learning curve' It means that, on a like-for-like basis, the project is on course to be cheaper than Hinkley Point C, which uses a near-identical design. Hinkley is expected to cost £31bn to £34bn in 2015 prices, according to EDF. The lower cost of Sizewell is due to 'learning curve' efficiencies, with supply chains and skilled workers set to be carried over from Hinkley. But despite this, and the money committed by Ms Reeves, the Government has so far refused to officially confirm what it expects the project to cost in total. Alison Downes, of the Stop Sizewell C campaign group, said: 'Given negotiations with private investors are incomplete, Sizewell C really should be excluded from Wednesday's announcements. 'Where is the good news in a project that will cost tens of billions, add to consumer bills and is guaranteed to be late and overspent?' A spokesman for the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero said: 'Hinkley was built after decades of no new nuclear. 'We are filling the gap with a new nuclear programme which will see greater efficiencies and learnings carried across projects. 'Sizewell C will be an almost exact replica of Hinkley Point C – but crucially learning from previous mistakes and replication. 'EDF says that the second unit of Hinkley is getting built at a rate 25pc quicker than the first, and Sizewell C is effectively a third and fourth version of this reactor.'
South Wales Argus
31 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
UK agrees to check-free land border for Gibraltar but EU controls for flights
The agreement on a 'fluid border' clears the way to finalise a post-Brexit deal on the territory with the EU. But those flying into Gibraltar from the UK will face one check from Gibraltarian officials and another by the Spanish on behalf of the EU. An agreement for the future relationship between the EU and the UK in relation to Gibraltar is now a reality. It is a historic agreement. — Fabian Picardo (@FabianPicardo) June 11, 2025 This is because the land border will allow those arriving by air access to the European Schengen free travel area unchecked once they are in Gibraltar. The UK and Gibraltar insisted the changes would not affect the British overseas territory's sovereignty. The airport will operate under a model similar to London's St Pancras station, where passengers pass through both UK and French passport checks to board international trains. Goods and customs checks will also eventually be removed in both directions under the agreement. The move could also see airlines start to add flights to Gibraltar from countries other than the UK in a boost to tourism. Officials say a hard border would have been introduced under the EU's incoming exit and entry control system if no deal was reached, causing delays for some 15,000 people who cross the border every day as every individual passport was checked. Talks on rules governing the border have been ongoing since Britain left the European Union in 2020. Foreign Secretary David Lammy said the previous Tory government left behind a situation that 'put Gibraltar's economy and way of life under threat'. President of the EU Commission Ursula von der Leyen welcomed the deal (Leon Neal/PA) He said the agreement was a 'breakthrough' after years of uncertainty. He said: 'Alongside the government of Gibraltar, we have reached an agreement which protects British sovereignty, supports Gibraltar's economy and allows businesses to plan for the long-term once again. 'I thank the chief minister and his government for their tireless dedication throughout the negotiations. The UK's commitment to Gibraltar remains as solid as The Rock itself.' Spanish foreign minister Jose Albares said the deal marked 'a new beginning' in the relationship between the UK and Spain. He said that Spain 'will guarantee free movement of people and goods', adding that Gibraltar would now be linked to the Schengen Area with Spanish authorities controlling entry and exit. I have always said nothing about Gibraltar, without Gibraltar. — David Lammy (@DavidLammy) June 11, 2025 President of the EU Commission Ursula von der Leyen welcomed the deal. In a post on X, she said: 'It safeguards the integrity of Schengen and the single market, while ensuring stability, legal certainty and prosperity for the region.' Gibraltar's chief minister Fabian Picardo said the deal would 'protect future generations of British Gibraltarians and does not in any way affect our British sovereignty'. 'Now is the time to look beyond the arguments of the past and towards a time of renewed co-operation and understanding. Now the deal is done, it's time to finalise the treaty,' he said. On Wednesday evening, Sir Keir Starmer spoke with Mr Picardo and thanked him for 'his years of hard work, commitment, and leadership to reach an agreement'. Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez also had a phone call with Sir Keir, and congratulated the British PM because 'his Government had succeeded where others had failed'. The Conservatives have said they will carefully review the UK's agreement with the EU on Gibraltar's border to see if it crosses any 'red lines' the party set out during its own negotiations when in government. Shadow foreign secretary Priti Patel said: 'Gibraltar is British, and given Labour's record of surrendering our territory and paying for the privilege, we will be reviewing carefully all the details of any agreement that is reached.' Mr Lammy held talks with Gibraltar's leaders, members of the opposition and the business community before leaving the British overseas territory to head to Brussels on Wednesday morning. Gibraltar was ceded to the UK by Spain in 1713 and the population is heavily in favour of remaining a British overseas territory. The last time it voted on a proposal to share sovereignty with Spain, in 2002, almost 99% of Gibraltarians rejected the move. Gibraltar also hosts an RAF base at its airport and an important naval facility.
