
Ranking the Saints' highest salary cap hits after Derek Carr, Ryan Ramczyk retirements
Ranking the Saints' highest salary cap hits after Derek Carr, Ryan Ramczyk retirements
A couple of big retirements hit the New Orleans Saints' accounting books this month with both Derek Carr and Ryan Ramczyk stepping away from football. With those two contracts out of the way, which players now carry the highest salary cap hits on the team?
It isn't as easy as saying "This guy has the biggest contract." The Saints always get creative in structuring deals and restructuring them in the years that follow so they can spread out the costs. It's a strategy that makes sense when the salary cap is going up and your team is competitive with a sure thing at quarterback. But the COVID years changed expectations for the cap, and the Saints never did find a worthy successor to Drew Brees. So now they're working to recover.
And they're very close to cleaning up the books. The Saints have almost $30 million in salary cap space right now, despite accounting for nearly $77 million in dead money going to players no longer on the roster. The cap is rising again and they'll be on the other side of this thing sooner rather than later. With almost all of this year's salary cap gymnastics behind us, here's a look at their 15 highest cap hits in 2025:
Taysom Hill: $17,986,500 Alvin Kamara: $10,061,471 Cameron Jordan: $9,775,000 Erik McCoy: $8,351,000 Demario Davis: $6,923,000 Chase Young: $6,842,000 Carl Granderson: $6,482,000 Chris Olave: $6,131,959 Tyrann Mathieu: $6,091,000 Cesar Ruiz: $5,866,000 Juwan Johnson: $5,245,000 Kelvin Banks Jr.: $5,042,045 Foster Moreau: $4,634,000 Trevor Penning: $4,500,146 Rashid Shaheed: $4,450,000
Something has to give with Hill's contract -- either another restructure, a pay cut, or some other arrangement. He's still recovering from a season-ending knee injury and the Saints aren't in a position to pay him that much money at this stage in his career. If he does plan on playing this season, they'll have to choose whether to take their lumps now or kick the can down the road a little further, knowing that Hill's contract ends after this season. It isn't an easy problem to solve.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Delta overtakes American to become second-largest airline at Austin's airport
This story is part of the KXAN Data Hub, where numbers help tell the whole created several data-driven stories and databases on topics including weather and climate, politics, education, sports and growth in Texas. Each story in the KXAN Data Hub is updated as new data becomes available. AUSTIN (KXAN) — Delta Air Lines overtook American Airlines to become the second-largest airline at Austin-Bergstrom International Airport in April, passenger data shows. Monthly passenger statistics for AUS are publicly available since January 2019. An airport spokesperson couldn't confirm if Delta had carried more passengers than American in a month prior to 2019, but told KXAN this was 'likely' the first time it happened in airport history, as Delta currently has its busiest schedule ever from AUS. AUS Data Hub: Passenger totals, busiest months and new flights in 2025 Delta flew 302,647 passengers in and out of Austin in April, while American carried 298,579 passengers. Southwest Airlines remains the largest airline by far, carrying more than 735,000 passengers in April alone. Throughout most of 2021, 2022 and 2023, American held a significant lead over Delta. In every month from March through December 2022, for example, American's passenger total was more than double that of Delta. Even during the COVID-19 pandemic, when air travel from Austin all but ground to a halt, American maintained an advantage. Delta has been surging in recent months, with a slew of new nonstop flights from Austin. Since 2023, the airline has launched or announced 16 new direct routes, three of which are set to begin later this year. Only one of those new routes, to Harlingen, has since been canceled. Meanwhile, American launched six new routes from AUS since 2023, but all have been canceled since their launch. The airline has canceled 35 nonstop routes from Austin in total since the start of 2023, including international destinations in the Bahamas, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Jamaica and Mexico. Full list of new nonstop flights from AUS in 2025 Many of Delta's new routes are those dropped by American, including Indianapolis, Jacksonville, Las Vegas, Memphis, Nashville, New Orleans, Orlando, Palm Springs, Panama City and Tampa. In the first four months of 2025, American flew more than 1.1 million people, accounting for 17.4% of AUS passengers. Delta flew a little more than 1 million people during the same timeframe — 16.1% of all passengers. Southwest has flown more than 2.6 million people, 41.6% of all passengers. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Effort to strip Fed of interest paying power seen likely to bring upheaval to markets
By Michael S. Derby NEW YORK (Reuters) -A Republican senator's plan to take away the Federal Reserve's power to pay banks interest on cash they park on central bank books could cause chaos for monetary policy implementation if it were implemented, market participants said. In recent days, Senator Ted Cruz of Texas has been speaking about this power and his desire to see it ended as part of what he views as an effort to save money by the federal government. Stripping the Fed of the longstanding power would save the government $1 trillion, Cruz said in a CNBC interview last week. The senator said then that he did not know if it was likely his effort would work but that it was certainly possible. On Wednesday, Bloomberg reported that Cruz had also lobbied President Donald Trump, who has long been at odds with the Fed, as well as Republican colleagues, about his idea. 'We're agonizing trying to find a $50 billion cut here and there. This is over a trillion dollars, big dollars in savings,' Cruz told Bloomberg, saying of the payments, 'half of it is going to foreign banks, which makes no sense.' Cruz's office did not respond to a request for comment. The Fed declined to comment. Cruz's effort is being treated cautiously by Senator Tim Scott, the Republican from South Carolina who chairs the Senate Finance Committee. "While the desire to return to pre-crisis monetary policy operating procedures is understandable," the matter must be considered under normal Senate procedures, Scott said in a statement. Any move on this must start with a hearing, Scott said, adding, "this is not a decision to be rushed – it must be carefully considered and openly debated." The Fed's power to pay banks interest, granted by Congress, took effect in 2008 as the financial crisis dawned. It quickly gained prominence as part of a large-scale overhaul of the monetary policy architecture, as the Fed confronted the greatest economic downturn since the Great Depression. As it now stands, the Fed pays deposit-taking banks 4.4% for reserves. It uses another tool called the reverse repo facility to take in cash from money market funds and others, paying them 4.25%. Together, the two rates are designed to keep the federal funds rate, the central bank's main tool for influencing the economy, within the desired range. Paying financial firms for de facto loans of cash is essential for interest rate control due to the very large amount of liquidity created by bond buying stimulus efforts. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the Fed more than doubled the size of its balance sheet to a peak of $9 trillion, with asset purchases providing support to the economy beyond what the then near-zero short-term rates could deliver. If the Fed did not have the power to pay interest on deposits, the still substantial amount of liquidity sloshing around in markets would prevent it from controlling short-term rates. That said, concerns have long existed, even among some former central bankers, that paying banks money to deposit cash at the Fed is effectively a subsidy to banks. The other issue with paying interest on reserves is that it has led the Fed into an unprecedented period of loss-making. The Fed has been operating in the red because the interest rate it now has in place outstrips the income it earns off bonds it owns. Most analysts expect the loss-making to occur for some time to come. Fed losses mean that it is not handing over profits back to the Treasury, as it is required to do when it is in the green. Sums handed back to the Treasury over recent years contributed modestly to lowering deficits. Experts believe Cruz's plan would completely fail to achieve its goals and would instead cause huge upheaval in money markets. Barclays Capital economists said on Tuesday that ending the power would simply push the cash into the reverse repo facility, which means the central bank would still be paying lots of interest to financial firms, thus negating any deficit savings. J.P. Morgan strategists said in a note last week that under Cruz's plan, 'the Fed's ability to control money market rates may be compromised, complicating its efforts to guide broader financial conditions via the fed funds rate and other money market rates.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Effort to strip Fed of interest paying power seen likely to bring upheaval to markets
By Michael S. Derby NEW YORK (Reuters) -A Republican senator's plan to take away the Federal Reserve's power to pay banks interest on cash they park on central bank books could cause chaos for monetary policy implementation if it were implemented, market participants said. In recent days, Senator Ted Cruz of Texas has been speaking about this power and his desire to see it ended as part of what he views as an effort to save money by the federal government. Stripping the Fed of the longstanding power would save the government $1 trillion, Cruz said in a CNBC interview last week. The senator said then that he did not know if it was likely his effort would work but that it was certainly possible. On Wednesday, Bloomberg reported that Cruz had also lobbied President Donald Trump, who has long been at odds with the Fed, as well as Republican colleagues, about his idea. 'We're agonizing trying to find a $50 billion cut here and there. This is over a trillion dollars, big dollars in savings,' Cruz told Bloomberg, saying of the payments, 'half of it is going to foreign banks, which makes no sense.' Cruz's office did not respond to a request for comment. The Fed declined to comment. Cruz's effort is being treated cautiously by Senator Tim Scott, the Republican from South Carolina who chairs the Senate Finance Committee. "While the desire to return to pre-crisis monetary policy operating procedures is understandable," the matter must be considered under normal Senate procedures, Scott said in a statement. Any move on this must start with a hearing, Scott said, adding, "this is not a decision to be rushed – it must be carefully considered and openly debated." The Fed's power to pay banks interest, granted by Congress, took effect in 2008 as the financial crisis dawned. It quickly gained prominence as part of a large-scale overhaul of the monetary policy architecture, as the Fed confronted the greatest economic downturn since the Great Depression. As it now stands, the Fed pays deposit-taking banks 4.4% for reserves. It uses another tool called the reverse repo facility to take in cash from money market funds and others, paying them 4.25%. Together, the two rates are designed to keep the federal funds rate, the central bank's main tool for influencing the economy, within the desired range. Paying financial firms for de facto loans of cash is essential for interest rate control due to the very large amount of liquidity created by bond buying stimulus efforts. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the Fed more than doubled the size of its balance sheet to a peak of $9 trillion, with asset purchases providing support to the economy beyond what the then near-zero short-term rates could deliver. If the Fed did not have the power to pay interest on deposits, the still substantial amount of liquidity sloshing around in markets would prevent it from controlling short-term rates. That said, concerns have long existed, even among some former central bankers, that paying banks money to deposit cash at the Fed is effectively a subsidy to banks. The other issue with paying interest on reserves is that it has led the Fed into an unprecedented period of loss-making. The Fed has been operating in the red because the interest rate it now has in place outstrips the income it earns off bonds it owns. Most analysts expect the loss-making to occur for some time to come. Fed losses mean that it is not handing over profits back to the Treasury, as it is required to do when it is in the green. Sums handed back to the Treasury over recent years contributed modestly to lowering deficits. Experts believe Cruz's plan would completely fail to achieve its goals and would instead cause huge upheaval in money markets. Barclays Capital economists said on Tuesday that ending the power would simply push the cash into the reverse repo facility, which means the central bank would still be paying lots of interest to financial firms, thus negating any deficit savings. J.P. Morgan strategists said in a note last week that under Cruz's plan, 'the Fed's ability to control money market rates may be compromised, complicating its efforts to guide broader financial conditions via the fed funds rate and other money market rates.'