California High-Speed Rail Project Leader Defies Trump
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The leader of the largest high-speed rail project in the U.S. has said the project will continue despite the Trump administration's withdrawal of funding.
Ian Choudri, the CEO of the California High-Speed Rail Authority, said the U.S. "cannot just fail" in trying to use the technology, adding that he would continue to ensure the project remained on track.
Newsweek has contacted the California High-Speed Rail Authority for more information via email.
Why It Matters
Years of delays and an inflated budget have damaged public and political faith in California's high-speed rail project, but the past few years have seen progress, with construction happening throughout the state and tracklaying set to begin later this year. Proponents of the project say that to call if off now, as many of its detractors in the White House desire, would waste years of advancement.
That has not stopped President Donald Trump, a long-standing critic of the project, from regularly threatening to take away the federal funding that has been vital to the project's progress—a threat he and Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy carried out in July.
What To Know
In an interview with the Central Valley Daily podcast, Choudri said, "The U.S. cannot just fail on high-speed rail." He added that any large construction project on this scale would take a long period of investment to bear fruit.
"That was not done in one year or two years or 10 years," he said, referring to the construction of large-scale projects such as the Big Dig and the interstate highway grid.
It "took generations, two or three sometimes," Choudri said, adding that the California high-speed rail project needed "national commitment."
"The issues and challenges … were not about how we can build bridges or tunnels or embankments or civil infrastructure, which we have been doing in this country for 300 years," he said, adding that he "came to realize the challenges were outside of that."
An Amtrak Pacific Surfliner train from San Diego to San Luis Obispo in Simi Valley, California, on April 6.
An Amtrak Pacific Surfliner train from San Diego to San Luis Obispo in Simi Valley, California, on April 6.
Getty Images
"The [Newsom] administration and the legislature and the folks that I talk to, we would love to have also the federal government commit the same way. Yes, there will be criticism but … the healthiest thing to do is just talk about, 'Hey, what works and what doesn't?' And my job is to go fix that," Choudri said.
Last month, the Trump administration officially revoked a $4 billion federal grant, branding the project a "boondoggle" and arguing that it failed to deliver on promises.
Shortly after, Governor Gavin Newsom proposed extending the state's cap-and-trade program, which generates about $1 billion annually for the rail, by 15 years to 2045 to ensure funding for the project's immediate future.
What People Are Saying
Ian Choudri, the CEO of the California High-Speed Rail Authority, previously said in response to the Trump administration's revocation: "Canceling these grants without cause isn't just wrong—it's illegal. These are legally binding agreements, and the Authority has met every obligation, as confirmed by repeated federal reviews, as recently as February 2025.
"America's only high-speed rail project underway is fast approaching the tracklaying phase, with 171 miles under active construction and design, 15,500 jobs created, and more than 50 major structures completed. This is no time for Washington to walk away on America's transportation future."
What Happens Next
The California High-Speed Rail Authority is expected to submit an updated business plan and comprehensive funding strategy to lawmakers in 2026.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
27 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
California moving forward with partisan redistricting effort to counter Texas' move
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The Democrats' proposed maps still haven't been released. That's expected on Friday. Then, lawmakers plan to quickly approve them next week. Democrats hold supermajorities in both chambers. Advertisement Newsom, who is seen as a potential 2028 presidential candidate, urged Trump in a letter earlier this week to abandon his scheme, telling the president he is 'playing with fire' and 'risking the destabilization of our democracy.' The California map would only take effect if Texas and other states move forward with their own redistricting efforts, and they would remain through the 2030 elections. After that, Democrats say they would return mapmaking power to an independent redistricting commission approved by voters more than a decade ago. Advertisement There are 435 seats in the U.S. House and Republicans currently hold an 219-212 majority, with four vacancies. New maps are typically drawn once a decade after the census is conducted. Many states give legislators the power to draw maps but some, like California, rely on an independent commission that is supposed to be nonpartisan. The Thursday announcement marks the first time any state beyond Texas is officially wading into the mid-decade redistricting fight, kicking off a national standoff that could continue spilling into other states. California Democrats face more complex legal and logistical hurdles than Republicans do in Texas. It's not clear how voters would respond to the mid-decade effort after they voted to give the power of drawing congressional maps to an independent commission in 2010. In Texas, that power lies with the Republican-controlled Legislature. Some already said they would sue to block the effort, and influential voices including former California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger may campaign against it. 'Gavin Newsom's latest stunt has nothing to do with Californians and everything to do with consolidating radical Democrat power, silencing California voters, and propping up his pathetic 2028 presidential pipe dream,' National Republican Congressional Committee spokesperson Christian Martinez said in a statement. 'Newsom's made it clear: he'll shred California's Constitution and trample over democracy - running a cynical, self-serving playbook where Californians are an afterthought and power is the only priority.' California Democrats already hold 43 of the state's 52 House seats, and the state has some of the most competitive House seats. Advertisement Elsewhere, leaders from red Florida to blue New York are threatening to write their own new maps, bucking the standard once-a-decade redistricting process that happens after the census. But none have moved as far as Texas and, soon, California, in advancing new maps. Missouri lawmakers are waiting for Gov. Mike Kehoe to call a special session to draw more favorable Republican maps, and a document obtained by The Associated Press shows the state Senate has received a $46,000 invoice to activate six redistricting software licenses and provide training for up to 10 staff members.
American Military News
27 minutes ago
- American Military News
Trump Says Putin Ready For Deal As Zelenskyy Shores Up Support With Starmer
This article was originally published by Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty and is reprinted with permission. Russian President Vladimir Putin is ready to make a deal over the war in Ukraine, US President Donald Trump said on the eve of a summit between the two world leaders in Alaska. Speaking in an interview on Fox News Radio on August 14, Trump said he believes Putin is 'convinced that he's going to make a deal' at the summit to be held at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson just outside Anchorage, Alaska. He's going to make a deal. I think he's going to, and we're going to find out,' Trump said. In Moscow, Putin praised Trump's efforts to end the war in a short video released by the Kremlin adding the White House was making 'quite energetic and sincere efforts to stop the hostilities' and to 'reach agreements that are of interest to all parties involved.' Hours before Trump spoke, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy was in London to discuss security with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. 'Under any scenario, Ukraine will maintain its strength,' Zelenskyy said following the meeting at 10 Downing Street, the prime minister's residence in central London. 'We discussed in considerable detail the security guarantees that can make peace truly durable,' he added, suggesting such a possibility could arise if the United States succeeds 'in pressuring Russia to stop the killings.' Zelenskyy's visit to London followed his visit to another European capital, Berlin, on August 13, where he attended a video conference with several major European leaders who feared being sidelined by Trump and Putin. Trump appeared to try and allay those fears by saying in the Fox News interview that 'depending on what happens' during the Putin meeting, he could call Zelenskyy to quickly set up a second meeting involving all three leaders. 'Depending on what happens with my meeting, I'm going to be calling up President Zelenskyy, and let's get him over to wherever we're going to meet,' Trump said. 'The second meeting is going to be very, very important, because that's going to be a meeting where they make a deal. And I don't want to use the word 'divvy things up,' but you know, to a certain extent, it's not a bad term, OK?' he added. Zelenskyy has said he warned Trump during an August 13 call that Putin was 'bluffing' about his desire to end the war. Trump has warned Russia of 'very severe consequences' if it doesn't halt its war against Ukraine, but fears remain that the exclusion of Kyiv and Brussels in the talks could sideline their desire for the protection of fundamental European and Ukrainian security interests. He gave no details on what consequences Moscow could face if it doesn't put an end to more than 3 1/2 years of war in Ukraine, but he said the aim of the talks, to be held at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson just outside Anchorage, Alaska, is 'to end the war.' Can Trump-Putin Talks Lead To A Cease-Fire? The talks between Trump and Putin are aimed at finding a path to end the conflict, the biggest in Europe since World War II. Trump has said both sides will have to swap land to end intense fighting that has cost tens of thousands of lives on both sides and displaced millions of Ukrainians. Appearing to be on the outside looking in ahead of the talks, European leaders and Zelenskyy have been scrambling to make their voices heard. Washington appears to be preparing Kyiv and Moscow for major compromises to end the war, with US Vice President JD Vance warning any peace deal will likely leave both sides 'unhappy.' But French President Emmanuel Macron said Trump was 'very clear' in the August 13 call that he wants to achieve a cease-fire at the summit and that Trump had been clear that 'territorial issues relating to Ukraine…will only be negotiated by the Ukrainian president.' 'There are currently no serious territorial exchange schemes on the table…. I think that's a very important point in this regard. And we hope that it can be held in Europe, in a neutral country that is acceptable to all parties,' he added. If Trump's insistence on involving Ukraine is confirmed, it would help ease fears among Ukraine and its allies that leaders of the two superpowers could reach an accord that sells out Europe's and Ukraine's security interests and proposes giving Ukrainian territory to Moscow. 'Trump's thinking is apparently closer aligned with that of the Europeans than first feared by some,' one European official told RFE/RL after the call. Russia has consistently given the idea of a meeting with Zelenskyy the cold shoulder, suggesting it should only happen once the sides are close to signing a peace deal, not just a cease-fire agreement. That moment seems far off given the huge gap between the Russian and Ukrainian positions that persists on several major issues, including territory and security, despite three rounds of direct talks in Turkey since mid-May. The talks come at a pivotal moment, with Trump increasingly frustrated with Putin and the Russian president showing no signs of bending on the Kremlin's maximalist demands. Trump and Putin have held six phone calls, and the White House's lead envoy has traveled to Moscow at least three times. The decision to meet Putin face-to-face — something Trump's predecessor, Joe Biden, refused to do following the invasion — reflects Trump's belief that his relationship with the Russian leader will yield a durable peace agreement.
Los Angeles Times
27 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Bitcoin retreats from record after markets get inflation jolt
A stronger-than-anticipated inflation reading reminded investors that Bitcoin remains a highly volatile asset just hours after the digital currency soared to another record high. The original cryptocurrency fell more than 4% in the minutes after a government report showed US wholesale inflation accelerated in July by the most in three years. That sent stocks lower and tempered expectations for a reduction in interest rates, sending Bitcoin down from a high of $124,515 set late Wednesday in New York. The previous record was reached in July. Helping to fuel the shift in sentiment were comments from Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Fox Business that the US would not be buying additional Bitcoin for President Donald Trump's crypto strategic reserve. Bitcoin was trading at about $118,100 as of 3:06 p.m. in New York. Bitcoin has been steadily rising for most of the past year as a result of the friendly legislative climate in Washington ushered in by Trump. Public companies, led by Michael Saylor's Strategy, have boosted the demand by following an increasingly popular corporate tactic of stockpiling the original cryptocurrency. The playbook has recently spread to smaller competitors, like Ether, leading to a broad rise across digital assets. Still, the retreat was quick Thursday. Leveraged bets on digital assets saw over $1 billion liquidations in the past 24 hours with $770 million and $269 million in long and short positions respectively, according to data complied by Coinglass. 'The recent pullback in crypto prices following a hotter-than-forecast reading on core PPI seems to have shaken broader confidence in a Fed rate cut next month,' said Thomas Perfumo, global economist at Kraken. 'Fundamentally, elevated inflation continues to underscore the long‑term appeal of crypto assets with fixed or programmatic supply, which are structurally better positioned to preserve, and even grow in value.' The recent coordinated move between stocks and Bitcoin underscores how speculative market corners and mainstream benchmarks are drawing from the same well of optimism. Earlier this week, US inflation data landed in line with expectations this week — and strengthened bets the Federal Reserve will cut interest rates in September, easing financial conditions and encouraging capital to flow from blue-chip equities to volatile digital tokens. Traders pared those bets Thursday. While Trump's January executive order did say that the government will acquire more Bitcoin via 'budget neutral' strategies, many crypto bulls assumed this would actually involve buying more tokens, not just getting them through confiscations in criminal cases. Some even speculated that the US would revalue its gold reserve and use that to buy more tokens. Bessent threw cold water on that idea. 'We're not going to be buying that, but are going to use confiscated assets and continue to build that up. We're going to stop selling that,' Bessent said on 'Mornings with Maria' on Fox. 'You know, I believe that the Bitcoin reserve at today's prices is somewhere between $15 and $20 billion.' Bitcoin's market cap rose to around $2.5 trillion and Ether's to nearly $575 billion when prices peaked, according to CoinGecko. Ether was trading just below its almost four-year old record on Thursday, changing hands at around the $4,600 level. Ether's rise has been propelled by sustained demand from newly active treasury firms, while Bitcoin's steadier climb has leaned on persistent exchange-traded inflows even as it has faced technical resistance. However, the second largest token has seen most of the liquidations in leveraged bets amid the sharp drawdown. 'Crypto has been positively correlated to equities with the relationship stronger for ETH than BTC,' said Chris Newhouse, director of research at Ergonia. 'General sentiment looks positive.' Pan and Kharif write for Bloomberg.
