
Epstein working undercover as a spy is nothing more than another conspiracy theory
Some myths refine themselves over generations.
Others spring into consciousness in an instant.
Advertisement
A bit of story or news captures the imagination so thoroughly that the entire culture suddenly projects its hope or terror onto a single hero — or, more often, a villain.
Jeffrey Epstein is one of these myths.
Since his arrest and jailhouse death, the disgraced financier, socialite and pedophile has become America's most famous villain, an archetype who offers virtually all factions something to hate.
Advertisement
To some, he represents the hidden sexual depravity of elites.
To others, a global conspiracy established through blackmail, espionage and intrigue.
To still others, he is a weapon to be wielded against his onetime friend, President Trump.
The omni-conspiracy
Epstein embodies the omni-conspiracy.
Advertisement
To some critics, his connections to the world's most powerful people suggest membership in a cabal that runs elite institutions.
And his houses, airplanes and islands — paired with the uncertain provenance of his wealth — all stand as proof that he profited from his corruption.
The game, then, is to assign the blame and establish the meaning of his crimes.
Epstein has captured the public mind, and the question is whether he will be cast as the Marquis de Sade or as Charles Ponzi.
Advertisement
A number of theories circulate: that Epstein was an intelligence asset who orchestrated sexual blackmail against the super-elite; that Epstein was a Rasputin figure who seduced the rich out of their fortunes; that he had enough kompromat on world leaders that he had to be secretly murdered in his prison cell.
There is enough documentary evidence to raise suspicion, at least: the snapshots of Bill Clinton getting a massage in a private airport hangar; the bizarre contracts and transactions between Epstein and billionaire Les Wexner; the seeming disappearance of the 'tens of thousands of videos' of Epstein 'with children or child porn.'
In each case, Epstein seems to transgress America's most deeply maintained taboos.
He is a pedophile who abused scores of young girls.
He is a criminal who defrauded others of billions.
He is a serpent who twisted his way into high society through manipulation and deceit.
He represents a complete repudiation of the virtues of America's Puritan culture — modesty, honesty, humility — and symbolizes all that is rotten with America's elite in a period of decadence and anxiety.
Beware projections
Thus, the intense public reaction.
Advertisement
Epstein allows us to project our hatreds and fears onto a single man.
His biography contains sufficient mystery to allow us to fill in the blanks with our pet obsessions.
Some, or all, of the conspiracy theories might be true. But the facts will never be enough.
Advertisement
On one side, it appears that many powerful people have a vested interest in burying Epstein's secrets; on the other, the public has grown so distrustful of officialdom that no report or accounting will ever be transparent enough.
I've watched the Epstein case percolate through right-wing and left-wing media for years, without forming strong judgments.
My sense is that the most elaborate fantasies — that Epstein was part of a cabal of pedophile cannibals, or that he was running world governments on behalf of the Mossad — are a deflection from a more banal, but perhaps even more disturbing, reality.
Jeffrey Epstein was not a cannibal or foreign subversive but a depraved twist on an all-American archetype: the Jay Gatsby character.
Advertisement
Like Gatsby, Epstein was an arriviste who sought to dissociate himself from his humble origins, gained his wealth through fraud and artifice, and showered money onto others in the hopes of being accepted into high society.
He amassed astounding wealth and cultivated an elite network.
But the money, the parties, the islands, the brokerage accounts, and the snapshots with the rich were all empty symbols, bribes that temporarily masked the horror of a badly lived life.
When it all came crashing down, no one attended Epstein's funeral — as no one attended Gatsby's.
Stick to the facts
Advertisement
We should seek to uncover all the facts, but we do not need an omni-conspiracy, or an elaborate espionage plot, to identify the deepest lessons of the Epstein myth.
Our elites are easily seduced by material wealth and, at a minimum, willing to turn a blind eye to a man who surrounds himself with teenaged girls.
Epstein produced nothing of value, built his status only on perceptions and, for anyone who cared to look, bore all of the marks of a predator.
But even America's wealthiest and most powerful could not resist a private plane or a few nights in the Virgin Islands.
Epstein was a monster, but the people who helped him maintain his status were guilty of a very American style of nihilism.
Epstein was just the dead man's switch, who, when his life blew up, sprayed the others in shrapnel.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Boston Globe
4 hours ago
- Boston Globe
California Democrats will vote on a new congressional map to counter Texas. Follow live updates.
pinned Other news we're following today: .cls-1{clip-path:url(#clippath);}.cls-2,.cls-3{fill:none;}.cls-2,.cls-3,.cls-4{stroke-width:0px;}.cls-5{clip-path:url(#clippath-1);}.cls-3{clip-rule:evenodd;} Link copied Judge denies request to unseal Epstein transcripts: The ruling Wednesday by federal Judge Richard Berman in Manhattan came after the judge presiding over the case against British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell also turned down the government's request to unseal grand jury transcripts and exhibits. Trump calls on Fed governor to resign: In a Truth Social post, Trump called on Federal Reserve governor Lisa Cook to resign after a member of his administration accused Cook of committing mortgage fraud. The allegation represents another front in the Trump administration's attack on the Fed, which has yet to cut its key interest rate as Trump has demanded. DHS to paint the border wall: Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said Tuesday that the entire wall along the southern border with Mexico is going to be painted black to make it hotter and deter illegal immigration. She credited Trump with the idea. State Department press officer fired after questioning talking points on Israel and Gaza — 8:05 p.m. .cls-1{clip-path:url(#clippath);}.cls-2,.cls-3{fill:none;}.cls-2,.cls-3,.cls-4{stroke-width:0px;}.cls-5{clip-path:url(#clippath-1);}.cls-3{clip-rule:evenodd;} Link copied By the Associated Press Officials said Shahed Ghoreishi, a contractor working for the Bureau of Near East Affairs, was terminated over the weekend following two incidents in which his loyalty to Trump administration policies was questioned. Advertisement He and two current US officials say he drew ire for drafting a response to an Associated Press query related to discussions between Israel and South Sudan about the possible relocation of Palestinians from Gaza to South Sudan. The draft response included a line that said the US does not support the forced relocation of Gazans, something that Trump and his special envoy Steve Witkoff have said repeatedly. That line was rejected by the US Embassy in Jerusalem, according to Ghoreishi and the officials. He also questioned an embassy statement referring to the West Bank as the biblical 'Judea and Samaria.' The officials spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss internal personnel changes.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump admin better-placed than courts to release Epstein files, judge says
By Luc Cohen NEW YORK (Reuters) -A U.S. judge said on Wednesday that the Trump administration is in a better position than federal courts to release materials that would satisfy public curiosity about the late financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking case. In rejecting the Justice Department's bid to unseal records from the grand jury that indicted Epstein in 2019, Manhattan-based U.S. District Judge Richard Berman wrote that the 70-odd pages of materials the grand jury saw paled in comparison to the 100,000 pages the government has from its Epstein investigation but is not releasing. The judge said the bid to persuade him to unseal the records was an apparent distraction from the Justice Department's decision in July not to release its files and directly cited another judge's decision earlier this month not to release similar materials from the grand jury that indicted Epstein's longtime girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell. "The instant grand jury motion appears to be a 'diversion' from the breadth and scope of the Epstein files in the Government's possession," Berman wrote. The Justice Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Berman's decision came as President Donald Trump has faced criticism from his conservative base of supporters and congressional Democrats over the Justice Department's decision not to release the files from its Epstein investigation. Epstein died by suicide in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges. He had pleaded not guilty. His death in jail and his friendships with the wealthy and powerful sparked conspiracy theories that other prominent people were involved in his alleged crimes and that he was murdered. Trump, a Republican, had campaigned for a second term in 2024 with promises to make public Epstein-related files, and accused Democrats of covering up the truth. But in July, the Justice Department declined to release any more material from its investigation of the case and said a previously touted Epstein client list did not exist, angering Trump's supporters. 'DIVERSION' To try to quell the discontent, Trump in July instructed Attorney General Pam Bondi to seek court approval for the release of grand jury material from Epstein's case. Evidence seen and heard by grand juries, which operate behind closed doors to prevent interference in criminal investigations, cannot be released without a judge's approval. Justice Department investigations typically collect more material than prosecutors ultimately present to grand juries. Some of that evidence is sometimes eventually disclosed to the public during criminal trials. The Justice Department does not routinely disclose its evidence in cases where a defendant pleads guilty or, like Epstein, never faces trial, but it would not require judicial approval to release such materials. The grand jury that indicted Epstein heard from just one witness, an agent with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and saw a PowerPoint presentation and call logs, Berman wrote. On Aug. 11, a different Manhattan-based judge, Paul Engelmayer, denied the Justice Department's request to unseal grand jury testimony and exhibits from Maxwell's case, writing that the material was duplicative of public testimony at her 2021 trial. Maxwell is serving a 20-year prison sentence following her conviction for recruiting underage girls for Epstein. "A member of the public, appreciating that the Maxwell grand jury materials do not contribute anything to public knowledge, might conclude that the Government's motion for their unsealing was aimed not at 'transparency' but at diversion - aimed not at full disclosure but at the illusion of such," Engelmayer wrote. Maxwell had pleaded not guilty. After losing an appeal, she asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review her case.


News24
10 hours ago
- News24
Trump administration should release its 100 000 pages on Jeffrey Epstein, judge says
The Trump administration should release its Jeffrey Epstein files rather than ask the courts, ruled a US judge. The government has 100 000 pages, compared to the 70-odd grand jury pages, said Judge Richard Berman. Berman said that the Trump administration's motion appeared to be a diversion. A US judge said on Wednesday that the Trump administration is in a better position than federal courts to release materials that would satisfy public curiosity about the late financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking case. In rejecting the Justice Department's bid to unseal records from the grand jury that indicted Epstein in 2019, Manhattan-based US District Judge Richard Berman wrote that the 70-odd pages of materials the grand jury saw paled in comparison to the 100 000 pages the government had from its Epstein investigation but was not releasing. The judge said the bid to persuade him to unseal the records was an apparent distraction from the Justice Department's decision in July not to release its files and directly cited another judge's decision earlier this month not to release similar materials from the grand jury that indicted Epstein's longtime girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell. 'The instant grand jury motion appears to be a 'diversion' from the breadth and scope of the Epstein files in the Government's possession,' Berman wrote. The Justice Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Berman's decision came as US President Donald Trump has faced criticism from his conservative base of supporters and congressional Democrats over the Justice Department's decision not to release the files from its Epstein investigation. Epstein died by suicide in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges. He had pleaded not guilty. His death in jail and his friendships with the wealthy and powerful sparked conspiracy theories that other prominent people were involved in his alleged crimes and that he was murdered. Trump, a Republican, had campaigned for a second term in 2024 with promises to make public Epstein-related files, and accused Democrats of covering up the truth. But in July, the Justice Department declined to release any more material from its investigation of the case and said a previously touted Epstein client list did not exist, angering Trump's supporters. To try to quell the discontent, Trump in July instructed Attorney General Pam Bondi to seek court approval for the release of grand jury material from Epstein's case. READ | Trump's name appears in Jeffrey Epstein files - but it's 'fake news' says White House Evidence seen and heard by grand juries, which operate behind closed doors to prevent interference in criminal investigations, cannot be released without a judge's approval. Justice Department investigations typically collect more material than prosecutors ultimately present to grand juries. Some of that evidence is sometimes eventually disclosed to the public during criminal trials. The Justice Department does not routinely disclose its evidence in cases where a defendant pleads guilty or, like Epstein, never faces trial, but it would not require judicial approval to release such materials. The grand jury that indicted Epstein heard from just one witness, an agent with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and saw a PowerPoint presentation and call logs, Berman wrote. READ | Under pressure, Trump urges Bondi to release 'whatever she thinks is credible' on Jeffrey Epstein On 11 August, a different Manhattan-based judge, Paul Engelmayer, denied the Justice Department's request to unseal grand jury testimony and exhibits from Maxwell's case, writing that the material was duplicative of public testimony at her 2021 trial. Jared Siskin/Patrick McMullan via Getty Images Maxwell is serving a 20-year prison sentence following her conviction for recruiting underage girls for Epstein. 'A member of the public, appreciating that the Maxwell grand jury materials do not contribute anything to public knowledge, might conclude that the Government's motion for their unsealing was aimed not at 'transparency' but at diversion - aimed not at full disclosure but at the illusion of such,' Engelmayer wrote. Maxwell had pleaded not guilty. After losing an appeal, she asked the US Supreme Court to review her case.