Corrections: July 16, 2025
An article on Monday about a new case against Tesla stemming from a 2019 crash of a Tesla Model S sedan with the Autopilot engaged made an incorrect distinction about the trial in Miami. It is the first trial over Tesla's Autopilot system to reach a federal jury, not the first trial over Autopilot ever to be heard by a jury.
An article on July 9 about the week's most notable new songs misspelled a trumpeter's given name. He is Rob Mazurek, not Rod.
An article on Tuesday about the hair loss medication finasteride potentially leading to sperm count reductions misquoted Dr. Kian Asanad, the director of the USC Fertility and Men's Sexual Health Center, and placed his comments out of context. He said, 'I always think about that on the back of my mind as something contributing or playing a role,' and, elsewhere, 'I don't think it's as common as we really think.' He did not say, 'I keep it in the back of my mind as a possible factor, but I would say it's a less common thing.' In addition, the article omitted funding information related to a 1999 study that found no effects from finasteride on sperm count. The researchers received support from the pharmaceutical company Merck & Co.
Errors are corrected during the press run whenever possible, so some errors noted here may not have appeared in all editions.
To contact the newsroom regarding correction requests, please email nytnews@nytimes.com. To share feedback, please visit nytimes.com/readerfeedback.
Comments on opinion articles may be emailed to letters@nytimes.com.
For newspaper delivery questions: 1-800-NYTIMES (1-800-698-4637) or email customercare@nytimes.com.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Bactericide Market Competitive Landscape and Company Profiles Report 2025
The global bactericide market is projected to grow significantly from $9.54 billion in 2024 to $13.42 billion by 2029, driven by rising food demand, population growth, and advanced agricultural practices. Top companies include BASF, Syngenta, Bayer Crop Science, Corteva Agriscience and more. Asia-Pacific leads in market size, while North America is the fastest-growing region. Bactericide Market Dublin, July 21, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The "Bactericide Market Report 2025" report has been added to bactericide market size has grown strongly in recent years. It will grow from $9.54 billion in 2024 to $10.24 billion in 2025 at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 7.3%. The growth during the historic period can be attributed to the rising global consumer demand for food, increased concerns about food security and quality, growing regulatory measures in the agricultural sector, a higher usage of bactericides, and the expanding demand in bactericide market size is expected to see strong growth in the next few years. It will grow to $13.42 billion in 2029 at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 7%. The projected growth for the forecast period is driven by the rising need for effective solutions for improved soil protection, a surge in food demand, population growth, changing climatic conditions, and a growing demand for high-quality crops. Key trends expected during this period include advancements in bactericide formulations, technological innovations in formulations, research in nanotechnology, expanding markets in developing regions, and the development of multifunctional products. The rising food security and quality concerns are expected to significantly drive the growth of the bactericide market. As the global population continues to grow, the demand for food increases, which places additional pressure on agricultural systems to produce enough safe and nutritious food. Bactericides play a crucial role in addressing these issues by preventing bacterial infections in crops and food products. They help protect agricultural yields by controlling harmful bacteria that can damage plants, reducing crop losses, and ensuring a stable food supply. For instance, in January 2025, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) reported that food insecurity affected 13.5% of U.S. households (18 million) in 2023, an increase from 12.8% (17 million) in 2022. This increase in food insecurity highlights the importance of bactericides in maintaining food security and in the bactericide market are focusing on advancing biological crop protection methods, which provide sustainable solutions for disease control while reducing chemical residues and environmental impact. Biological crop protection products use natural organisms or plant-derived compounds, such as beneficial microbes or plant extracts, to control pests and diseases in an environmentally friendly manner. For example, in October 2024, BioConsortia, Inc., a US-based biotechnology company, received approval from the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US-EPA) for its Amara bio fungicide or bactericide. This product is designed to combat foliar diseases in high-value fruits and vegetables. Amara uses beneficial bacteria to produce antimicrobial compounds that degrade fungal pathogen cells and enhance plant systemic resistance, offering improved consistency and efficacy compared to existing biological products. The approval of Amara highlights BioConsortia's commitment to providing a sustainable alternative to synthetic chemical fungicides, with enhanced residue management and environmental June 2022, Dhanuka Agritech, an India-based agrochemical company, partnered with Hokko Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. and Nippon Soda Co., Ltd. to launch Zanet, a dual-action fungicide and bactericide aimed at controlling diseases in tomato crops in India. This collaboration underscores the importance of advanced crop protection solutions to enhance food production and support sustainable agriculture players in the bactericide market are BASF, Syngenta Crop Protection, Bayer Crop Science, Sumitomo Chemical Company, Corteva Agriscience, Sinochem International, FMC Corporation, Adama Agricultural Solutions Ltd., UPL Limited, Nufarm Agriculture Inc., Albaugh, Nippon Soda Co. Ltd., Arysta LifeScience, Isagro S.p.A., Biostadt India, Koppert Biological Systems, Indofil Industries, Valent BioSciences, Marrone Bio Innovations, Certis Biologicals, BioSafe Systems, and Qingdao KingAgroot Chemical Company. Report Scope Markets Covered: Type: Organic Bactericides; Inorganic Bactericides; Biological Bactericides Formulation Type: Liquid Bactericides; Granular Bactericides; Powdered Bactericides Crop Type: Cereals and Grains; Oilseeds and Pulses; Fruits and Vegetables Application: Agricultural Bactericides; Industrial Bactericides; Household Bactericides Subsegment: Organic Bactericides: Amide Bactericides; Dithiocarbamate Bactericides; Antibiotic-Based Bactericides; Phenolic Bactericides Inorganic Bactericides: Copper-Based Bactericides; Sulfur-Based Bactericides; Quaternary Ammonium Compounds (QACs) Biological Bactericides: Bacteria-Based Bactericides; Fungal-Based Bactericides; Plant Extract-Based Bactericides; Essential Oil-Based Bactericides Key Attributes: Report Attribute Details No. of Pages 175 Forecast Period 2025 - 2029 Estimated Market Value (USD) in 2025 $10.24 Billion Forecasted Market Value (USD) by 2029 $13.42 Billion Compound Annual Growth Rate 7.0% Regions Covered Global Key Topics Covered: 1. Executive Summary2. Bactericide Market Characteristics3. Bactericide Market Trends and Strategies4. Bactericide Market - Macro Economic Scenario Macro Economic Scenario Including the Impact of Interest Rates, Inflation, Geopolitics, and the Recovery from COVID-19 on the Market5. Global Bactericide Growth Analysis and Strategic Analysis Framework5.1. Global Bactericide PESTEL Analysis (Political, Social, Technological, Environmental and Legal Factors, Drivers and Restraints)5.2. Analysis of End Use Industries5.3. Global Bactericide Market Growth Rate Analysis5.4. Global Bactericide Historic Market Size and Growth, 2019-2024, Value ($ Billion)5.5. Global Bactericide Forecast Market Size and Growth, 2024-2029, 2034F, Value ($ Billion)5.6. Global Bactericide Total Addressable Market (TAM)6. Bactericide Market Segmentation6.1. Global Bactericide Market, Segmentation by Type, Historic and Forecast, 2019-2024, 2024-2029F, 2034F, $ Billion Organic Bactericides Inorganic Bactericides Biological Bactericides 6.2. Global Bactericide Market, Segmentation by Formulation Type, Historic and Forecast, 2019-2024, 2024-2029F, 2034F, $ Billion Liquid Bactericides Granular Bactericides Powdered Bactericides 6.3. Global Bactericide Market, Segmentation by Crop Type, Historic and Forecast, 2019-2024, 2024-2029F, 2034F, $ Billion Cereals and Grains Oilseeds and Pulses Fruits and Vegetables 6.4. Global Bactericide Market, Segmentation by Application, Historic and Forecast, 2019-2024, 2024-2029F, 2034F, $ Billion Agricultural Bactericides Industrial Bactericides Household Bactericides 6.5. Global Bactericide Market, Sub-Segmentation of Organic Bactericides, by Type, Historic and Forecast, 2019-2024, 2024-2029F, 2034F, $ Billion Amide Bactericides Dithiocarbamate Bactericides Antibiotic-Based Bactericides Phenolic Bactericides 6.6. Global Bactericide Market, Sub-Segmentation of Inorganic Bactericides, by Type, Historic and Forecast, 2019-2024, 2024-2029F, 2034F, $ Billion Copper-Based Bactericides Sulfur-Based Bactericides Quaternary Ammonium Compounds (QACs) 6.7. Global Bactericide Market, Sub-Segmentation of Biological Bactericides, by Type, Historic and Forecast, 2019-2024, 2024-2029F, 2034F, $ Billion Bacteria-Based Bactericides Fungal-Based Bactericides Plant Extract-Based Bactericides Essential Oil-Based Bactericides 7-29. Bactericide Market Regional and Country Analysis7.1. Global Bactericide Market, Split by Region, Historic and Forecast, 2019-2024, 2024-2029F, 2034F, $ Billion7.2. Global Bactericide Market, Split by Country, Historic and Forecast, 2019-2024, 2024-2029F, 2034F, $ Billion30. Bactericide Market Competitive Landscape and Company Profiles30.1. Bactericide Market Competitive Landscape30.2. Bactericide Market Company Profiles30.2.1. BASF - Overview, Products and Services, Strategy and Financial Analysis30.2.2. Syngenta Crop Protection - Overview, Products and Services, Strategy and Financial Analysis30.2.3. Bayer Crop Science - Overview, Products and Services, Strategy and Financial Analysis30.2.4. Sumitomo Chemical Company Ltd. - Overview, Products and Services, Strategy and Financial Analysis30.2.5. Corteva Agriscience - Overview, Products and Services, Strategy and Financial Analysis31. Bactericide Market Other Major and Innovative Companies31.1. Sinochem International Corporation31.2. FMC Corporation31.3. Adama Agricultural Solutions Ltd.31.4. UPL Limited31.5. Nufarm Agriculture Inc.31.6. Albaugh LLC31.7. Nippon Soda Co. Ltd.31.8. Arysta LifeScience31.9. Isagro S.p.A.31.10. Biostadt India Limited31.11. Koppert Biological Systems31.12. Indofil Industries Limited31.13. Valent BioSciences31.14. Marrone Bio Innovations31.15. Certis Biologicals32. Global Bactericide Market Competitive Benchmarking and Dashboard33. Key Mergers and Acquisitions in the Bactericide Market34. Recent Developments in the Bactericide Market35. Bactericide Market High Potential Countries, Segments and Strategies35.1 Bactericide Market in 2029 - Countries Offering Most New Opportunities35.2 Bactericide Market in 2029 - Segments Offering Most New Opportunities35.3 Bactericide Market in 2029 - Growth Strategies35.3.1 Market Trend Based Strategies35.3.2 Competitor StrategiesFor more information about this report visit About is the world's leading source for international market research reports and market data. We provide you with the latest data on international and regional markets, key industries, the top companies, new products and the latest trends. Attachment Bactericide Market CONTACT: CONTACT: Laura Wood,Senior Press Manager press@ For E.S.T Office Hours Call 1-917-300-0470 For U.S./ CAN Toll Free Call 1-800-526-8630 For GMT Office Hours Call +353-1-416-8900Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'New kind of frontier': Shareholder proposals on AI becoming increasingly widespread
When Canada's most valuable companies hosted their annual general meetings this year, there was a new topic for shareholders to vote on among the usual requests to appoint board members and OK their executive compensation. The proposal from Quebec-based investor rights group le mouvement d'éducation et de défense des actionnaires centred on artificial intelligence. It asked 14 companies, including Canada's biggest banks, retailer Dollarama Inc. and telecom giant BCE Inc., to sign a voluntary code of conduct the federal government developed to govern the technology. Experts say the proposal is likely just the start of what they expect to become an annual phenomenon targeting the country's biggest companies — and beyond. "This is a new kind of frontier in Canada for shareholder proposals," said Renée Loiselle, a Montreal-based partner at law firm Norton Rose Fulbright. "Last year, this was not on the ballot. Companies were not getting shareholder proposals related to AI and this year, it absolutely is." Loiselle and other corporate governance watchers attribute the increase in AI-related shareholder proposals to the recent rise of the technology itself. While AI has been around for decades, it's being adopted more because of big advances in the technology's capabilities and a race to innovate that emerged after the birth of OpenAI's ChatGPT chatbot in 2022. The increased use has revealed many dangers. Some AI systems have fabricated information and thus, mislead users. Others have sparked concerns about job losses, cyber warfare and even, the end of humanity. The opportunities and risks associated with AI haven't escaped shareholders, said Juana Lee, associate director of corporate engagement at the Shareholder Association for Research and Education (SHARE). "In Canada, I think, in the last year or two, we're seeing more and more shareholders, investors being more interested in the topic of AI," she said. "At least for SHARE ourselves, many of our clients are making it a priority to think through what ethical AI means, but also what that means for investee companies." That thinking manifested itself in a proposal two funds at the B.C. General Employees' Union targeted Thomson Reuters Corp. with. The proposal asked the tech firm to amend its AI framework to square with a set of business and human rights principles the United Nations has. It got 4.87 per cent support. Meanwhile, MÉDAC centred its proposals around Canada's voluntary code of conduct on AI. The code was launched by the federal government in September 2023 and so far, has 46 signatories, including BlackBerry, Cohere, IBM, Mastercard and Telus. Signatories promise to bake risk mitigation measures into AI tools, use adversarial testing to uncover vulnerabilities in such systems and keep track of any harms the technology causes. MÉDAC framed its proposals around the code because there's a lack of domestic legislation for them to otherwise recommend firms heed and big companies have already supported the model, director general Willie Gagnon said. Several companies it sent the proposal to already have AI policies but didn't want to sign the code. "Some of them told us that the code is mainly designed for companies developing AI, but we disagree about that because we saw a bunch of companies that signed the code that are not developing any AI," Gagnon said. Many of the banks told MÉDAC they'll soon sign the code. Only CIBC has so far. Conversations with at least five companies were fruitful enough that MÉDAC withdrew its proposals. In the nine instances where the vote went forward, the proposal didn't succeed. It garnered as much as 17.4 per cent support at TD Bank but as little as 3.68 per cent at engineering firm AtkinsRéalis Group Inc. Loiselle said you can't measure the success of a proposal based on whether it passes or not. "The goal of these shareholder proposals is more for engagement," she said. Sometimes, even just by filing a proposal, companies reveal more about their AI use or understand it's an important topic for shareholders and then, discuss it more with them. While proposals don't always succeed, Lee has seen shareholder engagement drive real change. SHARE recently had discussions with a large Canadian software company. AI was central to its business but didn't crop up in its proxy statement — a document companies file governing their annual general meetings. The firm also had no board oversight of the technology. SHARE was able to get the company, which Lee would not name, to amend its board charter to include oversight of AI and commit to more disclosure around its use of the technology in its annual sustainability report. "This is a really positive development and it's leading to improvement related to further transparency," she said. If the U.S. is anything to judge by, Lee and Loiselle agree Canadian shareholders will keep pushing companies to adhere to higher AI standards. South of the border, AI-related proposals first cropped up around two years ago. They've targeted Apple, The Walt Disney Co. and even Netflix, where a vote on disclosing AI use and adhering to ethical guidelines amassed 43.3 per cent support. The frequency and spectrum of AI-related requests shareholders have has only grown since and is likely to be mirrored in Canada, Loiselle said. "The landscape for shareholder proposals is changing and I think that change is here to stay," she said. This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 21, 2025. Tara Deschamps, The Canadian Press Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Government blocked streaming sites for public servants as a 'people management issue,' documents show
Although streaming services like Netflix and Amazon Prime Video weren't straining the government's network, federal officials decided to block them because they were perceived to be a "people management" issue, according to internal documents obtained by CBC News. Last December, the agency responsible for IT services, Shared Services Canada (SSC), blocked access to paid subscription streaming sites, including Netflix, Hulu, Apple TV+, Prime Video, Disney+ and Crave for 45 government departments and agencies. At the time, a spokesperson for SSC said "streaming services are not considered work tools and offer no business value for the Government of Canada." Documents released as part of an access to information request provide more insight on how the decision was made. In an October 2024 email, SSC president Scott Jones wrote to officials at the Treasury Board, saying he wanted to "raise a couple of issues," including the use of personal phones and streaming services among bureaucrats. He wrote about a recent meeting of deputy ministers, where they discussed the use of streaming services in federal buildings — and voiced his support to block them. "While streaming may ultimately impact the bandwidth available to the [Government of Canada], it is also more importantly a people management issue," he wrote. "In the current context and with public perception of the public service as it is … there is value in engaging [deputy ministers] on these issues and in committing SSC to take some action." Soon after, SSC moved to block the streaming services. This email and others were obtained via an access to information request made by Matt Malone, an assistant professor at the University of Ottawa, and shared with CBC News. Thousands of hours of streaming The request, which sought documents detailing the rationale behind the decision to ban streaming services on government networks, includes a report on traffic to the streaming sites in September 2024, broken down by department. The report shed a more fulsome light into how much streaming was being done on government networks, compared to the agency's official statement when the sites were banned. In a November 2024 statement, Shared Services Canada said that "network traffic monitoring shows limited traffic to these sites from government systems." The report on streaming is presented as a bar chart, showing total volume of streaming per terabyte (TB). The amount of data used depends on the quality of video streamed. As an example, Netflix offers four data usage settings — ranging from low quality to ultra-high definition. If users were streaming on standard definition, one terabyte would equal at least 1,000 hours. If they were streaming on high definition, then one terabyte equals at least 340 hours of video. The departments with the highest streaming included the Department of National Defence at over three terabytes, Public Services and Procurement Canada (PSPC) with almost three terabytes and the Privy Council Office with about 1.5 terabytes of volume per month. The report includes the "top 10" departments with highest traffic to streaming websites in September 2024, including Global Affairs Canada, the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (East), Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Treasury Board Secretariat, Canada Revenue Agency and Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada. All of those departments reported about 0.75 TB of streaming volume in one month. Given the number of civil servants employed by the government, this volume is fairly minimal. For instance, PSPC alone has about 19,000 employees. Cybersecurity expert Eric Parent says the numbers presented just by volume of data don't paint a full picture. "The metric we're missing is how many users, how many users are actively on [streaming] and for how long," he said. The report also shows almost 10 TB of streaming done on the federal government's guest Wi-Fi. In a letter to colleagues, a director with SSC said the streaming numbers across the government could have been relatively low in part because they used a program that throttles the speed of streaming to prioritize different internet traffic on government networks.
