Menendez brothers suffer crushing blow after murder sentences were reduced leading to hopes of parole
The brothers were due to face a parole board on June 13, but that hearing has now been pushed back by more than two months to take place on August 21 and 22.
The latest setback delays any possibility of freedom by at least nine weeks, after already spending 35 years behind bars for after murdering both of their parents.
The brothers appeared in Los Angeles County Superior Court last Tuesday, where Judge Michael Jesic reduced their sentences from life without parole to 50 years to life.
The change means they're eligible to apply for parole under California 's youthful offender law because they committed the crime under the age of 26.
But the June 13 date was already scheduled as a separate pathway to freedom. Governor Gavin Newsom was due to reveal whether he would consider clemency for the brothers.
The brothers were ordered in 1996 to spend the rest of their lives in prison f or fatally shooting their entertainment executive father, Jose Menendez, and mother, Kitty Menendez, in their Beverly Hills home.
The brothers were 18 and 21 at the time of the killings.
Defense attorneys argued the brothers acted out of self-defense after years of sexual abuse by their father, while prosecutors said the brothers killed their parents for a multimillion-dollar inheritance.
The state parole board must still decide whether to release them from prison.
'I'm not saying they should be released, it's not for me to decide,' Jesic said. 'I do believe they've done enough in the past 35 years, that they should get that chance.'
The brothers are broadly supported by their relatives, many of whom testified on their behalf on Tuesday. One said the duo had been 'universally forgiven by the family' for their actions.
'Today, 35 years later, I am deeply ashamed of who I was,' Lyle told the court. 'I killed my mom and dad. I make no excuses and also no justification. The impact of my violent actions on my family... is unfathomable.'
The defense began by calling Ana Maria Baralt, a cousin of Erik and Lyle, who testified that the brothers have repeatedly expressed remorse for their actions.
'We all, on both sides of the family, believe that 35 years is enough,' Baralt said. 'They are universally forgiven by our family.'
Another cousin, Tamara Goodell, said she had recently taken her 13-year-old son to meet the brothers in prison, and that they would contribute a lot of good to the world if released.
Hernandez, who also testified during Erik and Lyle's first trial, spoke about the abuse she witnessed in the Menendez household when she lived with them and the so-called 'hallway rule.'
'When Jose was with one of the boys … you couldn't even go up the stairs to be on the same floor,' Hernandez said of the father.
The previous LA County District Attorney George Gascón had opened the door to possible freedom for the brothers last fall by asking a judge to reduce their sentences.
The brothers appeared in Los Angeles County Superior Court on Tuesday, where Judge Michael Jesic reduced their sentences from life without parole to 50 years to life
Gascón's office said the case would've been handled differently today due to modern understandings of sexual abuse and trauma, and the brothers' rehabilitation over three decades in prison.
A resentencing petition laid out by Gascón focuses on the brothers' accomplishments and rehabilitation.
Since their conviction, the brothers have gotten an education, participated in self-help classes and started various support groups for their fellow inmates.
But current district attorney Nathan Hochman said Tuesday that he believes the brothers are not ready for resentencing because 'they have not come clean' about their crimes.
His office also has said it does not believe they were sexually abused.
'Our position is not "no," it's not "never," it's "not yet,"' Hochman said. 'They have not fully accepted responsibility for all their criminal conduct.'
On August 20, 1989, armed with two shotguns, the brothers shot both parents to death as they watched a movie at their Beverly Hills mansion.
Their trial prompted worldwide headlines. Prosecutors said their motive was greed, as they stood to inherit $14 million from their parents.
The brothers insisted they acted against a father who sexually abused them for years and a mother who turned a blind eye to the abuse.
The first trial ended with a hung jury. But at a second trial in 1996 - where the judge refused to allow any evidence about the brothers being molested by their father - they were convicted and sentenced to life in prison with no possibility of parole.
New interest in the case was sparked by the recent Netflix drama, Monsters: The Lyle and Erik Menendez Story and the true crime documentary The Menendez Brothers.
Both films explain how the brothers claimed to police that they returned home from the theater to find their parents had been slaughtered.
At first it was feared that a vicious killer was on the loose in Beverly Hills, one of America's wealthiest communities.
But cops switched their suspicions to Lyle and Erik after they set about spending their inheritance soon after their parents' deaths.
Lyle bought a Porsche Carrera, Rolex watch and two restaurants, while his brother hired a full-time tennis coach to begin competing in tournaments.
In all, they spent $700,000 between the time of their parents' deaths and their arrests in March 1990, seven months after the murders.
Erik - who said his father abused him from the age of six to 12 - insisted in the new documentary that it's 'absurd' to suggest he was having a good time in the immediate aftermath of the murders.
'Everything was to cover up this horrible pain of not wanting to be alive,' he said.
'One of the things that stopped me from killing myself was that I would be a complete failure to my dad.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
3 minutes ago
- The Independent
20 states and DC sue DOJ to stop immigration requirements on victim funds
A coalition of attorneys general from 20 states and Washington, D.C., is asking a federal judge to stop the U.S. Department of Justice from withholding federal funds earmarked for crime victims if states don't cooperate with the Trump administration's immigration enforcement efforts. The lawsuit filed Monday in Rhode Island federal court seeks to block the Justice Department from enforcing conditions that would cut funding to a state or subgrantee if it refuses to honor civil immigration enforcement requests, denies Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers access to facilities or fails to provide advance notice of release dates of individuals possibly wanted by ICE because of their immigration status. The lawsuit asks that the conditions be thrown out, arguing that the administration and the agency are overstepping their constitutional and administrative authority. The lawsuit also argues that the requirements are not permitted or outlined in the Victims of Crime Act, known as VOCA, and would interfere with policies created to ensure victims and witnesses report crimes without fear of deportation. 'These people did not ask for this status as a crime victim. They don't break down neatly across partisan lines, but they share one common trait, which is that they've suffered an unimaginable trauma,' New Jersey Attorney General Matthew J. Platkin said during a video news conference Monday, calling the administration's threat to withhold funds 'the most heinous act' he's seen in politics. The federal conditions were placed on VOCA funding, which provides more than a billion dollars annually to states for victims compensation programs and grants that fund victims assistance organizations. VOCA funding comes entirely from fines and penalties in federal court cases, not from tax dollars. Every state and territory has a victims compensation program that follows federal guidelines, but largely is set up under state law to provide financial help to crime victims, including medical expense reimbursement, paying for crime scene cleanup, counseling or helping with funeral costs for homicide victims. VOCA covers the cost of about 75% of state compensation program awards. The funds are also used to pay for other services, including testing rape kits, funding grants to domestic violence recovery organizations, trauma recovery centers and more. Advocates and others argue that the system needs to protect victims regardless of their immigration status and ensure that reporting a crime does not lead to deportation threats. They also say that marginalized communities, such as newly arrived immigrants, are more likely to be crime targets. 'The federal government is attempting to use crime victim funds as a bargaining chip to force states into doing its bidding on immigration enforcement,' New York Attorney General Letitia James, who also joined the lawsuit, said in a statement Monday. 'These grants were created to help survivors heal and recover, and we will fight to ensure they continue to serve that purpose … We will not be bullied into abandoning any of our residents.' The Associated Press left a message seeking comment from a DOJ spokesperson Monday afternoon. President Donald Trump's administration has sought to withhold or pull back other federal funding or grant funding midstream, saying awardees and programs no longer agree with its priorities. In April, it cancelled about $800 million in DOJ grants, some of which were awarded to victims service and survivor organizations. And in June, states filed a lawsuit over added requirements in Violence Against Women Act funding that mandated applicants agree not to promote 'gender ideology,' or run diversity, equity and inclusion programs or prioritize people in the country illegally. Several attorneys general said the VOCA conditions appear to be another way the administration is targeting so-called sanctuary jurisdictions that limit cooperation with federal immigration authorities, though there is no clear definition of what a sanctuary state or city is. The Trump administration earlier this month released an updated list of states, cities and counties it considers sanctuary jurisdictions. U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi said in the August announcement that the department would 'continue bringing litigation against sanctuary jurisdictions and work closely with the Department of Homeland Security to eradicate these harmful policies around the country.' As of Monday afternoon attorneys general from California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington and Wisconsin — all Democrats — had signed on to the lawsuit.
BBC News
3 minutes ago
- BBC News
Two in court facing attempted murder charges after Aberdeen flat disturbance
Two people have appeared in court charged with attempted murder after a man was found seriously injured at a flat in were called to the property on Jasmine Terrace on Saturday afternoon following reports of a disturbance - a 39-year-old man was taken to hospital.A 51-year-old man and a 49-year-old-woman, both of Aberdeen, were charged over the incident, including a charge of attempting to defeat the ends of made no plea when they appeared in private before Aberdeen Sheriff Court on Monday. The man was remanded in custody while the woman was granted bail.
The Guardian
16 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Minnesota man who found car while fishing probably solved 1967 cold case
A fisher who recently went out on the Mississippi River in Minnesota ended up spotting a submerged car and evidently helped solve a nearly 60-year-old missing person case, according to authorities and local news reporting. Brody Loch, the fisher at the center of the remarkable chain of events, told the Minneapolis news outlet WCCO that he called authorities after discovering the 1960s-era Buick in question with a sonar device on the weekend of 9 August. By Wednesday in the community of Sartell, local sheriff's office divers and a tow truck crew had recovered the vehicle. And investigators processing the car found human remains inside, the office of Steve Soyka, the Stearns county sheriff, said in a statement. Furthermore, Soyka's agency said, through the car's vehicle identification number (VIN), investigators were able to determine the car belonged to Roy Benn, who at age 59 was reported missing to the sheriff's office of nearby Benton county in September 1967 – and had not been seen since. Officials have sent the remains in Benn's car to a medical examiner's office for possible identification. Nonetheless, based on the items in the car and its VIN, Soyka's office said it believed the remains were that of Benn. Soyka's office added that it had turned the case over to the Benton county sheriff's office. Benton county's sheriff, Troy Heck, told CNN that his office had notified Benn's remaining family, who had previously been asked for DNA samples. 'We're just grateful that we may likely have finally gotten the break that we needed to bring closure to this family,' Heck said to the network. A missing persons bulletin published by Minnesota's public safety department said Benn was last seen on 25 September 1967 while 'carrying a large sum of money'. He was also driving his 1963 four-door, metallic blue Buick Electra, said the bulletin, which described the car missing alongside Benn. Benn owned an appliance repair service in St Cloud, Minnesota, when he went missing, according to reports at the time from the local daily newspaper. The St Cloud Daily Times also reported that Benn's wife had died the year before he went missing. Benn's brother, Walter, worked with authorities investigating Roy's disappearance, but leads back then never materialized into something definitive, as CNN reported. Walter Benn moved to sell his missing brother's personal possessions at an auction in 1968, the St Cloud Daily Times reported. Roy Benn was then declared legally dead in 1975, about eight years after he was last seen, the St Cloud Daily Times' reporting showed. After finally being located, Benn's car was 'filled with river sediment' and 'severely deteriorated' from being underwater for decades, yet it was 'intact', Sartell's municipal police department said in a statement. Loch told WCCO that he hoped Benn's family was finally closer to getting meaningful answers about what happened to him. He attributed it to good fortune that he and the friend with whom he was fishing didn't float by Benn's car without detecting it on sonar that fateful day. 'It was 100% luck,' Loch said.
