logo
Maryland Gov. Wes Moore to speak at Detroit NAACP dinner later this month

Maryland Gov. Wes Moore to speak at Detroit NAACP dinner later this month

Yahoo13-06-2025
BALTIMORE — Weeks after returning from South Carolina, Maryland Gov. Wes Moore will hit the road again — this time as a featured speaker at the Detroit NAACP Dinner on Sunday, June 29.
Moore's senior press secretary, Carter Elliott, told The Baltimore Sun Friday that the governor 'believes it's important as the only Black governor' to speak to 'one of the oldest NAACP chapters in the country.'
Elliott added that the governor's reelection campaign funds will cover the cost of his trip to Michigan, meaning Maryland taxpayers are not directly on the hook. Moore has not yet officially filed to run for another term in 2026, but has more than $4 million in cash on hand.
Though Moore has publicly maintained he is 'not running' for president in 2028, his Detroit dinner speech marks another appearance in a state with a relatively early and important Democratic primary. In late May, Moore headlined the South Carolina Democratic Party's Blue Palmetto Dinner and attended Rep. Jim Clyburn's 'World Famous Fish Fry' — both historically important events for Democratic candidates seeking to woo the state's large base of Black voters.
Michigan is home to auto manufacturing titans like Ford and General Motors, which employ thousands of blue-collar workers whose votes carry considerable weight nationally. More narrowly, the Detroit metropolitan area has a high population of Arab and Muslim Americans who traditionally vote for Democrats but largely soured on the party last year amid the ongoing war in Gaza.
Moore told Politico theme of his speech will be 'the work of repair' — perhaps a catch-all term for his economic agenda since taking office in 2023.
'The theme of the speech is going to be the work of repair, and it's really highlighting some of the work we are doing here in the state of Maryland that we're really proud of,' Moore told the outlet. 'There is no state that has moved with a sense of urgency to be able to do the work of repair like the state of Maryland the past two years.'
The word 'repair' has been used in a different context by Black Baltimore leaders like Rev. Dr. Robert Turner, who criticized Moore's May 16 veto of a bill that would have studied reparations for slavery in Maryland. The reparations issue prompted a South Carolina lawmaker, state Rep. John King, to call for Moore to be disinvited from the Blue Palmetto Dinner before the governor ultimately headlined the event.
Moore's trip to the Detroit NAACP is not his only upcoming appearance that will address issues impacting the Black community. He has said he will visit Maryland's Eastern Shore on Juneteenth next Thursday to announce a plan to end the state's racial wealth gap.
---------------
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's war on mail-in voting is futile — and could hurt the GOP
Trump's war on mail-in voting is futile — and could hurt the GOP

New York Post

time27 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Trump's war on mail-in voting is futile — and could hurt the GOP

President Trump is threatening to wage war on mail-in ballots — and the GOP has to hope he thinks again before the 2026 mid-terms. In a Truth Social post, Trump said he is 'going to lead a movement to get rid of MAIL-IN BALLOTS,' and he'll start off with 'an EXECUTIVE ORDER to help bring HONESTY to the 2026 midterm elections.' Trump likes the idea of in-person, same-day voting, which has much to recommend it. Advertisement But mail-in and early voting are so ingrained and widespread that they aren't going anywhere. Most Republicans have concluded that there's no alternative to making use of these modes of voting, and crucially, they managed — most of the time — to get Trump on board in 2024. Advertisement This aided the Republican get-out-the-vote operation in a close election. Clearly, though, Trump believes that mail-in voting is a Democratic plot, and he also hates contemporary voting machines. Old-school paper ballots don't guarantee honesty, however: In an infamous instance of voter fraud, allies of Lyndon Johnson stuffed Box 13 with enough ballots to put him over the top in the very narrow 1948 Democratic Senate primary in Texas. Today's voting machines, moreover, were a reaction to the Florida fiasco in 2000, when punch-card ballots had to be painstakingly examined by hand with a presidential election at stake. Advertisement The fact is that vote-by-mail has been steadily growing since the 1980s, and it needn't favor one side or the other. In Florida, Republicans have long made it a priority to maximize mail voting. A study by the academic Andrew Hall of pre-COVID voting patterns in California, Utah and Washington found a negligible partisan effect as those states rolled out vote-by-mail systems. Advertisement Overall, turnout went up only very slightly, and 'the Democratic share of turnout did not increase appreciably.' Mail-in voting didn't change who was voting, but how they did it — encouraging, as you might expect, voting by mail rather than in-person. Vote-by-mail did have a strong partisan tilt in the COVID election of 2020, in part because Trump inveighed against it. In 2024, Republicans made a concerted effort to make up ground — and succeeded. The GOP went from 24% of the mail vote in the must-win swing state of Pennsylvania in 2020, to 33% in 2024. And Republicans outpaced Democrats in mail-in balloting in Arizona. The advantage to a party of getting people to vote early — whether in person or by mail — is that it takes high-propensity voters off the table. Then, a turnout operation can focus on getting lower-propensity voters to the polls. Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters If no one votes until Election Day, party operatives waste time and money right up to the cusp of the election contacting people who are going to vote no matter what. Advertisement None of this is to say that all mail-in voting is equal. So-called universal mail-in voting, or automatically sending a ballot to every registered voter and scattering live ballots around a state, is a bad practice. Every morning, the NY POSTcast offers a deep dive into the headlines with the Post's signature mix of politics, business, pop culture, true crime and everything in between. Subscribe here! The rules should be more stringent. Advertisement Georgia, for example, gets this right: You have to ask for an absentee ballot and provide your driver's license number or a copy of another form of valid ID. Ballots have to be requested at least 11 days before the election and must be returned by Election Day. The outer 'oath' envelope has to be properly completed or the ballot is subject to being rejected, although the county elections office will provide the voter a chance to 'cure' the envelope. Advertisement It's also important to count early and mail-in ballots quickly, something that too many states fail to do, with California — as usual — the worst offender. States should be expected to abide by whatever rules have been set prior to an election, rather than changing them on the fly, and they should ensure that voter rolls are regularly cleaned up. The real question about vote-by-mail isn't whether it is staying or going, but whether Republicans, too, will take advantage of it. Twitter: @RichLowry

Baldwin unsure of Trump Administration, Wisconsin's FEMA request
Baldwin unsure of Trump Administration, Wisconsin's FEMA request

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Baldwin unsure of Trump Administration, Wisconsin's FEMA request

(The Center Square) – Wisconsin's Democratic U.S. senator says she has little doubt that there is enough flood damage around the state to qualify for federal help. But Tuesday she said she has less confidence in President Donald Trump. 'Confident and Trump Administration are not two phrases that I don't necessarily always put in a sentence together,' Baldwin told reporters. 'The president has said very disparaging things about FEMA, before the start of his term. He even talked about abolishing FEMA.' Baldwin said the president has changed his tune. But she also said she wants to 'hold his feet to the fire.' Her comments came just hours after Wisconsin's entire Congressional delegation signed off on a letter to FEMA asking for federal assistance after last week's record flooding. 'On Aug. 9 and 10, historic rainfall caused severe flooding across the Milwaukee region, resulting in widespread damage to homes, businesses, and public infrastructure. The storm produced the second-highest 48-hour rainfall total on record in Milwaukee. Some areas saw more than 14 inches of rain in under 24 hours, overwhelming roads, basements, parking structures, and utility systems,' the letter states. 'The Milwaukee, Menomonee, and Root rivers reached record levels, flooding thousands of properties and prompting emergency crews to respond to hundreds of rescues and infrastructure problems.' Baldwin signed the letter. The letter asks for a Joint Preliminary Damage Assessment to get a sense of the damage. The congressional delegation also said it expects to make a formal request for a Presidential Major Disaster Declaration. That would not only open a pipeline for money to flow to the government's impacted by the floods but some of the 13,000 people who saw damage to their homes or businesses. "Federal assistance will be critical to repairing the damage from these severe weather events and supporting the long-term recovery of our communities," the letter states. " Solve the daily Crossword

Texas Democrat Spends Night on House Floor to Protest Map She Says Erodes Black and Latino Voting Power
Texas Democrat Spends Night on House Floor to Protest Map She Says Erodes Black and Latino Voting Power

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Texas Democrat Spends Night on House Floor to Protest Map She Says Erodes Black and Latino Voting Power

The redistricting battle in Texas has taken a turn. After state House Democrats returned from their walkout, they were informed on Monday that they would need a police escort when they leave the chamber floor in order to prevent them from fleeing the state again before the House reconvenes on Wednesday. State Rep. Nicole Collier, however, refused to sign what Democrats are calling 'permission slips,' and she spent the night on the chamber floor in protest. 'My constituents sent me to Austin to protect their voices and rights,' she said. 'I refuse to sign away my dignity as a duly elected representative just so Republicans can control my movements and monitor me with police escorts.' Collier added that her community, which is majority-minority, expects her to fight for fair representation. 'When I press that button to vote, I know these maps will harm my constituents — I won't just go along quietly with their intimidation or their discrimination,' she said. Dozens of Texas House Democrats fled to Illinois, New York, and Massachusetts on Aug. 3. They hoped that their absence would deny the chamber the quorum it needs to conduct business and, as a result, block the proposed congressional map, which is designed to aggressively favor the Republican Party in the 2026 midterm later said they were prepared to return once their Republican colleagues adjourn the special legislative session and California releases a retaliatory map of its own. Advocates have criticized the Texas map, unveiled just days before the 60th anniversary of the Voting Rights Act, for potentially chipping away at the political power of Texans of color. Texas state Rep. Jolanda Jones is one of the Democrats who left the state. 'The districts that are targeted overwhelmingly are Black districts [that are represented by Democrats],' Jones said at a press conference earlier this month. 'They're pitting [U.S. Rep.] Jasmine Crockett against [U.S. Rep.] Marc Veasey. And they're pitting [U.S. Rep] Al Green against [the vacant] CD18, where there was a Black representative.' For instance, in Green's current district, which includes a portion of the Greater Houston area, the Black voting-age population would drop from 39% to 11%. Similarly, the Black voting-age population of Veasey's Fort Worth-based district, currently 25%, would also drop. On Aug. 14, California Gov. Gavin Newsom formally called on state lawmakers to approve a Nov. 4 ballot measure that would temporarily allow California to redraw its map without having to go through its independent commission. Here's more information about the latest developments in the Lone Star State — and beyond. Why did Texas House Democrats flee the state? For months, President Donald Trump has been pushing his allies in Texas to redraw district lines. Doing so could give the Republican Party five additional seats in the U.S. House in next year's midterm elections. Historically, midterm elections haven't been kind to the party of the sitting president. Trump is attempting to build on Republicans' 219-212 majority in the House, where four seats are vacant. It wasn't until after Trump called Abbott this summer that the Texas governor put redistricting on the agenda for a special legislative session, according to The Texas Tribune. The 30-day session began on July 21. Its agenda included 18 items, from national disaster preparation and property taxes to redistricting. Texas House Democrats slammed Abbott for putting items related to this summer's deadly flooding on an agenda that they say was filled with partisan priorities. The lawmakers hoped to run out the clock on the session by leaving the state, though Abbott has already called another session. Yet the battle over map-drawing is expected to have ramifications across the U.S. And some say that it could possibly trigger a redistricting arms race. Democratic leaders in a number of other states — including California, Illinois, Maryland, New Jersey, and New York — have vowed to retaliate if Texas House Republicans continue with the unusual move to redistrict in the middle of the decade instead of after the next census in 2030. And according to some legal scholars, the U.S. Supreme Court likely won't provide a way out of the crisis. 'The court determined in 2019's Rucho v. Common Cause that partisan gerrymandering presented a non-justiciable political question, so federal courts couldn't intervene and hear those cases,' Melissa Murray, a law professor at New York University, told Capital B. 'The only avenues for relief would be state courts or redistricting commissions.' What are politicians saying about the Texas map? Crockett, a vocal Democratic critic of the Trump administration, blasted state Republicans on Aug. 3, but said that the issue is 'bigger than Texas.' 'This isn't just about the five seats in Texas,' Crockett told MSNBC. 'This is about a power grab. It's about basically setting the tone for what Donald Trump will try to do throughout the country so that he can suppress the voices of Black and brown folk just so that he can stay in power.' Texas state Rep. Ron Reynolds, one of the Democrats who left the state, echoed some of these thoughts, saying that he and his colleagues won't 'relent to an authoritarian president that wants to steal and racially gerrymander our Black and Brown districts.' Trump has also pressured Republican state lawmakers in Florida, Indiana, Missouri, New Hampshire, and Ohio to redraw their maps. Some Democratic leaders have vowed to use every tactic at their disposal to prevent any mid-cycle redistricting. 'Everything is on the table,' Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, who has met with the Texas Democrats, said on July 30. 'We've got to preserve democracy.' Maryland House Majority Leader David Moon, also a Democrat, went even further. He told The Associated Press on Aug. 1 that he would introduce a bill permitting mid-cycle redistricting if Texas continues down its current path because 'we can't have one state, especially a very large state, constantly trying to one-up and alter the course of congressional control while the other states sit idly by.' Former U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, who runs the Democratic Party's redistricting efforts and has traditionally pushed for a nonpartisan approach, seemed to give the green light — at least for now — to Democrats exploring map-drawing outside the census period. 'We have to understand that the nature of the threat that has been put upon the country through what they're trying to do in Texas has really increased the danger to our democracy,' he told ABC News on Aug. 3. 'As a result of that, we've got to do things that, perhaps in the past, I would not have supported.' 'I think that responsible Democrats in other states have to take into account the threat to our democracy, the need to preserve our democracy, so that we can ultimately try to heal it,' he added. 'And I would hope that they will take steps that are, again, as I said, temporary but responsible.' What does the walkout say about the Voting Rights Act? To many advocates, the redistricting battle illustrates the precarious state of voting rights. On Aug. 13, Texas House Minority Leader Gene Wu, one of the Democrats who left the state, called the Texas map a 'racist and unconstitutional gerrymandering effort.' He also said that it was an attempt to 'stifle Americans who have had enough.' This latest controversy erupted on the eve of the 60th anniversary of the Voting Rights Act, which some legal scholars say is standing on its last leg. Over the past decade, the Voting Rights Act has been scaled back through various legal challenges. In 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court gutted a section of the act that required jurisdictions with histories of discrimination against Black voters to secure federal approval before changing its election laws. 'If we don't know our history, we don't know nothing,' Khadidah Stone, who was a plaintiff in a major 2023 Supreme Court case, recently told Capital B. 'Especially if you aren't a white man, you need to be putting yourself on the line fighting for voting rights just as much as anybody else.' What's the next move for Democrats? Though many Democratic leaders are exploring retaliatory measures, not all of them can move as quickly as Texas House Republicans. That's because different states have different procedures for redrawing maps. In Texas and a number of other Republican-controlled states, state legislatures handle redistricting. This means that in these states the task of redrawing maps is simpler and faster and that the party in power can almost guarantee that its lawmakers will be reelected. Meanwhile, in many Democratic-controlled states, including California and New York, redistricting is done through an independent commission. This is meant to minimize partisan influence and maximize competitiveness, though reliance on this model also slows down the speed with which maps can be redrawn. It remains to be seen how Democratic leaders' countermoves will play out. This story has been updated. The post Texas Democrat Spends Night on House Floor to Protest Map She Says Erodes Black and Latino Voting Power appeared first on Capital B News.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store