
From 'fantastic' to 'spoiled': How Japan's trade effort to woo Trump backfired
By Tamiyuki Kihara, Makiko Yamazaki and Yoshifumi Takemoto
When Japanese Premier Shigeru Ishiba first met Donald Trump in February, his plan to placate the protectionist president's long-held frustration with Tokyo on trade was a promise to invest $1 trillion in the United States.
It appeared to work. The pledge was hailed by Trump, who said at the time he did not expect "any problem whatsoever" in reaching a trade deal with Japan, citing their "fantastic relationship".
In the months since, Tokyo's trade negotiators stuck to that strategy to avoid lowering barriers for imports of politically-sensitive products such as rice ahead of a dicey July 20 election, said four Japanese government sources with knowledge of the talks, who spoke on condition of anonymity.
But despite showing early signs of promise, the efforts backfired spectacularly, leaving negotiators with little time and few palatable options left to avert levies set to strain the world's fourth largest economy, the sources added.
After calling Japan "spoiled" in social media posts last week that accused Tokyo of reluctance to buy U.S rice, Trump notified Ishiba on Monday that Washington would impose tariffs of 25% on Japanese imports from Aug 1.
"It's a sign of Trump's frustration," said Kazuhiro Maeshima, a specialist in American government and foreign policy at Tokyo's Sophia University. "Japanese companies will need to find ways to manage their businesses in a way that does not depend on the United States."
A spokesperson for Japan's cabinet office, which oversees U.S. tariff matters, declined to comment on Reuters' specific questions related to negotiations.
Tokyo will continue to seek a pact with the United States "that benefits both countries, while protecting Japan's national interests" Ishiba told a cabinet meeting in televised remarks on Tuesday.
The U.S. embassy in Japan referred questions on tariffs to the White House, which could not immediately be reached for comment.
'DENSE FOG'
Japan, the largest foreign investor in the United States and one of its biggest trade partners, was among the first countries to engage Washington in tariff negotiations after Trump announced sweeping trade duties on April 2.
Led by one of Ishiba's closest confidants, Economy Minister Ryosei Akazawa, Tokyo's negotiators pledged investments in sectors such as energy and steel during seven visits to Washington between April and June, the sources said.
In return, they aimed to get Washington to drop tariffs on the automotive sector, which employs one in ten of Japan's workers and accounts for a fifth of overall exports.
They also hoped it would head off any U.S. demands for Japan to drop its own levies on agricultural products such as rice, moves opposed by rural voters as an election loomed.
Polls show Ishiba's ruling coalition is at risk of losing its majority in the upper house vote, which could cast doubt over his shaky government and his own political future, analysts say.
Tokyo's negotiators believed they were making progress and had found a sympathetic ear in Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, with whom Akazawa regularly spoke in Washington and by telephone.
In his public remarks, Akazawa repeatedly said the two sides aimed for a deal by the time Ishiba and Trump were due to meet for a second time on the sidelines of the G7 meeting at Kananaskis in the Canadian Rockies, from June 15 to 17.
But as the date neared, his optimism appeared to wane. "It feels like we're still in a dense fog," he told reporters on June 10, shortly before he left for Washington.
When the leaders met in Canada, Trump appeared tired and disinterested and neither spoke much about trade, deferring to their cabinet ministers, said a source with knowledge of the meeting.
Afterwards, Ishiba told reporters the meeting had confirmed "discrepancies in our understanding".
Two weeks later, Trump took to Truth Social in frustration.
"To show people how spoiled countries have become with respect to the United States of America, and I have great respect for Japan, they won't take our rice, and yet they have a massive rice shortage," he said.
Some Japanese officials believe Tokyo will have to change tack and consider lowering barriers on farm imports to appease Trump.
Others, including Tokyo's top trade negotiator Akazawa, have said Washington must reduce tariffs on Japan's vital automotive sector if a broader deal is to be reached.
But first Ishiba must face his public, some of whom are growing increasingly frustrated by the lack of progress.
"Given the tariffs number that we got, frankly it makes me wonder what all the past negotiations were for," said Hidetoshi Inada, 64, speaking outside Tokyo's Shimbashi station on his way home from his office job for a telecoms firm.
"The outcome is everything," he said.
© Thomson Reuters 2025.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Asahi Shimbun
8 minutes ago
- Asahi Shimbun
Ishiba's deep interest in war, security reflected in Aug. 15 speech
Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba listens to an explanation while visiting Iwoto island in March. (Pool) Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba's use of the word 'remorse' in his speech marking the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II was notable for two key reasons. It revived a tone that was dropped 13 years ago in statements issued each Aug. 15 by his predecessors and reflected his abiding interest in war-related issues. Ishiba, who is 68 and a former defense minister, often told close associates that this anniversary will almost certainly be the last major milestone year before the war generation fades into history. In visits overseas as well as domestically, Ishiba has made it a point to visit sites closely linked with the war. For example, he took a two-hour drive on April 30 to the suburbs of Manila to visit a monument to Japanese who died in the Philippines during the fighting. He was the first prime minister to visit the site. Touching upon the fact the monument is in an isolated location, Ishiba told his associates, 'Consideration likely had to be made for anti-Japanese sentiment' in light of the 1.11 million local residents who perished in the fighting. Japan occupied the Philippines during the war. While Japan now enjoys friendly ties with the Philippines, Ishiba has said, 'We must not only view the history that is convenient for us.' Domestically, Ishiba visited Iwoto island in March. Formerly known as Iwojima, it was the site of fierce fighting during the war. In June, Ishiba visited the Himeyuri Peace Museum in Okinawa Prefecture, where one-quarter of the civilian population perished in the battle that raged there in 1945. Ishiba at one time, according to government sources, wanted to become the first prime minister to visit the island of Peleliu in Palau where about 10,000 Imperial Japanese Army soldiers died. But that trip never got off the ground. He has written that the catalyst for his stance to squarely face history was a meeting he had with Lee Kuan Yew, Singapore's first prime minister. Ishiba recalled he was at a loss for words when Lee asked him if he knew what Japan did when it occupied Singapore during the war. Lee reminded Ishiba that even though Japanese may forget what took place, the people of Singapore will never forget. Ishiba wrote that he took home from that experience the fact that even though the aggressor in war may forget as time passes, the victims will never forget. Because of his long interest in national security issues, Ishiba has sought to gain better insights on Japan's push to wage war all those decades ago. Prior to Japan's Dec. 7, 1941, attack on Pearl Harbor, younger elite bureaucrats, military officers and businessmen took part in a simulation exercise to gauge possible outcomes if Japan declared war against the United States. The conclusion was that defeat was inevitable, but that did not stop the top brass from blindly forging ahead. Ishiba told his associates, 'Such a tragedy will arise if civilian control over the military is insufficient.' Despite his strong interest in war issues, Ishiba did not issue a personal message on Aug. 15 that reflected his own thoughts. With the calls from within the Liberal Democratic Party for Ishiba to step down to take responsibility for the disastrous showing in the July Upper House election, he likely did not want to antagonize conservative elements in the party. Instead, Ishiba chose to include for the first time in 13 years the word remorse in his speech at the Aug. 15 ceremony. He confided to associates that he had many things he wanted to talk about but realized the speech would go on far too long if he raised the issue of historical understanding.


The Mainichi
38 minutes ago
- The Mainichi
Trump administration agrees to keep DC police chief in place, but with immigration enforcement order
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Trump administration on Friday reversed course and agreed to leave the Washington, D.C., police chief in control of the department, while Attorney General Pam Bondi, in a new memo, directed the District's police to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement regardless of any city law. The order from Bondi came after officials in the nation's capital sued Friday to block President Donald Trump's takeover of the Washington police. The night before, his administration had escalated its intervention into the city's law enforcement by naming a federal official as the new emergency head of the department, essentially placing the police force under the full control of the federal government. The attorney general's new order represents a partial retreat for the Trump administration in the face of intense skepticism from a judge over the legality of Bondi's earlier directive. But Bondi also signaled the administration would continue to pressure D.C. leaders to help federal authorities aggressively pursue immigrants in the country illegally, despite city laws on the books that limit cooperation between police and immigration authorities. In a social media post Friday evening, Bondi criticized D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb, saying he "continues to oppose our efforts to improve public safety." But she added, "We remain committed to working closely with Mayor Bowser." Mayor Muriel Bowser's office said late Friday that it was still evaluating how it can comply with the new Bondi order on immigration enforcement operations. The police department already eased some restrictions on cooperating with federal officials facilitating Trump's mass-deportation campaign but reaffirmed that it would follow the district's sanctuary city laws. In a letter sent Friday night to D.C. citizens, Bowser wrote: "It has been an unsettling and unprecedented week in our city. Over the course of a week, the surge in federal law enforcement across D.C. has created waves of anxiety." She added that "our limited self-government has never faced the type of test we are facing right now," but added that if Washingtonians stick together, "we will show the entire nation what it looks like to fight for American democracy -- even when we don't have full access to it." The legal battle was the latest evidence of the escalating tensions in a mostly Democratic city that now has its police department largely under the control of the Republican president's administration. Trump's takeover is historic, yet it had played out with a slow ramp-up in federal law enforcement officials and National Guard troops to start the week. As the weekend approached, though, signs across the city -- from the streets to the legal system -- suggested a deepening crisis over who controls the city's immigration and policing policies, the district's right to govern itself and daily life for the millions of people who live and work in the metro area. A push for compromise The two sides sparred in court for hours Friday before U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes, who is overseeing the district's lawsuit. She indicated the law likely doesn't grant the Trump administration power to fully take over city police, but it probably does give the president more power than the city might like. "The way I read the statute, the president can ask, the mayor must provide, but the president can't control," said Reyes, who was nominated to the bench by Democratic President Joe Biden. The judge pushed the two sides to make a compromise. An attorney for the Trump administration, Yaakov Roth, said the move to sideline Metropolitan Police Department Chief Pamela Smith came after an immigration order that still held back some aid to federal authorities. He argued that the president has broad authority to determine what kind of help police in Washington must provide. The police takeover is the latest move by Trump to test the limits of his legal authorities to carry out his agenda, relying on obscure statutes and a supposed state of emergency to bolster his tough-on-crime message and his plans to speed up the mass deportation of people in the United States illegally. It also marks one of the most sweeping assertions of federal authority over a local government in modern times. While Washington has grappled with spikes in violence and visible homelessness, the city's homicide rate ranks below those of several other major U.S. cities, and the capital is not in the throes of the public safety collapse the Trump administration has portrayed. The president has more power over the nation's capital than other cities, but D.C. has elected its own mayor and city council since the Home Rule Act was signed in 1973. Trump is the first president to exert control over the city's police force since it was passed. The law limits that control to 30 days without congressional approval, though Trump has suggested he'd seek to extend it. Chief had agreed to share immigration information Bondi's Thursday night directive to place the head of the Drug Enforcement Administration, Terry Cole, in charge of the police department came even after Smith had told MPD officers hours earlier to share information with immigration agencies regarding people not in custody, such as someone involved in a traffic stop or checkpoint. The Justice Department said Bondi disagreed with the police chief's instructions because they allowed for continued practice of "sanctuary policies," which generally limit cooperation by local law enforcement with federal immigration officers. Meanwhile, advocates in Washington were trying to advise immigrants on how to respond. Anusce Sanai, associate legal director for the Washington-based immigrant nonprofit Ayuda, said they're still parsing the legal aspects of the policies. "Even with the most anti-immigrant administration, we would always tell our clients that they must call the police, that they should call the police," Sanai said. "But now we find ourselves that we have to be very careful on what we advise." Amy Fischer, an organizer with Migrant Solidarity Mutual Aid, said that before the federal takeover, most of what they had seen in the nation's capital was Immigration and Customs Enforcement targeting specific individuals. But since last Friday night they've seen a "really significant change," she said, with ICE and federal officers doing roving patrols around the city. She said a hotline set up by immigration advocates to report ICE activity "is receiving calls almost off the hook." ICE said in a post on X that their teams had arrested "several" people in Washington Friday. A video posted on X showed two uniformed personnel putting handcuffs on someone while standing outside a white transport van. Residents are seeing a significant show of force A population already tense from days of ramp-up has begun seeing more significant shows of force across the city. National Guard troops watched over some of the world's most renowned landmarks, and Humvees took position in front of the busy main train station. Volunteers helped homeless people leave long-standing encampments -- to where was often unclear. Friday night along the district's U Street, a popular nightlife corridor, an Associated Press photographer saw officers from the FBI, the DEA, the Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Park Police, U.S. Marshals and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.


Nikkei Asia
38 minutes ago
- Nikkei Asia
China's streaming companies gain on Netflix in Southeast Asia
Chinese streaming platform iQiyi is rushing to introduce original content in Southeast Asia. (Photo by Kenya Akama) KENYA AKAMA and TOMOKO WAKASUGI August 16, 2025 14:12 JST BANGKOK/SHANGHAI -- Chinese streaming services are catching American rivals in the Southeast Asian market, with giants iQiyi and Tencent planning to roll out original productions in Thailand and elsewhere.