Aberdeenshire Council leader quits Tories after 45 years
Gillian Owen, who represents Ellon and District ward, announced her intention to quit the party as she stepped down as leader in a meeting this morning.
She said she was "actually quite sad" over the alleged plot and hinted at joining Reform UK, telling the meeting: 'If you can't beat them, join them.'
READ MORE: Reform UK predicted to pick up first Scottish seats in landmark poll
Owen said: 'The last few months have been extremely hard.
'Not just for me as an elected representative, but for my family as well.
'Some may say I deserve the treatment I have received from my party and the press. Others may say I brought it on myself.
'Yes … I do feel betrayed by some colleagues I considered to be friends.
'They have achieved their wish. I have been removed as leader of the Scottish Conservative group and as leader of the council.'
READ MORE: Scottish Tory Aberdeenshire councillor defects to Reform UK
It comes after WhatsApp messages were leaked which showed Owen calling her colleagues "f***ing b******s" amid internal splits over the role of councillor John Cox in the administration of the council after he joined Reform UK as a member, but continued to serve as an independent.
He was voted out of the local authority's coalition earlier this month, after refusing to give up his membership.
Five councillors have defected to Reform from the Scottish Conservative Aberdeenshire group; Dominic Lonchay, Lauren Knight, John Crawley, Mark Findlater, and Laurie Carnie.
Tory Stewart Adams and LibDem Anne Stirling will now lead the council as co-leaders.
Owen continued: 'This is all with the backdrop of the Conservative group losing members hand over fist to Reform.
'I wonder why that is?'
She added: 'The party seems to have lost its way. Moving on, I will become an independent councillor aligned to the administration. I will no longer have masters to serve.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
30 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Bid to halt Edinburgh George Street revamp defeated
A bid to scrap the £35 million plans to revamp Edinburgh's George Street has been rejected by councillors. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... The city's transport and environment committee voted down a Tory proposal that because of the lack of any confirmed funding for the project, the council should opt for a maintenance-only approach instead. The George Street plans are to remove parking and reroute buses, turning it into a pedestrian and cycle zone with vehicles excluded for most of the day. Pavements are to be widened and trees planted at each end of the street, along with planters and benches. The full revamp of George Street would see the current parking down the centre of the street removed, buses rerouted, the pavement widened and vehicles excluded for most of the day. | supplied Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad City Centre Tory councillor Joanna Mowat said: 'The elephant in the room is we still don't have any money and are reliant on applying to third parties and having this money granted to us before we can put a single shovel in the ground.' She said a report to the committee made clear it would cost £10.5m to carry out maintenance to bring George Street up to standard. And she argued that could be paid for with the parking revenue from the street of £3.2m a year. 'We should just be realistic - that's what we've got, that's what we can afford, let's do the maintenance schedule from the parking income rather than having a £35m fantasy budget. 'I don't see, given the financial climate we're in and the pressures on government funding, that we're suddenly going to get this money.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad But officers said a 'do minimum' scheme would not meet the criteria for external funding. And committee convener Stephen Jenkinson said: 'It's perfectly normal not to have all the funds sitting in a bank account ready to be spent. As you move through developing a project, at various different stages you will draw down funding both internal and external.' Some of the money for the George Street revamp is likely to come from the city's planned Visitor Levy; there could also be contributions from developers; and the main source is expected to be various Scottish Government and Transport Scotland funding channels. The committee agreed to proceed with the full scheme to the next stage, advertising the road traffic orders, while keeping options open for future cost savings, for example by changing some of the materials. But it was agreed to rule out two 'do minimum' options - the maintenance-only proposal advocated by the Tories and another which would include the removal of parking. However, SNP transport spokesman Neil Gardiner said: 'This project needs a lot of scrutiny. Until we understand the money side of it we should not be taking any of the options off at this stage.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad He said it was possible the money could be better used elsewhere. "We will make our decision on whether to proceed or not on the basis of future reports." Lib Dem councillor Hal Osler said she was ' deeply concerned' about the level of funding. She said: 'Of course, as a council, we should have aspiration and we should bring forward something that isn't just a 'do minimum' approach. But we have to be realistic about the situation we're in and this is public funding. We do have to make a decision whether it is actually going to be worth spending £35m on something.' Green councillor Chas Booth said: 'We share a lot of people's concerns about the cost of this project but the question is: What do we do about that? 'The Conservative position is to say 'Scrap the whole scheme' - but we've heard from officers that might actually increase the financial exposure of the council. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'We've heard there is the potential for external funding if we proceed with this scheme and I think that's the right thing to do. And we've heard from officers that, if that financing is not available they will come back to us for a further decision.' The George Street Association, which represents the street's businesses and other organisations, gave its backing to the full revamp. In a written submission, association chair Dr William Duncan said the other options simply deferred essential infrastructure work that will need to be done He said: 'George Street should look and operate very much better than it currently does. Planning its transformation has been under discussion for far too many years and it needs to move forward at pace to deliver the high-quality changes needed for the future success of this iconic 'go to place,' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'We do not agree with those who might want to put this project on hold or not to proceed, because the physical condition of the public realm in George Street has deteriorated due to lack of investment for decades, meaning that status quo is not an acceptable or credible alternative. 'The need has gone beyond a facelift – the street needs major work done and the longer this is delayed the more extensive and expensive it will be.' Afterwards, Cllr Jenkinson said he was pleased the committee had agreed to move forward with the project. "This is a unique opportunity to bring one of Edinburgh's most important streets into the modern world whilst still maintaining its unique history and features. "The wider potential improvements are vast, from benefits to local residents and businesses to enhancing Edinburgh as a visitor destination, and beyond – we're on our way to delivering a bold new vision for George Street and our city centre.'
South Wales Guardian
39 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
Days of empire show Britons can cope with soaring temperatures, says ex-minister
In making his case at Westminster, Lord Robathan argued people continued to withstand hot climates in India and Africa, and believed UK residents should 'just take sensible precautions'. The Conservative peer and former SAS officer made his remarks as a second amber heat health alert was issued in as many weeks, with temperatures again set to pass 30C over the weekend. Earlier this month, a Met Office study detailed the increasing likelihood of extreme temperatures in the UK as a result of climate change and underlined the need for society to prepare. Speaking during a question on the issue in Parliament, Lord Robathan said: 'We should not take climate change in any way lightly nor indeed the rise in heat. 'But I think we should also remember, during those wicked days of empire, we all went to India and Africa, and do you know something people managed to survive, and they still survive in India and Africa and places. 'So I don't think we should take this overseriously. 'Does the minister agree that actually we should just take sensible precautions?' Responding, Labour frontbencher Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent said: 'I think that's the most House of Lords question I've had so far.' She highlighted the record-breaking heatwave of 2022, which saw temperatures reach more than 40C in the UK for the first time, peaking at 40.3C in Coningsby in Lincolnshire. It led to more than 3,000 heat-related deaths in England over the summer that year and a spike in destructive wildfires. Lady Anderson said: 'The impact of heat in the UK is something we are going to have to deal with.' She added: 'We also have to make sure that British nationals have the support when they travel too, which is why we've issued guidance only this week about excessive heat in Spain, Greece, Turkey and Cyprus. 'We need to make sure that people look after themselves where they travel, wherever they are.' Independent crossbencher Baroness Hayman, a director of Peers for the Planet parliamentary group, said: 'Should we not be aware… that extreme heat affects us in certain ways, but extreme heat overseas can have devastating effects on crops, with drought, famine and population changes and movements, so we should not treat this lightly? 'Alongside the need for mitigation, resilience measures… is not the proof of the increased likelihood of these sorts of episodes an absolute clarion call for this country not to withdraw or retreat from our commitment to domestic progress and international leadership on fighting further climate change?' Lady Anderson said: 'It is clear that the chance of 40C days in the UK is now 20 times higher than it was in the 1960s, and we have a 50:50 chance of a 40C day within the next 12 years. 'This is changing within the UK, and obviously that has a knock-on effect on climate elsewhere, which is why we need to take this extremely seriously in terms of our impact on the environment.' She pointed to steps being taken across the Government to tackle climate change and reach the emissions goal of net-zero by 2050. Earlier, she told peers: 'This Government are taking action to strengthen the UK's resilience, including against environmental threats such as the recent heatwave. 'The national risk register details the wide-ranging impacts of extreme heat to ensure that comprehensive contingency plans are in place.'
STV News
44 minutes ago
- STV News
Scottish Government warned someone could be killed by 'menacing gulls'
The Scottish Government has been urged to intervene in the 'extremely serious' issue of 'menacing gulls' in Scotland amid warnings that someone could be killed. Tory MSP Douglas Ross led a Holyrood debate about the 'dangerous seagull menace' in the north of Scotland on Thursday, right before Parliament broke up for summer recess. He warned that Scots risk losing their lives over the 'growing problem' of 'nuisance' gulls, and he called on the Scottish Government take urgent action. 'Some people do smirk when you say you're going to be debating in Parliament about the issue of gulls, but this is an extremely serious issue,' Ross said. He reiterated extreme examples of seagull attacks and aggression in coastal communities like Elgin, Nairn, Inverness, and more. In Hopeman, Ross said a retired couple are afraid to leave their own home because they are 'continually dive-bombed' by gulls every time they go down their street. In another case, he said an elderly Moray woman fell outside her house as a result of a gull attack, broke her leg, went to hospital, came back out of hospital, and was attacked again. Tory MSP Rachael Hamilton called for a nationwide summit to tackle the issue as she warned that Scots are being left 'scared, attacked and traumatised'. The Ettrick, Roxburgh and Berwickshire MSP said 'aggressive' seagulls had attacked seven children in one month last year in Eyemouth, with one girl 'left with gashes to her scalp and blood running down her face'. Finlay Carson, Tory MSP for Galloway and West Dumfries, said in his own constituency, the local council is 'spending upwards of £85,000 a year trying to manage gulls'. 'That money would be far better spent if the licensing system actually worked,' he said. 'When non-lethal methods fail, communities are left without any viable options. The result is growing frustration, rising costs, and a real risk to public safety.' Agriculture minister Jim Fairlie reiterated that he's already promised to hold a seagull summit in Inverness, where MSPs will examine all the issues raised to try to solve the problem. 'This is something we have to deal with,' Fairlie said. 'We have a joint responsibility to figure out how we are creating environments for these birds to thrive in our communities and manage that going forward. 'The figures I've seen show large increases in the numbers of urban gulls, but absolute crashing numbers in their natural environment. We've got to stop feeding them, stop creating nesting spaces, and find ways to displace them to go back to their natural habitat.' Labour MSP Rhoda Grant (Highlands and Islands) also emphasised a need for balance. 'I think we need to be clear, the birds are not acting maliciously,' Grant said. 'They are looking for food and trying to protect their young. 'It may be the case that [gull populations are in decline] in their normal habitat, but it doesn't feel like that's the case in urban areas where the danger they cause to the public is increasing.' SNP MSP Christine Grahame (Midlothian South, Tweeddale and Lauderdale) also defended the 'clever and adaptable gull'. Grahame said words like 'mugging and menace' are 'not appropriate to demonise an animal simply looking for food'. STV News is now on WhatsApp Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News
