
Hum: Korean eateries in downtown Ottawa please with punchy flavours, affordable prices
For me, fried rice is comfort food. I like Maroo's kimchi fried rice ($20), available with one of those pork patties or a sunny-side egg, that adds kimchi's heat and funk and the umami lift of seaweed flakes to the mix.
Article content
Bulgogi, the easy-to-like fry-up of sweet-salty beef, stars in multiple dishes, from a rice bowl ($18) to fajitas ($22) to a ciabatta-bun sandwich ($19, including a side dish) in which it's joined by cheddar, grilled mushrooms, garlic butter and mayo. Choose your own bulgogi adventure, I say. They've all hit the spot for me.
Article content
Article content
The new Maroo serves several traditional Korean soups and stews that I don't recall seeing at its first iteration. Soon-tofu and seafood stew ($20) was piping hot and significantly spicy but its shrimp, squid and mussels were still plump and toothsome. A less hearty choice was the fish-stock soup ($20) bulked up with onions, mushrooms cabbage, an imitation crab, not to mention the perfectly fried pork cutlet on the side that would have made any schnitzel cook proud.
Article content
Article content
Previously when I've had Korean short ribs, I cooked them myself at Daldongnae, the Korean table-top barbecue eatery in Chinatown, as part of a convivial, family-style dinner. At Maroo, it was worth it to have Kim do the grilling of a single-diner's version, given the nicely charred, flavourfully marinated short ribs ($33) that he sent to our table.
Article content
Korean fried chicken ($22 to $38, half- and full-orders respectively) had all the right fast-food attributes — admirably crisp exteriors, sweet-savoury or sweet-spicy sauces on the side. Still, I prefer the KFC from the specialists at Pelicana inside the OK Mart on Merivale Road.
Article content
Speaking of other Korean-run food businesses in Ottawa, I will note two more that recently joined Kitchen Maroo downtown.
Article content
In Sandy Hill, close to the University of Ottawa, there's In's Kitchen, which opened in early 2024. I've paid two more cursory visits to In's Kitchen and can speak highly of its traditional, full-flavoured dishes. I thought best of its spicier items, including dakgalbi ($22), which here was a saucy stir-fry of boneless chicken, chewy rice cakes and vegetables, as well as the new-to-me and evocatively named 'troop's soup ($22), a hearty stew of pantry meats such as ham and sausage, instant noodles, plus kimchi and vegetables.
Article content
Article content
Like Ottawa's Middle Eastern restaurants, and an increasing number of non-Middle Eastern eateries, In's Kitchen uses halal ingredients so as not to exclude Muslim customers.
Article content
Last fall, the takeout-oriented shop Kimbap opened on Bank Street, a little more than three blocks from Parliament Hill.
Article content
Kimbap is named after its grab-and-go specialty, which is not to be confused with sushi rolls, despite their similar appearances. While kimbap rolls do wrap cooked rice in seaweed, its cooked fillings can be meatier (think ham, bulgogi or bits of spicy chicken) or seafood-y (think spicy fish cakes, cooked tuna or imitation crab).
Article content
I've sampled some of the Kimbap's offerings, including spicy fish kimbap ($15), spicy chicken on rice ($15) and a bulgogi bowl ($16). While the smaller portions wouldn't leave you stuffed, they should tide you over, especially at lunch, and please you with freshness and lucid flavours.
Article content
Together, Kitchen Maroo, In's Kitchen and Kimbap make me realize that a larger wave of casual Korean food businesses have opened in downtown Ottawa in the last five years. Had I had the time or appetite to be more comprehensive, I would have gone to Maht, up the street from Maroo, or Gogiya, down the street from Kimbap.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

2 hours ago
Ontario, Michigan business groups jointly warn of 'crisis' if Canada, U.S. can't reach trade deal
Two groups representing businesses in Ontario and Michigan are urging Canada and the U.S. to get a trade deal done in order to avoid prolonged instability. Prolonged instability could have serious consequences for key sectors, from automotive and advanced manufacturing to agriculture and logistics, a joint statement Friday from the Ontario and Michigan chambers of commerce said. This is not just a trade story, it's a North American competitiveness crisis. The chambers are calling on both governments to return to the negotiating table. The statement comes after the two countries failed to come to some sort of agreement by an Aug. 1 deadline. U.S. President Donald Trump signed an executive order on Thursday boosting tariffs from 25 per cent to 35 per cent on Canadian goods that don't comply with the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA). Michigan and Ontario form one of the largest trade corridors between the two countries. The two jurisdictions are largely connected via the integrated auto sector. In addition to the 35 per cent tariffs on non-CUSMA compliant goods, Trump has also slapped a 25 per cent levy on the non-U.S. portion of assembled vehicles. The U.S. has also imposed 50 per cent tariffs on steel and aluminum imports from all countries. Enlarge image (new window) Tracking the trade war between the U.S. and Canada. Photo: CBC / Wendy Martinez, Graeme Bruce Prime Minister Mark Carney released a statement just past midnight on Friday saying Canada will continue to work toward a deal while focusing on providing supports for impacted industry and diversifying trade. Canada will be our own best customer, creating well-paying careers at home, as we strengthen and diversify our trading partnerships, the statement said. Trump's order cites Canada's lack of co-operation in stemming the flood of fentanyl and other illicit drugs across our northern border — even though Canada accounts for a small percentage of drug seizures entering the U.S. But a White House official gave CBC News a different explanation for the lack of an agreement with Canada, saying on background that Canada has repeatedly demonstrated a lack of seriousness in trade discussions as it relates to removing trade barriers. Trump gave Mexico, which accounts for the majority of drug seizures at the U.S. border, a 90-day extension of its current tariff regime with the goal of signing a new deal during that period. 'No deal better than a bad deal' Other Canadian business groups also expressed concerns about the lack of an agreement, but say it's better that Canada take its time rather than accept a bad deal. The Canadian Chamber of Commerce says it feels spending a little bit more time on crafting the right deal is well worth the wait because it will deliver lasting benefits. However, the group also feels businesses in Canada and the U.S. urgently need more certainty. Dan Kelly, the president and CEO of the Canadian Federation of Independent Business (CFIB), blasted the U.S. administration for its tariff rationale. The hike in U.S. tariffs to 35 per cent will harm small businesses on both sides of the border. The fentanyl rationale is even more ridiculous than the decision itself, Kelly said in a statement. CFIB supports the view that no deal is better than a bad deal, but the lack of resolution means small firms will not be able to plan for the future or continue to put off difficult choices. WATCH | Scarcity of goods will force a trade deal by September, O'Toole says: Kelly's sentiment was echoed by the United Steelworkers union on Friday. While we're disappointed an agreement wasn't reached to end this trade war, the worst outcome would have been a deal that locked in permanent damage to our economy, national director Marty Warren said in a statement. Warren encouraged Ottawa to take retaliatory action if necessary. This fight is far from over. The federal government must remain steadfast to secure the right deal for the Canadian economy and Canadian workers and must not accept anything less. Premiers urge Ottawa to stand its ground Ontario Premier Doug Ford called the tariff increase concerning and said Ottawa should retaliate with 50 per cent tariffs on U.S. steel and aluminum. Canada shouldn't settle for anything less than the right deal, Ford said on X Thursday night. Now is not the time to roll over. We need to stand our ground. Quebec Premier François Legault called Trump's latest move disappointing and argued that it will hurt Americans. Recent events highlight the importance we must place on diversifying our markets and increasing our economic autonomy, Legault wrote on X in French. We are in contact with the federal government and other provinces regarding the next steps. Discussions with the American administration must continue. In any case, we will defend the interests of Quebecers. New Brunswick Premier Susan Holt said Canada should still push for a good deal. Canada has what the world wants, and we should not settle for anything less than the best deal for New Brunswickers, she wrote Friday on X. Canada is coming together like never before to support our local businesses, workers and build a strong and resilient economy. We have your back. Darren Major (new window) · CBC News · Senior writer Darren Major is a senior writer for CBC's parliamentary bureau in Ottawa. He previously worked as a digital reporter for CBC Ottawa and a producer for CBC's Power & Politics. He holds a master's degree in journalism and a bachelor's degree in public affairs and policy management, both from Carleton University. He also holds master's degree in arts from Queen's University. He can be reached at With files from Katie Simpson and The Canadian Press


Toronto Star
3 hours ago
- Toronto Star
Steelworkers call on federal government to hold the line and strengthen Canada's economic defences as trade war escalates
TORONTO, Aug. 01, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — United Steelworkers union (USW) National Director, Marty Warren, issued the following statement: 'Trump's tariffs on Canadian exports remain in place and now he's imposed a 35% general tariff on non-CUSMA compliant Canadian exports, a 50% tariff on steel, aluminum and copper, new duties on softwood lumber and ongoing investigations that could hit even more sectors. These are direct threats to Canadian economic sovereignty and key industries like steel, aluminum, softwood and other manufacturing sectors where thousands of good jobs are on the line.


Toronto Sun
7 hours ago
- Toronto Sun
CHARLEBOIS: Canada's food chain just got tariff-slapped — again. Ottawa has only itself to blame.
In the face of rising tariffs and global trade turbulence, Ottawa didn't just drop the ball—it left the field entirely, and now Canada's agri-food sector and Canadians will be paying the price. Customers grocery shopping in an aisle at the Real Canadian Superstore on March 3, 2025 in Toronto, Canada. Photo by Katherine KY Cheng / Getty Images As August 1 quietly slipped by, so did Canada's last, best chance to avoid a sharp escalation in trade tensions with its most important economic partner. Unlike Mexico, which secured a temporary reprieve, Canada is now fully exposed to a 35% tariff imposed by the United States on a range of non-USMCA-covered goods. For the Canadian agri-food sector — and for consumers from coast to coast — this is less a policy adjustment and more a gut punch. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account Prime Minister Mark Carney — the seasoned economist who campaigned on his negotiating acumen and international gravitas — is failing. Instead of delivering results, Parliament was sent home for the summer, and Ottawa's silence echoed through what is arguably Canada's most consequential trade dispute in a generation. To be clear, not all food exports are affected. Products covered under USMCA quotas — dairy, poultry, and some meat — remain exempt. But for producers of grains, oilseeds, processed foods, and niche value-added products, this 35% tariff is a major blow. Margins in agri-food are notoriously thin. For many exporters, the choice is binary: absorb the cost, or exit the U.S. market. Either path reduces revenues, heightens the risk of layoffs, and weakens Canada's competitive position. With the U.S. absorbing over half of our agri-food exports annually, this is no minor hiccup — it's a strategic failure. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. And this is not an isolated case. Canadian farmers are already facing stiff tariffs in other key markets. India continues to impose duties on Canadian lentils and pulses, while China maintains restrictions and tariffs on pork, canola, and lobster. For a trading nation, these accumulating barriers are suffocating — yet Ottawa seems content to manage the damage rather than prevent it. There may be isolated benefits. As seen in the cocoa and chocolate supply chain, tariffs can shift some production northward, potentially boosting domestic processing. But these are exceptions. The broader story is one of uncertainty, rising input costs, and declining production volumes. And even for goods that never cross the border, Canadian consumers are unlikely to be spared. Processors losing export markets may attempt to recover margins domestically, pushing prices higher — particularly in small markets or for export-facing SKUs like baking products, specialty grains, and packaged goods. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Tariffs also wreak havoc upstream. Input sourcing, contract logistics, and production planning are all disrupted. Expect more volatility in prices, sporadic availability of staple ingredients, and even stockouts for certain SKUs. Compounding this are retaliatory tariffs and ripple effects through global supply chains. Many Canadian food manufacturers depend on imported inputs — machinery, additives, packaging — that are themselves caught in the crossfire. Inflationary pressures will persist, even if headline food inflation slows. What's most alarming isn't the tariff itself — but the absence of a coordinated Canadian response. Washington gave plenty of notice. And yet, no contingency plan emerged, no strategy was communicated, and most telling of all, no serious negotiation took place. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Supporters of Bill C-202 may take solace in the temporary shielding of supply-managed sectors. But that's little comfort for the rest of the agri-food economy — and let's not pretend supply management is immune to geopolitical pushback. It is, at best, a partial solution in an increasingly complex trade environment. Canada once led in global trade diplomacy. Today, we are reactive, overly reliant on past frameworks, and slow to acknowledge that trade has become a geopolitical chessboard, not a rules-based playground. The agri-food sector — which accounts for nearly 1 in 9 jobs and close to 7% of Canada's GDP — deserves more than summer recesses and bureaucratic platitudes. It requires decisive leadership, policy agility, and a proactive strategy to preserve market access and stabilize domestic food systems. If Prime Minister Carney hopes to reset the narrative this fall, he'll need to do far more than issue statements. Targeted tariff relief, short-term support for exposed sectors, and a clear diplomatic pathway with Washington must be top priorities. Without this, more markets will close, more family farms will shutter, and more grocery bills will climb. — Dr. Sylvain Charlebois is Director of the Agri-Food Analytics Lab at Dalhousie University, co-host of The Food Professor Podcast and Visiting Scholar at McGill University. Sunshine Girls Toronto & GTA World World Tennis