logo
Scientists have designed the perfect day. So I tried it

Scientists have designed the perfect day. So I tried it

Telegraph04-07-2025
According to the Lou Reed song, the ultimate perfect day involves sangria in the park, feeding animals at the zoo and a movie. And possibly heroin. But that was the Seventies and things have changed. Feeding zoo animals is generally frowned upon nowadays, as is smack.
Instead, researchers at the University of British Columbia have created the formula for a perfect day using AI analysis (admittedly, not as exciting as Spanish booze or narcotics). The boffins used data from the American Time Use Survey, in which participants recorded how much time they spent on 100 different activities and rated each.
According to the science, the 'perfect' day consists of six hours of quality time with family, two hours with friends, one-and-a-half hours of socialising, less than six hours spent working (with a brief 15-minute commute), two hours of exercise and no more than an hour's worth of screen time.
Sounds lovely, doesn't it? That's if you enjoy interaction with other people, because it involves a lot of that. If, on the other hand, you're an introvert, it could well be hell.
Personally, I have reservations. Six hours of family time sounds excessive. And surely it would depend on which members of your family that time is devoted to. Do pets count? And two hours of exercise? I'm an avid gym-goer but would struggle with that amount of exertion.
Consider, then, the opposite. What constitutes the 'worst' day? While there's been no definitive studies into this, I decided to try and build a non-scientific template by flipping the formula for the perfect day and substituting the 'good' activities with their 'bad' opposites, adding a few of the unhealthiest habits for good measure, such as sleeping in, being sedentary, excessive screen time, drinking alcohol, stress and isolation.
Helpfully, the study also lists some of the lowest scoring activities, which includes gardening, looking after other people's children and time spent with spouses, which confusingly, may sound like fun ways to spend time (I love spending time with my wife, obvs).
So, is the perfect day really perfect, and could the imperfect day be just as fun? I tested which was better…
Skip to:
The perfect day
Two hours spent exercising
Normally I'll wake at 6am, get to the gym for around 7am and then spend an hour working out. I like to start work by 8.30am so the logistics of a two-hour session don't suit me. Instead, I set the alarm for 5am and get up straight away, which is a struggle, then head out for a light run, before heading to the gym for some weight training and a Blaze HIIT (high-intensity interval training) class. This is achievable in the summer when the weather is kind, but must be miserable in the cold and dark. By the end of this early morning marathon, I'm exhausted. It's much more than I'd normally do.
One-and-a-half hours spent socialising
The study distinguishes between socialising and time spent with friends and family, so I take socialising to mean social interactions. Luckily, I am friendly with many of the regulars in the gym and today I ramp up the chattiness. I stop to talk to the receptionist, then chat to the staff in the café while they try to set up for the day.
On the gym floor I am that annoying person who wanders around and talks to everyone, and in the HIIT class I have plenty of banter with the instructor, monopolising the session. I then chat absently to people in the changing room in various stages of undress. As I don't work in an office, I've always valued these small interactions with different people during the day and I feel good about the connections I've made, but judging by some of the body language I fear I may have been a nuisance today. Nevertheless, I'm at my desk by 8am, happy in the knowledge that by 2pm I'll have finished.
Six hours of work
Normally I work 10 hours or more a day, often on weekends too. Being self-employed means if I don't work, I don't get paid. So a six-hour day should feel like a treat. Instead, I finish at 2pm weighed down by guilt and anxiety, knowing I'll have to start early and work late the next day just to catch up. Not exactly the perfect start to an afternoon off.
Six hours of family time
According to the study, spouses don't count, which is a shame, because I really enjoy my wife's company. Besides, she's busier than I am anyway. Luckily, my mother, who lives in Australia, is visiting. It's a great chance to spend time with her and also catch up with my son and daughter, now 18 and 23.
I haven't seen my mother in several years, so it's wonderful to be together again. Even so, after a couple of hours, the conversation slows, thankfully, she's great at filling the gaps. After a long lunch, I then meet up with my children, whose company I always treasure.
Two hours with friends
In the evening I head off to the pub to meet a friend for an easy two hours decompressing after family time. To start with, the amount of social time looked daunting, but having spent it with a selection of my favourite people the time passes easily. The trick, I think, is to choose your company carefully. Some people are effortless company, others drain energy.
One hour of screen time
Another easy win. An hour of Clarkson's Farm to round off the day is time well spent and leaves me lifted before bed. I read for half an hour before drifting off.
The imperfect day
Late waking and zero hours exercising
Forcing myself to stay in bed until 8am on a weekday felt vaguely criminal. I tried to do something positive with the time and scrolled through the newspapers online, but still felt guilty. And the no-exercise rule was hard to adhere to. I wanted to go for a walk at least but instead headed to my desk in the home office.
Eight hours of work
According to the study, when individuals worked for more than six hours, the positive effects rapidly turned negative, so I set myself an eight-hour working day. I have a love/hate relationship with my WFH set-up. I share the home office with my wife, who often presents seminars and workshops online, while I try to concentrate on writing. And when she is away, which she is a lot, I find the office isolating, so I work in a café or in the pub in the evening where the hum of life is comforting.
Today my wife is away so, in keeping with the spirit of the experiment, I work in the home office with just the cat for company. And he whines all day. As expected, I find the solitude soul-crushing. The only bonus is that an eight-hour day, while detrimental in terms of the study data, is still shorter than my normal working day, which allows me to fit in the other unhealthy activities.
Two hours of gardening, plus online shopping
In the study, time related to consumer purchases indicated a 'zero effect' on whether participants would have a good day, as did gardening. I love my garden, but am no fan of gardening. I do as little as possible, and we have gardeners. I choose the unpleasant job of pruning away aphid-infected leaves from the apple tree. The bugs excrete a liquid called honeydew and, as I chop away haphazardly, aphid excrement drips down on me. Ninety minutes later I head for a shower, then spend 30 minutes online shopping for summer clothes and pesticides.
One-and-a-half hours of drinking alone
I'm lucky enough to have two pubs within yards of my front door. I head to the Brewery Inn for a couple of pints alone. I take my laptop too and cram in a bit more work. This is a regular early evening thing for me. My wife thinks it's sad; I think it's one of the best things you can do with your time. I'm comfortable with my own company, and the pub serves excellent beer and plays excellent music. Ninety minutes later, I emerge comfortably lubricated.
Five hours spent watching television and eating junk food
Another surprising finding of the study was that time spent relaxing was negatively associated with having a good day. The authors make the presumption that this is because most of this time was devoted to watching television, 'which would not necessarily make for a better day'.
In this spirit I settle on the sofa with crisps, biscuits, beer and wine. I try to watch programmes with no intrinsic value, but, after a trio of Eastenders, Coronation Street and Love Island, I begin to lose the will to live so switch to Shōgun, which is very good – although by this point I'm feeling the effects of the alcohol and the subtitles are challenging. I opt for something educational and watch the first episode of Adam Curtis's new social history, Shifty, which is excellent, but my brain struggles to keep up with the high-brow concepts. For light relief I head to Noel Edmonds' Kiwi Adventure, which requires no energy, unlike the show's protagonist.
Late night TikTok and doom-scrolling
I finish the day in bed scrolling through TikTok, X and Truth Social, and drift off dreaming of cats and hatred.
The verdict
Perfect Day
Not as perfect as it would appear, especially if you value 'me time', or time with your spouse. It depends on who you spend your time with and what you do. Meanwhile a six-hour workday seems impractical for anyone with a full-time job.
Imperfect Day
For me the most detrimental elements were the lack of interactions with people and the lack of exercise. This is not a prescription for good health, and it was easy to see how this sort of lifestyle could be damaging in the long term.
As a one-off, however, parts of it were enjoyable, such as slobbing out on the sofa and sinking a few pints in the pub. The only ill-effect was a fuzzy head the following morning.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Octopus selfie off Vancouver Island as giant Pacific take camera from diver
Octopus selfie off Vancouver Island as giant Pacific take camera from diver

BBC News

time14 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Octopus selfie off Vancouver Island as giant Pacific take camera from diver

Two divers got a surprise when an octopus decided it could do a better job at underwater photography - and took their videographers, John Roney and Chris Mullen, were diving off the coast of Vancouver Island in an area known for its giant Pacific came across several of the creatures, but one octopus in particular was as interested in them as they were in it. After climbing all over the two divers, the octopus was drawn to one of their cameras. John said: "It reached out, stretched its arms and engulfed my camera completely giving us this incredible view of its suckers."John let go of the camera and for a while the octopus carried the kit around making its own "personal photoshoot", even managing to turn the camera off after a few minutes. Chris said: "It's just the coolest thing to see"So what did experienced videographer John Roney think of the filming? "Ten out of 10 underwater videographer for the octopus," Roney told CBC. "Honestly, the best footage of inside an octopus's web I've seen an octopus take."

The unfortunate similarity between Princess Anne and Henry VIII, as the Princess Royal turns 75 today
The unfortunate similarity between Princess Anne and Henry VIII, as the Princess Royal turns 75 today

Daily Mail​

time3 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

The unfortunate similarity between Princess Anne and Henry VIII, as the Princess Royal turns 75 today

In no uncertain terms, Princess Anne has been a trailblazer within the Royal Family. At the 1976 Montreal Olympics she became the first member of the family to take part in the tournament when she competed in the equestrian event. The Princess Royal turns 75 today but has not let this slow her down with Anne holding the title for the hardest working royal, taking on 474 engagements last year and a whopping 20,000 throughout her adult life. A more unfortunate record that Anne holds is being the first of Queen Elizabeth II's children to go through a divorce. Anne separated from her husband Mark Phillips in 1989, and the couple announced they had filed for divorce in April 1992 after just shy of 19 years of marriage. Writing in his biography of the Princess Royal - titled Anne - Brian Hoey acknowledged that after divorcing Mark and marrying Sir Tim Laurence Anne had a fascinating connection with her distant relative Henry VIII. Hoey said that when The Princess Royal said 'I do' to Sir Tim in December 1992 she became the first major royal to divorce and then remarry in 459 years. 'Once again the Princess was notching up a first. She became the first member of the Royal Family to remarry after a divorce since Henry VIII married Anne Boleyn in 1533, after divorcing his first wife, Catherine of Aragon, the same year,' Hoey wrote. Another royal, Princess Victoria Melita of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha, did divorce her husband in 1901 - but she was not an immediate member of the Royal Family like the Princess Royal. The marriage was unusual for a royal one. While her wedding to Mark in 1973 took place in Westminster Abbey and was watched by an estimated audience of 500 million, her second was a much more low-key affair. Anne and Sir Tim said their vows in a tiny parish church in Crathie, Scotland, on a chilly December afternoon. According to Hoey, Scotland was deliberately chosen as the venue for the wedding. He wrote: 'Scotland was chosen to avoid any possible embarrassment to the Church of England as the Princess had so recently been divorced - the Church of Scotland does not bar divorcees from remarrying in church.' Thankfully for Anne and Sir Tim the similarities between their wedding and Henry VIII and Anne Boleyn's nuptial ends there. The Tudor King's marriage to his second wife ended with her execution - just three years after they walked down the aisle. Fortunately, neither Anne nor Tim's heads have rolled and they have now been married for over 30 years. In fact, Tim is widely regarded as the Princess's rock. Sir Tim's unwavering support has not gone unnoticed, with Anne's son Peter Phillips praising him during a documentary marking the Princess's 70th birthday. 'They both have an understanding of what being a part of the wider family means and what is required,' Peter told the programme, as he discussed the 'strong support' his step-father gives his mother. The couple reportedly met when Sir Tim was stationed on the Royal Yacht Britannia. At the time, Sir Tim was working for the Queen as the senior member of the British Armed Forces appointed to assist the royal family. Despite reports that Anne and Mark were linked romantically to other people, the Queen was left upset by their divorce. According to author Robert Hardman's book, Queen of Our Times: The Life of Queen Elizabeth II, the Queen found the divorces 'deeply upsetting'. He quoted former staffers as saying that the divorces 'distressed her much more than she let on'. Anne and her first husband had two children - Peter and Zara - and the Princess Royal was desperate for her children to have as normal an upbringing as possible. To do so, she decided on behalf of her son and daughter that they would forgo much of the trappings of royal life. Anne and Sir Tim in July 2025. They have now been married for over 30 years and Sir Tim is regularly called Anne's rock Anne's controversial decision happened immediately after the birth of her son Peter in 1977 when she decided her son would not be given a title. Writing in his biography of Princess Anne, royal insider Brian Hoey said that Anne did so because she believed 'in this day and age a title would be more of a hindrance than an advantage as her children try to make their way in the world'. Although Queen Elizabeth II reluctantly agreed to Anne's request, Hoey wrote that she had been 'anxious' to give her firstborn grandson a title. And according to royal biographer Ingrid Seward, Elizabeth was left disappointed by her decision but was nevertheless persuaded to respect her daughter's decision. Despite not being bestowed the title of prince, Peter still grew up with many of the airs and graces that define the royals. After his birth Anne was quick to resume her own duties as a working member of the royals, which meant that Peter was brought up by a nanny. Peter and later his sister also went to Gordonstoun, the same public school his grandfather Philip and his three uncles attended. Hoey perfectly summarised Peter's upbringing as 'not exactly a run-of-the-mill commoner'. When Anne's daughter was born in 1981, she again decided not to give her a royal title and broke convention in a different way when she named her Zara, an unusual name for a member of the Royal Family. And the Princess Royal was very much involved with bringing up her daughter with a young Zara 'never very far from Anne's side'. Whether Anne succeeded in giving Zara and Peter a 'normal' life is up for debate but they certainly got the best of both worlds in many respects. While their cousins continue their roles as working members of the family, Anne's children have had successful careers elsewhere.

Universal deny that head Lucian Grainge was personally involved in Kendrick Lamar attack on Drake
Universal deny that head Lucian Grainge was personally involved in Kendrick Lamar attack on Drake

The Guardian

time3 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Universal deny that head Lucian Grainge was personally involved in Kendrick Lamar attack on Drake

Universal Music Group has denied new allegations made by Drake's lawyers that its British chair and chief executive Lucian Grainge had a 'role in and knowledge of the scheme to defame and harass' the Canadian rapper by peer Kendrick Lamar, and that as such the label should 'collect, review and produce' communications by Grainge. Drake is suing UMG – his label Republic's parent company – over its release of Lamar's 2024 diss track Not Like Us, which contains the line: 'Say, Drake, I hear you like 'em young … Certified Lover Boy? Certified pedophiles.' The artwork for the global hit single features an image of Drake's home dotted with icons used to identify the homes of registered sex offenders. Drake has denied the allegations, and in January filed a lawsuit against UMG – not Lamar himself – alleging that it 'approved, published and launched a campaign to create a viral hit out of a rap track' that was 'intended to convey the specific, unmistakable and false factual allegation that Drake is a criminal paedophile, and to suggest that the public should resort to vigilante justice in response'. The label initially responded that the suit was 'utterly without merit'. Drake's latest motion argued that Drake believes 'Grainge was personally involved in decisions made regarding the marketing and promotion of [Not Like Us] around its release'. Lawyers for UMG have now called for Drake's motion to be denied, labelling it a 'transparent attempt to use discovery to harass UMG and force it to waste time and resources out of spite' and that his 'attempts to show Sir Lucian's relevance are so strained that they defy credulity'. In legal documents, Grainge declared that he never heard the song prior to its release. Lawyer Rollin A Ransom continued: 'The premise of Drake's motion – that he could not have lost a rap battle unless it was the product of some imagined secret conspiracy going to the top of UMG's corporate structure – is absurd. Sir Lucian is the CEO of a multinational enterprise; his days are spent determining and implementing global strategy, not vetting individual tracks or album covers or driving the release and promotional plans for any one recording.' Drake previously agreed not to seek documents from Grainge, the letter states. 'And even if Sir Lucian had any responsive documents, they would surely be captured by discovery from UMG's other document custodians, who were actually responsible for releasing and promoting Not Like Us. Drake does not come close to meeting his burden of showing that Sir Lucian must be a custodian.' The letter concludes: 'Drake argues that Sir Lucian must be a custodian for no other reason than because Drake asked for him. That is entirely inconsistent with the law and is particularly inappropriate given that Drake's request is clearly based on a desire to harass UMG, rather than for a legitimate reason.' Drake has not responded to the new filing. The Guardian has contacted his representatives. UMG is seeking to have the case dismissed entirely, claiming in March that Drake 'lost a rap battle that he provoked and in which he willingly participated … diss tracks are a popular and celebrated art form centred around outrageous insults, and they would be severely chilled if Drake's suit were permitted to proceed'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store