Perikatan deputy chief: PM talks reform, but ‘biased' A-G pick fails the test
He said the move goes against constitutional norms and undermines the principles of good governance and independence.
'According to Articles 7 and 105 (4) and (5) of the Federal Constitution, the Auditor-General should not be appointed from among those still actively serving in the civil service. While it may not be illegal, it certainly goes against the spirit of independence and accountability,' he said during a press conference in Parliament here today.
Hamzah argued that the role demands independence from executive influence and questioned the credibility of the appointment, given that the appointee still reports to senior civil service officers, including the Director-General of Public Services and the Chief Secretary to the Government.
He also cited the late Tan Sri Hadenan Jalil's appointment as a proper example, noting that Hadenan had resigned from his civil service post before becoming Auditor-General.
'The prime minister (Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim) talks about governance, but when it comes to implementation, it all falls apart. The people will see this as biased. The individual should have resigned before the appointment to maintain independence,' he said.
Hamzah then went on to defend growing calls for a public protest this weekend, saying it reflects the people's frustration over unresolved issues and governance failures.
He said several civil society organisations including Bersih, C4, IDEAS, Projek Sama, and others had met with the opposition to voice their dissatisfaction over current national issues.
'They are not happy, and when people are unhappy, it builds momentum. That's why many are planning to take to the streets this Saturday.
'Don't blame us. This is the people's response, they are fed up because so many issues have piled up. When I asked my team what issues we should raise today, they said there are a thousand. If each issue affects a group of a thousand people, that's already a million voices. That's how serious it is,' he said.
Hamzah urged the authorities not to prevent or suppress the planned gathering and respect the public's right to express themselves.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
13 minutes ago
- The Sun
Kedah NGO praises PM's ceasefire success amid criticism
ALOR SETAR: The Kedah MADANI Youth Association has defended Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's role in securing an immediate ceasefire between Thailand and Cambodia, calling it a historic diplomatic achievement. Association chairman Datuk Zuraidi Rahim criticised those mocking the effort, stating it undermines Malaysia's credibility as ASEAN Chair. Zuraidi was responding to a social media post by PAS Information Chief Ahmad Fadhli Shaari, which allegedly belittled the PM's mediation. 'This is a success all Malaysians should celebrate, not insult. Such remarks damage our diplomatic standing,' he said. The post, which included a screenshot of a news report on the conflict, drew public backlash. Zuraidi revealed that 10 police reports had been lodged by him and seven PKR division chiefs in Kedah, urging authorities to investigate Ahmad Fadhli. Padang Terap PKR division chief Mohd Tahar Hussin echoed the sentiment, demanding stern action. 'This involves security and humanity—it's no laughing matter,' he said. - Bernama
Malay Mail
44 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
Myanmar junta mandates prison sentences for election critics
YANGON, July 30 — Myanmar's junta said today it has enacted a new law dictating prison sentences for critics or protesters of their planned election, which is being boycotted by opposition groups. The junta seized power in a 2021 coup, sparking a many-sided civil war, and has touted elections at the end of this year as a path to peace. Opposition groups—including democratic lawmakers ousted by the military takeover—and international monitors have called the poll a ploy to legitimise the junta's rule. State newspaper The Global New Light of Myanmar said the 'Law on the Protection of Multiparty Democratic Elections from Obstruction, Disruption and Destruction' was enacted on Tuesday. Its 14-page text forbids 'any speech, organising, inciting, protesting or distributing leaflets in order to destroy a part of the electoral process'. Individuals convicted face between three and seven years behind bars, while offences committed in groups can result in sentences between five and 10 years. The legislation also outlaws damaging ballot papers and polling stations, as well as the intimidation or harm of voters, candidates and election workers, with a maximum punishment of 20 years in prison. If anyone is killed during an attempt to disrupt the election 'everyone involved in the crime faces the death penalty', the law says. Swathes of Myanmar are beyond the control of the junta and some government census workers deployed last year to gather data ahead of the poll faced resistance and security threats. Data could not be collected from an estimated 19 million of the country's 51 million people, provisional results said, in part because of 'significant security constraints'. Analysts have predicted the myriad of anti-coup guerrillas and ethnic armed groups the junta is battling may stage offensives in the run-up to the vote as a sign of their opposition. A UN expert called on the international community last month to reject the election plan as 'a fraud'. Tom Andrews, the UN special rapporteur on the rights situation in Myanmar, said the junta is 'trying to create this mirage of an election exercise that will create a legitimate civilian government'. — AFP
Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
High Court to decide Oct 24 on SRC's RM19.5m suit against Umno, Selangor Umno
KUALA LUMPUR, July 30 — The High Court here today fixed Oct 24 for its decision in the civil suit filed by SRC International Sdn Bhd and its two subsidiaries against Umno and Selangor Umno over the alleged receipt of RM19.5 million from the companies in 2015. Judge Datuk Raja Ahmad Mohzanuddin Shah Raja Mohzan set the date following the conclusion of two days of oral submissions by counsel Razlan Hadri Zulkifli, who appeared for the plaintiffs SRC International, Gandingan Mentari Sdn Bhd (GMSB), and Jendela Pinggiran Sdn Bhd (JPSB). Appearing for the defendants were counsel Mohamed Shahrul Fazli Kamarulzaman for Umno and Datuk Hasnal Rezua Merican for Umno Selangor. 'Thank you to the parties for your extensive submissions. I will deliver my decision on Oct 24 at 9 am,' the judge said. In their claim against Umno, the plaintiffs seek the recovery of RM16 million, alleging the funds were wrongfully transferred and that the party had no lawful basis to receive them. The second suit concerns a claim of RM3.5 million against Selangor Umno, which is likewise alleged to have received funds from the plaintiffs. Earlier, Hasnal Rezua submitted that it is their pleaded position that the sum in question constituted a political donation. 'There is no serious doubt here about the money that came to Umno Selangor,' he said, while counsel Razlan Hadri argued that a breach of fiduciary duties had been clearly established. 'Based on the admission by former SRC International director Datuk Suboh Md Yassin (the second SRC witness) himself in signing blank cheques, and the documentary evidence presented before this court, the plaintiffs have proven the breach of trust or duties by the former directors of the plaintiffs on the balance of probabilities,' he said. Meanwhile, Mohamed Shahrul Fazli reiterated Umno's position that it had received the RM16 million and maintained that the entire sum was expended on activities and programmes undertaken as part of the party's corporate social responsibility initiatives. — Bernama
