‘Golden visa' shutting out Chinese investors, legal experts say
RNZ
Legal experts have been left perplexed by Immigration New Zealand's interpretation of regulations related to the investment visa pathway for Chinese nationals.
The government upgraded the Active Investor Plus visa on 1 April to help encourage growth and make investing in New Zealand more attractive for overseas individuals.
The updated information on Immigration New Zealand's website in April noted that two Chinese investment programmes - Qualified Domestic Institutional Investor (QDII) and Qualified Domestic Limited Partner (QDLP) - were "not considered acceptable methods of transfer to meet immigration requirements" under the visa.
The Active Investor Plus visa was first introduced in 2022 by the Labour government, replacing the previous Investor 1 and 2 categories.
Due to the visa's high investment threshold and English-language requirement, it did not attract a lot of interest, immigration advisors and lawyers said, adding that questions over the exclusion of the Chinese investment programmes had yet to materialise.
After the April upgrade, the category attracted high interest from
applicants around the world
.
Peter Luo
Photo:
Supplied
However, licensed immigration advisor Peter Luo said interest from China quickly dried up after the government explicitly excluded the QDII programme from the upgraded "golden visa".
"I have quite a number of clients who wanted to apply, but they can't anymore," Luo said. "Some have signed a contract with us, but we had to pause the process."
QDII was introduced by the Chinese regulators in 2006 to allow individuals in China to invest in financial product markets overseas through approved domestic institutions such as commercial banks, security firms and trust companies.
It aims to increase the proportion of mainland China's privately held assets abroad in a managed way, according to the government's foreign exchange agency.
The QDLP programme is a separate investment scheme launched by Chinese authorities that has never been adopted by New Zealand.
Luo said QDII was virtually the only pathway for individuals from China to transfer capital overseas.
The Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment told RNZ that QDII and QDLP had been excluded from the investor visa when it was introduced in 2022.
Stacey O'Dowd, border and funding immigration policy manager at MBIE, said the core objective of the Active Investor Plus policy settings was to seek active and ongoing investment to help grow the New Zealand economy.
"Funds passively invested in New Zealand which are subject to obligations or restrictions would not align with this objective, as there is no certain potential of the funds remaining productively invested beyond an investor's investment period," O'Dowd said.
However, Luo said he only became aware of the QDII programme's exclusion recently.
Luo claimed the QDII programme complied with the new investor visa conditions, and its exclusion was "baseless".
"If the government is genuinely interested in attracting Chinese money and talent, INZ should withdraw its improper interpretation and engage with financial institutions to develop a workable solution," Luo said.
Arran Hunt
Photo:
Supplied
Immigration lawyer Arran Hunt said the exclusion of the QDII pathway meant the Active Investor Plus visa was "shut off from almost all Chinese investors".
Some countries restricted the amount of funds that someone could move out of the country, and the QDII programme provided an option that appeared to work with the former investment visa categories, he said.
Hunt said Immigration New Zealand had not explained why funds transferred via the QDII programme were not acceptable.
"We expect it is because the QDII/QDLP funds need to be returned to China at some point, which would make any investment in New Zealand temporary," he said.
However, there was no guarantee that an investment under the new investor visa would remain in New Zealand after the investment term, he said.
Repatriation of funds was more likely to happen if the funds had been sent via the QDII programme, he said.
"This change would have an impact on applicants from China, as it removes the most common way to take money out of China lawfully," he said.
"This removal will leave the only possible way out being through a place like Hong Kong but, even then, it won't be simple."
Hunt said China did not allow unrestricted movement of funds out of the country, with such transfer constraints being outside of New Zealand's control.
Harris Gu
Photo:
Screenshot / Queen City Law
Harris Gu, an immigration lawyer who is also policy chair of the New Zealand Association for Migration and Investment, said the exclusion of QDII from the investor visa settings was unreasonable because immigration laws did not explicitly forbid it.
"I believe there has perhaps been a misconception on the government's part in terms of exactly what QDII is and how it operates," Gu said. "Nevertheless, their statements are not above the actual law."
Gu said the exclusion would negatively affect investment from Chinese institutions that might have ordinarily come through the QDII programme under the old Investor 1 and 2 visa categories.
O'Dowd said New Zealand investment settings were, and would remain, "country neutral".
"We welcome high quality and productive foreign investment from all investors, provided it meets our regulatory requirements," O'Dowd said.
"Active Investor Plus settings have been designed to incentivise active investment so New Zealand benefits from investor capital, skills, experience and networks over the longer term."
Immigration New Zealand received 45 applications for the Active Investor Plus visa under the new settings between 1 and 14 April.
Of those applications, eight were from Hong Kong and five were from Chinese nationals, according to MBIE statistics.
RNZ approached Immigration Minister Erica Stanford for comment but was told Immigration New Zealand, which falls under MBIE, oversaw such operational questions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
38 minutes ago
- NZ Herald
How a2 Milk's $282m Yashili deal opens doors in China's infant formula market
Yashili NZ is owned by Yashili International, a subsidiary of China's Mengniu Dairy. MVM will be treated as discontinued operations and a2 Milk expects to recognise a loss on the sale of about $130m. In its result, the company made a net profit of $202.9m, up 21.1%, and ahead of market expectations ($192m). Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (ebitda) came to $274.3m, up 17.1%, on an ebitda margin of 14.4%, up 0.4 percentage points (market expectations: $271m). And a2 Milk also announced plans to pay a $300m special dividend. Bortolussi said a2 Milk has attained a top-four brand position in China – the world's largest infant milk formula market. 'It has been an exceptional year for our infant milk formula business, growing 10% in the year driven by our English label business which was up 17%,' he said. Looking ahead, the company expects high single-digit percentage revenue growth this year against 2025's. It also expects margins to be about 15% to 16%, with a net profit similar to the 2025 year. 'In the context of the range of outcomes, I think it's a solid set of numbers,' Forsyth Barr senior analyst Matt Montgomerie said. On the buy-and-sell transactions, Montgomerie said: 'I'm reluctant to say it's a game-changer, but clearly it's quite a step change and transformational for the business. 'I think it makes a lot of sense.' The addition of two licences should support a2 Milk's China label growth story, he added. Jarden analysts said the market would likely take time to digest the future 'capital intensity' required to become a more vertically integrated infant formula player. English-label formula, usually marketed through cross-border e-commerce channels, is cheaper than Chinese-label product, which uses more expensive ingredients and is sold in the more conventional mother-and-baby stores in China. Double-digit sales growth in English-label sales was a key factor in a2 Milk's profit improvement. The company also said it had achieved record market share in the Chinese-label market. Bortolussi said the decision to sell MVM and buy the plant at Pōkeno was part of a strategic initiative which had its origins in early 2021, soon after he started as CEO. 'For a long time, we have been focused on accelerating and expanding our market access in China and on development of our infant formula capability,' he told the Herald. 'The combined impact of these transactions deliver on that.' As it stands, a2 Milk has access to only one China registration through its sole formula manufacturer, Synlait Milk. Chinese regulations allow for just three formula registrations per factory. Registrations are highly sought after, and the process to gain one can take several years to complete. 'It would have taken us another five years or more at MVM to get registration, which would have required more investment in blending and canning, on building capability throughout the process to get there, and with no certainty about the outcome,' Bortolussi said. 'What we have announced today allows us immediate access to a world-class facility at Pōkeno.' Pōkeno has a milk-drying capability similar to MVM's, making MVM surplus to requirements. Bortolussi said there was potential for one more licence to be granted for Yashili NZ's Pōkeno plant, and for another at Synlait further down the track. In China, it's common for a2 Milk's competitors to have five to 20 product registrations. 'This will really open up the opportunity for us to expand our position in the China market,' Bortolussi said. The company, which specialises in product containing just the a2 beta protein and not the a1/a2 combination found in regular milk, declared a final dividend of 11.5 cents, taking the total to 20c. Shares in a2 Milk rallied on the news to a high of $9.29, but later eased to $8.83. The stock started the year at $6.17. Jamie Gray is an Auckland-based journalist, covering the financial markets,the primary sector and energy. He joined the Herald in 2011.
RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
Road-user charges can pay for more than just road maintenance - NZ could lead the way
By Simon Kingham* of Road user charges would see a shift away from petrol tax, which is currently about 77 cents per litre. File photo. Photo: RNZ / Cole Eastham-Farrelly The government heralded its plan to move New Zealand's entire vehicle fleet to road-user charges as a fairer method of funding road maintenance. For owners of electric and diesel vehicles, this is nothing new. They already pay road-user charges based on the distance travelled. But for petrol vehicles, it is a shift away from fuel excise duty, or petrol tax, which is currently about 77 cents per litre of fuel. As it is linked to the price of petrol, more fuel-efficient petrol vehicles pay relatively less than gas guzzlers for every kilometre travelled. Much of the policy detail is yet to be worked out, but if all of the country's vehicles paid road-user charges, this would provide opportunities to do more than raise revenue for road building and maintenance. New Zealand would become the first country to charge all vehicles a distance-based fee and, used in creative ways, this could save money and deliver better societal outcomes, such as safer roads and lower pollution. Fuel excise duty is currently collected at source, when refined fuel either leaves the refinery or is imported. Some other costs are included, such as a fee for New Zealand's Emissions Trading Scheme , currently about 13 cents per litre . These are simple to collect, have low compliance costs and are essentially unavoidable. Road-user charges are a distance-based payment. Licenses are pre-purchased in increments of 1000 kilometres and various rates apply depending on vehicle weight and axle configuration. Heavier electric vehicles (more than 3.5 tonnes) are currently exempt until June 2027. This system has higher compliance and administration costs than fuel excise duty. It also has a greater risk of evasion, because to some extent, it relies on vehicle owners' honesty. With all vehicles moving to road-user charges, everyone will pay for every kilometre they travel on the roads, with increased rates for heavier vehicles (currently anything above 3.5 tonnes). The plan is that this will be administered electronically through some device in or on the vehicle. This already happens with many freight vehicles. In most freight vehicles, the technology includes GPS and allows freight companies to monitor the performance of their vehicles and drivers. But rolling out electronic road-user charges across the whole vehicle fleet creates interesting opportunities beyond just raising revenue. The move to a distance-based scheme could discourage some people from selecting more fuel-efficient vehicles because a road-use system does not encourage that. This could lead to increased greenhouse gas and other emissions. However, rather than using a uniform road-user charge based solely on vehicle weight and distance travelled, rates could vary based on a range of criteria, including emissions, and pay for other traffic-related costs to society and the environment. For instance, about 300 people die each year in road crashes, and thousands more are injured. This costs NZ$9-10 billion annually. To help pay, New Zealand could collect higher road-user charge rates for vehicles more likely to cause crashes, based on safety ratings . Traffic-related air pollution causes more than 2000 deaths per year , costing New Zealand about $10 billion . Road-user charges could be used to pay for this by charging a higher rate for vehicles that emit more pollution. The same could be done for noise pollution. And if the electronic road-user charge device is GPS-enabled, vehicles travelling near the most vulnerable citizens - such as near schools during pick-up and drop-off - could be charged more. This may deter some people from dropping children off right outside the school gate, which in turn could have the added benefit of making walking and cycling feel safer due to less traffic, attracting more people to use active transport and helping create neighbourhood greenways . But why stop there? New Zealand could use electronic road-user charges to encourage all sorts of other behaviours. For example, lower rates might encourage vehicles to use highways and main roads instead of cutting through quiet residential streets. Road-user charges could be used to set a congestion price, manage on- and off-street parking and monitor speed limits without the need for any additional technology, saving on setting up separate congestion and parking pricing schemes and speed cameras. Some will argue this is an invasion of privacy . But as Minister of Transport Chris Bishop indicated, the privacy commissioner will oversee it. If New Zealand becomes the first country to charge all vehicles for the use of roads, this an opportunity to lead in innovation. * Simon Kingham is a Professor of Human Geography at the University of Canterbury - This story originally appeared on The Conversation.
Newsroom
4 hours ago
- Newsroom
RNZ an easy target for flailing Goldsmith
Comment: Melissa Lee was dumped as Minister for Media and Communications for being, in her own words, 'a little slow'. Lee had done nothing in her six-month tenure and resembled an opossum in the headlights when Newshub closed and TVNZ slashed staff numbers. If the same rules applied, Lee's replacement, Paul Goldsmith, should also be handing the portfolio over to the next hopeful. In his 12-month reign, Goldsmith has failed to strengthen the media presence in New Zealand – the job given to him by his boss, Christopher Luxon. He hailed Sky's $1 takeover of Three as a welcome investment in local media. It was, of course, the American owners admitting defeat and bailing out. This might be harsh, but Goldsmith's one achievement seems to have been getting walked over by Google and Facebook. Since Goldsmith gave up on plans to force these global giants into paying for news, Google has voluntarily started renewing content deals that were in place before the last election. These deals pump millions into the media sector including RNZ and TVNZ. Under pressure to be seen to be doing something, anything, Goldsmith has turned his sights on an easier target – RNZ. Easier in multiple ways. No one in the coalition Government is going to stand up for RNZ. Act doesn't think there is any need for the public broadcaster and NZ First leader, Winston Peters, seems bent on revenge for a perceived lack of reporting on his party's successes. The Prime Minister struggles with his own performances in the media and is unlikely to deter Goldsmith from selecting RNZ as a whipping boy. RNZ's falling radio ratings are a soft target for Goldsmith to zero in on. The connection between a falling audience and management failure is an easy concept to push and a hard one to defend. Further slides in the ratings following Goldsmith's pronouncements left RNZ's CEO Paul Thompson in a very tough spot. As well as indirect pressure from Goldsmith, Thompson would have felt the heat from a new (Goldsmith appointed) board member, Brent Impey. Impey is a veteran of commercial radio, where ratings are everything. The current chair, Jim Mather, would also see the need for action. Appointed chair during Labour's time in office, Mather is an ex-military man who understands the chain of command and always does things by the book. He would have felt the need to respond to Goldsmith's concerns even if he didn't agree with them. Thompson decided on a bold move. He contracted RNZ's former news boss, Richard Sutherland, to produce a report looking at the reasons behind the ratings slide and possible solutions. Thompson would have known that Sutherland, who left RNZ in August 2023 after five years as head of news, was unlikely to take prisoners. It was hardly a secret in media circles that Sutherland had become frustrated with parts of the organisation's structure including the archaic separation of news and digital (RNZ's web content). He was furious at what he saw as a lack of accountability from those overseeing online during the Russian propaganda fiasco in mid 2023. Thompson would also have known that Sutherland's report would end up in the public arena. RNZ is subject to the Official Information Act and competing media, particularly NZME, delight in opportunities to cast the state broadcaster in a negative light. What Thompson possibly didn't anticipate was how big a swing Sutherland would take at his old employer. In a report most media have described as 'highly critical' or 'scathing' Sutherland criticised the quality of on-air work, the amount of time staffers are allowed to work from home and a Wellington bias in its news selection. But perhaps the most interesting revelation in the report is that interviews conducted by Sutherland revealed most of the staff see radio as a sunset industry. It is not hard to imagine Goldsmith and Impey (who will probably chair RNZ after Mather retires from the board) saying 'gotcha' as they read that part of the report. There is no doubt RNZ has undergone a culture change in the past few years. After Sutherland left, he was replaced as news boss by Mark Stevens from Stuff. Sutherland grew up in commercial radio and TV – he is a broadcaster through and through. Stevens has no radio experience but is well regarded for his digital know how. In many ways Stevens has been a good hire for RNZ. With Megan Whelan (Head of Content) they have dramatically broadened the range and scope of RNZ's online offering. This has led to rapid growth in RNZ's online audience, helped by Newshub's closure and spikes in readership of one-off lifestyle or fast-twitch content. If RNZ was private media company, its executive would have been praised for the successful investment in online media. But the inability to slow the rate decline of radio audiences is now creating huge pressure on Thompson and his team. Whelan has resigned and RNZ has advertised for a 'Chief Audio Officer.' Turning around the ratings will be hard, partly because the staff view that radio is a 'sunset industry' is not exactly wrong. Like audiences of most legacy media with linear offerings, it will keep declining but the end of the medium is someway off yet. Sutherland suggested a 'high profile' hire would be an important step on the road to redemption, but who? NZME will desperately hold on to its stars and on-air talent from the failed Today FM have mainly drifted out of the industry. Ex-TV3 journalists like Paddy Gower, Duncan Garner, Rebecca Wright and Melissa Chan-Green are names being mentioned and no doubt considered, but the search for outside talent also highlights RNZ's failure to develop more of its own presenters into top performers. Who is the next Kim Hill? Katherine Ryan is probably the closest to a Hill-type RNZ has, but is in the later stages of her career. The Sutherland report also presents Thompson, now the country's longest serving media CEO, with another problem. It paints a picture of failure; failure to address problems that have built up over years. Radio stations take time to turn around and it usually requires myriad small changes as well as major ones. The RNZ board will be acutely aware the underperforming media minister Paul Goldsmith won't want to hear that. He will want a quick result to improve his own scoreboard.
