
Lebanese Academic Charles Chartouni: An Alliance With The U.S. Will End Hizbullah's Iran-Led Subversive Policy In Lebanon; Lebanon Doesn't Seek War With Israel
Chartouni stated that Hizbullah is not a Lebanese political party, but a subversive group driven by Iranian policy. He emphasized that it was Hizbullah, not the Lebanese people, that wanted war with Israel, and he noted that Lebanon has international agreements with the State of Israel.
Charles Chartouni: "I am an ally of the United States. This is not a secret. I will rely on the U.S., whether militarily, politically, or diplomatically, to put an end to the attack on my country, by a terrorist group, run by the Iranian regime, for over 40 years. Collaborating with Hizbullah serves as a catalyst to promoting subversive Shiite policy throughout the Middle East. Lebanon is occupying a remarkable position in this strategy. Hizbullah did not just play a role in the Iranian intervention in the region. It served as the main catalyst. Therefore, I have no problem to ally myself with any foreign power, in order to change this reality. I do not recognize Hizbullah as a Lebanese party. Hizbullah is a subversive group that is driven by a subversive Iranian policy."
[...]
News Reporter: "Is Israel only Hizbullah's problem or is it the problem of all Lebanese?"
Chartouni: "It is absolutely not the problem of all Lebanese. Hizbullah wanted to wage war with them and it should be held responsible for it. We have international agreements with the State of Israel, which began with the 1949 Armistice Agreement, which was honored by Israel between 1949 and 1965. From 1965 until 2006, south Lebanon became a regional and international open war zone.
[...]
"Lebanon became a dumping ground for settling scores. We are no longer willing to be in that capacity.
[...]
"This time we are not going to just make our opinion heard. No. We will strike political and military subversive alliances that will put an end to this situation. They'd better understand this. This story cannot continue."
News Reporter: "Clarify by what you mean by 'subversive military alliances.' Does anyone in Lebanon have weapons, except for Hizbullah?"
Chartouni: "We will strike an alliance with the U.S. to end this state of affairs."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Shafaq News
11 hours ago
- Shafaq News
Lebanon's Hezbollah rejects disarmament, warns against dragging army into conflict
Shafaq News – Beirut Hezbollah Secretary-General Naim Qassem said on Friday the group will not give up its weapons, insisting there can be 'no Lebanese sovereignty without the resistance.' In a televised speech, Qassem condemned an August 5 government decision that, he said, would 'strip the resistance of its weapons' and pave the way for fighters to be expelled from their homes. He accused the cabinet of executing ' American and Israeli orders' to end the resistance, even if it meant civil war, and serving 'the Israeli project' — a stance he said explained the 'joy' expressed by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Qassem argued that the decision targeted the resistance's legitimacy instead of focusing on ending Israel's occupation of Lebanese territory, urging the government to plan for confronting the ongoing assault, not 'handing over the country to the Israeli enemy.' Warning against drawing the military into internal disputes, Qassem said the army's leadership rejects such a role. He also pointed to Netanyahu's recent talk of a 'Greater Israel' — which he said refers to control over all of Palestine and parts of Egypt, Jordan, Syria, and Lebanon — as evidence of the threat facing the country. 'We have said repeatedly: stop the aggression, remove Israel from Lebanon, and you will have from us every possible facilitation when discussing national and strategic security,' Qassem concluded.


Iraq Business
18 hours ago
- Iraq Business
US Reiterates Opposition to Iraq PMF Bill
By John Lee. The US State Department has reiterated its opposition to proposed legislation in Iraq concerning the Popular Mobilisation Forces (PMF), warning that it could increase Iranian influence and undermine Iraq's sovereignty. Speaking at a press briefing on Tuesday, State Department Spokesperson Tammy Bruce (pictured) said Washington opposed any legislation inconsistent with the goals of bilateral security cooperation or that weakened Iraq's existing security institutions. She added that the United States supports " genuine Iraqi sovereignty, not legislation that would turn Iraq into an Iranian satellite state, " emphasising that the future of nations should be determined by their own people. The comments followed reports of Iranian official Ali Larijani's visit to Baghdad, during which he signed a security agreement with Iraq. (Source: US State Department)


Shafaq News
18 hours ago
- Shafaq News
Iranian FM defends Hezbollah's arms as vital to peace
Shafaq News – Beirut Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi affirmed on Thursday that Tehran's position on Lebanon and the resistance does not mean interference in the country's internal affairs. In statements carried by Iranian media outlets, Araghchi described Hezbollah as a 'fully independent group,' adding, 'However, this position does not prevent us from expressing our views on peace in the region.' He argued that stability in the Middle East cannot be sustained 'without the weapons of the resistance,' warning that no other force could contain what he described as Israel's expansionist and hegemonic ambitions if those arms were removed. Earlier today, Iran's Supreme National Security Council Secretary Ali Larijani, during his trip to Lebanon, underlined that his country does not impose decisions on resistance groups or sovereign states. He explained that Tehran shares its perspectives openly and offers counsel when invited—without coercion or imposition. The remarks coincide with growing international calls for Hezbollah to disarm. Tehran rejects the disarmament campaign as a US- and Israeli-backed initiative aimed at weakening the movement, while critics of Iran view its stance as interference in Lebanon's internal affairs.