logo
Unpacking Truths Behind Mental Health Trends

Unpacking Truths Behind Mental Health Trends

New York Times27-05-2025
TikTok is flooded with videos from users discussing mental health topics that have long been taboo: Managing anxiety. Seeking help for depression. Living with bipolar disorder.
In many ways, the shift in America toward cultural openness around these topics is a cause for celebration, said Christina Caron, a reporter who covers mental health for the Well desk of The New York Times. But the proliferation of online discourse around subjects like trauma disorders and cognitive behavioral therapy can come with a downside: misinformation.
'It's hard to know what's true,' Ms. Caron said.
In her new monthly column, Psych 101, Ms. Caron tries to combat that uncertainty by unpacking topics like what happens when your moral compass is compromised and how a simple technique known as cognitive shuffling can help calm a busy brain. She speaks with people who have experienced the symptoms that she is writing about, as well as clinicians and researchers.
Ms. Caron is a former clinical research coordinator, so she is familiar with weedy medical terminology. But her goal is to provide readers with trusted — and vetted — health information, without the jargon that can sometimes accompany it.
In an interview, Ms. Caron shared how she selects topics for the column and which subjects she wants to tackle next. These are edited excerpts from the conversation.
Why did you want to start this column?
The idea is to look at mental health terms and trends that we think are worthy of bigger conversations. You see a lot of people online talking about, for example, relationship O.C.D. We can add clarity to that and help explain why people are discussing the distinctions between different types of O.C.D., and why it matters.
We want to be conversational and help people understand topics and ideas that they either might be hearing a lot about and want to understand better, or that they hadn't heard of before but that really resonate with them.
Your recent piece on moral injury comes to mind.
I got so much feedback from readers that the phrase was something they identified with, and that they had never been able to put a name to what they were feeling before.
Before your journalism days — first at ABC News and NBC News, then The Times — you were a clinical research coordinator at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston. Was there a learning curve when you shifted to writing for a general audience?
I've always had an interest in health and science content, but before I joined the Well desk in 2021, I had never been a health reporter. Over the last four years, I've learned a lot about how to interview people and help them step away from some of the jargon that they're so accustomed to using in their professional lives. Sometimes I say to them plainly: Explain it to me like I'm in junior high.
I try to think about this in the way my audience would. They're quickly scrolling through their phones, glancing at headlines, and then they click into my story. I'm always imagining the most accurate way to explain a concept and the most compelling way of phrasing the explanation.
What makes a topic a particularly good fit for this column?
I'm looking at concepts that are percolating on social media, or ideas that might be especially resonant in light of recent headlines. I like digging into questions that don't have an immediate, obvious answer that you can Google. I want to offer a deeper layer of explanation, or insight that you won't find elsewhere.
In the first column, you wrote about a dissociative condition called depersonalization/derealization disorder, or D.D.D., which is thought to occur in only about 1 or 2 percent of the population. Why dedicate a column to such a rare condition?
There are a lot of people on TikTok talking about what it feels like to be disconnected from your life, as though you're living in a movie or a dream. It's not clear that all those people necessarily have D.D.D. or would be diagnosed with it, but it's enough to generate a conversation online in which people are examining these symptoms and wondering, 'Is this something I've experienced, too?'
The goal of the column was to clarify what the characteristics were, according to the most authoritative sources possible. We're trying to counter any misinformation, and we're also addressing people's curiosity about something they think they might have noticed in themselves.
Some experts think D.D.D. might be underdiagnosed. The people I spoke with who had the disorder talked about the difficulty they had in getting diagnosed. In my view, some of the less common disorders deserve more attention, in part because it can be harder to find reliable information about them.
You typically start the column with an anecdote from someone who has experienced the symptoms you're discussing. Why?
I feel very strongly that we should, whenever possible, include people with lived experience when talking about a disorder, and not just rely on experts.
How has the way people talk about mental health changed in recent years?
In the last decade, it's changed quite a bit. A lot of people have noted how the pandemic, in many ways, pushed people to think more about their mental health and to talk more openly about it. But that isn't the case across the board. There are still pockets of the country where mental health isn't discussed openly or frequently.
But, on average, there is a greater openness to discussing mental health, and you can see evidence of that on social media, which is both good and bad. On the one hand, talking about mental health has been a great way for people to educate one another and to feel less alone. But on the other hand, these conversations do sometimes promote misinformation, or encourage people to label themselves in ways that might be too restrictive.
What topics are on your wish list for the column?
I'm interested in taking a closer look at tapping, which is also known as the E.F.T., or emotional freedom technique.
I also want to look into enmeshment. This is where two or more people, usually family members, are involved in one another's activities and personal relationships to an excessive degree that makes it hard to have healthy interactions, and tough to have autonomy. How is it different from codependency? Is there a way to disentangle yourself?
I don't know these answers, but I'm eager to find out.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Dunkin's Newest Drink Has 84 Grams of Added Sugar—Here's What a Dietitian Thinks
Dunkin's Newest Drink Has 84 Grams of Added Sugar—Here's What a Dietitian Thinks

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Dunkin's Newest Drink Has 84 Grams of Added Sugar—Here's What a Dietitian Thinks

Reviewed by Dietitian Emily Lachtrupp, M.S., RD Key Points Dunkin' launched its fall menu with a new Cereal N' Milk Latte, hinting at Coolatta and matcha versions. But the upcoming Cereal N' Milk Coolatta packs 84g added sugar, which is 2x the recommended daily limit. The latte is a lighter option, with 18g added sugar and fewer calories, making it easier to enjoy in moderation. This week, Dunkin' released their highly anticipated fall menu to kick off pumpkin spice season. But to our surprise, pumpkin is a side note at the breakfast chain this year. Instead, they have a few new flavors up their sleeve, including a nostalgic sip. Alongside a line of Sabrina Carpenter's fruity Daydream Refreshers, a new coffee flavor has arrived. Meet 'Cereal N' Milk,' the newest addition to Dunkin's seasonal menu. Currently available in hot and iced latte form, the Cereal N' Milk flavor will also be arriving as a Coolatta variety later in the season and in a specialty Blueberry Cereal N' Milk Matcha Latte. But before you wait up on trying it in its Coolatta form, the slushy-style drink offered at the chain, there's something you should know. When looking at the nutrition information for the Cereal N' Milk line, the Coolatta stood out to us as pretty alarming. Let's explain. For one small Cereal N' Milk Coolatta, the nutrition shows: Calories: 440 Carbohydrates: 97g Dietary Fiber: 0g Total Sugars: 93g Added Sugar: 84g Protein: 6g Total Fat: 3.5g Saturated Fat: 2g Cholesterol: 10mg Sodium: 230mg Mind you, this is the small, 16-ounce size of this drink, and it's loaded with 84 grams of added sugar. The medium and large? A whopping 126 and 168 grams of added sugar, respectively. To really break down the excessive amount of added sugar in this drink, we asked our senior nutrition editor and registered dietitian Jessica Ball, M.S., RD, to weigh in. 'Most Americans eat too much added sugar, and for many the top source is sugar-sweetened beverages. That's because it's easy to way overshoot the recommended daily maximum intake of added sugar—which is around 40 grams per day—in just one sweetened drink without realizing it. This drink, for example, has over twice that amount,' explains Ball. 'While your diet should make room for foods you like, it's important to be mindful of how highly-sweetened drinks like this not only fit into your day, but also your week as a whole. Trying this drink once is one thing, but I would not recommend having it regularly or multiple times per week.' But don't fret: If you were excited about the Cereal N' Milk flavor, there are a couple of ways to enjoy it instead of waiting for this Coolatta. And the other options are available now and have a fraction of the sugar per sip. Slurping up this flavor in latte form, whether it be hot or iced, is the way to go. In each small Cereal N' Milk latte, there are 18 grams of added sugar. That's still fairly high, but it's definitely easier to incorporate into a healthy eating pattern—it has nearly 80% less sugar than the Coolatta. Plus, the latte versions have half as many calories as the Coolatta, and they even have slightly more protein! Read the original article on EatingWell

Children whose parents did not go to university more likely to develop an eating disorder
Children whose parents did not go to university more likely to develop an eating disorder

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Children whose parents did not go to university more likely to develop an eating disorder

Children of parents who received the minimum amount of education face the highest risk of developing eating disorders, a new study claims. Research published by the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) on Wednesday reveals that children who come from more deprived backgrounds are more likely to experience symptoms of eating disorders in their teenage years. Those whose parents did not go on to any further education after secondary school were most likely to develop symptoms of disordered eating, as opposed to children whose parents went on to university. 'Socioeconomic deprivation is a major determinant of poor mental and physical health in children,' the study reports. 'Children from the most deprived households experience a higher prevalence of mental health problems, such as depression and anxiety, compared with those living in the least deprived households.' Symptoms included problematic eating behaviours, weight and shape concerns, and body dissatisfaction at 14, 16 and 18 years old. The study, which was carried out by University College London PhD students, included nearly 8,000 participants. It analysed several factors, including parental income, education, occupation, and financial hardship. The researchers added: 'We defined disordered eating as a binary variable based on whether adolescents reported any binge eating, purging, or restrictive eating (excessive dieting and fasting) or none of these behaviours in the previous 12 months at ages 14, 16, and 18 years. 'We used binge eating, purging, and restrictive eating individually as a secondary outcome to investigate their specific associations with socioeconomic position.' It said it has often been believed that eating disorders are more common in people who come from higher socioeconomic backgrounds, but the evidence is mixed. It also notes that children from lower socioeconomic backgrounds face more barriers in receiving diagnoses and care. The Washington Post reported findings from a study in 2021 that showed that 16.5 per cent of women from more deprived backgrounds experience body dissatisfaction compared to 12.2 per cent of those from less deprived backgrounds. That gap further widened among young adults, with 22.7 per cent of those with low income feeling dissatisfied with their bodies versus 8.1 per cent of those with high incomes. It also reported that 37.2 per cent of girls in the highest income bracket reported unhealthy behaviours such as skipping meals, purging or taking laxatives compared to 53.5 per cent of young girls in the lower income bracket. For anyone struggling with the issues raised in this article, eating disorder charity Beat's helpline is available 365 days a year on 0808 801 0677. NCFED offers information, resources and counselling for those suffering from eating disorders, as well as their support networks. Visit or call 0845 838 2040.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store