NGT orders expert panel to examine pollution from Satna shaw mills
National Green Tribunal
(NGT) asked for the constitution of an expert committee to examine the issues raised in a petition seeking the intervention of the green tribunal to check pollution and damage to the environment caused by shaw mills and factories producing wooden goods in Satna district and nearby areas.
Hearing the petition filed by Mahendra Pratap Singh from Satna, the NGT judicial member Sheo Kumar Singh and expert member Dr Agroz Ahmed also issued notices to the state govt, forest department, MP Pollution Control Board, and district collector, Satna, seeking a response. The expert committee was asked to submit a report to the tribunal before the next hearing of the case on July 21.
Appearing for the petitioner, advocate Amit Singh Sengar and Deepankar Singh said most of the shaw mills and factories are illegally operated.
They are polluting water in the ponds and other water bodies with the hazardous chemicals put on the wooden logs. Besides, shaw mills create noise and emit smoke, which is damaging the atmosphere.
They contended that no shaw mill or plywood factories operating without a licence should be immediately closed. They further argued that in the year 2010, the district collector, Satna, issued a circular banning the opening of a shaw mill or stone crusher unit within a 5 km radius of the urban area or a residential area.
Following the initial hearing, the NGT ordered the constitution of an expert committee to examine the issue and issued notices to the respondents.
Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with
Brother's Day wishes
,
messages
and quotes !
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
8 hours ago
- Indian Express
‘No coercive steps to be taken': SC respite for owners of 10-year-old diesel, 15-year-old petrol vehicles
In a big relief to vehicle owners in the National Capital Region (NCR), the Supreme Court on Tuesday directed that no coercive action be taken against owners of 10-year-old diesel and 15-year-old petrol vehicles while it hears a review plea filed by the Delhi government in this regard. Issuing notice on the plea, a three-judge bench presided by Chief Justice of India B R Gavai said, 'In the meantime, no coercive steps to be taken against the owners of the car on the ground that they are 10 years old in respect to diesel vehicles and 15 years old with respect to petrol vehicles.' The bench also comprised Justices K Vinod Chandran and K V Anjaria. As part of efforts to combat air pollution, the National Green Tribunal had in 2015 directed that diesel vehicles older than 10 years and petrol vehicles older than 15 years should not be allowed to operate in Delhi NCR. This was upheld by the Supreme Court in 2018. Recently, the Delhi government approached the Supreme Court seeking a review of the order saying the blanket ban on old vehicles 'was observed to have caused numerous practical hardships to the citizens of Delhi'. In its application dated July 25, the Rekha Gupta government argued that 'the road-worthiness of a vehicle is a technical and scientific issue that must be linked to actual emissions as tested and recorded by mechanisms as set out under the Motor Vehicles Act, the Central Motor Vehicles Rules, etc., as opposed to blanket ban on the basis of age which is unlinked to actual emissions'. The state said that the ban on the plying of the said vehicles in the last seven years, 'though undoubtedly salutary in aim was observed to have caused numerous practical hardships to the citizens of Delhi, which today, in light of the advancements in technology and enforcement now prima facie appear to outweigh the prudence and feasibility of continuance of the said ban'. The plea further urged the court to direct the Centre or the Commission on Air Quality Management (CAQM) 'to carry out a suitable broad based, scientific study on the need for continuance of' the complete ban imposed by the Supreme Court's October 29, 2018, order. The Delhi government said that in its considered view, 'the significant improvements in Pollution Under Control (PUC) technology, increased coverage of PUC testing, stricter monitoring of emission standards, transitioning over to Bharat Stage VI engines and various other measures' that have been implemented since the Supreme Court order 'suitably address the concerns that impelled' the apex court to pass such a judgment. 'It is the view of the State Government that there is great need for a graded, balanced and technology driven regime to handle vehicular pollution and that instead of an age-based blanket ban, a scientific, data-driven framework should be developed that considers all relevant indicators to ascertain individual vehicular pollution, for example but not limited to: (i) Actual emission, (ii) Actual mileage, (iii) regular and period vehicle fitness tests and (iv) best available retrofitting options (CNG/electric conversions),' the application stated. The plea added that 'a balanced policy would ensure not only the protection of the environment through the phasing out of polluting vehicles, but would also preserve the rights of the responsible vehicle owners'. The government said the complete ban order 'was originally passed as an emergency measure during a period when Bharat Stage IV (BS-IV) emission standards were in force and the migration to Bharat Stage VI (BS-VI), which has much stricter and advanced norms, had not yet commenced'. It added, 'However, it is submitted that to tackle the issue of pollution in the NCR region, a comprehensive policy is required which gives vehicle fitness based on the actual emission levels of an individual vehicle as per scientific methods rather than implementing a blanket ban based on solely the age of the vehicle.' The government said that significant technological, legal, and environmental developments have taken place since 2018, which warrant a 're-examination of this decision' by an expert body to form a structured and graded plan to tackle pollution. The state said that since the issue of Delhi's air quality is not confined solely to the National Capital Territory but rather to the broader National Capital Region, it is respectfully submitted that 'it would be appropriate if suitable scientific studies on the feasibility, desirability and efficacy of continuing the said ban are carried out at the level of the Union of India or the Commission for Air Quality Management'.
Hindustan Times
a day ago
- Hindustan Times
Ludhiana: Residents' body moves NGT against Punjab govt's order
The Public Action Committee (PAC) has approached the National Green Tribunal (NGT) against the Punjab Government's order seeking ₹356 crore from the Forest Department and the Punjab Pollution Control Board (PPCB). The committee said the move violates Supreme Court orders, the Compensatory Afforestation Act 2016, NGT directions, and guidelines of the Union ministry of environment, Forest and climate change (MoEFCC). The dispute arose after a meeting on August 7, chaired by the chief secretary, where various departments were directed to transfer ₹ 1,440 crore to the state's finance department. (HT Photo) The dispute arose after a meeting on August 7, chaired by the chief secretary, where various departments were directed to transfer ₹1,440 crore to the state's finance department. This included ₹84 crore from the Forest Department, ₹44 crore from the sale of fallen trees and ₹40 crore from unused land acquisition funds and ₹250 crore from PPCB's non-NGT funds. The Department of Environment was also asked to deposit ₹22 crore from Mission Tandarust Punjab. PAC members Kuldeep Singh Khaira and Jaskirat Singh said that under the law, Forest Department funds can only be used for activities such as compensatory afforestation, forest protection, wildlife management, and development of forest-related infrastructure. Similarly, PPCB, being an autonomous body, holds funds collected from environmental compensation, National Clean Air Programme grants, and fees from industries for consents, all of which are meant strictly for environmental protection and restoration. Environmental activists Kapil Arora added that diverting such funds for non-environmental purposes undermines sustainable development. They pointed out that environmental challenges in Punjab, including polluted water bodies, mismanaged legacy waste, and worsening air quality already require urgent attention and adequate resources. PAC members Gurpreet Plaha and Vikas Arora alleged that the state government has often sided with polluters and failed to act against violations, prioritising revenue over environmental health. 'Now, by targeting environmental funds, the government is further risking Punjab's ecological future,' they said. The PAC has urged the NGT to quash the order and restrain the Punjab government from making such demands in the future, calling the move 'unwarranted' and harmful to the state's environmental interests.
Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
NGT seeks state's reply on Doon Valley plan change with removed eco safeguards
Dehradun: The (NGT) gas directed the state govt and central agencies to respond to a petition alleging that the May 13, 2025, Doon Valley Notification diluted earlier environmental safeguards and transferred full control over development plans to the state. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The notification amended the original Feb 1, 1989, order, issued under a Supreme Court judgment in Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendra & Ors v State of UP & Ors. (1988), which had declared Doon Valley an ecologically sensitive area and mandated special protection. The plea, filed by Dev Bhoomi Manav Sansadhan Vikas Samiti, said the 2025 amendment gave the state complete authority over the tourism plan, grazing plan, master plan of development, and land use plan without central govt oversight. "It destroys the very essence of the notification... it allows all the industries to work in the area," the petition said. The 1989 notification required the state to prepare these plans and secure approval from the Union ministry of environment, forests and climate change (MoEFCC). The petition also referred to a plea filed in Uttarakhand high court in June 2025 that described the amendment as a move "failing the original motive of the notification of 1989" by enabling unrestricted industrial activity in the ecologically sensitive zone. NGT also asked the Uttarakhand Pollution Control Board (UKPCB), MoEFCC and Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) to file replies. The petitioner's counsel argued that the amendment effectively removed the safeguards of the 1989 notification, which ensured that tourism, grazing, and land use were regulated according to centrally approved plans. As per the amended notification, all such plans will now be prepared and approved by a competent authority within the state govt. The petition claimed this change went against a Sept 6, 2023, Uttarakhand high court order that criticised the state's "policy to commercialise the hills" and observed there was "very little emphasis on actual preservation and protection of the environment." The court had directed the state to prepare tourism and grazing plans for MoEFCC's approval and maintain strict adherence to centrally vetted plans. The NGT, in its Aug 5, 2025, order, reiterated these concerns and issued notices under environmental statutes, requiring the state, MoEFCC, UKPCB and CPCB to submit their responses by Sept 19, 2025.
